Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Mitochondrial metabolism regulates macrophage biology

Yafang Wang, Na Li, Xin Zhang and 1 more

Journal of Biological Chemistry · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100904

Abstract

Mitochondria are critical for regulation of the activation, differentiation, and survival of macrophages and other immune cells. In response to various extracellular signals, such as microbial or viral infection, changes to mitochondrial metabolism and physiology could underlie the corresponding state of macrophage activation. These changes include alterations of oxidative metabolism, mitochondrial membrane potential, and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycling, as well as the release of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and transformation of the mitochondrial ultrastructure. Here, we provide an updated review of how changes in mitochondrial metabolism and various metabolites such as fumarate, succinate, and itaconate coordinate to guide macrophage activation to distinct cellular states, thus clarifying the vital link between mitochondria metabolism and immunity. We also discuss how in disease settings, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress contribute to dysregulation of the inflammatory response. Therefore, mitochondria are a vital source of dynamic signals that regulate macrophage biology to fine-tune immune responses.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Macrophages safeguard tissue homeostasis and regulate inflammatory responses. To exert these varied functions, macrophages show high plasticity and adopt different activation states according to the stimulus signals. The Th1 cytokine interferon-γ (IFNγ) together with Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands, including lipopolysaccharide (LPS), promotes classically activated proinflammatory macrophages (commonly known as M1-like macrophages), which secrete proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-1β to induce inflammatory responses and fight against infection; generate highly reactive oxygen species and nitrogen intermediates to gain efficient microbicidal and tumoricidal activities; and increase major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-I/II, CD80, and CD86 expression. However, continuous and excessive activation of proinflammatory macrophages may lead to sustained inflammation and accessory tissue damage. Macrophages can also be activated by other stimulating factors to alternatively activated states. For example, the Th2 cytokines interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 induce macrophage alternative activation (commonly known as M2-like activation). These macrophages attenuate Th1/M1-driven inflammation, facilitate tissue repair and remodeling, and induce Th2-driven pathologies, such as asthma and helminth infections. Such macrophages highly express a range of specific scavenging molecules, including mannose and galactose receptors and enzymes such as arginase. In response to various kinds of environmental stimuli, macrophages populations will change their physiology and shift their phenotype, which allow them to actively participate in disease resolution or progression.

Recent studies indicate that shifts in mitochondrial metabolism and physiology are vital for macrophage activation to different states, including alterations of oxidative metabolism, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS), tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, mitochondrial ultrastructure, and membrane potential. The signals that drive macrophage inflammatory activation induce breaks in and rewire the TCA cycle by influencing expression of TCA cycle enzymes, IDH (isocitrate dehydrogenase) and SDH (succinate dehydrogenase), resulting in elevations in citrate and succinate, respectively. These signals also augment glycolysis (also known as Warburg Effect). In contrast, IL-4-activated macrophages maintain an unbroken TCA cycle and preferentially engage oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and fatty acid oxidation (FAO) for ATP production. OXPHOS in IL-4-activated macrophages is fueled by the oxidation of fatty acids and glutamine, which activates the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) to mediate the induction of genes regulating alternative macrophage functions. Glucose oxidation, induced by the mTORC2-IRF4 signaling axis, also contributes to IL-4 mediated gene induction.

Shifts in mitochondrial metabolism are closely linked to macrophage activation. In this review, we discuss the mechanistic underpinnings of differential mitochondrial metabolism in distinct macrophage activation states, discuss how they are induced and how they contribute to macrophage activation and biology.

Macrophage activation signals regulate shifts in mitochondrial metabolism

The type I inflammatory response usually starts when macrophages and other sentinel cells are activated by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), including microbial cell wall components, nucleic acids, and lipoproteins. Macrophage metabolism also undergoes dynamic changes during such activation. At the center of cellular metabolism is the mitochondria, which not only supplies energy but is also involved in biosynthesis and maintaining cellular redox and serves as a platform for various innate immunological signaling pathways. Macrophage activation signals alter the activity of the electron transport chain (ETC) and the TCA cycle to influence multiple aspects of mitochondrial metabolism. They also induce an upregulation of glucose and glutamine utilization and a shift toward anabolic pathways. Aerobic glycolysis, induced by LPS-stimulated mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) pathways, is upregulated for ATP production while OXPHOS is repressed through multiple mechanisms, including the two breaks in the TCA cycle. One break results from decreased expression of IDH, the TCA cycle enzyme that converts citrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), allowing for the cumulation of citrate, which can be redirected for generating itaconic acid or withdrawn for fatty acid biosynthesis. The second break occurs after succinate, with a novel pathway termed the aspartate-arginosuccinate shunt, which can produce arginine to support nitric oxide (NO) production. NO generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) can hamper mitochondrial respiration and impair the plasticity of proinflammatory to anti-inflammatory repolarization, and LPS plus IFNγ stimulation can inhibit FAO. Consistently, oxidative metabolism is suppressed in LPS-tolerant macrophages, which are no longer able to produce inflammatory cytokines as a result of long-term LPS exposure. Note that while some characteristics of tolerant macrophages resemble that of the M2 macrophages, it would be an oversimplification to equate the two macrophage states, which differ in many aspects of metabolism, phenotype, and function.

In contrast, IL-4-activated macrophages have more demand for glucose, glutamine, and fatty acids compared with inflammatory macrophages and rely on β-oxidation. The increased fatty acid necessary for engaging mitochondrial OXPHOS is derived from lipolysis of triglycerides. This metabolic adaptation results in a shift in the proportion of NADH and FADH2 (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and flavin adenine dinucleotide) that feeds the ETC. Inhibition of FAO is sufficient to repress the alternatively activated macrophage phenotype and induce M1-like gene programs.

Similar to PAMPs, self-encoded damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) such as mitochondrial DNA and N-formyl peptides (NFP) are detected by macrophages leading to induction of inflammatory responses. Recent studies indicate that a class of DAMPs represented by oxidized naturally occurring phospholipids, derived from 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine (PAPC) and collectively known as oxPAPC, resides in cell membranes and lipoproteins and functions together with PAMPs to induce optimal immune responses. OxPAPC modulates cell metabolism by upregulating mitochondrial respiration and OXPHOS as well as glutamine utilization, an energy and anaplerotic carbon source that replenishes TCA cycle intermediates, leading to increased cytoplasmic levels of oxaloacetate (OAA). HIF-1α is a key transcription factor induced by LPS stimulation that regulates expression of numerous proglycolytic enzymes and proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, and its stability is tightly regulated by metabolites of the TCA cycle, such as succinate, fumarate, citrate, and OAA, which inhibit the activity of the HIF-1α prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs). OxPAPC treatment stabilizes HIF-1α activity and potentiates IL-1β production in the presence of an intact TCA cycle.

Effects of metabolites on macrophage activation

Shifts in metabolism, including oxidative metabolism, influence the production of various metabolites that have been shown to have powerful roles in influencing inflammation through effects on signaling pathways, transcription factors, and chromatin. Because of multiple disruptions to the TCA cycle in macrophages stimulated with LPS, certain metabolites such as citrate, itaconate, and succinate accumulate and play important roles in inflammatory macrophages (Fig. 1).

Citrate

Citrate production can be linked to production of a nuclear-cytosolic pool of acetyl coenzyme A (Acetyl-CoA), which serves as a substrate for histone acetylation and lipid synthesis, both of which have been shown to support macrophage activation. Citrate is exported from the mitochondria through the mitochondrial citrate carrier (CIC), followed by its cleavage into acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate by ATP citrate lyase (ACLY) in the cytosol. Acetyl-CoA is necessary for TNFα or IFNγ to induce NO and prostaglandin production and has been shown to fuel histone acetylation at IL-4 and LPS-inducible genes in M2 and M1 macrophages, respectively. Oxaloacetate is needed for NO and ROS production by providing NADPH. In addition, citrate is acted on by the mitochondrial aconitase 2 (ACO2) to produce cis-aconitate, which is further decarboxylated for itaconate synthesis. Itaconate acts as a negative regulator of inflammation by inhibiting SDH and the production of the inflammatory cytokines. These findings endow citrate, transported from the mitochondria, a crucial role in LPS signaling, via effects on production of ROS, NO, prostaglandin, and itaconate as well as effects on inducible histone acetylation and gene expression

Itaconate

Itaconate, produced in the mitochondrial matrix from the TCA cycle metabolite cis-aconitate by the enzyme immune-responsive gene 1 (IRG1) during LPS stimulation, critically regulates multiple aspects of macrophage functions. A growing number of studies show that itaconate can exert anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting inflammatory gene expression and reducing oxidative stress in activated macrophages. Itaconate influences oxidative metabolism by suppressing the activity of SDH, a key enzyme in TCA cycle and in Complex II of the ETC. Such activity of itaconate leads to succinate accumulation and decreases in oxygen consumption and contributes to its anti-inflammatory activity. Furthermore, itaconate acts as an electrophile to alkylate cysteine residues on KEAP1 protein, which is a key oxidative and electrophilic sensor and normally drives ubiquitination and degradation of the anti-inflammatory transcription factor NF-E2–related factor 2 (Nrf2) protein, thus allowing newly synthesized Nrf2 to accumulate, translocate into the nucleus, and initiate a transcriptional antioxidant and anti-inflammatory program. In this way, LPS-induced itaconate production leads to Nrf2 protein accumulation and induction of target genes with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions. In contrast, other studies suggest that effects of itaconate on inflammation are not Nrf2-dependent. They reported that electrophilic properties of itaconate and its derivatives inhibit IκBζ protein induction through activating transcription factor 3, leading to selective inhibition of some TLR-inducible transcriptional responses. Finally, there may be a negative feedback loop between itaconate and type I interferon signaling. Type I interferons enhance the expression of Irg1 and the generation of itaconate, but itaconate limits the type I interferon responses by repressing mitochondrial ROS production as well as proinflammatory cytokines, including IL1-β and IL6.

Succinate

It has been shown that during inflammatory macrophage activation, the Krebs cycle metabolite succinate accumulates and enhances mitochondrial ROS production, acting as a signal to activate proinflammatory gene expression. Succinate oxidation by succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) leads to HIF-1α stabilization through effects on reverse electron transport (RET) and PHD inhibition, leading to the induction of glycolytic genes and sustaining the glycolytic metabolism of inflammatory macrophages. The accumulation of succinate is further linked to the induction of a proinflammatory phenotype through autocrine stimulation of a receptor called succinate receptor 1 (SUCNR1) that activates inflammatory pathways by enhancing IL-1β production. In intestinal Tuft cells of the gut that express high levels of SUCNR1, succinate has also been shown to activate microbiota-induced type 2 immunity in response to certain infectious agents.

Fumarate

Fumarate is another TCA metabolite that regulates macrophage functions. Fumarate is highly antimicrobial toward Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes under acidic conditions, by inhibiting the GAD (glutamic acid decarboxylase) system, which converts glutamate to γ-amino butyric acid (GABA), resulting in intracellular pH increase. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), a derivative of the TCA cycle intermediate fumarate, is used to treat inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis and multiple sclerosis. DMF inactivates the catalytic cysteine of the glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) to downregulate aerobic glycolysis in activated myeloid and lymphoid cells. Moreover, exogenous DMF or endogenous fumarate can modify gasdermin D (GSDMD) at critical cysteine residues to form S-(2-succinyl)-cysteine. Since GSDMD is an executioner of pyroptosis, succination of GSDMD blocks its interaction with caspase 1, decreasing its processing, oligomerization, and capacity to cause cell perforation and pyroptotic cell death. A recent study has also found that Nrf2 agonists 4-OI and DMF induce a distinct IFN-independent antiviral program that is broadly effective in limiting virus replication and in suppressing the proinflammatory responses of human pathogenic viruses, including SARS-CoV2. These findings indicate the possibility that fumarate may have a similar effect to DMF in inhibiting aerobic glycolysis and possessing antiviral, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activity.

NO

Nitric oxide (NO) is a reactive free radical produced by arginine and catalyzed by nitric oxide synthase (NOS). NO can interact with superoxides to produce reactive nitrogen (RNS), leading to macromolecular changes and cell damage. All of these may endow NO produced by macrophage with antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, and tumoricidal effects. A paradox has been found that intracellular NO produced by iNOS plays a proapoptotic role in inflammatory macrophages, but high NO induced by the treatment of LPS and IFN-γ exerts antiapoptotic effect on anti-inflammatory macrophages. We proposed that its effect on cell metabolism may attribute to this paradoxical situation. On the one hand, recent labeling analyses indicate that in inflammatory macrophages, part of the TCA cycle is co-opted by the aspartate-arginosuccinate shunt to generate arginine and coordinate NO production. The aspartate-aminotransferase Got1, a key enzyme of the shunt, promotes NO and IL-6 production in inflammatory macrophages, while suppressing mitochondrial respiration. NO rapidly triggers release of the mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic mediators, such as cytochrome c, into the cytosol. On the other hand, iNOS-derived NO is known to be a vital effector of inflammatory macrophages that adjusts ETC activity by inhibiting critical N-module subunits in Complex I and Complex IV. By these means, NO and NO-derived reactive nitrogen species are responsible for inhibiting OXPHOS in stimulated macrophages, thus modulating levels of the essential TCA cycle metabolites citrate and succinate, as well as the anti-inflammatory mediator itaconate, resulting in reduced production of inflammatory mediators.

Histone modifications

Growing evidence supports the notion that oxidative metabolism-derived metabolites converge on chromatin to regulate gene expression, either by providing substrates for histone modification or by influencing the activity of enzymes, which modulate histone modifications. Recent studies indicate that acute LPS exposure augments oxidative metabolism and increases the availability of the TCA cycle intermediate citrate that is used by ATP citrate lyase (ACLY) to produce a nuclear-cytoplasmic pool of Ac-CoA, the carbon substrate for histone acetylation, thus enhancing histone acetylation at inflammatory gene promoters to induce inflammatory responses. In contrast, prolonged exposure to LPS drives a shift to oxidative metabolism shutdown in LPS tolerant macrophages, thus reducing histone acetylation at inflammatory genes due to the decreased production of Ac-CoA. Therefore, oxidative metabolism influences inflammatory gene induction and suppression via effects on Ac-CoA availability for histone acetylation.

TCA cycle intermediates influence the activities of DNA and histone methylation enzymes and shape the epigenetic landscape of chromatin. One example is α-KG, which is a necessary cofactor for some dioxygenases that regulate DNA and histone demethylation, i.e., Ten-Eleven Translocation (TETs) and Jumonji C domain containing (JmjC) demethylases. Upon IL-4 stimulation, α-KG produced via glutaminolysis supports the activity of the histone demethylase Jmjd3 to drive loss of trimethylation of histone H3K27, a repressive epigenetic marker, to induce transcription of anti-inflammatory genes. Interestingly, succinate and fumarate, also TCA cycle intermediates and structurally related to α-KG, may inhibit α-KG-dependent enzymes. So, the balance of TCA cycle reactions can affect levels of DNA and histone methylation to control gene expression. Specifically, succinate and fumarate could increase H3K4me3 levels at the promoters of proinflammatory cytokine genes through the suppression of KDM5 histone demethylases, thus driving gene induction.

Apart from histone acetylation and methylation, histone lactylation has been recently implicated in regulating macrophage gene expression. In inflammatory macrophages, reduced oxidative metabolism but increased aerobic glycolysis fuels production of the glycolysis end-product lactate, which is used as a carbon substrate for histone lactylation. Histone lactylation drives a subset of genes induced in M2-like macrophages, particularly homeostatic genes that are involved in wound healing.

Sirtuin-mediated deacetylation

Sirtuins such as SIRT1 are conserved NAD(+)-dependent deacylases and ADP ribosyl transferases. It has been reported that SIRT1 suppresses proinflammatory cytokine production by deacetylating p65 at the early stage of LPS stimulation and deacetylates but activates PGC-1β to promote FAO and mitochondrial biogenesis at the late stage of LPS stimulation. Furthermore, the Sirt1 signaling cascade can be activated by increased NAD+ availability to enhance IL-10 production, thus polarizing macrophages for tissue repair during efferocytosis. Another study has also revealed that Sirt1 and Sirt6 are required for the switch from glycolysis to enhanced fatty acid mitochondrial oxidation, while Sirt6 suppresses glucose metabolism by epigenetically silencing the HIF-1α pathway, consequently contributing to a shift toward FAO.

eIF5A hypusination

Hypusine is uniquely formed through posttranslational modification of a specific lysine residue in eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) by the enzymes deoxyhypusine synthase (DHS) and deoxyhypusine hydroxylase (DOHH). Such hypusination occurs shortly after eIF5A synthesis and is needed for eIF-5A activity, and according to a recent study, is dynamically regulated after macrophage activation. In IL-4-stimulated macrophages, an increase in production of the polyamine spermidine fuels an increase in eIF5AH to improve the translation efficiency of certain mitochondrial proteins participating in the TCA cycle and OXPHOS, including succinyl-CoA synthetase (SUCLG1) and SDH. Another study showed that eIF5AH is vital for inducing the expression of autophagy transcription factor TFEB, thus implicating a role in autophagy regulation.

Mitochondrial dynamics influence macrophage metabolism and gene expression

Mitochondria represent a major metabolic hub and coordinate metabolic shifts in response to intra- and extracellular signals. Such a role for mitochondria can involve corresponding changes to their morphology and ultrastructure, since nutrient deprivation drives mitochondrial fusion and cristae remodeling to favor coupled respiration and bioenergetic efficiency, while nutrient excess triggers mitochondrial fission and cristae expansion to potentiate uncoupled respiration and reduce mtROS production. Mitochondrial fusion in IL-4-stimulated macrophages stimulates interactions between ETC complexes that are conducive to OXPHOS and FAO, while fission in inflammatory macrophages causes cristae expansion to dampen ETC efficiency and enhance aerobic glycolysis (Fig. 2). In TLR-stimulated macrophages, the outer mitochondrial membrane protein FAM73b (also known as Miga2) plays a vital role in switching mitochondria from fission to fusion and thus decreasing IL-12 expression. Consistently, mitochondrial fusion regulators Mfn1 and Mfn2 have similar effects on inflammatory gene expression as FAM73b. Furthermore, aberrant mitochondrial elongation due to dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) knockdown initiates NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation and IL-1β secretion, while induction of mitochondrial fission impedes NLRP3 inflammasomal assembly and activation.

Mitochondrial membrane potential exerts effects on macrophage functions

The mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) is generated by proton pumping at multiple sites of the ETC and is needed for multiple aspects of mitochondrial physiology including uptake/import of mitochondrial matrix proteins and many metabolites and ions. ΔΨm can be influenced by the efficiency of the TCA cycle, the availability of NADH and FADH2 to feed the ETC, and expression of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins and matrix resident protein such as MICUs, MCUR1, and EMRE. It has been pointed out that LPS stimulation leads to an elevated ΔΨm, which together with enhanced SDH oxidation of succinate leads to accumulation of mtROS and promotion of Il1b gene induction. Moreover, ΔΨm affects the expression of a set of voltage-regulated genes (VRGs) and mediates mitochondria-directed regulation of macrophage function. In IL-4-stimulated macrophage, Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) modulates the expression of genes encoding the malate-aspartate shuttle (MAS) and reduces levels of MAS metabolites, leading to the decrease of ΔΨm. The reduced ΔΨm increases the activity of a transcription factor called ETS variant 1 (ETV1) to promote the expression of some IL-4-inducible genes (Fig. 2).

Mitophagy

Degradation or turnover of mitochondria via autophagy (mitophagy) is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for mitochondrial quality control and homeostasis. Upon stress or inflammation, mitophagy prevents the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and the increased steady-state levels of ROS that otherwise leads to oxidative stress and cell death. Mitophagy may restrict inflammatory cytokine secretion and directly regulate mitochondrial antigen presentation and immune cell homeostasis. Moreover, the mitophagy receptor BNIP3L/NIX-dependent mitophagy manipulates metabolic reprogramming toward glycolysis, supporting inflammatory macrophage polarization to develop a rapid immune response during inflammation. Mitophagy can also be stimulated by the energy sensor AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), leading to inactivation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. In macrophages, activated mTOR can suppress mitophagy, while selective inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling will lead to the accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria and induce macrophage apoptosis.

Mitochondrial stress

Mitochondria are one of the main targets of cellular stress induced by inflammation, pathogen infection, and aging. Mitochondrial perturbations including mtROS generation, ATP synthesis reduction, glutathione levels reduction, and mitochondrial morphology alterations may all lead to mitochondrial stress (Fig. 3). In inflammatory macrophages, mitochondrial stress can contribute to release of DAMPs such as mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) that stimulate innate immune receptors and downstream pathways, implicating mitochondria as both a target and an instigator of the inflammatory response. For example, herpesvirus infection induces mtDNA stress and aberrant mtDNA packaging to promote mtDNA escape into the cytosol, where it is recognized by the DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) to activate STING (stimulator of interferon genes)-IRF3-dependent signaling and induce interferon (IFN)-stimulated gene (ISG) expression, enhance type I IFN responses, and confer broad viral resistance. The mtDNA also can be released into the extracellular plasma, where it activates the TLR9 pathway to increase proinflammatory cytokine production. Moreover, mitochondrial stress may cause mitochondrial unfolded protein response and mitophagy to eliminate dysfunctional mitochondria characterized by low membrane potential and a high level of ROS. If all else fails, stressed macrophages undergo apoptosis

Inflammasomes are both a key target and an instigator of mitochondrial stress in its induction of inflammatory responses. PAMPs or DAMPs including mtROS and oxidized mtDNA can prime and activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to the secretion of inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and IL-18 and pyroptosis, a form of lytic programmed cell death. On the other hand, it has been reported that blockade of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway represses expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β and cleavage of caspase-1, thus predisposing macrophages to die from noninflammatory apoptosis rather than proinflammatory pyroptosis. NLRP3 is modified and activated by acetylation in macrophages and is deacetylated by Sirtuin 2 (SIRT2), a cytosolic NAD+-dependent deacetylase and metabolic sensor, contributing to aging-associated inflammation and insulin resistance.

Mitochondrial ROS (mtROS)

ROS, including superoxide (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (OH), are very reactive and can attack lipids, proteins, and DNA. ROS can be produced at multiple intracellular sites including the mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, peroxisomes, and phagosomes; in activated macrophages, NADPH oxidase and mitochondrial ETC activity are thought to be major sources. Recently, reverse electron transport (RET) has been shown to contribute to mtROS production in LPS-stimulated macrophages. Increased mitochondrial oxidation of succinate via SDH and an elevation of ΔΨm combine to boost RET and consequent mtROS production at Complex I, leading to increased induction of IL-1β. Another study reported that the glycerol phosphate shuttle contributes to RET and mtROS production in LPS tolerant macrophages. Increased NADH/NAD+ ratio in LPS-stimulated macrophages can also favor the generation of O2− at Complex I.

How does increased mtROS contribute to macrophage functions? mtROS has been shown to promote killing of phagosomal bacterial by inducing cellular H2O2. Furthermore, mitochondrial enzyme superoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2) can be delivered from mitochondria to bacteria-containing phagosomes via mitochondria-derived vesicles (MDVs), maintaining phagosomal H2O2 production and thus bacterial killing. mtROS can also act as a proinflammatory signal to induce proinflammatory gene expression and cytokines production through regulating MAPK and NF-κB pathways. Moreover, mtROS production is implicated in the stabilization of HIF-1α, thus promotes aerobic glycolysis and IL-1β induction in LPS-activated macrophages. Finally, mtROS produced by Complex III of the mitochondrial ETC plays a role in the DNA damage response and NAD+ metabolism in LPS-stimulated macrophages. Such mtROS promotes DNA damage and activation of DNA damage-sensing poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), leading to depletion of its substrate NAD+. Consequent induction of nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (NAMPT), a key enzyme in the NAD+ salvage pathway, is linked to maintenance of glycolytic flux, Warburg metabolism, and the inflammatory response. The increased level of mtROS results from inhibited glycolytic activity, contributing to exacerbated unfolded protein response (UPR) and inflammatory response.

Altogether, these findings implicate mtROS as an important component of antibacterial responses and inflammatory cytokine production and further establish the critical role of mitochondria in regulating innate immune signaling in macrophages.

Conclusions and perspectives

Mounting evidence indicates that mitochondrial metabolism coordinates signal transduction, chromatin regulation, and transcriptional regulation to influence macrophage activation and fine-tune the immune responses. Mitochondria can no longer be viewed solely as the energy machinery of the cell but as a vital source of dynamic signals that coordinate changes to shifting environments. Future work may focus on the adaptive and dynamic mitochondrial responses of macrophages in other settings. For example, tissue resident macrophages (TRMs) reside in most tissues of the body, where they are thought to serve as critical support cells with context-dependent roles in maintaining tissue homeostasis and tissue stress adaptation. Some studies are starting to report how macrophage metabolism influences such roles, but information is currently limited due to technological challenges in examining mitochondrial metabolism in situ and/or from small numbers of TRMs. With technological advances in metabolite profiling and other metabolic techniques on the horizon, we can expect to see some breakthroughs in our understanding of the role of TRMs mitochondrial metabolism in the future.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

References 116

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Shapouri-Moghaddam A., Mohammadian S., Vazini H., Taghadosi M., Esmaeili S.A., Mardani F., Seifi B., Mohammadi A., Afshari J.T., Sahebkar A. Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;233:6425-6440.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.26429

  3. 3.

    Sica A., Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: In vivo veritas. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:787-795.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci59643

  4. 4.

    Gordon S., Martinez F.O. Alternative activation of macrophages: Mechanism and functions. Immunity. 2010;32:593-604.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.007

  5. 5.
  6. 6.

    Natoli G., Monticelli S. Macrophage activation: Glancing into diversity. Immunity. 2014;40:175-177.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.004

  7. 7.

    Mosser D.M., Edwards J.P. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008;8:958-969.

    Not in our library10.1038/nri2448

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    Huang S.C., Smith A.M., Everts B., Colonna M., Pearce E.L., Schilling J.D., Pearce E.J. Metabolic reprogramming mediated by the mTORC2-IRF4 signaling axis is essential for macrophage alternative activation. Immunity. 2016;45:817-830.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.016

  10. 10.

    Tur J., Vico T., Lloberas J., Zorzano A., Celada A. Macrophages and mitochondria: A critical interplay between metabolism, signaling, and the functional activity. Adv. Immunol. 2017;133:1-36.

    Not in our library10.1016/bs.ai.2016.12.001

  11. 11.

    Cheng S.C., Quintin J., Cramer R.A., Shepardson K.M., Saeed S., Kumar V., Giamarellos-Bourboulis E.J., Martens J.H., Rao N.A., Aghajanirefah A., Manjeri G.R., Li Y., Ifrim D.C., Arts R.J., van der Veer B.M. mTOR- and HIF-1α-mediated aerobic glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity. Science. 2014;345:1250684.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1250684

  12. 12.

    Jha A.K., Huang S.C., Sergushichev A., Lampropoulou V., Ivanova Y., Loginicheva E., Chmielewski K., Stewart K.M., Ashall J., Everts B., Pearce E.J., Driggers E.M., Artyomov M.N. Network integration of parallel metabolic and transcriptional data reveals metabolic modules that regulate macrophage polarization. Immunity. 2015;42:419-430.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.005

  13. 13.

    Eisner V., Picard M., Hajnóczky G. Mitochondrial dynamics in adaptive and maladaptive cellular stress responses. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:755-765.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41556-018-0133-0

  14. 14.

    Butcher S.K., O'Carroll C.E., Wells C.A., Carmody R.J. Toll-like receptors drive specific patterns of tolerance and training on restimulation of macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:933.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2018.00933

  15. 15.

    Huang S.C., Everts B., Ivanova Y., O'Sullivan D., Nascimento M., Smith A.M., Beatty W., Love-Gregory L., Lam W.Y., O'Neill C.M., Yan C., Du H., Abumrad N.A., Urban J.F., Artyomov M.N. Cell-intrinsic lysosomal lipolysis is essential for alternative activation of macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:846-855.

    Not in our library10.1038/ni.2956

  16. 16.
  17. 17.

    Johnson A.R., Qin Y., Cozzo A.J., Freemerman A.J., Huang M.J., Zhao L., Sampey B.P., Milner J.J., Beck M.A., Damania B., Rashid N., Galanko J.A., Lee D.P., Edin M.L., Zeldin D.C. Metabolic reprogramming through fatty acid transport protein 1 (FATP1) regulates macrophage inflammatory potential and adipose inflammation. Mol. Metab. 2016;5:506-526.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molmet.2016.04.005

  18. 18.

    Dela Cruz C.S., Kang M.J. Mitochondrial dysfunction and damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in chronic inflammatory diseases. Mitochondrion. 2018;41:37-44.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mito.2017.12.001

  19. 19.

    Freigang S. The regulation of inflammation by oxidized phospholipids. Eur. J. Immunol. 2016;46:1818-1825.

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.201545676

  20. 20.
  21. 21.

    Koivunen P., Hirsilä M., Remes A.M., Hassinen I.E., Kivirikko K.I., Myllyharju J. Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) hydroxylases by citric acid cycle intermediates: Possible links between cell metabolism and stabilization of HIF. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:4524-4532.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m610415200

  22. 22.

    Di Gioia M., Spreafico R., Springstead J.R., Mendelson M.M., Joehanes R., Levy D., Zanoni I. Endogenous oxidized phospholipids reprogram cellular metabolism and boost hyperinflammation. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21:42-53.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41590-019-0539-2

  23. 23.

    Novakovic B., Habibi E., Wang S.Y., Arts R.J.W., Davar R., Megchelenbrink W., Kim B., Kuznetsova T., Kox M., Zwaag J., Matarese F., van Heeringen S.J., Janssen-Megens E.M., Sharifi N., Wang C. β-Glucan reverses the epigenetic state of LPS-induced immunological tolerance. Cell. 2016;167:1354-1368.e1314.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.034

  24. 24.

    Baardman J., Licht I., de Winther M.P., Van den Bossche J. Metabolic-epigenetic crosstalk in macrophage activation. Epigenomics. 2015;7:1155-1164.

    Not in our library10.2217/epi.15.71

  25. 25.

    Noe J.T., Mitchell R.A. Tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolites in the control of macrophage activation and effector phenotypes. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019;106:359-367.

    Not in our library10.1002/jlb.3ru1218-496r

  26. 26.

    Wellen K.E., Hatzivassiliou G., Sachdeva U.M., Bui T.V., Cross J.R., Thompson C.B. ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation. Science. 2009;324:1076-1080.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1164097

  27. 27.
  28. 28.

    Langston P.K., Nambu A., Jung J., Shibata M., Aksoylar H.I., Lei J., Xu P., Doan M.T., Jiang H., MacArthur M.R., Gao X., Kong Y., Chouchani E.T., Locasale J.W., Snyder N.W. Glycerol phosphate shuttle enzyme GPD2 regulates macrophage inflammatory responses. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:1186-1195.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41590-019-0453-7

  29. 29.
  30. 30.

    Infantino V., Pierri C.L., Iacobazzi V. Metabolic routes in inflammation: The citrate pathway and its potential as therapeutic target. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019;26:7104-7116.

    Not in our library10.2174/0929867325666180510124558

  31. 31.

    Kim J., Seo H.M., Bhatia S.K., Song H.S., Kim J.H., Jeon J.M., Choi K.Y., Kim W., Yoon J.J., Kim Y.G., Yang Y.H. Production of itaconate by whole-cell bioconversion of citrate mediated by expression of multiple cis-aconitate decarboxylase (cadA) genes in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:39768.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep39768

  32. 32.

    Lampropoulou V., Sergushichev A., Bambouskova M., Nair S., Vincent E.E., Loginicheva E., Cervantes-Barragan L., Ma X., Huang S.C., Griss T., Weinheimer C.J., Khader S., Randolph G.J., Pearce E.J., Jones R.G. Itaconate links inhibition of succinate dehydrogenase with macrophage metabolic remodeling and regulation of inflammation. Cell Metab. 2016;24:158-166.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.004

  33. 33.

    Infantino V., Convertini P., Cucci L., Panaro M.A., Di Noia M.A., Calvello R., Palmieri F., Iacobazzi V. The mitochondrial citrate carrier: A new player in inflammation. Biochem. J. 2011;438:433-436.

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20111275

  34. 34.

    O'Neill L.A. A critical role for citrate metabolism in LPS signalling. Biochem. J. 2011;438:e5-e6.

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20111386

  35. 35.

    Degrandi D., Hoffmann R., Beuter-Gunia C., Pfeffer K. The proinflammatory cytokine-induced IRG1 protein associates with mitochondria. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2009;29:55-67.

    Not in our library10.1089/jir.2008.0013

  36. 36.

    Michelucci A., Cordes T., Ghelfi J., Pailot A., Reiling N., Goldmann O., Binz T., Wegner A., Tallam A., Rausell A., Buttini M., Linster C.L., Medina E., Balling R., Hiller K. Immune-responsive gene 1 protein links metabolism to immunity by catalyzing itaconic acid production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013;110:7820-7825.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1218599110

  37. 37.

    Mills E.L., Ryan D.G., Prag H.A., Dikovskaya D., Menon D., Zaslona Z., Jedrychowski M.P., Costa A.S.H., Higgins M., Hams E., Szpyt J., Runtsch M.C., King M.S., McGouran J.F., Fischer R. Itaconate is an anti-inflammatory metabolite that activates Nrf2 via alkylation of KEAP1. Nature. 2018;556:113-117.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature25986

  38. 38.

    O'Neill L.A.J., Artyomov M.N. Itaconate: The poster child of metabolic reprogramming in macrophage function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;19:273-281.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41577-019-0128-5

  39. 39.

    Yamamoto M., Kensler T.W., Motohashi H. The KEAP1-NRF2 system: A thiol-based sensor-effector apparatus for maintaining redox homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 2018;98:1169-1203.

    Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00023.2017

  40. 40.
  41. 41.

    Bambouskova M., Gorvel L., Lampropoulou V., Sergushichev A., Loginicheva E., Johnson K., Korenfeld D., Mathyer M.E., Kim H., Huang L.H., Duncan D., Bregman H., Keskin A., Santeford A., Apte R.S. Electrophilic properties of itaconate and derivatives regulate the IκBζ-ATF3 inflammatory axis. Nature. 2018;556:501-504.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0052-z

  42. 42.

    Yu X.H., Zhang D.W., Zheng X.L., Tang C.K. Itaconate: An emerging determinant of inflammation in activated macrophages. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2019;97:134-141.

    Not in our library10.1111/imcb.12218

  43. 43.

    Tannahill G.M., Curtis A.M., Adamik J., Palsson-McDermott E.M., McGettrick A.F., Goel G., Frezza C., Bernard N.J., Kelly B., Foley N.H., Zheng L., Gardet A., Tong Z., Jany S.S., Corr S.C. Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature. 2013;496:238-242.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11986

  44. 44.

    Mills E.L., Kelly B., Logan A., Costa A.S.H., Varma M., Bryant C.E., Tourlomousis P., Däbritz J.H.M., Gottlieb E., Latorre I., Corr S.C., McManus G., Ryan D., Jacobs H.T., Szibor M. Succinate dehydrogenase supports metabolic repurposing of mitochondria to drive inflammatory macrophages. Cell. 2016;167:457-470.e413.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.064

  45. 45.

    Littlewood-Evans A., Sarret S., Apfel V., Loesle P., Dawson J., Zhang J., Muller A., Tigani B., Kneuer R., Patel S., Valeaux S., Gommermann N., Rubic-Schneider T., Junt T., Carballido J.M. GPR91 senses extracellular succinate released from inflammatory macrophages and exacerbates rheumatoid arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:1655-1662.

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20160061

  46. 46.

    Murphy M.P., O'Neill L.A.J. Krebs cycle reimagined: The emerging roles of succinate and itaconate as signal transducers. Cell. 2018;174:780-784.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.030

  47. 47.

    Lei W., Ren W., Ohmoto M., Urban J.F., Matsumoto I., Margolskee R.F., Jiang P. Activation of intestinal tuft cell-expressed Sucnr1 triggers type 2 immunity in the mouse small intestine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018;115:5552-5557.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1720758115

  48. 48.

    Barnes R.H., Karatzas K.A.G. Investigation into the antimicrobial activity of fumarate against Listeria monocytogenes and its mode of action under acidic conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020;324:108614.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108614

  49. 49.

    Nisbet D.J., Callaway T.R., Edrington T.S., Anderson R.C., Krueger N. Effects of the dicarboxylic acids malate and fumarate on E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica typhimurium populations in pure culture and in mixed ruminal microorganism fermentations. Curr. Microbiol. 2009;58:488-492.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00284-008-9351-1

  50. 50.

    Kornberg M.D., Bhargava P., Kim P.M., Putluri V., Snowman A.M., Putluri N., Calabresi P.A., Snyder S.H. Dimethyl fumarate targets GAPDH and aerobic glycolysis to modulate immunity. Science. 2018;360:449-453.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aan4665

  51. 51.

    Humphries F., Shmuel-Galia L., Ketelut-Carneiro N., Li S., Wang B., Nemmara V.V., Wilson R., Jiang Z., Khalighinejad F., Muneeruddin K., Shaffer S.A., Dutta R., Ionete C., Pesiridis S., Yang S. Succination inactivates gasdermin D and blocks pyroptosis. Science. 2020;369:1633-1637.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abb9818

  52. 52.
  53. 53.

    Willems P.H., Rossignol R., Dieteren C.E., Murphy M.P., Koopman W.J. Redox homeostasis and mitochondrial dynamics. Cell Metab. 2015;22:207-218.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2015.06.006

  54. 54.

    MacMicking J., Xie Q.W., Nathan C. Nitric oxide and macrophage function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1997;15:323-350.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.323

  55. 55.

    Boscá L., Zeini M., Través P.G., Hortelano S. Nitric oxide and cell viability in inflammatory cells: A role for NO in macrophage function and fate. Toxicology. 2005;208:249-258.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tox.2004.11.035

  56. 56.

    Hortelano S., Través P.G., Zeini M., Alvarez A.M., Boscá L. Sustained nitric oxide delivery delays nitric oxide-dependent apoptosis in macrophages: Contribution to the physiological function of activated macrophages. J. Immunol. 2003;171:6059-6064.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.171.11.6059

  57. 57.

    Karabay A.Z., Aktan F., Sunguroğlu A., Buyukbingol Z. Methylsulfonylmethane modulates apoptosis of LPS/IFN-γ-activated RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells by targeting p53, Bax, Bcl-2, cytochrome c and PARP proteins. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2014;36:379-389.

    Not in our library10.3109/08923973.2014.956752

  58. 58.
  59. 59.

    Sarti P., Arese M., Bacchi A., Barone M.C., Forte E., Mastronicola D., Brunori M., Giuffrè A. Nitric oxide and mitochondrial complex IV. IUBMB Life. 2003;55:605-611.

    Not in our library10.1080/15216540310001628726

  60. 60.

    Everts B., Amiel E., van der Windt G.J., Freitas T.C., Chott R., Yarasheski K.E., Pearce E.L., Pearce E.J. Commitment to glycolysis sustains survival of NO-producing inflammatory dendritic cells. Blood. 2012;120:1422-1431.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2012-03-419747

  61. 61.

    Lauterbach M.A., Hanke J.E., Serefidou M., Mangan M.S.J., Kolbe C.C., Hess T., Rothe M., Kaiser R., Hoss F., Gehlen J., Engels G., Kreutzenbeck M., Schmidt S.V., Christ A., Imhof A. Toll-like receptor signaling rewires macrophage metabolism and promotes histone acetylation via ATP-citrate lyase. Immunity. 2019;51:997-1011.e1017.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2019.11.009

  62. 62.

    Liu P.S., Wang H., Li X., Chao T., Teav T., Christen S., Di Conza G., Cheng W.C., Chou C.H., Vavakova M., Muret C., Debackere K., Mazzone M., Huang H.D., Fendt S.M. alpha-Ketoglutarate orchestrates macrophage activation through metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming. Nat. Immunol. 2017;18:985-994.

    Not in our library10.1038/ni.3796

  63. 63.

    Arts R.J., Novakovic B., Ter Horst R., Carvalho A., Bekkering S., Lachmandas E., Rodrigues F., Silvestre R., Cheng S.C., Wang S.Y., Habibi E., Gonçalves L.G., Mesquita I., Cunha C., van Laarhoven A. Glutaminolysis and fumarate accumulation integrate immunometabolic and epigenetic programs in trained immunity. Cell Metab. 2016;24:807-819.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2016.10.008

  64. 64.

    Salminen A., Kauppinen A., Hiltunen M., Kaarniranta K. Krebs cycle intermediates regulate DNA and histone methylation: Epigenetic impact on the aging process. Ageing Res. Rev. 2014;16:45-65.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arr.2014.05.004

  65. 65.

    Tarhonskaya H., Nowak R.P., Johansson C., Szykowska A., Tumber A., Hancock R.L., Lang P., Flashman E., Oppermann U., Schofield C.J., Kawamura A. Studies on the interaction of the histone demethylase KDM5B with tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates. J. Mol. Biol. 2017;429:2895-2906.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2017.08.007

  66. 66.

    Saeed S., Quintin J., Kerstens H.H., Rao N.A., Aghajanirefah A., Matarese F., Cheng S.C., Ratter J., Berentsen K., van der Ent M.A., Sharifi N., Janssen-Megens E.M., Ter Huurne M., Mandoli A., van Schaik T. Epigenetic programming of monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and trained innate immunity. Science. 2014;345:1251086.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1251086

  67. 67.

    Zhang D., Tang Z., Huang H., Zhou G., Cui C., Weng Y., Liu W., Kim S., Lee S., Perez-Neut M., Ding J., Czyz D., Hu R., Ye Z., He M. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574:575-580.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1

  68. 68.

    Chang H.C., Guarente L. SIRT1 and other sirtuins in metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;25:138-145.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tem.2013.12.001

  69. 69.

    Rodgers J.T., Lerin C., Haas W., Gygi S.P., Spiegelman B.M., Puigserver P. Nutrient control of glucose homeostasis through a complex of PGC-1alpha and SIRT1. Nature. 2005;434:113-118.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03354

  70. 70.
  71. 71.

    Kelly T.J., Lerin C., Haas W., Gygi S.P., Puigserver P. GCN5-mediated transcriptional control of the metabolic coactivator PGC-1beta through lysine acetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:19945-19952.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m109.015164

  72. 72.

    Chen X., Lu Y., Zhang Z., Wang J., Yang H., Liu G. Intercellular interplay between Sirt1 signalling and cell metabolism in immune cell biology. Immunology. 2015;145:455-467.

    Not in our library10.1111/imm.12473

  73. 73.

    Zhang S., Weinberg S., DeBerge M., Gainullina A., Schipma M., Kinchen J.M., Ben-Sahra I., Gius D.R., Yvan-Charvet L., Chandel N.S., Schumacker P.T., Thorp E.B. Efferocytosis fuels requirements of fatty acid oxidation and the electron transport chain to polarize macrophages for tissue repair. Cell Metab. 2019;29:443-456.e445.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2018.12.004

  74. 74.

    Zhong L., D'Urso A., Toiber D., Sebastian C., Henry R.E., Vadysirisack D.D., Guimaraes A., Marinelli B., Wikstrom J.D., Nir T., Clish C.B., Vaitheesvaran B., Iliopoulos O., Kurland I., Dor Y. The histone deacetylase Sirt6 regulates glucose homeostasis via Hif1alpha. Cell. 2010;140:280-293.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.041

  75. 75.

    Park M.H., Wolff E.C., Folk J.E. Hypusine: Its post-translational formation in eukaryotic initiation factor 5A and its potential role in cellular regulation. Biofactors. 1993;4:95-104.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    Puleston D.J., Buck M.D., Klein Geltink R.I., Kyle R.L., Caputa G., O'Sullivan D., Cameron A.M., Castoldi A., Musa Y., Kabat A.M., Zhang Y., Flachsmann L.J., Field C.S., Patterson A.E., Scherer S. Polyamines and eIF5A hypusination modulate mitochondrial respiration and macrophage activation. Cell Metab. 2019;30:352-363.e358.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.003

  77. 77.
  78. 78.

    Pernas L., Scorrano L. Mito-Morphosis: Mitochondrial fusion, fission, and cristae remodeling as key mediators of cellular function. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2016;78:505-531.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105011

  79. 79.
  80. 80.

    Sloat S.R., Whitley B.N., Engelhart E.A., Hoppins S. Identification of a mitofusin specificity region that confers unique activities to Mfn1 and Mfn2. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2019;30:2309-2319.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e19-05-0291

  81. 81.

    Wei H., Zhang Y., Song S., Pinkerton K.E., Geng H., Ro C.U. Alveolar macrophage reaction to PM(2.5) of hazy day in vitro: Evaluation methods and mitochondrial screening to determine mechanisms of biological effect. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;174:566-573.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.093

  82. 82.
  83. 83.

    Zorova L.D., Popkov V.A., Plotnikov E.Y., Silachev D.N., Pevzner I.B., Jankauskas S.S., Babenko V.A., Zorov S.D., Balakireva A.V., Juhaszova M., Sollott S.J., Zorov D.B. Mitochondrial membrane potential. Anal. Biochem. 2018;552:50-59.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ab.2017.07.009

  84. 84.

    Sancak Y., Markhard A.L., Kitami T., Kovács-Bogdán E., Kamer K.J., Udeshi N.D., Carr S.A., Chaudhuri D., Clapham D.E., Li A.A., Calvo S.E., Goldberger O., Mootha V.K. EMRE is an essential component of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter complex. Science. 2013;342:1379-1382.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1242993

  85. 85.

    Mallilankaraman K., Cárdenas C., Doonan P.J., Chandramoorthy H.C., Irrinki K.M., Golenár T., Csordás G., Madireddi P., Yang J., Müller M., Miller R., Kolesar J.E., Molgó J., Kaufman B., Hajnóczky G. MCUR1 is an essential component of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake that regulates cellular metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012;14:1336-1343.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2622

  86. 86.

    Perocchi F., Gohil V.M., Girgis H.S., Bao X.R., McCombs J.E., Palmer A.E., Mootha V.K. MICU1 encodes a mitochondrial EF hand protein required for Ca(2+) uptake. Nature. 2010;467:291-296.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09358

  87. 87.

    Sanin D.E., Matsushita M., Klein Geltink R.I., Grzes K.M., van Teijlingen Bakker N., Corrado M., Kabat A.M., Buck M.D., Qiu J., Lawless S.J., Cameron A.M., Villa M., Baixauli F., Patterson A.E., Hässler F. Mitochondrial membrane potential regulates nuclear gene expression in macrophages exposed to prostaglandin E2. Immunity. 2018;49:1021-1033.e1026.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2018.10.011

  88. 88.

    Montava-Garriga L., Ganley I.G. Outstanding questions in mitophagy: What we do and do not know. J. Mol. Biol. 2020;432:206-230.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2019.06.032

  89. 89.

    Esteban-Martínez L., Boya P. BNIP3L/NIX-dependent mitophagy regulates cell differentiation via metabolic reprogramming. Autophagy. 2018;14:915-917.

    Not in our library10.1080/15548627.2017.1332567

  90. 90.

    Sanchez-Lopez E., Zhong Z., Stubelius A., Sweeney S.R., Booshehri L.M., Antonucci L., Liu-Bryan R., Lodi A., Terkeltaub R., Lacal J.C., Murphy A.N., Hoffman H.M., Tiziani S., Guma M., Karin M. Choline uptake and metabolism modulate macrophage IL-1β and IL-18 production. Cell Metab. 2019;29:1350-1362.e1357.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2019.03.011

  91. 91.
  92. 92.

    D'Amico D., Sorrentino V., Auwerx J. Cytosolic proteostasis networks of the mitochondrial stress response. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017;42:712-725.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2017.05.002

  93. 93.

    West A.P., Khoury-Hanold W., Staron M., Tal M.C., Pineda C.M., Lang S.M., Bestwick M., Duguay B.A., Raimundo N., MacDuff D.A., Kaech S.M., Smiley J.R., Means R.E., Iwasaki A., Shadel G.S. Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature. 2015;520:553-557.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14156

  94. 94.
  95. 95.

    Wu G., Zhu Q., Zeng J., Gu X., Miao Y., Xu W., Lv T., Song Y. Extracellular mitochondrial DNA promote NLRP3 inflammasome activation and induce acute lung injury through TLR9 and NF-κB. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019;11:4816-4828.

    Not in our library10.21037/jtd.2019.10.26

  96. 96.

    Li H., Xiao Y., Tang L., Zhong F., Huang G., Xu J.M., Xu A.M., Dai R.P., Zhou Z.G. Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein promotes palmitate-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis in macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:81.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2018.00081

  97. 97.

    Larson-Casey J.L., Deshane J.S., Ryan A.J., Thannickal V.J., Carter A.B. Macrophage Akt1 kinase-mediated mitophagy modulates apoptosis resistance and pulmonary fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44:582-596.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.001

  98. 98.

    Guo H., Callaway J.B., Ting J.P. Inflammasomes: Mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat. Med. 2015;21:677-687.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.3893

  99. 99.

    An N., Gao Y., Si Z., Zhang H., Wang L., Tian C., Yuan M., Yang X., Li X., Shang H., Xiong X., Xing Y. Regulatory mechanisms of the NLRP3 inflammasome, a novel immune-inflammatory marker in cardiovascular diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1592.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2019.01592

  100. 100.
  101. 101.

    Jorgensen I., Miao E.A. Pyroptotic cell death defends against intracellular pathogens. Immunol. Rev. 2015;265:130-142.

    Not in our library10.1111/imr.12287

  102. 102.

    Li D., Ren W., Jiang Z., Zhu L. Regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and macrophage pyroptosis by the p38 MAPK signaling pathway in a mouse model of acute lung injury. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;18:4399-4409.

    Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2018.9427

  103. 103.

    He M., Chiang H.H., Luo H., Zheng Z., Qiao Q., Wang L., Tan M., Ohkubo R., Mu W.C., Zhao S., Wu H., Chen D. An acetylation switch of the NLRP3 inflammasome regulates aging-associated chronic inflammation and insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2020;31:580-591.e585.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2020.01.009

  104. 104.

    Rendra E., Riabov V., Mossel D.M., Sevastyanova T., Harmsen M.C., Kzhyshkowska J. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) in macrophage activation and function in diabetes. Immunobiology. 2019;224:242-253.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.imbio.2018.11.010

  105. 105.

    West A.P., Brodsky I.E., Rahner C., Woo D.K., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Walsh M.C., Choi Y., Shadel G.S., Ghosh S. TLR signalling augments macrophage bactericidal activity through mitochondrial ROS. Nature. 2011;472:476-480.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09973

  106. 106.

    Hall C.J., Boyle R.H., Astin J.W., Flores M.V., Oehlers S.H., Sanderson L.E., Ellett F., Lieschke G.J., Crosier K.E., Crosier P.S. Immunoresponsive gene 1 augments bactericidal activity of macrophage-lineage cells by regulating β-oxidation-dependent mitochondrial ROS production. Cell Metab. 2013;18:265-278.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2013.06.018

  107. 107.

    Dubouchaud H., Walter L., Rigoulet M., Batandier C. Mitochondrial NADH redox potential impacts the reactive oxygen species production of reverse electron transfer through complex I. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2018;50:367-377.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10863-018-9767-7

  108. 108.

    Murphy M.P. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem. J. 2009;417:1-13.

    Not in our library10.1042/bj20081386

  109. 109.

    Abuaita B.H., Schultz T.L., O'Riordan M.X. Mitochondria-derived vesicles deliver antimicrobial reactive oxygen species to control phagosome-localized Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24:625-636.e625.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2018.10.005

  110. 110.

    Gu L., Larson Casey J.L., Andrabi S.A., Lee J.H., Meza-Perez S., Randall T.D., Carter A.B. Mitochondrial calcium uniporter regulates PGC-1α expression to mediate metabolic reprogramming in pulmonary fibrosis. Redox Biol. 2019;26:101307.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.redox.2019.101307

  111. 111.

    Forrester S.J., Kikuchi D.S., Hernandes M.S., Xu Q., Griendling K.K. Reactive oxygen species in metabolic and inflammatory signaling. Circ. Res. 2018;122:877-902.

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.117.311401

  112. 112.
  113. 113.

    Cameron A.M., Castoldi A., Sanin D.E., Flachsmann L.J., Field C.S., Puleston D.J., Kyle R.L., Patterson A.E., Hässler F., Buescher J.M., Kelly B., Pearce E.L., Pearce E.J. Inflammatory macrophage dependence on NAD(+) salvage is a consequence of reactive oxygen species-mediated DNA damage. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:420-432.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41590-019-0336-y

  114. 114.

    Mogilenko D.A., Haas J.T., L'Homme L., Fleury S., Quemener S., Levavasseur M., Becquart C., Wartelle J., Bogomolova A., Pineau L., Molendi-Coste O., Lancel S., Dehondt H., Gheeraert C., Melchior A. Metabolic and innate immune cues merge into a specific inflammatory response via the UPR. Cell. 2019;178:263.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.017

  115. 115.

    Ginhoux F., Guilliams M. Tissue-resident macrophage ontogeny and homeostasis. Immunity. 2016;44:439-449.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.024

  116. 116.

    Artyomov M.N., Van den Bossche J. Immunometabolism in the single-cell era. Cell Metab. 2020;32:710-725.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2020.09.013

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.