In vitro interaction of ceftazidimeâavibactam in combination with different antimicrobials against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates
Paolo Gaibani, Russell E. Lewis, Silvia L. Volpe and 6 more
International Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2017
doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2017.09.017 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Objectives: Combination therapy has been recommended when using ceftazidimeâavibactam (CAZâAVI) for the treatment of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp), but the optimal combination is unknown. Six common antimicrobial agents (ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, tigecycline, and ciprofloxacin) were evaluated for synergy with the recently approved cephalosporinâβ-lactamase inhibitor combination CAZâAVI in this study. Methods: Different antimicrobial combinations were tested against 13 KPC-Kp, including CAZâAVI-susceptible (n = 11) and resistant (n = 2) clinical isolates. In vitro interactions of CAZâAVI with different antimicrobials were tested using the gradient synergy test. Changes in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value were interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index and susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). Results: The combination of CAZâAVI with gentamicin or ciprofloxacin displayed no synergism against any of the KPC-Kp isolates, whereas synergistic activity was observed with imipenem and meropenem against all KPC-Kp isolates. Notably, CAZâAVI reduced MICs for meropenem and imipenem below the resistance breakpoints against all strains. The SBPI analysis showed that CAZâAVI in combination with imipenem achieved higher SBPI values than other CAZâAVI-based combinations. Conclusions: These data suggest that combinations of CAZâAVI with imipenem may be considered a useful therapeutic option for the treatment of KPC-Kp infections. Keywords: KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, Ceftazidimeâavibactam, Synergy, Carbapenem, Imipenem
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.