Emergency
Bassem Nashaat Beshey, Tamer Abdallah Helmy, Hany Samir Asaad and 1 more
Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis · 2014
doi:10.1016/j.ejcdt.2014.07.016 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Objective: Cricothyrotomy is the emergency surgical means of gaining access to the airways. However it holds a lot of problems to the patient and is only a temporary measure until a definitive airway is reached. Griggs’ forceps technique for elective bedside percutaneous dilational tracheotomy (PDT) is safe, fast, and carries fewer complications in expert hands. This study aimed at comparing between emergency cricothyrotomy and emergency PDT in patients with failed intubation. Design: A comparative double blind study. Setting: Emergency room of Alexandria main university hospitals. Patients: 169 failed to intubate, failed to ventilate patients. Methods: They were serially randomized into group I (85 patients): percutaneous cricothyrotomy and group II (84 patients): PDT using Griggs’ forceps technique. Results: Success rate was 95.3% in group I and 97.6% in group II. Procedure duration (in minutes) was 1.85 ± 0.36 in group I versus 1.46 ± 0.31 in group II. Lung atelectasis occurred to 8.2% of patients in group I only. Vocal cord injury occurred to 4.7% of patients in group I versus 1.2% in group II. Conclusion: Emergency PDT is feasible and safe in expert hands.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.