Pediatric cranioplasty: lessons from a 1940s neurosurgical procedure
Max Kahn, Mark Calayag, Ashit Patel and 1 more
Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery · 2014
doi:10.1016/j.inat.2014.08.002 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
No clear consensus exists regarding the best material and technique for use in pediatric cranioplasty. The immature bone in pediatric patients poses several challenges, such as rapid growth, skull growth restriction, plate migration, and tissue erosion. We present a pediatric cranioplasty from the 1940s, and examine the characteristics of the plating and anchoring used. The patient suffered a skull fracture after falling from a swing in 1946 at age six, requiring cranioplasty. Sixty-seven years later, she noted drainage from the old incision site, requiring reoperation. During surgery, the skull appeared normally shaped, and the area under the plate exhibited complete bone growth. The plate was noted to have several innovative design features that contributed to this outcome, notably that the plate and its anchors were “semi-rigid”; the hardware was softer than surrounding bone and easily pliable, deforming to accommodate skull growth and prevent restriction. The structure of the plate was also such that it allowed growth of underlying bone tissue to close the defect. This case contains unique features that can foster discussion regarding plate design and surgical technique that might avoid traditional complications.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.