Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Users of a citizen science platform for bird data collection differ from other birdwatchers in knowledge and degree of specialization

Christoph Randler

Global Ecology and Conservation · 2021

doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01580 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Citizen Science (CS) projects are important for scientific research and for biodiversity conservation. In ornithology, citizen scientists make important contributions to biological conservation, because they have a highly developed knowledge about birds, making their data more valuable than those from lay persons. However, to make the data even more valuable for conservation, it is important to learn more about the citizen scientists themselves. In this study, birdwatchers using a CS portal for data collection (ornitho) were compared with birdwatchers not using it. The theoretical framework was based on the recreation specialization concept. Different measurements for birding specialization and demographics were used in an online questionnaire survey. A total of 2964 people participated in the study (1119 (37.8%) were ornitho users; mostly from Germany; 1551 (52.3%) were males). Men more than women were submitting observations to the CS platform. Users of the platform scored significantly higher in skill/competence, behavior, and in commitment than non-users, with medium to large effect sizes. However, CS users were significantly younger than non-users. CS users reported to be able to identify 4 times more bird species by song and appearance and spent more days birdwatching, owned more bird books and a more expensive equipment compared with non-users. Higher specialized birdwatchers contributed more observations to the citizen science platform. The study shows considerable differences between birdwatchers using the CS platform ornitho and non-using birdwatchers. This gives some insight into different specialization grades and supports the view that CS data from such portals have important conservation implications.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.