No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.
Global Reorganization of the Nuclear Landscape in Senescent Cells
Tamir Chandra, Philip Andrew Ewels, Stefan Schoenfelder and 7 more
Cell Reports · 2015 · CC BY
doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.055
Abstract
Cellular senescence has been implicated in tumor suppression, development, and aging and is accompanied by large-scale chromatin rearrangements, forming senescence-associated heterochromatic foci (SAHF). However, how the chromatin is reorganized during SAHF formation is poorly understood. Furthermore, heterochromatin formation in senescence appears to contrast with loss of heterochromatin in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria. We mapped architectural changes in genome organization in cellular senescence using Hi-C. Unexpectedly, we find a dramatic sequence- and lamin-dependent loss of local interactions in heterochromatin. This change in local connectivity resolves the paradox of opposing chromatin changes in senescence and progeria. In addition, we observe a senescence-specific spatial clustering of heterochromatic regions, suggesting a unique second step required for SAHF formation. Comparison of embryonic stem cells (ESCs), somatic cells, and senescent cells shows a unidirectional loss in local chromatin connectivity, suggesting that senescence is an endpoint of the continuous nuclear remodelling process during differentiation.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Cellular senescence is an irreversible cell-cycle arrest, originally described for primary cells after long-term cell culture and attributed to telomere attrition. More recently, cellular senescence has been established as a cellular response to a variety of stresses such as DNA double-strand breaks or oncogene activation.
Oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) is an intrinsic tumor suppressor mechanism, involving activation of the key tumor suppressor pathways p53 and pRB/p16INK4a. Inactivation of one or both of these pathways is found in the majority of cancers. Markers of senescence, such as p16 upregulation, are particularly prevalent in benign lesions and are often lost upon malignancy. Reactivation of p53 in mouse models of liver cancer leads to senescence with subsequent immune clearance of cancer cells. A key aspect of the senescence response implicated in the immune clearance is the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). SASP is characterized through the secretion of cytokines, which are able to induce paracrine senescence in neighboring cells. Recent work has implicated cellular senescence in normal developmental processes.
In addition to its role in oncogenesis, a role for senescence in organismal aging has recently been substantiated; the depletion of senescent cells has been shown to relieve symptoms in mouse models of age-related diseases, suggesting that cellular senescence may be a useful model system for organismal aging.
Previous work has shown that cellular senescence in human diploid fibroblasts is accompanied by a large-scale spatial rearrangement of chromatin, forming nuclear structures known as senescence-associated heterochromatic foci (SAHF). SAHF are enriched in constitutive heterochromatic markers, such as H3K9me3 and HP1 proteins. However, SAHF formation does not occur in all senescent cells. The proportion of cells exhibiting SAHF depends on the method of senescence induction, ranging from a few percent in replicative senescence to nearly 90% in c-raf OIS. In contrast, other cellular models of organismal aging such as cells from Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) patients show a decrease in heterochromatin and are devoid of SAHF. Cellular models of HGPS and cellular senescence of fibroblasts have proven to be relevant models for organismal aging. It is therefore important to understand the seemingly contradictory roles of heterochromatin in cellular aging and SAHF formation.
We have recently shown that SAHF chromosomes show an inversion of euchromatin, facultative heterochromatin (fHC), and constitutive heterochromatin (cHC), with cHC moving to the center of chromosomal territories (see also Figure 4C; ). This inversion is due to a physical reorientation of the chromatin rather than a redistribution of repressive histone marks, questioning a causal role for classical heterochromatic marks, H3K9me3 (cHC) and H3K27me3 (fHC), in the formation of heterochromatin in somatic cells. A key feature of the senescent nucleus and strong correlate with SAHF formation is the loss of lamin B1. Other factors involved in SAHF formation, such as the cell-cycle regulator pRb, high mobility group proteins HMGA1/HMGA2, histone chaperones HIRA and ASF1a, canonical Wnt signaling, chromatin remodelling proteins p400 and BRG1, and linker histone H1, have been identified; however, knowledge of how the chromosome structure is changed is still lacking. More importantly, the function of SAHF is controversial. Whereas the role of SAHF was initially reported as being tumor and cell-cycle suppressive, recent work has suggested that SAHF may in fact be proproliferative.
To gain insight into the function of SAHF, we decided to unravel the physical structure of senescent chromatin in unprecedented detail, combining fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with Hi-C to map the physical changes that accompany SAHF formation. We find dramatic changes in both the global interaction network and local neighborhood of genomic regions. Surprisingly, we find distinct global changes in the interactions and compaction of certain classes of lamin-associated domains, defined by continuous genomic fragments of homogenous guanine-cytosine (GC) content (isochores; ). Contrary to the current view of enhanced heterochromatinization in SAHF formation, we find a loss of internal structure in constitutive heterochromatic (cHC) regions in cellular senescence. This loss of internal structure is accompanied by spatial clustering of the cHC regions. We further show that HGPS cells behave similarly to senescent cells in their local interaction changes but do not exhibit the spatial clustering of cHC, suggesting a two-step mechanism for SAHF formation. Finally, we investigate embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and senescent cells and find a fundamentally opposing local architecture with somatic cells representing an intermediate state.
Senescence Causes Global Shifts in Local Chromatin Interactions
To study OIS, we used the WI-38hTERT/GFP-RAF1-ER model system. Senescence is induced by the activation of the GFP-RAF1-ER kinase by addition of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen. The nuclear phenotype in these cells is highly homogenous compared to other OIS systems such as Ras-induced senescence, with a high percentage of SAHF-positive cells (∼86%; Figures 1A and S1A). Analyses of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and abundance of key senescence markers at 48 hr after induction confirmed an OIS phenotype (Figures S1A and S1B).
Previous work on the reorganization of chromatin in senescence has revealed a complex change in nuclear architecture; intrachromosomal heterochromatin clusters within SAHF without redistribution of repressive histone marks along the linear DNA sequence (; see also Figure 4C). These observations suggest a dynamic remodelling of the nucleus driven by spatial changes, as opposed to a change in chromatin identity. To further understand these changes in nuclear architecture in growing and senescent cells, we performed Hi-C, a proximity-based ligation assay that measures the frequency of close chromatin interactions, as summarized in Figure S1C. Two independently grown and fixed batches of cells were sequenced to a depth of at least 114 million reads. Data were processed using the HiCUP pipeline (S.W.W. and S.A., unpublished data; Figure S1D). For initial inspection, we plotted Hi-C interaction heatmaps using HOMER (Figure 1B; ). The heatmaps show a typical pattern of self-interacting topologically associated domains (TADs). Although the global chromosomal interaction pattern appears largely unchanged between growing and senescent cells, closer inspection shows striking differences in the strength of internal interactions within TADs (Figures 1B and 1C). To further investigate this phenomenon, we calculated the number of interactions in which both interacting regions are located within a single TAD versus those spanning the TAD boundaries (Figure 1C). This revealed a loss of interactions within the TAD and a corresponding gain of cross-boundary interactions in senescent cells (Figure 1C). To assess the consequences of loss of local contacts for chromatin compaction, we measured the distance between two FISH probes (separated by ∼2.2 Mb)—one approximately 100 kb upstream of the TAD and the corresponding probe inside the TAD (Figures 1D and 1F for probe locations). We found a substantial shift in the mean distance separating the probes from 0.57 μm in growing to 0.86 μm in senescent cells (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test; p = 0.00003). This observation confirms for this TAD that a loss of local interactions leads to a change in physical compaction in senescence.
To study this change in local interaction frequency more precisely, we developed a measure to examine the difference in local versus distal interactions genome wide, which we call open chromatin index (OCI) (Figure 1E). This analysis counts the number of interactions with both Hi-C reads within a window and compares these to a control. Initially, we used interaction counts across the remainder of the chromosome as a control but found that results were biased due to the varying lengths of chromosomes. As an alternative, we used the number of interchromosomal contacts. The distal and interchromosomal interaction counts behaved concordantly (Figure 1C), and the latter provided a more stable metric. We measured the ratios of these interactions in windows across the genome and normalized by subtracting the median chromosomal value from each window and then by smoothing values in a rolling 20 Mb window. The resulting OCI values give insight into the propensity of a region to form local or distal interactions. Our measurement bears some resemblance to the previously described interchromosomal contact propensity (ICP), which itself has been found to correlate with active marks such as RNA polymerase II occupancy. When visualized over the TAD shown in Figures 1B and 1C, we find a rise in the OCI in senescence, suggesting OCI may be a suitable metric to measure a switch from local to distal interactions (Figure 1F). To explore OCI changes genome wide, we plotted OCI values in growing and senescence in a scatterplot (Figure 1G). A population of regions appears to follow the behavior of the TAD described above: an initially low OCI in growing cells with a rise in senescent cells, indicating a loss of local interactions. It has been previously suggested that high ICP values could be affected by proximity to the periphery of chromosomal territories. To rule out any such effect in our measurements, we calculated the OCI using only cis contacts, counting any interaction spanning more than 20 Mb as a distal contact (Figures S1E and S1F). We readily identified the same changing regions, confirming OCI as a suitable metric to measure changes in local architecture.
Based on the TAD shown in Figures 1B, 1C, and 1F, a low OCI in growing cells would suggest a compact structure with strong local interactions. To test this hypothesis, we correlated OCI with DNase accessibility in growing cells (Figure 1G). Corroborating our hypothesis, we found a striking overlap between the least-accessible regions in growing cells (dark blue) and regions showing the strongest rise in OCI. Next, we analyzed whether genomic regions with changing chromosomal interactions display a characteristic sequence-composition signature. We highlighted the GC content of each point within the ICP scatterplot and again identified a strong correlation, with those regions losing internal contacts strongly enriched for low GC content (Figure 1G).
Using OCI, we have identified regions of chromatin losing internal structure. These regions are the least accessible in the genome in growing cells and are rich in adenine-thymine (AT) content.
Sequence Composition Predicts Structural Chromatin Dynamics in Senescence
The bias in the GC content of regions showing changing OCI (Figure 1G) led us to investigate the role of sequence composition within senescent nuclear reorganization. We used a recently published annotation to split the genome into isochores, large blocks of similar GC content (in GC%: L1 <37; L2 37–41; H1 41–46; H2 46–53; and H3 >53), which show little compositional heterogeneity. Isochores were originally resolved according to their behavior in density gradient centrifugation, adding a dimension of macromolecular behavior to our analysis of sequence content.
To see how isochores behave in growing and senescent cells, we plotted the OCI for each isochore (Figures 2A and S2A). We observe a large difference in the behavior between L-isochores (L1 and L2) and H-isochores (H1, H2, and H3), with the majority of regions losing their local interactions within the GC-poor isochores (Figure 2A). Our data extend the role of the sequence composition in higher-order chromatin dynamics in senescence to the physical entities of isochores.
TADs are self-interacting domains with boundaries defined by a change in the directionality bias of interacting fragments. We calculated the position of TAD boundaries within growing and senescent cells, as previously described. We found a high 89.3% percent of the domains to be conserved between growing and senescent cells.
TAD boundary strength and decreased TAD internal contacts have been shown to be affected by acute loss of a functional cohesion complex. Interestingly, a recent report suggests a loss of CTCF at CDKN2A in oncogene-induced senescence. To test whether TAD boundaries are affected by a change in OCI, we calculated the ratio of interactions found within TADs versus those spanning a boundary (Figure 2B). We found a change in insulation strength that correlates with isochores. L1 TAD boundaries show a striking loss of boundary strength (“opening”), whereas H2 and H3 TAD boundaries appear to strengthen slightly (“closing”; Figures 2B and 2C). Thus, whereas the position of TAD boundaries remains largely unchanged in senescent cells, their quality is affected by changes in local and distal interactions, with a significant fraction of TADs losing insulation strength and a smaller fraction gaining insulation strength.
To test the changing TADs for enrichment in genomic features, we selected regions based on the significance of the difference in insulation strength (p < 0.05 for opening TADs; p < 0.25 for closing TADs; Figure 2C). We find opening TADs are enriched in H3K9me3, late replication timing (RT), and lamina-associated domains (LADs). TADs with stronger boundary insulation show a strong underrepresentation in these features and are instead enriched in regions of early replication and H3K36me3.
Sequence Composition and Lamin Association Predict OCI Increase in Senescence
Recent research has highlighted the importance of LADs and the loss of LMNB1 for the senescence phenotype. The level of LMNB1 reduction was shown to predict SAHF-positive cells in a heterogeneous population, and ectopic expression of LMNB1 was able to reduce the number of SAHF-positive cells. L1 isochores showed the strongest loss of local interactions (Figure 2A) and TAD isolation strength (Figure 2B) and were strongly enriched in LADs (Figure 2C). To understand the behavior of LADs, we plotted the change in average OCI across LADs (Figure S2B). We find a strong correlation between isochore class and LAD OCI behavior, with L1 LADs losing and H-LADs gaining local interactions. These observations allow us to predict LAD behavior by sequence content alone.
To exclude the possibility that this observation is due only to the enrichment of LADs within AT-rich regions of the genome, we calculated OCI changes across LAD and inter-LAD regions of each isochore (Figure 3A). We find that the loss of internal contacts for L-isochores (a rise in OCI) is LAD dependent, with L-inter LADs showing no change in OCI. This suggests that the combination of being in an AT-rich L-isochore and a LAD predicts the dramatic OCI gain in senescence. For H2 and H3 isochores, the OCI change is not dependent on lamin binding (Figure 3A), suggesting that other features control the behavior of these LADs.
Senescence is accompanied by a major loss of LMNB1, and recent chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments have identified the majority of the regions losing LMNB1 occupancy in senescence. Despite this dramatic loss, a subset of regions not bound by LMNB1 in growing cells appears to gain binding in senescence. We calculated the enrichment of these growing- and senescent-specific LMNB1 regions across the isochore LADs and inter-LAD regions (Figure 3B). We observe a strong enrichment for areas losing LMNB1 in L-isochore lamin-associated domains (L-LADs), suggesting the loss of LMNB1 may be involved in the architectural changes we have uncovered. There was no enrichment of LMNB1-gaining regions in any LAD category, supporting the previous observation that these regions are unique to senescence. GC-rich inter-LADs were enriched for senescence-specific LMNB1 binding, showing the opposite isochore pattern to the loss of lamin. We tested the overlap between opening and closing TADs and growing/senescence-specific LMNB1 regions (Figure S3A). We find a strong enrichment for the newly forming senescence-specific LADs within TADs exhibiting greater insulation, suggesting a functional role for the senescence-specific gain of LMNB1. Our data suggest a role for the chromosomal redistribution of LMNB1 in the architectural changes we described.
To investigate whether the changes in LAD OCI are accompanied by changes in positioning in the nucleus, we used DNA-FISH microscopy to measure the distance of specific LADs to the nuclear periphery. We designed probes within two adjacent L1- and H2-LADs (Figure 3C); the L1-LAD showed a significant increase in the mean distance to the periphery (Figures 3D and 3E; p < 0.006). Interestingly, the H-LAD also showed a significant change, moving closer to the periphery (Figures 3D and 3E; p < 0.009). We tested another L1-LAD in close proximity to the CDKN2A locus and observed a similar move away from the nuclear periphery (Figure S3B; p < 0.002). These observations suggest that the consequences of chromatin restructuring go beyond the change in local interactions described by OCI and could additionally entail a change in nuclear positioning, with L1 LADs moving away from the periphery and H-LADs moving closer to it.
Local Changes Are Accompanied by the Formation of Specific Distal Interactions
Through changes in OCI and TAD insulation strength, we observe a redistribution of local interactions to more distal interactions for L-LADs. To test whether these new distal contacts are distributed randomly or form specific interactions, we mapped the change in normalized interaction count between different LADs. We calculated all reads linking selected features while ignoring interactions separated by less than 2 Mb to avoid any distance effects (Figure 4A). We observe a strong increase in the number of interactions between L-LADs, with the strongest gain found between L1-LADs (Figure 4B). In contrast, we do not observe any major changes in interactions between H-LADs.
Whereas L-LADs lose internal contacts, they increase their interactions between each other across the genome, indicating that they cluster together in nuclear space. This observation is reminiscent of the rearrangement of heterochromatin observed with microscopy during SAHF formation in Ras-induced senescence (Figure 4C; ). We therefore analyzed whether interactions between domains defined by specific histone marks change in senescence. Consistent with previous microscopy data, we find that H3K9me3 domains come together in a specific manner during senescence (Figure 4D).
The concerted local loss of internal contacts and global clustering of L-LADs leads us to the model depicted in Figure 4E, whereby lamin-bound regions detach from the nuclear periphery and cluster within the nuclear interior. Some GC-rich H2/H3 regions appear to have gained internal structure and relocate to the periphery, consistent with a scenario of nuclear reshuffling resulting from LAD relocation.
Analyzing distal contacts of regions dramatically changing their local structure (L1-LADs and H3K9me3 domains) suggests a clustering of these regions within the nucleus. Previous work has speculated that SAHF may represent a special heterochromatic compartment, supported by immunofluorescence studies using DNA stains such as DAPI which show a very high intensity signal within the SAHF core. Contrary to this theory, our initial observations using Hi-C data suggest a loss of internal structure and possible decompaction of DNA enriched in the SAHF core. The clustering shown here can now explain the perceived expansion and clustering of heterochromatin and provides a new depth of understanding of the structural organization of senescent chromatin.
Pre-senescent Replication Timing Predicts Chromatin Changes
OIS shows an accumulation of cells arrested in S phase. This has been linked to replication-stress-induced DNA damage signaling, possibly caused by an initial hyperproliferative burst following oncogene activation. Although the relationship between structural chromatin changes and cellular senescence is not well understood, one key protein required for SAHF formation is pRB, linking higher-order chromatin changes and replication. The interplay between replication timing and SAHF architecture has also been shown by pulse-chase studies, tracking nucleoside analogue incorporation.
Having identified the regions with the most dynamic structural changes in the Hi-C data, we tested whether these regions show any change in pre-senescence replication timing (RT). We reanalyzed whole-genome replication timing data from IMR90 ER-Ras cells, comparing growing cells and presenescent cells (48 hr after induction of Ras; ). SAHF formation takes longer in ER-Ras cells, and kinetics of senescence establishment are better described, suggesting that changes observed at 48 hr would precede SAHF formation. To compare the two data sets, we measured the change in normalized replication timing (Figure 5A). We split the genome into LADs and inter-LADs and then isochores. We see a shift toward earlier RT for L1-LADs, whereas L1 iLADs show little change. The scatterplots for the L1 isochore indicates a split between LADs (green) and iLADs (purple) into late and early replication timing, respectively (Figure 5B). A subpopulation of L1 LADs appears to be biased toward earlier RT in presenescence. An example of a locus exhibiting this shift can be seen in Figure 5C, which shows a region surrounding an L1-LAD losing its internal contact bias and changing in presenescence RT.
We find a correlation between the most significant structural changes in senescence as revealed by Hi-C and RT changes in hyperproliferating presenescent cells. This observation may indicate a role for replication timing in shaping the senescence chromatin landscape.
Higher-Order Chromatin Dynamics in Senescence Reflect Changes in Progeria and May Represent the Endpoint of a Continuous Remodelling Process in Differentiation
The role of p16-dependent senescence in organismal aging highlights the importance of cellular senescence as an in vitro aging model. Fibroblasts belonging to patients suffering from Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) undergo premature senescence and also provide an important model to study aging. However, OIS and HGPS cells have distinct chromatin features; for example, SAHF formation is exclusive to OIS. Whereas OIS is accompanied by a major loss in LMNB1, premature aging in HPGS is due to the accumulation of progerin, a mutated version of LMNA/LMNC. As such, a commonality found within both models is the destabilization of the nuclear lamina. To investigate the breadth of our findings regarding local chromatin changes in senescence and to examine similarities between OIS and HGPS fibroblasts, we compared our data to recently published Hi-C data sets in HGPS fibroblasts.
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of OCI in growing, senescent, and progeroid fibroblasts split the data into six classes, which show strong correlation with GC content (Figure 6A). Classes 1 and 5 show similar trends for senescence and progeria and represent 58% of the genome (Figure S4). Class 1 is GC poor and highly enriched in L1-LADs (Figure 6B), suggesting a common loss of internal structure for these regions in both senescence and progeria. Cluster 5 shows the strongest enrichment of all clusters for regions gaining LMNB1 in senescence, suggesting that a common mechanism may lead to the compaction of these regions.
Whereas the decompaction of heterochromatin for HGPS cells is consistent with previous observations, the congruency in changing OCI seems to contradict the fact that HGPS cells do not form SAHF, suggesting that changes in OCI are not solely responsible for the formation of SAHF. To understand these differences, we mapped the difference in distal interactions between growing cells and HGPS cells (Figure 6C). Interestingly, we do not observe a spatial clustering of constitutive heterochromatin in HGPS cells, suggesting that SAHF formation is a two-step process, with the initial L1-LAD decompaction shared between cellular senescence and HGPS.
The similar trends in OCI between senescence and progeria may suggest that the perturbation of the lamina has comparable consequences, independent of its cause, and that these consequences connect the nuclear changes seen in both cell types.
A role for changes in nuclear lamina interactions and RT dynamics has been described in differentiation. Although senescence and differentiation are both being studied thoroughly, there are few studies focusing on the crosstalk between the two. Senescence has been identified as a barrier to dedifferentiation with induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) reprogramming, and a role for senescence in embryonic development has been highlighted in two recent studies. The emerging concept of epigenetic rejuvenation aims to reverse the aging process without dedifferentiating target cells and depends on our ability to discriminate these two processes. To position the higher-order chromatin structure dynamics described above within the wider context of differentiation, we compared our Hi-C data to an ESC Hi-C data set. We plotted the changes in OCI for ESCs, growing, and senescent cells over LADs, grouped by LAD overlap and isochore (Figure 6D). Remarkably, we find LAD OCI behavior in senescence to be inversed with respect to the ESC configuration (Figure 6D). L1-LADs show a similar profile in both ESCs and growing cells with an inverted profile in senescence, again highlighting the unique behavior of the L1-LADs for the senescence phenotype. The growing OCI shows an intermediate behavior between ESCs and senescent cells, suggesting a potentially continuous process of higher-order chromatin structure changes from pluripotency to senescence.
To get a more detailed impression of the dynamics of these changes, we called OCI domains in ESCs using a hidden Markov model and tested the conservation of these domains in growing and senescence cells (Figure 6E). We see a dramatic loss of the original OCI domain structure in senescence and an intermediate state in growing cells. These data suggest a close relationship between architectural events in differentiation and senescence.
Discussion
Due to the profound changes seen within DNA-stained SAHF-positive senescent cells, a number of studies have attempted to capture the key drivers of senescence using epigenomic and microscopic techniques. Using Hi-C, we have been able to generate a comprehensive description of spatial changes within senescent nuclei on a global scale.
SAHF were originally described as a gene-silencing compartment, and cellular senescence has since been associated with an increase in constitutive heterochromatin (cHC). Contrary to these expectations, we find a dramatic loss of local interactions in the cHC compartment, as described by an increase in OCI. Although this observation challenges the current view of SAHF, it resolves the previously paradoxical relationship between senescence and aging by correlating both with the loss of heterochromatin observed in premature and healthy aging. A loss of heterochromatin in senescence is also supported by a recent study showing the activation of satellite repeats early in cellular senescence, termed senescence-associated distension of satellites (SADS). If loss of cHC unifies senescent and aging cells, what is unique to senescence that enables SAHF formation?
Further to the general loss of heterochromatin, we show a spatial clustering of decondensing regions in cellular senescence, but not in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) cells. These interactions may represent a unique consecutive step required for SAHF formation, leading to a two-step mechanism where heterochromatin decondensation is followed by spatial clustering (Figure S5). A two-step mechanism for SAHF formation has also been proposed in the recent study uncovering SADS, in agreement with our findings.
Whereas we can only speculate about the reason behind the L-LADs decompaction, one possible mechanism is the recently described activation of long interspersed nuclear elements involved in replicative senescence. This activation and retrotransposition was implicated in reinforcing the senescence phenotype through DNA damage.
Whereas a higher OCI could suggest an activation of the cHC compartment within senescence, a deeper investigation into the relationship with transcriptional changes will be necessary to better understand SAHF function or to break with the concept of SAHF as a silencing compartment. For example, it may be that the retention of repressive chromatin marks such as H3K9me3 and an increase in HP1 proteins is sufficient for gene silencing, despite chromatin decondensation.
Our data suggest common chromatin changes between senescence and progeria; however, we can only speculate about the upstream mechanisms leading to these similar nuclear phenotypes. Some possible crosstalks have been described in the literature, such as the activation of p53 and pRb due to progerin overexpression via a telomeric DNA damage response. Likewise, telomere erosion in replicative senescence was shown to induce progerin expression in normal fibroblasts. However, the same study found no progerin induction in oncogene-induced (telomere-independent) senescence. Our study establishes a link between oncogene-induced senescence and HGPS in the loss of local contacts of GC-poor LADs, suggesting a common destabilization of the nuclear lamina phenocopied by the loss of LMNB1 in senescence and the expression of progerin in HGPS.
In addition to the dramatic changes we see in L-LADs, we consistently find a GC-rich compartment of the genome gaining internal contacts in senescence. This compartment is enriched in H2 and H3 isochores and overlaps those TADs gaining boundary insulation. When compared to LMNB1 ChIP-seq data, these regions overlap with regions gaining LMNB1 in senescence. Based on our FISH data, they may locate to the nuclear periphery. It will be interesting to characterize these senescence-acquired LADs further, especially to see whether they are a senescence-specific feature or whether they exist in other cellular states.
The global extent to which regions switch their OCI in senescence is reminiscent of an inversion of the global interaction pattern. This global response starts to take effect after a few hours of c-raf induction and affects the whole population of cells after 48 hr. SAHF formation has been shown to occur downstream of several different cellular stresses. The extent of the interactome change, the response time, and the variety of triggers leads us to speculate that this nuclear restructuring may be a fundamental hardwired response of the cell. Our data show a strong correlation between OCI change and isochores; isochores may have physical properties beyond simple sequence recognition that allow the genome to rearrange its architecture during a stress response. A relationship between isochore structure and stress response would have important implications for evolution and could go some way to explaining the differences between the integration and fixation rates seen for some repetitive elements.
Senescent cells share similarities with terminally differentiated cells, such as those having permanently exited the cell cycle. Furthermore, effectors of senescence like p53 and p16 have been shown to critically regulate self-renewal in adult stem cells. However, there have been few studies on the relationship between senescence and differentiation. The emerging concept of epigenetic rejuvenation aims to reverse the aging process without dedifferentiating target cells (as opposed to iPSC reprogramming), thereby avoiding risks associated with pluripotency, such as cancer. Any realization of epigenetic rejuvenation depends on our ability to discriminate differentiation and senescence. ESCs and senescent cells show globally inverted domains of local compaction whereas somatic cells show an intermediate state between ESCs and senescence. Our observations suggest that the remodelling of the higher-order structure we describe for senescence is a continuation of ESC to somatic differentiation. Based on this preliminary observation, reversing these architectural changes may reboot the nuclear architecture in an undifferentiated ESC-like state, contrary to the concept of rejuvenation. However, a deeper understanding of distinct architectural features, distinguishing early differentiation and senescence, could provide a rationale for rejuvenation approaches.
Hi-C
Hi-C was performed essentially as described in, with some modifications described in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
FISH
FISH labeling was performed as described in. FISH probes were ordered prelabeled from empire genomics. A list of clones can be found in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures. FISH data were analyzed from confocal sections using Volocity software. Top and bottom focal planes were discarded, and the analysis was restricted to central focal planes showing a clear FISH signal. Volocity software was used for automated object detection and distance measurements.
Cell Culture
WI-38hTERT/GFP-RAF1-ER was a generous gift from Carl Mann. Cells were cultured with 10% fetal bovine serum under 5% O2 and handled as described in. Senescent cells were harvested 48 hr after induction with 4-OH tamoxifen.
Cell Proliferation Assays
BrdU (anti-BrdU; PharMingen) and DAPI staining were carried out as described in.
Computational Data Analysis
Please refer to the Supplemental Experimental Procedures for details about the data analysis.
Author Contributions
T.C., P.F., and W.R. designed the study. T.C., S.S., M.F.-M., J.-Y.T., and K.K. performed experiments. T.C., P.A.E., S.W.W., and S.A. analyzed the data. T.C., P.A.E., and W.R. wrote the manuscript.
References 67
- 1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 13.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 18.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 19.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 20.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 23.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 24.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 25.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 29.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 30.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 31.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 34.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 35.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 36.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 37.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 38.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 39.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 40.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 41.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 42.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 43.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 44.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 45.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 46.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 47.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 48.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 49.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 50.
- 51.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 52.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 53.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 54.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 55.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 56.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 57.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 58.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 59.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 60.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 61.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 62.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 63.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 64.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 65.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 66.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 67.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 8
- The Skin Microbiome: Current Landscape and Future Opportunities · 2023No notice
- Epigenetic regulation of aging: implications for interventions of aging and diseases · 2022No notice
- Mechanisms of Cellular Senescence: Cell Cycle Arrest and Senescence Associated Secretory Phenotype · 2021No notice
- Epigenetic deregulation of lamina-associated domains in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome · 2020Not checked
- Assessment of the Utility of Gene Positioning Biomarkers in the Stratification of Prostate Cancers · 2019Not checked
- Micro RNA ‐31a‐5p from aging BMSC s links bone formation and resorption in the aged bone marrow microenvironment · 2018No notice
- Hallmarks of progeroid syndromes: lessons from mice and reprogrammed cells · 2016No notice
- Nuclear morphologies: their diversity and functional relevance · 2016No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.