Nanostim leadless pacemaker system: A longer waiting period after active fixation may reduce unnecessary repositioning
Hiro Kawata, MD, PhD, Pranav M. Patel, MD, Rajesh Banker, MD, MPH
HeartRhythm Case Reports · 2018
doi:10.1016/j.hrcr.2017.11.003 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Key Teaching Points•Compared to conventional pacemaker systems, pacing thresholds in the Nanostim leadless pacemaker showed greater magnitude of improvement of pacing threshold.•Even if an initial pacing threshold is high, a longer waiting period may lead to significant reduction of the pacing threshold.•The unique behavior of the Nanostim pacemaker system is likely owing to the difference in the size of the helix and the position of the anode compared to traditional active-fixation transvenous leads. •Compared to conventional pacemaker systems, pacing thresholds in the Nanostim leadless pacemaker showed greater magnitude of improvement of pacing threshold.•Even if an initial pacing threshold is high, a longer waiting period may lead to significant reduction of the pacing threshold.•The unique behavior of the Nanostim pacemaker system is likely owing to the difference in the size of the helix and the position of the anode compared to traditional active-fixation transvenous leads.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References5
5 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.