Three-dimensional bioprinting of auricular cartilage: A review
Ruifang Jiang, Guo Wang, Jing Zhang and 3 more
Medicine in Drug Discovery · 2019
doi:10.1016/j.medidd.2020.100016 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Auricular reconstruction is one of the greatest challenges to plastic surgeons. Auricular reconstruction using autologous cartilage is considered to be the standard procedure, however, autograft absorption and donor site morbidity are still inevitable. The utilization of alloplastic implants made of silicone or polyethylene are associated with risks such as infection, extrusion, non-biocompatibility, and uncertain long-term durability. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting shows great potential in creating fine structures with selectively spatial distribution of biomaterials, biomolecules, and living cells, which is promising for functional auricle scaffold preparation. This paper presents current advances about the bioprinting of auricle scaffold, including auricular reconstruction and 3D bioprinting concepts, biomaterials, cell sources, and bioactive constituents. And finally, the limit of current technology and future developments are highlighted. Keywords: 3D bioprinting, Auricular reconstruction, Tissue engineering, Cartilage, Scaffolds
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.