Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Visual analysis of high density EEG: As good as electrical source imaging?

Gianpaolo Toscano, Margherita Carboni, Maria Rubega and 8 more

Clinical Neurophysiology Practice · 2020

doi:10.1016/j.cnp.2019.09.002 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we sought to determine whether visual analysis of high density EEG (HD-EEG) would provide similar localizing information comparable to electrical source imaging (ESI). Methods: HD-EEG (256 electrodes) recordings from 20 patients suffering from unifocal, drug-resistant epilepsy (13 women, mean age 29.1 ± 2.62 years, 11 with temporal lobe epilepsy) were examined. In the visual analysis condition, we identified the 5 contacts with maximal spike amplitude and determined their localization with respect to the underlying cortex. ESI was computed using the LAURA algorithm of the averaged spikes in the patient’s individual MRI. We considered the localization “correct” if all 5 contacts were concordant with the resection volume underneath or if ESI was located within the resection as determined by the postoperative MRI. Results: Twelve patients were postoperatively seizure-free (Engel Class IA), while the remaining eight were in class IB to IV. Visual analysis and ESI showed sensitivity of 58% and 75%, specificity of 75% and 87%, and accuracy of 65% and 80%, respectively. In 70% of cases, visual analysis and ESI provided concordant results. Conclusions: Localization of the electrodes with maximal spike amplitude provides very good estimation of the localization of the underlying source. However, ESI has a higher accuracy and adds 3D information; therefore, it should remain the tool of choice for presurgical evaluation. Significance: The present study proposes the possibility to analyze HD-EEG visually, in tandem with ESI or alone, if ESI is not accessible.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.