Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Improving the accuracy of prediction of heart disease risk based on ensemble classification techniques

C. Beulah Christalin Latha, S. Carolin Jeeva

Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · 2019

doi:10.1016/j.imu.2019.100203 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Machine learning involves artificial intelligence, and it is used in solving many problems in data science. One common application of machine learning is the prediction of an outcome based upon existing data. The machine learns patterns from the existing dataset, and then applies them to an unknown dataset in order to predict the outcome. Classification is a powerful machine learning technique that is commonly used for prediction. Some classification algorithms predict with satisfactory accuracy, whereas others exhibit a limited accuracy. This paper investigates a method termed ensemble classification, which is used for improving the accuracy of weak algorithms by combining multiple classifiers. Experiments with this tool were performed using a heart disease dataset. A comparative analytical approach was done to determine how the ensemble technique can be applied for improving prediction accuracy in heart disease. The focus of this paper is not only on increasing the accuracy of weak classification algorithms, but also on the implementation of the algorithm with a medical dataset, to show its utility to predict disease at an early stage. The results of the study indicate that ensemble techniques, such as bagging and boosting, are effective in improving the prediction accuracy of weak classifiers, and exhibit satisfactory performance in identifying risk of heart disease. A maximum increase of 7% accuracy for weak classifiers was achieved with the help of ensemble classification. The performance of the process was further enhanced with a feature selection implementation, and the results showed significant improvement in prediction accuracy.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

References24

    24 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Cited by papers we hold1

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.