Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Evaluating the efficacy of RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 direct approaches in comparison to RNA extraction

Ofir Israeli, Adi Beth-Din, Nir Paran and 8 more

International Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2020

doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.015 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The genetic identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is based on viral RNA extraction prior to RT-qPCR assay. However, recent studies have supported the elimination of the extraction step. This study was performed to assess the necessity for the RNA extraction, by comparing the efficacy of RT-qPCR in several direct approaches versus the gold standard RNA extraction, in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in laboratory samples, as well as in clinical oro-nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 swabs. The findings showed an advantage for the extraction procedure; however a direct no-buffer approach might be an alternative, since it identified more than 60% of positive clinical specimens.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.