Race/Ethnicity versus cotinine-based smoking status in relation to glycemic control in US adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Gerard Ngueta, Stella Ruddy, Ruth Ndjaboue
Diabetes Epidemiology and Management · 2022
doi:10.1016/j.deman.2022.100086 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the independent and combined relationship of race/ethnicity and cotinine-based smoking status in relation to poor glycemic control in US adults with T2DM in a sex-stratified analysis. Methods: We abstracted data from the 1999 to 2018 NHANES examination. We defined poor glycemic control as glycated hemoglobin A1C ≥ 8% (if aged ≥ 75 years) or A1C≥ 7% (aged 20–65 years). Participants were nonpregnant individuals aged ≥ 20 years with known diabetes. Race/ethnicity was self-reported and categorized as non-Hispanic white (NHW), non-Hispanic black (NHB) and Hispanic. We used generalized linear models to estimate prevalence ratio of poor glycemic control, after adjusting for confounders. Results: We included 7,537 adults with T2DM. The overall prevalence of poor glycemic control was 44.9%. Among nonsmokers, the risk of poor glycemic control increased by 14% (P=.06) in NHB and 30% (P<.0001) in Hispanic, compared with their relatives in NHW group. When compared with NHW not exposed to tobacco smoking, the risk of poor glycemic control was significantly higher in Hispanic men, independent of smoking status. The prevalence ratio was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.10–1.57) in nonsmokers and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.00–1.74) in smokers. In women not exposed to tobacco smoke, the prevalence ratio was significantly higher in both NHB [1.29 (95% CI: 1.04–1.58)] and Hispanic [1.33 (95% CI: 1.08–1.63)]. Conclusions: Overall, tobacco smoking did not appear to confer additional risk for poor glycemic control beyond that of race/ethnicity.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.