Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Nationwide Surveillance of Clinical Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Strains in China

Rong Zhang, Lizhang Liu, Hongwei Zhou and 6 more

EBioMedicine · 2017 · CC BY

doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.04.032

Abstract

The increasing incidence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) - mediated hospital infections in China prompted a need to investigate the genetic basis of emergence of such strains. A nationwide survey was conducted in China covering a total of 1105 CRE strains collected from 25 geographical locales with results showing that acquisition of two carbapenemase genes, bla KPC-2 and bla NDM , was responsible for phenotypic resistance in 90% of the CRE strains tested (58% and 32% respectively), among which several major strain types, such as ST11 of K. pneumoniae and ST131/ST167 of E. coli , were identified, suggesting that dissemination of specific resistant clones is mainly responsible for emergence of new CRE strains. Prevalence of the fosA3 gene which mediates fosfomycin resistance, was high, while the colistin resistance determinant mcr-1 was rarely present in these isolates. Consistently, the majority of the bla NDM -bearing plasmids recoverable from the test strains belonged to IncX3, which contained a common core structure, bla NDM - blaMBL - trpF . Likewise, the core structure of IS Kpn27 - bla KPC-2 -IS Kpn2 was observed among plasmids harboring the bla KPC-2 gene, although they were genetically more divergent. In conclusion, the increasing prevalence of CRE strains in China is attributed to dissemination of conservative mobile elements carrying bla NDM or bla KPC-2 on conjugative and non-conjugative plasmids.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

The scale of clinical and public health problems due to multidrug-resistant bacterial infections has further escalated in recent years following the emergence of blaNDM, a plasmid-borne carbapenem resistance gene that has been widely disseminated among various species of bacterial pathogens worldwide. Descriptions such as “superbug”, “nightmare bacteria” and “post-antibiotic era” reflected the seriousness of the antimicrobial resistance issue.

Among the major multidrug-resistant organisms that emerged within the past two decades, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), which commonly cause untreatable and hard-to-treat infections among hospitalized patients, is considered an urgent threat according to a report by the Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2013 on antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. In the past two decades, utilization of carbapenems such as imipenem and meropenem in clinical treatments has become necessary due to proliferation of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens in clinical settings. Such increase in carbapenem consumption has been accompanied by the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. According to the CDC report of 2013, > 9000 healthcare-associated infections are caused by CRE each year and almost half of the hospital patients who suffer from CRE-mediated bloodstream infections died subsequently. Each year, approximately 600 deaths result from infections caused by the two most common types of CRE, namely carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella spp. and E. coli.

In China, the first clinical report of blaNDM involved carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains detectable in four patients who resided in different provinces, in 2011. Since then it has been recoverable in most species of Enterobacteriaceae, including K. pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes and Citrobacter freundii, in various cities or regions in China, such as Beijing, Changsha, Chongqing, Fuzhou, Guangzhou, Hangzhou, Hebei, Hong Kong and Zhengzhou. The first KPC producing CRE strain in China was reported in 2007, and the blaKPC-2 gene has since become the most widely spread carbapenemase gene in China as well as various parts of the world. In this study, we conducted a nationwide surveillance of the prevalence of CRE in China and investigated the molecular epidemiological features of these strains, and hoped to identify the key strains and mobile resistance elements responsible for causing an increase in prevalence of CRE-mediated infections in China. Findings of this work shall provide essential insight into development of effective strategies for worldwide control of CRE and reducing the rate of untreatable infections in clinical settings.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates

Non-duplicated Enterobacteriaceae strains that exhibited carbapenem resistance phenotype (meropenem MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml) were collected from hospitals located in 25 Provinces and Municipalities in China, namely Anhui, Beijing, Fujian, Gansu, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, Hebei, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Jilin, Jiangxi, Liaoning, Nanjing, Shandong, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Shanghai, Sichuan, Tianjing, Xinjiang, Zhejiang and Chengdu, during the period, June 2014 through June 2015. One representative hospital (normally the largest general hospital in the location) from each location was chosen for sample collection. All strains were subjected to species confirmation using the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'E' toile, France), and the MALDI-TOF MS apparatus (Bruker Microflex LT, Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany).

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 12 antibiotics, namely amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, imipenem, mropenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, colistin, fosfomycin and tigecycline, were determined using the agar dilution method, and the results were analyzed according to the CLSI criteria of 2016. The 2017 EUCAST breakpoints were used (available at http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/) for tigecycline.

Screening of Carbapenemase and Other Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

PCR and nucleotide sequencing were performed to screen for the presence of the carbapenemase-encoding genes blaVIM, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaOXA-48 and blaNDM as described previously. Screening of fosA3 and mcr-1 was performed as previously described. An imipenem-EDTA double-disc synergy test and the modified Hodge test were used to assess the ability of the test strains to produce carbapenemases; analysis was performed according to CLSI guidelines.

PFGE and ST Typing

Multi locus sequence typing (MLST) for these CRE isolates was performed according to the previously reported protocol. Clonal relationships of major ST stain types of K. pneumonia and E. coli were investigated by PFGE of XbaI-digested genomic DNA using a Rotaphor System 6.0 instrument (Whatman Biometra, Goettingen, Germany), with a running time of 24 h and pulse times of 3–40 s. Salmonella strain H9812 was used as the control strain. Dendrograms depicting the genetic relatedness of the test strains were generated from the homology matrix to describe the relationships of the PFGE profiles of the test strains.

Conjugation, S1-PFGE and Southern Hybridization

Conjugation experiments were carried out using the mixed broth method as previously described. PFGE, S1-PFGE and Southern Hybridization were performed as previously described.

Plasmid Sequencing

Plasmids carrying the blaKPC-2 and blaNDM genes were extracted from transformants using the Plasmid Midi kits (Qiagen, Germany). The plasmids were subjected to sequencing using Illumina NextSeq 500 platforms. After obtaining the raw reads, SPAdes was utilized to perform the hybrid-assembly and obtain complete plasmid sequences. Illumina short-reads were then utilized to polish the finished plasmids. The RAST annotation pipeline was chosen to perform rapid annotation of the plasmids. Comparison of the plasmids against the highly homologous plasmids in the NCBI database was performed by BRIG.

Plasmid Mapping

PCR mapping of the conservative regions of IncX3 plasmid and regions carrying blaNDM-bearing mobile elements was performed on IncX3 plasmids as previously described. The genetic environment of blaKPC-2 on conjugative plasmids was analyzed by primer walking as previously described.

CRE Strains and Their Susceptibility to Various Antimicrobials

A total of 1105 non-duplicate CRE strains collected from hospitals in 25 Provinces and Municipalities in China were studied to obtain molecular epidemiological features of such organisms. K. pneumoniae was the most prevalent species (703 strains), followed by E. coli (164), E. cloacae (132), E. aerogenes, Klebsiella oxytoca, Serratia marcescens, C. freundii and 16 strains of other Enterobacteriaceae species (Table 1). All carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, E. coli and E. cloacae isolates were found to be resistant to almost all β-lactam antibiotics tested, with only a small proportion of the strains being susceptible to carbapenems and cephalosporins. The rate of susceptibility to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin and tigecycline were respectively 47.7%, 27.7%, 31.3% and 7.8% among the K. pneumoniae strains, 68.8%, 41.4%, 88.9% and 54.4% among the E. coli strains, and 62.5%, 25.0%, 35.3% and 6.8% among the E. cloaceae strains. Overall, resistance to colistin was extremely rare among CRE strains in China, with respectively 1.1%, 2.3% and 6.2% of the K. pneumoniae, E. coli and E. cloaceae strains displaying colistin MIC ≧ 4 μg/ml (Table 2).

Carbapenemase-encoding Elements Harbored by Clinical CRE Strains

The CRE strains were further tested for their ability to produce carbapenemase and carriage of carbapenemase genes. A total of 887 out of the 1105 CRE were found to produce carbapenemases. All these carbapenemase-producing CRE were found to carry different carbapenemase genes. The degree of correlation between carbapenem resistance phenotype and carriage of carbapenemase genes was over 90% for K. pneumoniae and E. coli, whereas only 80% of carbapenem-resistant E. cloacae strains were found to harbor carbapenemase genes. Among the CRE strains tested, the KPC-2-type carbapenemase gene (blaKPC-2) was the most dominant type and detected in 627 (57%) strains, whereas the blaNDM gene was detected in 343 (31%) strains; 21 strains were found to harbor both genes (1.9%). The blaIMP-4 gene was detected in 35 (3%) strains, one of which was found to harbor the blaKPC-2 gene (0.1%) (Table 1). The prevalence of these three types of carbapenemase genes varied in different species of CRE. The blaKPC-2 gene was detectable in 517 of 703 (73%) K. pneumoniae isolates tested but only in 65 of the 164 (40%) E. coli isolates, and 19 of the 132 (14%) E. cloacae strains tested. The detection rate of blaKPC-2 was also < 30% in the species of E. aerogenes, K. oxytoca, S. marcescens and C. freumdii. On the other hand, the blaNDM gene was detected in 67% of E. aerogenes (16/24) and S. marcescens (14/21), followed by C. freumdii (62%, 13/20), E. cloacae (61%, 81/132), E. coli (49%, 83/171), K. oxytoca (42%, 10/24) and K. pneumoniae (17%, 121/702). The blaIMP-4 gene was detected in several different species of CRE even though the prevalence rate was very low (Table 1).

Distribution of ST and PFGE Types Among Clinical Carbapenemase-producing CRE Isolates

Among the 668 carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates that harbored carbapenemase genes, a total of 76 ST strain types were identified, with ST11 being the major type (Fig. 1, Table 3). The top 10 STs of K. pneumoniae were listed in Table 3. Unlike other parts of the world, where K. pneumoniae ST258 is the major type that produces carbapenemases, ST11 is the key strain type in China, accounting for as much as 60% of the carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae strains tested in this study. A total of 76 different PFGE patterns were observed among the 370 ST11 strains with 26 ST11 strains being untypable, suggesting that both clonal and non-clonal dissemination played an important role in the transmission of carbapenem resistant ST11 K. pneumoniae strains in China (SF1). Among the 150 clinical carbapenemase-producing E. coli isolates examined, 39 ST strain types were detected, with ST131, which accounted for 33% of the isolates, being the most dominant (Fig. 2, Table 3). It should be noted that ST167 and ST410 were the second and third most prevalent strain types, accounting for 17% and 7% of all E. coli isolates, respectively. A total of 89 PFGE patterns were observed among the 150 carbapenemase-producing E. coli isolates, suggesting that non-clonal dissemination played an important role in the transmission of carbapenemase-producing E. coli strains in China (SF2). PFGE patterns among the ST131 E. coli strains were less divergent compared to other strain types of E. coli. A total of 22 PFGE patterns were observed among the 52 ST131 strains, suggesting that both clonal and non-clonal dissemination contributed to carbapenemase-producing ST131 E. coli transmission in China (SF2). Another interesting observation is the close association between specific ST types and carriage of specific carbapenemase genes. Most of the ST types of K. pneumoniae, including ST11, were found to carry blaKPC-2, whereas ST23 (25/27) and ST17 (9/11) and ST45 (5/6) types of K. pneumoniae mainly carried blaNDM. On the other hand, ST35 and ST37 of K. pneumoniae were found to harbor both blaNDM and blaKPC-2. A similar phenomenon was observed in the carbapenem-resistant E. coli isolates; for instance, ST131 (48/52), ST44 (5/6) and ST648 (3/4) types of E. coli mainly carried blaKPC-2, whereas other strain types such as ST167 (23/27), ST410 (10/10) and ST10 (7/7) mainly carried blaNDM (Table 3).

Prevalence and Characteristics of CRE in Different Parts of China

Data obtained from the China Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Report showed that the rate of carbapenem resistance in clinical E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains was around 0.6–3.6% and 1.2%–18.9% respectively in different provinces of China (http://www.yiyimama.com/Sys/res/file/201512/20151220130152_4645_81ed026304834a5d81842924c78a1a9f_2014%E7%BB%86%E8%8F%8C%E8%80%90%E8%8D%AF%E7%9B%91%E6%B5%8B%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A.pdf; http://www.yiyimama.com/Sys/res/file/201512/20151220130134_7741_482f3b7ae95841998a37898e2ab2fa87_2015%E5%B9%B4%E7%9B%91%E6%B5%8B%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A.pdf). In this study, variations in the prevalence rate of different carbapenemase genes were observed among different CREs recovered from different locations. For K. pneumoniae isolates, although the blaKPC-2 gene was prevalent among K. pneumoniae isolates in most parts of China, blaNDM was the major resistance gene detectable in several regions such as Shanxi, Shaanxi, Guangxi, Jiangxi and Jilin. Second, both blaKPC-2 and blaNDM were detectable in some parts of China such as Gansu, Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Jiangshu and Zhejiang, even though blaKPC-2 remained more prevalent (Table 4, Fig. 3). Among carbapenem-resistant E. coli strains, NDM-type carbapenemase was the most common enzyme produced except in Beijing, Shanghai and Sichuan, where the majority of carbapenem-resistant E. coli isolates were found to produce the KPC-2 carbapenemase. In Hunan province, the majority of carbapenem-resistant E. coli produced blaIMP-4 (Table 4, Fig. 4).

For carbapenemase-producing K. pneumonia, the ST11 strain type was prevalent in most parts of China except the provinces of Gansu, Guizhou, Hainan, Shanxi, Shaanxi and Sichuan (Table 4). It should be noted that ST23 was the predominant type in Shaanxi, where 26 out of a total 32 K. pneumoniae isolates surveyed belonged to this strain type. All these ST23 strains were found to belong to the same clone as they exhibited identical PFGE pattern, again suggesting that clonal dissemination is common in certain regions. It is interesting to note that the low prevalence rate of ST11 type K. pneumoniae strains in these areas correlated with the low rate of recovery of the blaKPC-2 gene in such locations (Table 4). For carbapenemase-producing E. coli, ST131 was commonly detected in Beijing, with 44/59 E. coli isolates belonging to this strain type. The predominance of ST131 in Beijing correlated well with the high prevalence of KPC-2-producing E. coli isolates in this location, where 48 out of the 52 ST131 E. coli isolates tested were found to produce the KPC-2-type carbapenemase. Although ST131 is the most common clinical strain type, it is not widely distributed throughout the country. In comparison, ST167 and ST410 seem to be of greater concern since they are widely disseminated in China and known to cause infections nationwide (Table 4).

Mechanisms of Fosfomycin and Colistin Resistance in CREs

All fosfomycin-resistant K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates were subjected to screening for the presence of the fosA3 gene. Among the 410 fosfomycin-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates tested, 244 (59%) were found to harbor the fosA3 gene; on the other hand, all the 17 fosfomycin-resistant E. coli isolates were positive for fosA3, suggesting that this gene plays a key role in mediating fosfomycin resistance in CREs in China. All CREs with colistin MIC ≧ 2 μg/ml were then subjected to screening for the presence of newly discovered colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Only two carbapenem-resistant E. coli (CREC) strains, CREC-A6 and CREC-TJ2, were found to harbor the mcr-1 gene and exhibit colistin resistance. To determine if some colistin susceptible CRE strains might also carry mcr-1, we performed PCR screening of this gene for all the colistin susceptible CRE. Our data revealed that none of the colistin susceptible CRE strain carried the mcr-1 gene, suggesting that the carriage of this gene was consistent with its colistin resistance phenotype. Please note that due to the large numbers of carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae, we did not include these strains for the screening of mcr-1. Both CREC-A6 and CREC-TJ2 were subjected to further analysis by conjugation, S1-PFGE and Southern-hybridization. The plasmids harboring mcr-1 in CREC-A6 and CREC-TJ2 were conjugative and found to be ~ 33 kb and ~ 60 kb in sizes respectively (Table 5). Illumina contigs were obtained for these two plasmids and subjected to BLASTN analysis with results showing that the ~ 33 kd conjugative plasmid recovered from CREC-A6 was highly similar to a mcr-1-bearing plasmid isolated from an E. coli strain recovered from farm animals in Estonia (NCBI accession no. KU743383), as well as other plasmids derived from E. coli of animal origin, pECJC-B65-33 (KX084392.1), while the ~ 60 kb, mcr-1-bearing plasmid from CREC-TJ2 was highly similar to the original mcr-1-bearing plasmid pHNSHP45 (KP347127.1) (SF3).

Mechanisms of Transmission of Carbapenemase Genes Among Clinical CRE Strains

To understand the mechanisms underlying the transmission of carbapenemase genes among CREs, conjugation experiments were performed on 100 K. pneumoniae strains carrying the blaKPC-2 element, 50 K. pneumoniae strains carrying blaNDM, and each of 50 strains of E. coli carrying blaKPC-2 and blaNDM respectively. Conjugation rate was very high among blaNDM-bearing plasmids in both carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) and E. coli. On the other hand, the conjugation rate of the blaKPC-2-bearing plasmids in E. coli was high, but relatively low in K. pneumoniae (Table 5).

For blaNDM-bearing plasmids in both K. pneumoniae and E. coli, the majority of plasmids (85/92 or 92%) were at sizes of 35 kb–60 kb and shown to belong to IncX3 through plasmid typing. Other blaNDM -bearing plasmids with sizes of ~ 110 kb were detected in E. coli, whereas similar plasmids of ~ 140 kb and ~ 450 kb could be recovered from K. pneumoniae (Table 5). PCR mapping of the conservative regions of IncX3 plasmid and regions carrying blaNDM-bearing mobile elements showed that all IncX3 conjugative plasmids recovered from these CRE strains contained a similar IncX3 backbone, but slightly different mobile elements. A total of six different blaNDM genetic environments were found and shown in Fig. 5. Genetic variations were detectable in the upstream transposase genes and several downstream genes. This core structure was also detectable in other non-IncX3 conjugative plasmids carrying the blaNDM gene (Fig. 5).

Most of the blaKPC-2-bearing plasmids (90%) in E. coli were transmissible, but the conjugative rate of this type of plasmids was relatively low among K. pneumoniae strains (25%). S1-PFGE and Southern hybridization revealed that conjugative plasmids harboring blaKPC-2 were genetically more divergent than those carrying blaNDM, and can be categorized into following groups, ~ 60 to ~ 70 kb, ~ 85 to ~ 95 kb, ~ 100 to ~ 110 kb, ~ 120 to ~ 130 kb and ~ 210 to ~ 230 kb (Table 5). The genetic environment of blaKPC-2 in these conjugative plasmids, analyzed by primer walking was found to share a similar core structure, ISKpn27-blaKPC-2-ISKpn2, implying that this mobile element played a key role in the transmission of blaKPC-2 gene (Fig. 6).

Discussion

Findings of this work confirmed that production of carbapenemases is the major mechanism of carbapenem resistance in CRE in China, among which NDM and KPC-2 were the major carbapenemases concerned. These data provide important insight into the development anti-CRE therapy in China, and demonstrated that the types of resistance genes harbored by CRE strains differed significantly from one region to another. In particular, our data contradicted those of a recent meta surveillance conducted in European countries, which showed that only 71% of CRE were carbapenemase-producing, among which a wide variety of carbapenemases were detected.

Although there is no evidence to suggest that CRE originated from China, dissemination of such strains in China was found to be extremely rapid, eventually facilitating transmission to other parts of the world through traffic and trade. This study represents the first comprehensive nationwide surveillance of CRE in China to provide an overview of the genetic and phenotypic features of this category of multidrug resistant organisms in the country. The data is highly representative as the surveillance covers almost every province or municipal city. Key findings of this study are summarized as follows. First, blaKPC-2 and blaNDM were found to be the key carbapenemase genes responsible for mediating development of the carbapenem resistance phenotypes in CREs in China, with blaKPC-2 being the most common carbapenemase gene harbored by K. pneumoniae; however, blaNDM was found to be the predominant resistance gene in E. coli. Other carbapenemase genes such as blaIMP-4 were much less frequently detected; other elements such as blaVIM and blaOXA-48 were not detectable in a single clinical CRE strain tested in this work. Second, 21 out of 1105 CRE strains tested were found to carry multiple carbapenemase genes, in particular the blaNDM and blaKPC-2 combination, with K. pneumoniae being the most common species in this category. These observations urged the development of novel therapies to combat CRE in China. Current new antibiotics such as ceftazidime-avibactam may not be suitable to treat CRE in China since a large proportion of CRE produce NDM carbapenemase, to which ceftazidime-avibactam is not active. Development of inhibitors targeting NDM and KPC-2 should be a feasible strategy to develop novel anti-CRE therapies.

Although CRE exhibiting a range of strain types were detected in China, several unique strain types are clearly responsible for the increased rate of CRE infections in China. ST11 of K. pneumoniae, but not ST258, a common strain type reported worldwide, is the major strain type, which exhibited signs of multi-clonal dissemination. Other strain types were relatively rare and more sporadic, with ST23 (4%) and ST17 (2.6%) being the 2nd and 3rd most common strain types. Except for some regions, ST11 is the major CRKP in China. Genetic analysis showed that ST258 is not simply a distinct clone of ST11. These two types of CRKP shared about 3/4 of the common genome, while 1/4 of the ST258 genome is derived from other types of K. pneumonia. The genetic basis of predominant prevalence of ST11 in China and ST258 in other part of the world is not well understood. Unlike ST11, which was strictly associated with KPC-2 production, other strain types including ST23, ST17, ST76 and ST45 were associated with NDM production. Further research is needed to understand the adaptability of plasmids encoding different carbapnemases in different strain types of K. pneumoniae. Similar to the case of K. pneumoniae among which ST11 was the major strain type, a major strain type of carbapenemase-producing E. coli was also identified. ST131 of CREC was found to be a major strain type in both China and other countries. Consistent with reports in other parts of the world, ST131 in this study was also closely associated with KPC-2 production. However, it should be noted that ST131 type E. coli were more commonly detected in Beijing and Zhejiang province where signs of clonal spread were evident, whereas it was less common in other parts of the country. In contrast, ST167 and ST410 seem to be of more clinically relevant since they are not only widely disseminated in China but are also the major blaNDM-bearing strains. Further dissemination of these types of carbapenem-resistant E. coli may become a significant problem in clinical settings in China. Variation between the prevalence rate of CRE among different locations was obvious. The unique pattern of distribution CRE and carbapenemase genes may suggest that clonal spread in specific region is common.

Consistent with the sporadic reports in China, characterization of the blaKPC-2- and blaNDM-bearing plasmids recovered from CRE in this study indicated that IncX3 conjugative plasmids carrying blaNDM is the major gene involved in dissemination of blaNDM among clinical CRE strains. Although other conjugative plasmids were also involved in the transmission of blaNDM, the core structure of such mobile elements remains highly similar, suggesting that horizontal transfer of such mobile elements is the major mechanism responsible for emergence and rapid transmission of blaNDM. Compared to blaNDM, blaKPC-2-bearing plasmids were structurally more divergent, as blaKPC-2-bearing plasmids of various types and sizes were detectable in both K. pneumoniae and E. coli. However, the major mobile element that harbored blaKPC-2 was also found to be highly conservative, suggesting that this mobile element plays an important role in the emergence and transmission of blaKPC-2 among clinical CRE strains. The fact that the blaKPC-2-bearing plasmids in K. pneumoniae were less conjugative (35% were conjugative), but such plasmids in E. coli could undergo conjugation in most cases, suggests that these plasmids most likely emerged in K. pneumoniae, and were transmitted to E. coli and other bacterial species through conjugation.

In conclusion, this study reported the first nationwide surveillance of CRE in China, a largest scale of CRE surveillance that have ever been reported. Essential information obtained from this study include: 1) blaNDM and blaKPC-2 were the major carbapenemase genes harbored by clinical CRE strains, with blaKPC-2 being more prevalent in K. pneumoniae and blaNDM being more prevalent in E. coli; 2) ST11 was the dominant type of CRKP, while ST131, ST167 and ST410 were the dominant types of CREC; 3) Polymyxins remained effective for K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae, while a number of antibiotics are still effective for treatment of E. coli infections; 4) IncX3 plasmid was the major type of plasmid mediating transmission of blaNDM among clinical CRE strains, whereas plasmids harboring blaKPC-2 were more diverse in structure; 5) regardless of the structural diversity of plasmids harboring carbapenemase genes, the core structures of mobile elements containing blaNDM and blaKPC-2 were highly conservative; 6) the horizontal transfer of core structure of mobile elements carrying blaNDM and blaKPC-2 responsible for the transmission of these two carbapenemase genes in clinical CRE in China.

Financial Support

This study was funded by grants provided by the National Basic Research (973) Program of China (2013CB127200) and Collaborative Research Fund from Research Grant Council (C7038-15G and C5026-16G).

Conflicts of Interest

All authors: No reported conflicts.

Author Contribution

RZ designed research and collected all the CRE strains; LZL performed molecular characterization of all CRE strains; HWZ, JPL, YF, YL and KL performed CRE strain identification and phenotypic characterization; EWCC analyzed the data and contributed to manuscript writing; SC designed the research, supervised the progress of the study and wrote the manuscript.

References 35

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.
  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 13

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.