Not checked for notices yet.

Does prospective acceptability of an intervention influence refusal to participate in a randomised controlled trial? An interview study

Mandeep Sekhon, Martin Cartwright, Sadie Lawes-Wickwar and 4 more

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · 2021

doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100698

References 34

1.
Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis · 2008
No notice
2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
13.
A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies · 2013
No notice
14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
16.
Strategies for Increasing Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Systematic Review · 2010
No notice
17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
18.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
19.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
20.
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities · 2014
No notice
21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
23.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
24.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
25.
Optimising recruitment and informed consent in randomised controlled trials: the development and implementation of the Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) · 2016
No notice
26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
29.
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials · 2016
No notice
30.
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework · 2017
No notice
31.
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems · 2017
No notice
32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
34.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.