Tensile deformation mechanism and micro-void nucleation of Ti-55531 alloy with bimodal microstructure
Di Wu, Libin Liu, Ligang Zhang and 2 more
Journal of Materials Research and Technology · 2020
doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.008 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Tensile fracture of near-β-titanium alloys with bimodal microstructure (BM) is very sensitive to micro-void nucleation. In this study, micro-void nucleation, growth, and propagation during tensile fracture of Ti-55531 alloy are investigated. α/β grain boundary (α/β-GB) and α/β grain boundary shear (α/β-GBSH) micro-voids are the main void sources, accounting for 83% of the total voids. The reason for the formation of α/β-GB voids is the stress concentration caused by the difference in the strength of the primary α (αp) and β transformation (βtrans) microstructure and the low strength of the non-coherent αp/β interface. α/β-GB voids eventually lead to fractures along the αp/β interface. α/β-GBSH voids are caused by the difference in the strength of the αp phase, the grain boundary α phase and the βtrans structure, which will cause the αp phase to tear and fracture along the grain boundary α-phase. The {112¯2} twin is first observed in near-β-titanium alloy, which explains the high plasticity of the alloy.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
References42
40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
All 42 referencesReads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.