Cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava without communicating innominate vein - should we proceed from the same side? - A dilemma revisited
Debabrata Bera, Neeta Bachani, Prashant Pawar and 3 more
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal · 2018
doi:10.1016/j.ipej.2017.12.005 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is an uncommon congenital anomaly. We report a case of implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy - pacemaker (CRT-P) device in a 38-year-old lady with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. After left axillary vein puncture, we faced an unexpected entry of left subclavian to PLSVC draining into the coronary sinus (CS). The target posterolateral vein which had been identified before, seemed to have an acute angle at its entry into the CS. Hence, at this stage we were in a dilemma, whether to switch to the right side or to continue from the same side. We continued the procedure from the left side and completed it successfully after some manipulation and improvisation.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References8
8 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.