Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Screening for major depressive disorder in a tertiary mental health centre using EarlyDetect: A machine learning-based pilot study

Yang Liu, Jeffrey Hankey, Bo Cao and 1 more

Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · 2021

doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2020.100062 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Background: Screening for major depressive disorder (MDD) in tertiary care settings can be challenging, as patients often present with complex symptom profiles and false positives are common. We used machine learning (ML) to test our composite screening application—EarlyDetect (ED), which includes extant validated scales as well as a selection of life history factors—for predictive accuracy, with the central aim of improving specificity in tertiary settings. Methods: This was a retrospective, naturalistic study at a tertiary mental health centre in western Canada. Participants (n = 955; 56.4% female; mean age 35.4; 34.6% MDD) completed ED and underwent a clinical interview with a blinded psychiatrist for diagnostic accuracy. ML was used to make more confident predictions at an individual level. Results: Using composite scoring, the balanced accuracy of our tool was 72.0%, with a sensitivity of 74.2% and a specificity of 69.8%, with an AUC of 0.781. Compared with the MDD symptoms-only model, the fully composite ED model improved balanced accuracy by 5.6%, specificity by 13%, and AUC by 0.072. Limitations: Patients were assessed using clinical psychiatric evaluations, which are subjective. There is also the potential for self-reporting bias, particularly with depressed patients. Finally, the cross-sectional design of this study rules out conclusions of causality. Conclusions: Our results show improved MDD. detection accuracy using composite measures and highlight key predictive factors that contribute to the accurate diagnosis of MDD, including disability, family history of mental illness, and stressful events. These factors may need to be included in regular screening assessments.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.