An anti-doping perspective on nicotine detection in the peri-exercise period in a cohort of trained male cyclists
Toby Mündel
Current Research in Physiology · 2020
doi:10.1016/j.crphys.2020.04.001 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the detection of nicotine in athletes: before vs. after 90 min exercise, and in serum vs. urine. Serum [cotinine] was not different before vs. after exercise (31 ± 14 vs. 29 ± 14 ng mL−1, P = 0.43), although urine [cotinine] measured greater than serum (148 ± 142 vs. 31 ± 14 ng mL−1, P < 0.01). Urinary [nicotine] measured greater than [cotinine] (790 ± 1176 vs. 148 ± 128 ng mL−1, P = 0.05), which significantly correlated (r = 0.57, P = 0.04). These results indicate that urine [cotinine] concentration is the optimal biomarker to detect nicotine use in athletes.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.