Impact of social distancing during COVID-19 pandemic on crime in Los Angeles and Indianapolis

Abstract

Governments have implemented social distancing measures to address the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The measures include instructions that individuals maintain social distance when in public, school closures, limitations on gatherings and business operations, and instructions to remain at home. Social distancing may have an impact on the volume and distribution of crime. Crimes such as residential burglary may decrease as a byproduct of increased guardianship over personal space and property. Crimes such as domestic violence may increase because of extended periods of contact between potential offenders and victims. Understanding the impact of social distancing on crime is critical for ensuring the safety of police and government capacity to deal with the evolving crisis. Understanding how social distancing policies impact crime may also provide insights into whether people are complying with public health measures. Examination of the most recently available data from both Los Angeles, CA, and Indianapolis, IN, shows that social distancing has had a statistically significant impact on a few specific crime types. However, the overall effect is notably less than might be expected given the scale of the disruption to social and economic life.

References 20

1. 1.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170

2. 2.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0611071104

3. 3.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2007.1197

4. 4.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library10.31219/osf.io/gcpq8

5. 5.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library10.1080/10410236.2012.664805

6. 6.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library10.2307/2094589

7. 7.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0610941104

10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

12. 12.
    Simulation suggests that rapid activation of social distancing can arrest epidemic development due to a novel strain of influenza · 2009

    No notice
13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb01236.x

14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0047-2352(02)00219-2

15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

18. 18.
    Game Theory of Social Distancing in Response to an Epidemic · 2010

    No notice
19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 4

• Desigualdades de gênero e raça na pandemia de Covid-19: implicações para o controle no Brasil · 2021
  Not checked
• Algunos apuntes acerca de la Psicología Ambiental · 2021
  Not checked
• Crime and COVID-19: effect of changes in routine activities in Mexico City · 2021
  Not checked
• Suspected COVID-19 flu-like syndrome in men who have sex with men and have been involved in casual sex
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.