No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
Restriction of HIV-1 Escape by a Highly Broad and Potent Neutralizing Antibody
Philipp Schommers, Henning Gruell, Morgan E. Abernathy and 22 more
Cell · 2020 · CC BY
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.010
Abstract
Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) represent a promising approach to prevent and treat HIV-1 infection.However, viral escape through mutation of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) limits clinical applications.Here we describe 1-18, a new V H 1-46encoded CD4 binding site (CD4bs) bNAb with outstanding breadth (97%) and potency (GeoMean IC 50 = 0.048 mg/mL).Notably, 1-18 is not susceptible to typical CD4bs escape mutations and effectively overcomes HIV-1 resistance to other CD4bs bNAbs.Moreover, mutational antigenic profiling uncovered restricted pathways of HIV-1 escape.Of most promise for therapeutic use, even 1-18 alone fully suppressed viremia in HIV-1-infected humanized mice without selecting for resistant viral variants.A 2.5-A ˚ cryo-EM structure of a 1-18-BG505 SOSIP.664Env complex revealed that these characteristics are likely facilitated by a heavy-chain insertion and increased inter-protomer contacts.The ability of 1-18 to effectively restrict HIV-1 escape pathways provides a new option to successfully prevent and treat HIV-1 infection.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) targeting the HIV-1 envelope protein (Env) can prevent infection in animal models and are under investigation for passive immunization in clinical trials. Moreover, bNAbs have been demonstrated to suppress viremia and delay viral rebound after interruption of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-1-infected individuals. Although these results highlight the significant clinical potential of bNAbs, pre-existing or de novo HIV-1 resistance cause treatment failure and can strongly limit bNAb applications in humans. Strategies to prevent and overcome viral escape are therefore critical to effectively implement bNAb-mediated approaches for HIV-1 prevention and therapy.
In recent years, potent bNAbs have been isolated from HIV-1-infected donors that target distinct vulnerable epitopes on the Env trimer. These epitopes include the CD4 binding site (CD4bs), the V1/V2 loop, the V3 loop glycan patch, the membrane-proximal external region (MPER), and the interface between the gp120 and gp41 subunits. Among these sites, the CD4bs is of particular interest because CD4 serves as the primary receptor for viral entry.
Most potent CD4bs bNAbs are characterized by use of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene segment IGVH1-2∗02, high levels of somatic hypermutation, a five-residue complementarity-determining region 3 of the light chain (CDRL3), and mimicry of the CD4-Env interaction. Named after the prototypical antibody, these antibodies are referred to as VRC01-class bNAbs. Additional members of this class include 3BNC117, NIH45-46, N49-P7, N6, and VRC07-523. Other bNAbs that mimic CD4 binding are derived from the VH1-46 gene segment. However, compared with VH1-2-derived bNAbs, the VH1-46 bNAbs reported to date have lower potencies and breadth, which limits their potential for clinical use. For example, CH235.12, one of the best VH1-46-derived CD4bs antibodies, is less broad and more than 10-fold less potent than the VRC01-class bNAb N6 when tested against a large panel of HIV-1 strains.
Accordingly, all CD4bs bNAbs that have advanced into clinical testing are members of the VRC01 class (3BNC117, N6, VRC01, and VRC07-523). However, although escape from VRC01 has been associated with a reduction in viral fitness, the effects of VRC01-class monotherapy are only transient and associated with emergence of viral escape variants.
Here we describe bNAb 1-18, a VH1-46-derived CD4bs antibody that exceeds the potency and breadth of most classical VH1-46- and VH1-2-derived bNAbs. The structural basis of its high activity was revealed by a single-particle cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of a 1-18 Fab-BG505SOSIP.664 Env trimer complex solved at 2.5-Å resolution. Of particular interest, compared with 3BNC117 and VRC01, the two most clinically advanced CD4bs bNAbs, 1-18 effectively restricts viral escape and maintains both neutralizing activity against VRC01-class escape variants and full viral suppression when tested in HIV-1YU2-infected humanized mice. Therefore, 1-18 is a highly promising candidate for antibody-mediated strategies to effectively treat and prevent HIV-1 infection.
Identification of Potent VH1-46-Derived bNAbs
To identify individuals with elite HIV-1-neutralizing activity, we screened HIV-1-infected subjects. From each individual, purified serum or plasma immunoglobulin G (IgG) was tested for neutralizing activity in a TZM-bl cell assay against a multiclade screening panel of 12 HIV-1 pseudoviruses (,; Figure 1A). We identified IDC561, a clade B-infected long-term non-progressor, as ranking among the top 1% of a cohort of 2,274 individuals (HIV-1-neutralizing activity at a geometric mean IC50 [50% inhibitory concentration] of 41.7 μg IgG/mL; Figures 1A and S1A–S1C). To characterize the epitope specificity of the IgG response, we performed neutralization fingerprinting and detected VRC01-like activity (; Figure S1D). However, virus obtained from IDC561 was sensitive to 3BNC117 and N6, suggesting that the HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies in IDC561 differ from VRC01-class antibodies (Figure S1E).
To identify antibodies that accounted for the potent neutralizing activity of IDC561, we performed single-cell sorting of Env-reactive B cells that bound to native-like BG505SOSIP.664 (0.08% of IgG+ B cells) or to YU2gp140 (0.72% of IgG+ B cells) (Figure 1B). Using a new amplification strategy with primer sets optimized for precise detection of highly mutated IgG gene segments (OPT5/oPR; ), we obtained and analyzed 812 IgG heavy-chain sequences (BG505SOSIP.664, n = 445; YU2gp140, n = 367) (Figure 1B). Compared with the total IgG+ B cell reservoir of IDC561, Env-reactive B cells carried slightly longer CDRH3s (median length of 17 versus 16 amino acids, p < 0.001), had higher levels of somatic mutation (median VH gene nucleotide germline identity of 88.4% versus 95.3%, p < 0.001), and were enriched for the VH gene segments 1-46, 1-69, and 4-4 (Figures S1F–S1H). Among Env-reactive B cells, we identified 80 B cell clones with two or more members (Figure 1B).
Following production of monoclonal antibodies (Table S1), binding of both BG505SOSIP.664 and YU2gp140 was detected by ELISA for 70% of the tested antibody clones (Figure 1C; Table S2). The antibodies of most clones showed no or minimal neutralizing activity when analyzed against the 12-strain global panel, suggesting that they play a limited role in the serum activity of IDC561 (Figure 1C; Table S3A). In contrast, all tested members (23 antibodies) of B cell clone 4 (comprising subclones 4.1–4.4) neutralized 92%–100% of viruses in the screening panel with remarkable potency (GeoMean IC50 of 0.032–0.198 μg/mL; Figure 1D; Table S3A). B cell clone 4, derived from the VH1-46 and VΚ3-20 gene segments, included members with different CDRH3 lengths of 18 (subclones 4.1 and 4.2), 20 (subclone 4.4), or 21 (subclone 4.3) amino acids (Table S1). Subclone 4.1 showed the highest breadth and potency and was characterized by a six-amino-acid CDRH1 insertion that lengthened the CDRH1 from 8 to 14 amino acids (Figure 1D; Tables S1 and S4). We conclude that antibodies of the VH1-46-derived B cell clone 4 are highly potent, broadly active, and likely mediate the neutralizing serum activity of the elite neutralizer IDC561.
1-18: A CD4bs bNAb with Near-Universal Breadth and Outstanding Potency
We selected antibodies 561_01_18 and 561_01_55 (hereafter referred to as 1-18 and 1-55), two representative members of clone 4.1, for further analyses (Figure 2A). Both antibodies are highly mutated, with heavy and light chain V gene germline nucleotide sequence identities of 68% and 78%–79%, respectively (Figure 2A; Table S4). Notably, the neutralizing activities of 1-18 and serum IgG of IDC561 against 42 pseudoviruses strongly correlated, suggesting that members of clone 4.1 are main contributors to the serum activity of IDC561 (Figure S2A). To determine binding of 1-18 and 1-55 to the BG505SOSIP.664 trimer in the presence of other HIV-1 bNAbs, we performed competition ELISAs and detected interference with 3BNC117, N6, and VRC01 (Figures 2A; S2B). However, compared with these VRC01-class CD4bs antibodies, a different binding pattern was detected for 1-18 and 1-55 when tested by ELISA against several Env proteins. For example, whereas 3BNC117, N6, and VRC01 bound similarly to YU2gp120, YU2gp140, and BALgp140 and were reactive to the V1-V3 loop-deficient gp120 variant RSC3, bNAbs 1-18 and 1-55 showed lower (YU2gp120, YU2gp140, and BALgp140) or no (RSC3) binding to these proteins (Figure S2C). Therefore, 1-18 and 1-55 target the CD4bs but recognize this epitope differently than VRC01-class antibodies.
We next evaluated the neutralizing activity of 1-18 in detail. In comparison with four bNAbs in advanced stages of clinical investigation (3BNC117, VRC01, 10-1074, and PGT121), 1-18 demonstrated superior activity with high potency (GeoMean IC50 of 0.035 μg/mL, GeoMean IC80 [80% inhibitory concentration] of 0.155 μg/mL) against all viruses of the 12-strain global screening panel (; Figure 2B; Table S3A). Although 1-18 competed with other CD4bs bNAbs for binding to BG505SOSIP.664 by ELISA, no reduction in neutralizing activity was detected when 1-18 and 3BNC117 were combined (Figure S2D). To confirm the results of the screening panel, we evaluated the activity of 1-18 on extended pseudovirus panels. Overall, 1-18 ranked among the best bNAbs that are currently available (Figure 2C). When tested against a 119-strain multiclade panel, 1-18 showed highly potent activity (GeoMean IC50 of 0.048 μg/mL, GeoMean IC80 of 0.183 μg/mL) with a breadth of 97% (Figure 2D; Table S5A). In addition, 1-18 demonstrated high potency (GeoMean IC50 of 0.074 μg/mL, GeoMean IC80 of 0.279 μg/mL) and breadth (90%) when tested against a 100-strain clade C panel (Table S5B). Finally, we determined the activity of 1-18 against culture-derived primary HIV-1 strains that are generally more difficult to neutralize than pseudoviruses. Against viruses obtained from 51 HIV-1-infected individuals, 1-18 demonstrated higher breadth and/or potency (GeoMean IC50 of 0.56 μg/mL, GeoMean IC80 of 1.57 μg/mL, 96% breadth) than 3BNC117, VRC01, 10-1074, and PGDM1400 (Figure 2E; Table S5C) and was superior to the near-pan-neutralizing VH1-2-derived CD4bs bNAb N6 (; Figure 2F; Table S5C).
We conclude that 1-18 is a highly broad and potent VH1-46-derived antibody that rivals or exceeds the activity of CD4bs bNAbs described to date.
1-18 Targets the CD4bs and Regions of the Adjacent gp120 Protomer
To characterize Env recognition by the 1-18 family of bNAbs, we solved cryo-EM structures of 1-18 and 1-55 Fabs in complex with soluble native-like Env trimers and the V3-targeting bNAb 10-1074 at resolutions of 2.5 Å (1-18 complexed with BG505SOSIP.664) and 3.9 Å (1-55 complexed with RC1, a designed immunogen that is a derivative of BG505SOSIP.664; ) (Figures 3A and S3; Table S6). Notably, at 2.5-Å resolution, the 1-18 complex is the highest resolution view yet obtained of an HIV-1 Env trimer (Figure S3A; Table S6). Both complexes contained three 1-18 family Fabs and three 10-1074 Fabs interacting with three-fold symmetry with a SOSIP-Env trimer. 1-18 and 1-55 recognized the CD4bs similarly to other VH1-46-derived bNAbs, including 8ANC131 and CH235.12, with interactions encompassing contacts with the N276gp120 and N197gp120 glycans, the CD4bs loop via the CDRH2, the V5 loop via the CDRH2, and loop D via the CDRL3 (Figures 3A, 3B, S4A, and S4B). However, in addition, 1-18 contacts Env by residue F54HC, which is buried in the gp120 ‘Phe43 pocket’, and by residue R64HC, which makes a salt bridge with V5 residue D457gp120 (Figure S4B). These interactions mimic analogous gp120 contacts made by CD4 residues F43CD4 and K35CD4, respectively, and the VH1-2-derived bNAb N6 also buries an aromatic residue (Y54HC) in the ‘Phe43 pocket’ (,; Figure S4B).
In addition to the canonical VH1-46 contacts, 1-18 contains a six-residue insertion in its CDRH1, resulting in a negatively charged 25DDDPYTDDD33 motif that interacts with the adjacent gp120 protomer (Figures 3B–3D). At the adjacent protomer, four Asp residues in the 1-18 CDRH1 (D25HC, D27HC, D31HC, and D32HC) plus T30HC form coordinated interactions around the highly conserved Env residue K207gp120 (Figure 3C). In addition, the increased length of the 1-18 CDRH1 places Y29HC in a position to interact with residues in the V3 loop on the adjacent protomer (S306gp120, R308gp120, A316gp120, and Y318gp120) (Figure 3C). Although not all of the Asp residues in the 1-18 CDRH1 contact positively charged residues on gp120, the Asp-rich insertion may have been selected to carry an overall negative charge that is electrostatically attracted to the positively charged patch within the V3 loop on the adjacent protomer (Figure 3D), which could drive formation of an initial Env-antibody complex. Although other CD4bs bNAbs include Asp-containing insertions in either the CDRH1 or heavy-chain framework region 3 (FWRH3) that interact with the positively charged gp120 patch (,,; Figure S4C), the number of Asp in the CDRH1 of 1-18 and the extent of their interaction to Env have not been described before. Notably, gp120 residues contacted by the 1-18 CDRH1 contribute to the CD4 and/or co-receptor binding sites, and most residues are highly conserved (Figure 3C). Demonstrating their importance for viral function, mutations in some of these residues have been shown to substantially reduce infectivity.
To evaluate the relevance of the CDRH1 insertion for the neutralizing activity of 1-18, we engineered 1-18Δins, a 1-18 variant lacking the insertion. When tested against the 12-strain global panel, 1-18Δins showed significantly reduced potency compared with 1-18 (GeoMean IC50 values of 0.114 μg/mL [1-18Δins] and 0.035 μg/mL [1-18], respectively; p = 0.012; Table S3B). In addition, we investigated antibody 561_02_12 (referred to as 2-12), a member of clone 4 that developed in individual IDC561 but does not have a CDRH1 insertion. Compared with 1-18, antibody 2-12 showed lower breadth on extended pseudovirus panels (119-strain multiclade panel: 1-18, 97% breadth; 2-12, 87% breadth; 100-strain clade C panel: 1-18, 90% breadth; 2-12, 74% breadth; Tables S5A and S5B). Analysis of the neutralization panel data indicated reduced potency of 2-12 against viruses carrying H364gp120 in the CD4 binding loop. In contrast, 1-18 is less affected by this variation, suggesting a higher tolerance for structural variations in this site.
Compared with the epitopes of the CD4bs bNAbs 3BNC117 and VRC01, 1-18 and 1-55 bury more surface area on both the primary gp120 epitope and the adjacent protomer, another potential mechanism for their increased breadth and potency (; Figure 3E). Finally, the slightly higher neutralizing activity of 1-18 compared with 1-55 might be explained by variations in glycan accommodation (Figure S4D). We conclude that 1-18 mediates exceptional HIV-1-neutralizing activity by an increase in buried surface on gp120, primarily through increased inter-protomer contacts mediated by its unique CDRH1.
1-18 Is Not Affected by Typical VRC01-Class Escape Mutations
To determine how known Env escape mutations affect the neutralizing activity of 1-18, we evaluated the sensitivity of HIV-1YU2 pseudovirus variants. As expected, removal of potential N-linked glycosylation sites (PNGSs) in the V2 (N160gp120) and V3 (N301gp120, N332gp120) loops mediated resistance to the V1/V2-directed bNAbs PG16 and PDGM1400 and the V3-directed bNAbs 10-1074 and PGT128, respectively, but did not affect neutralization by 1-18 or other CD4bs bNAbs (Figure 4). Similarly, removal of a PNGS adjacent to the CD4bs (N276gp120) reduced sensitivity to the gp120-gp41 interface bNAb 8ANC195 but had no effect on 1-18 (Figure 4).
VH-restricted CD4bs bNAbs typically interact with loop D residues N279gp120 and/or N280gp120, and changes in these residues have been associated with viral rebound from CD4bs therapy. When we tested HIV-1YU2 variants with mutations at these residues, we observed reduced or abrogated sensitivity to VRC01-class bNAbs and to the VH1-46-derived CD4bs bNAb 8ANC131 (Figure 4). In contrast, these mutations had no or only minimal effects on 1-18 (Figure 4). Maintained neutralizing activity against these variants might be mediated by increased contacts of 1-18’s extended CDRH1 that formed compensatory interactions, alleviating the necessity for loop D contacts normally required by CD4bs antibodies. Additionally, the portion of 1-18’s CDRL3 that contacts loop D utilizes a glycine-rich 92GGT94 motif rather than the 92SST94 motif in 8ANC131. This could accommodate mutations in loop D (N279K, N280Y) through increased flexibility. Finally, the 7-Å shift in CDRL2 location between 1-18 and 8ANC131 could allow greater accommodation of a glycan at N279gp120 in two HIV-1YU2 variants (A281T and T278I/A281T).
Mutations in the β23 and β24 strands surrounding the V5 loop (gp120 residues 451-471) were associated with viral resistance against 8ANC131 but were tolerated by 1-18 (Figure 4). V5 loop residue D457gp120 interacts with 1-18 R64HC, a somatic mutation from the VH1-46 germline that is present in 1-18 but not in 8ANC131. We hypothesize that the R64HC-D457gp120 salt bridge is a crucial interaction between 1-18 and gp120 that potentially allows it to tolerate common routes of Env escape within the V5 loop.
We conclude that 1-18 maintains full activity against viruses carrying mutations associated with viral resistance against other CD4bs bNAbs in vitro.
Mutational Antigenic Profiling of 1-18 Reveals Restricted HIV-1 Escape
To identify potential pathways of viral escape from 1-18, we used mutational antigenic profiling with libraries of HIV-1BG505 variants containing all single amino acid substitutions within the ecto- and transmembrane domains of Env (Figure S5;, ). In this assay, the effects of Env mutations on antibody resistance are quantitatively determined by deep sequencing of cells that become infected in the presence versus the absence of an antibody.
1-18 only selected escape mutants at a small number of residues, all of which were outside of the canonical CD4bs. In contrast to 3BNC117 and VRC01, we observed no statistically significant escape from 1-18 in loop D and the CD4 binding loop (Figures 5A–5C and S5). Rather, 1-18-mediated selection was localized to the V3 loop and the stem of the V1/V2 loop of gp120 (Figure 5C). Among the four sites of significant escape, three residues (K207gp120, R304gp120, and Y318gp120) interact with the CDRH1 of 1-18 (Figure 5C). The fourth residue, C119gp120, generally forms a disulfide bond with C205gp120 at the stem of the V1/V2 loop. Thus, mutations at residue C119gp120 may reduce 1-18 accessibility to the highly conserved K207gp120 by disordering the V1/V2 loop structure.
Mutational antigenic profiling allows identification of the strongest escape mutations for each antibody (Figures 5A–5C and S5E). Importantly, although VRC01 escape mutations were associated with a 3- to more than 175-fold increase in the antibody IC50 values for HIV-1BG505 pseudovirus variants, the effects were much less pronounced for potential 1-18 escape mutants (Figure 5D). When we evaluated HIV-1BG505 pseudoviruses carrying single mutations at the six residues with the highest level of 1-18-mediated selection, the sensitivity to 1-18 was reduced by less than 2.3-fold for 5 of the 6 tested viruses (Figure 5D). The sixth virus, carrying an A316E mutation, showed a 3.2-fold decrease in sensitivity (IC50 increased to 0.098 μg/mL) (Figure 5D). Therefore, all tested potential escape variants remained highly 1-18-sensitive when evaluated as pseudoviruses. To determine the ease of viral escape, we compared the effects of the 40 strongest mutations from antigenic profiling of 1-18 with those of VRC01, 3BNC117, 10-1074, or the combination of 3BNC117 and 10-1074. The levels of escape observed for 1-18 were lower than those for the single bNAbs and similar to the combination of 3BNC117 and 10-1074 (Figure 5E).
Overall, mutational antigenic profiling of 1-18 revealed a strong limitation of HIV-1BG505 escape via single amino acid mutations, with no evidence of selection at the canonical CD4bs that is critical for resistance against VRC01-class bNAbs.
Full Suppression of Viremia by 1-18 Monotherapy In Vivo
To determine the antiviral activity of 1-18 in vivo, we used HIV-1YU2-infected humanized mice that can maintain stable viremia with a rate of HIV-1 diversification similar to what is observed in humans (,,,; Figure S6A).
Following a 1-mg loading dose of antibody administered subcutaneously (s.c.), we treated HIV-1YU2-infected mice (n = 6–10 per group) twice a week with s.c. injections of 0.5 mg per bNAb for 4–8 weeks (Figure 6A). Treatment with 3BNC117, VRC01, or the combination of both bNAbs resulted in mean viral load reductions of 0.5, 0.5, and 0.7 log10 copies/mL, respectively. However, these effects were only transient, and viral rebound occurred within the first 2 weeks in most animals, indicating rapid viral escape (Figure 6A). Indeed, when plasma single-genome sequencing (SGS) was performed at week 4 after the start of treatment, 79 of 82 isolated viruses from 16 mice showed mutations in the VRC01 and 3BNC117 target sites in loop D and/or the β23/V5 loop regions of gp120 (Figures 6B and 7A; Tables S7A–S7C).
In contrast to the transient effects of 3BNC117 and VRC01, monotherapy of HIV-1YU2-infected humanized mice with 1-18 resulted in sustained viral suppression over a period of 8 weeks in all treated animals (average drop of 1.7 log10 copies/mL; Figure 6A). Moreover, in all but one mouse, viremia dropped to levels below the level of quantitation (384 copies/mL) by day 35. From the one mouse (1069) that had quantifiable levels of viremia but was suppressed (drop of 1.9 log10 copies/mL), we analyzed HIV-1 env sequences at week 4 (Figures 6A and 6B). We detected no recurrent mutations at contact residues of 1-18 or typical CD4bs bNAbs, and pseudoviruses derived from these sequences remained sensitive to 1-18 (Figure 6B; Table S7D). These results were confirmed in an independent repeat experiment for 1-18 as well as for 1-55, another member of clone 4.1 (Figure S6B). Although five of six 1-18-treated mice in this experiment were fully suppressed, one mouse (1730) continued to show high HIV-1 RNA copy numbers (Figure S6B). However, all env sequences obtained from this mouse carried large V4 loop deletions as well as early stop codons (Figure S6C). Thus, despite detectable rebound of viremia in 1 of 18 mice treated with 1-18 or 1-55, no functional escape viruses were observed by SGS and evaluation of pseudoviruses.
Effective clinical application of bNAbs depends on favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profiles. Following a single injection of 1-18 or 1-55, their decline in serum of immunodeficient mice was slower compared with VRC01-class bNAbs and more similar to 10-1074, which has a longer half-life than 3BNC117 and VRC01 in humans (,,,,,; Figure S6D). In addition, whereas some bNAbs demonstrate binding to self-antigens, we found no indication for autoreactivity of 1-18 or 1-55 when tested against HEp-2 cells (Figure S6E).
In summary, we conclude that 1-18 has exceptional antiviral in vivo activity against HIV-1YU2. This activity is superior to the CD4bs antibodies 3BNC117 and VRC01, which are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Importantly, single bNAb therapy with 1-18 is sufficient to effectively prevent development of viral escape variants that rapidly emerge during HIV-1YU2 monotherapy with other bNAbs.
1-18 Overcomes VRC01-Class Escape Mutations In Vivo
To confirm that mutations occurring during 3BNC117 and/or VRC01 therapy conferred antibody resistance, we generated 30 pseudoviruses derived from day 28 env sequences of 11 VRC01-class-treated mice. We found 23 viral variants that were fully resistant to the administered antibodies (IC50 > 25 μg/mL) or showed increased VRC01-class resistance (>5-fold increase in IC50 values). Notably, however, all of these pseudoviruses remained sensitive to 1-18 in vitro (Figure 7B; Table S7).
To determine whether 1-18 can overcome escape from VRC01-class bNAbs in vivo, we added bNAb 1-18 therapy (1-mg loading dose s.c. followed by 0.5 mg s.c. twice weekly) to 3BNC117- and/or VRC01-pretreated animals while continuing 3BNC117 and/or VRC01 administrations (Figure 7C). Despite circulating VRC01-class-resistant viral variants, 1-18 effectively reduced viremia and maintained viral suppression in 17 of 18 mice (Figure 7C). Following interruption of bNAb therapy, viral rebound occurred in all fully suppressed mice when Env-reactive antibody plasma concentrations declined to a median of 0.1 μg/mL (Figure 7D). To determine whether declining 1-18 levels resulted in selection of 1-18-resistant escape variants, we performed plasma SGS of rebound viruses 8 weeks after treatment interruption (day 114) (Figure 7E). Although we found novel mutations compared with day 0 and day 28 in 39 of 60 sequences from 12 mice, there was no recurrent pattern of mutations that developed after 1-18 therapy (Figure 7E). Indeed, all 20 sequences tested as pseudoviruses were demonstrated to be fully sensitive to 1-18 (Figure 7E; Table S7).
We conclude that bNAb 1-18 effectively overcomes VRC01-class resistance in vivo and maintains viral suppression without the development of 1-18-resistant HIV-1YU2 variants.
Discussion
Implementation of HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies for clinical practice requires antibodies with specific characteristics. These include safety, a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, and broad and highly potent neutralizing activity to effectively target the remarkable diversity of HIV-1. In addition, as for any drug against HIV-1, viral escape represents one of the biggest challenges for clinical application. This became evident when (1) single bNAbs were used for therapy and HIV-1 resistance developed within a few weeks, and (2) antibody combinations resulted in improved viral control by preventing early development of resistance. Therefore, restriction of HIV-1 escape will be an antibody-dependent feature of utmost importance for successful bNAb applications.
VRC01-class antibodies targeting the functionally critical CD4bs have broad and potent neutralizing activity but fail to prevent viral escape in vivo. Through a combination of functional in vitro mapping and in vivo therapy of HIV-1-infected humanized mice, we demonstrated that the VH1-46-derived CD4bs bNAb 1-18 effectively restricts development of HIV-1 resistance. Contrasting other CD4bs bNAbs, we did not identify single amino acid mutations resulting in 1-18 resistance in two viral strains of different clades (BG505, clade A; YU2, clade B). Most importantly, in the setting of viral replication and diversification in HIV-1YU2-infected humanized mice, 1-18 monotherapy resulted in effective and sustained viral suppression. Notably, the in vivo activity of 1-18 was not affected by VRC01-class-resistant viral variants. Thus, despite mutations in up to two sites associated with escape from CD4bs antibodies, 1-18 effectively suppressed viremia and restricted the development of additional escape mutations.
In our cryo-EM analysis of a 1-18-BG505 complex, the highest-resolution HIV-1 Env trimer structure obtained to date (2.5 Å), the details of 1-18 recognition of Env were determined. The structure demonstrated that 1-18 combines favorable features found in potent VH1-2 bNAbs that likely contribute to its exceptional potency and breadth. These characteristics include (1) an aromatic residue that mimics residue Phe43 of CD4 to target the ‘Phe43gp120 pocket’, as seen in bNAb N6; (2) contacts with the adjacent gp120 protomer, as seen for bNAb 3BNC117 but with increased buried surface area (via its six-residue insertion in CDRH1); and (3) a larger buried surface area on gp120 than other VH1-2 bNAbs: 1,530 Å2 compared with 1,260 Å2 (VRC01) and 1,290 Å2 (3BNC117). Finally, 1-18’s unique mode of binding enables it to make additional contacts with conserved residues on gp120 not found in other CD4bs bNAbs, allowing 1-18 to rely less on classical CD4bs bNAb contacts and making viral escape more difficult. These characteristics may explain 1-18’s exceptional potency, breadth, and resistance to viral escape. Notably, functional antigenic mapping demonstrated that 1-18-mediated selection was focused on contact residues within the CDRH1. Moreover, the lack of the CDRH1 insertion in antibodies 1-18Δins and 2-12 was associated with reduced neutralizing activity compared with 1-18.
Despite the remarkable neutralization breadth of 1-18 (covering 256 of 271 evaluated primary viruses and pseudoviruses), a small number of viruses was found to be 1-18 resistant. However, sequence analysis did not identify single residues that were associated with 1-18 resistance. In addition, we analyzed viruses from individual IDC561, from whom 1-18 was identified. Although viremia was controlled in the absence of ART for more than 15 years, it was detectable by the time of 1-18 isolation. Indeed, viruses obtained at this time showed resistance against 1-18 and clonal members (Figure S7). Remarkably, however, their CD4bs sequences presented with highly infrequent amino acid residues (Figure S7). For example, among 2,351 clade B env sequences in the Los Alamos HIV Sequence Database, only 0.8% carried a glycine at the loop D residue 281gp120, and not a single virus had a glutamic acid at position 474gp120 (Figure S7). Similarly, uncommon amino acids were found in other loop D (282gp120) and V5 loop (471gp120) positions as well as at residue 208gp120, which neighbors K207gp120 that strongly interacts with the CDRH1 of 1-18 (Figure S7). Taking the results from profiling escape pathways in vitro together with the lack of viral escape in humanized mouse experiments, the occurrence of multiple uncommon amino acid residues in 1-18-resistant viruses suggests a restricted escape pathway from 1-18 that may require accumulation of multiple rare mutations.
Current strategies to combine bNAbs are based on the use of antibodies targeting non-overlapping epitopes. To this end, the combination of 1-18 with bNAbs targeting other epitopes (e.g., the MPER antibody DH511.2_K3, which neutralizes 100% of tested clade C viruses; ) may be a promising option. Because the most potent known CD4bs bNAbs are of the VRC01-class, synergistic effects by combinations of these antibodies are not expected. However, given their different binding, neutralization, and escape patterns, a combination of 1-18 with VRC01-class CD4bs bNAbs may be highly beneficial. The capacity of 1-18 to overcome VRC01-class escape mutations in vivo as well as a calculated breadth of more than 99% when 1-18 is combined with VRC01-class bNAbs (e.g., N6 or 3BNC117) offers new possibilities of bNAb combinations, such as a dual anti-CD4bs therapy. Finally, CD4bs bNAbs have been demonstrated to induce escape variants with reduced viral fitness. Applying double CD4bs-targeting pressure may force the virus to more extensively mutate this functionally critical epitope and, therefore, result in impaired viral variants and prolonged viral control.
In summary, by combining outstanding neutralizing activity and a high barrier for viral escape, 1-18 provides a new option for highly effective treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection.
Lead Contact and Materials Availability
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Florian Klein (florian.klein@uk-koeln.de). Nucleotide sequences of all generated antibodies were deposited at GenBank, and expression plasmids for 1-18, 1-55, 2-12, and clonal members will be shared upon request.
Human Subjects
Blood and leukapheresis samples were obtained under protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Cologne (protocols 13-364 and 16-054) and the local IRBs. All participants provided written informed consent. Participants of the neutralization screening cohort are recruited at hospitals and/or private practices in Germany (Cologne, Essen, and Frankfurt), Cameroon (Yaoundé), Nepal (Kathmandu), and Tanzania (Mbeya). At the time of leukapheresis, IDC561 was a 48-year-old male who was diagnosed with HIV-1 infection 21 years earlier. He was recruited at the University Hospital Cologne. PBMCs for bulk viral outgrowth cultures were obtained from individuals recruited in Germany (Cologne).
Mouse Models
NOD.Cg-Rag1tm1momIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NRG) mice were purchased at The Jackson Laboratory and bred and maintained at the Decentralized Animal Husbandry Network (Dezentrales Tierhaltungsnetzwerk) of the University of Cologne under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions with 12-hour light/dark cycles. For breeding purposes, mice were provided with ssniff 1124 breeding feed; for experimental purposes, mice were provided with ssniff 1543 maintenance feed. Humanized mice were generated as previously described with modifications. In brief, human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells were isolated from cord blood and perfused placental tissues using CD34 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Collection of cord blood and placental tissues was conducted under a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Cologne (16-110), and all donors provided written informed consent. NRG mice were sublethally irradiated within 5 days of birth and intrahepatically injected with purified human CD34+ stem cells 4 to 6 hours later. Success of humanization was determined approximately 12 weeks later by FACS analysis of blood for human PBMCs. All mouse experiments were authorized by the State Agency for Nature, Environmental Protection, and Consumer Protection North Rhine-Westphalia (LANUV).
Cell Lines
HEK293T cells (American Type Culture Collection) were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Thermo Fisher) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1x antibiotic-antimycotic (all from Thermo Fisher). TZM-bl cells were maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 μg/ml gentamicin (Merck), and 25 mM HEPES (Millipore). 293-6E cells (National Research Council of Canada) were maintained at 37°C and 6% CO2 in FreeStyle Expression Medium (Thermo Fisher) and kept under constant shaking at 90-120 rpm. Expi293 cells (Thermo Fisher) were maintained at 37°C and 8% CO2 in Expi293 Expression medium (Thermo Fisher) and kept under constant shaking at 130 rpm. CHO cells were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 in ProCHO-5 media (Lonza) supplemented with 0.1 M HEPES, 1x GlutaMAX, 1x MEM NEAA, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 0.5 mg/ml hygromycin B (all from Thermo Fisher). SupT1-R5 cells were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 300 mg/l L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher), 10% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher). The sex of HEK293T, TZM-bl, 293-6E, Expi293, and CHO cell lines is female, and the sex of SupT1-R5 cells is male. Cell lines were not specifically authenticated.
Clinical Samples
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by density-gradient centrifugation and stored at −150°C in 90% FBS and 10% DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) until further use. Plasma and serum samples were stored at −80°C until further use.
Serum and Plasma IgG Isolation
Serum and plasma samples were heat-inactivated (56°C for 40 min) and incubated with Protein G Sepharose (GE Life Sciences) overnight at 4°C. IgGs were eluted from Protein G in chromatography columns using 0.1 M glycine (pH = 3.0) and buffered in 1 M Tris (pH = 8.0). Subsequently, buffer exchange to PBS and antibody concentration was performed using Amicon 30 kDa spin membranes (Millipore). Purified IgGs were stored at 4°C until further use.
Single Cell Sort
B cells were isolated from PBMCs using the Pan B Cell Isolation Kit, B Cell Isolation Kit II, or IgG+ Memory B Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec). Isolated cells were labeled with anti-human CD19-AF700 (BD), anti-human IgG-APC (BD), DAPI (Thermo Fisher), and the respective HIV-1 Env bait for 30 minutes on ice. BG505SOSIP.664-GFP or biotinylated YU2gp140 that was labeled with Streptavidin-PE (BD) were used as HIV-1 Env baits. Env-reactive CD19+IgG+DAPI- single cells were sorted into 96-well plates containing 4 μl of lysis buffer (0.5x PBS, 10 mM DTT (Thermo Fisher), 2 U/μl RNasin (Promega), and 1 U/μl RNaseOUT (Thermo Fisher)) per well using a BD FACSAria Fusion. Plates were stored at −80°C until further use.
Single Cell cDNA Synthesis and PCR
Sorted cells were incubated with 0.75 μl Random Hexamer Primer (Thermo Fisher), 0.5 μl NP-40 (Thermo Fisher), and 5.6 μl RNase-free H2O for 1 min at 65°C. Subsequently, 3 μl of 5x RT Buffer (Thermo Fisher), 0.5 μl dNTPs mix (25 mM, Thermo Fisher), 1 μl DTT (100 mM, Sigma Aldrich), 2.05 μl of RNase-free H2O, 0.1 μl RNasin (40 U/μl, Promega), 0.1 μl RNaseOUT (40 U/μl, Promega), and 0.25 μl Superscript IV (200 U/μl, Thermo Fisher) were added and samples were incubated at 42°C for 10 min, 25°C for 10 min, 50°C for 10 min, and 94°C for 5 min. Antibody sequences for single cell analysis were amplified by semi-nested PCRs using Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase or Platinum Taq Green Hot Start DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher) and previously described primers, including the novel OPT5/oPR-primer set optimized for detection of highly mutated IgG sequences, using the OPT5/oPR-primer mix and CG_RT 5′-AGGTGTGCACGCCGCTGGTC for the 1st PCR, and the OPT5/oPR-primer mix and IgG_Internal RT 5′-GTTCGGGGAAGTAGTCCTTGAC for the 2nd PCR. First-round PCR was run at 94°C for 2 min; followed by 50 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 55 s. Second-round PCR was run at 94°C for 2 min; followed by 50 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s. Second-round PCR products were sequenced by Sanger sequencing and used for further sequence analyses.
Antibody Sequence Analysis
Sequences with a mean Phred score ≥ 28 and a minimal length of 240 nucleotides were annotated with IgBLAST and trimmed from framework region (FWR) 1 of the variable region to the end of the J gene. Base calls with a Phred score < 16 were masked and sequences with > 15 masked nucleotides, frameshifts, or stop codons were excluded from further analyses. To analyze the sequences for potential clonalities, all productive heavy chain sequences were grouped by identical V genes and the pairwise Levenshtein distance of their CDRH3s was determined. Individual sequences were grouped into clones when they shared the same V gene and had a minimal CDRH3 identity of 75%. After 10 rounds with a randomized input of sequences, the result that yielded the lowest number of unassigned (non-clonal) sequences was selected for further analyses. All clones were re-validated manually by the investigators in order to identify shared mutations. Sequences that were initially assigned to different clones but shared the same VDJ genes and amino acid and/or silent nucleotide mutations were subsequently grouped into subclones. Nucleotide sequence identity to germline was calculated using IgBLAST. The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree in Figure 1D was generated using nucleotide sequences of heavy-chain V genes (FWRH1-FWRH3) of subclones 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4 (n = 86 sequences) and of the IGHV1-46∗01 Homo sapiens allele (GenBank X92343.1). All sequences were aligned using ClustalW (Geneious R10; cost matrix: IUB; gap open cost: 15; gap extend cost: 6.66) and the maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was calculated using PhyML with 1,000 bootstrap replicates (substitution model: general time reversible [GTR]; Geneious R10). The best-scoring tree was then rooted to IGHV1-46∗01.
Antibody Cloning and Production
For cloning of single cell-derived antibodies, the 1st PCR product of single cell-PCR was used as template and amplified using Q5 Hot Start High Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) and specific forward- and reverse primers that resembled the respective nucleotide sequence of the V- and J-regions with expression vector overhangs for subsequent sequence and ligation independent cloning (SLIC). PCR was run at 98°C for 30 s; 35 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; and 72°C for 2 min. 561_01_18_ΔINS was generated by cloning a synthesized (Eurofins Genomics) heavy-chain variable region DNA fragment of 1-18 lacking the CDRH1 insertion (28PYTDDD33). PCR products or synthesized DNA fragments were cloned into human antibody expression vectors (IgG1, kappa, or lambda chain) by SLIC assembly as previously described. Antibodies were produced in 293-6E cells (National Research Council Canada) by transfection using 25 kDa branched polyethylenimine (PEI) (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were maintained at 37°C and 6% CO2 in FreeStyle 293 Expression Medium (Thermo Fisher) and 0.2% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher). 5-7 days after transfection, culture supernatants were harvested, filtered, and incubated with Protein G Sepharose (GE Life Sciences) overnight at 4°C. Antibodies were eluted from chromatography columns using 0.1 M glycine (pH = 3.0) and buffered in 1 M Tris (pH = 8.0). Subsequent buffer exchange to PBS and antibody concentration was performed using Amicon 30 kDa spin membranes (Millipore). Antibodies were filter-sterilized using Ultrafree-CL or Ultrafree-MC 0.22 μm membranes (Millipore) and stored at 4°C.
Pseudovirus Production
Pseudoviruses for the 12-strain global screening panel and f61 finger printing panel were produced in HEK293T cells by co-transfection with pSG3ΔEnv plasmid as described previously. Single genome sequencing (SGS)-derived pseudoviruses were generated by co-transfection of SGS-derived CMV promoter-Env products and pSG3ΔEnv as previously described. For sequences obtained from mice, env/rev cassettes were amplified from the first-round SGS PCR product using primers env1Atopo 5′-CACCGGCTTAGGCATCTCCTATGGCAGGAAGAA and envB3in 5′-CACCTTAGGCATCTCCTATGGCAGGAAGAAG. Pseudoviruses were only produced from sequences containing no ambiguities. For patient-derived sequences, env/rev cassettes were amplified from the first-round SGS product using primers env1Atopo and Rev19 5′-ACTTTTTGACCACTTGCCACCCAT. CMV promoter and env/rev overlap PCR was performed using primers CMVenv 5′-AGTAATCAATTACGGGGTCATTAGTTCAT and Rev19. Mouse-derived sequences were amplified using the Platinum Taq High Fidelity Polymerase (Thermo Fisher), patient-derived sequences using the Phusion Hot Start Flex Polymerase (New England Biolabs).
Neutralization Assays
Neutralization assays were performed as previously described. In brief, pseudoviruses and dilution series of antibodies or purified IgG were mixed and co-incubated at 37°C for 1 h, followed by the addition of TZM-bl cells at a final concentration of 104 cells per well on a 96-well plate in 250 μl medium supplemented with DEAE-dextran at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml. Following a 2-day incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2, 150 μl of culture supernatant was removed and 100 μl luciferase assay reagent was added. After a 2 min incubation, 150 μl of lysate was transferred to a black microtiter assay plate and luminescence was determined using a luminometer. After subtracting background relative luminescence units (RLUs) of non-infected TZM-bl cells, 50% and 80% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s and IC80s) were determined as the antibody/IgG concentrations resulting in a 50%/80% RLU reduction compared to untreated virus control wells. Murine leukemia virus (MuLV)-pseudotyped virus was used to determine unspecific activity. Initial screening of isolated antibody clonal members was performed using a single dilution series per antibody. Antibodies or purified serum IgG in all further neutralization assays were tested in duplicates. For screening assays, assays against culture-derived viruses, assays of pseudovirus mutant variants, and assays of IDC561-derived pseudoviruses, bioluminescence was determined after adding a luciferin/lysis-buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mM ATP, 0.5 mM Coenzyme A, 17 mM IGEPAL (all Sigma-Aldrich), and 1 mM D-Luciferin (GoldBio) in Tris-HCL). For assays against the 119-pseudovirus panel, the 100-pseudovirus clade C panel, and the f61 panel, bioluminescence was determined after adding Bright-Glo reagent (Promega).
Neutralization Fingerprinting Panel-Based Antibody Epitope Prediction
Computational epitope prediction of serum IgG neutralizing activity was conducted as previously described. In brief, neutralizing serum IgG activity was determined against the 20 pseudoviruses included in the f61 fingerprinting panel by a TZM-bl cell neutralization assay as described above. The determined IgG neutralization fingerprint is compared to the fingerprint of 10 bNAbs picked as reference for their specific epitope, and the prevalence of these reference antibody epitope specificities is computationally predicted and assigned a delineation score between 0 (low) and 1 (high).
HIV-1 Envelope Protein Production and Purification
YU2gp120, YU2gp140 (foldon trimer), and BaLgp140 (foldon trimer) were produced in 293-6E cells after transfection with polyethylenimine. Proteins were purified from culture supernatants using Ni-NTA Agarose beads (Macherey-Nagel) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −80°C until further use after buffer exchange to PBS. eOD-GT8 was produced as previously described. 93THO527 was produced in 293-6E cells in the presence of kifunensine at a concentration of 1 mg/l.
HIV-1 Env ELISAs
High-binding ELISA plates (Corning) were coated with HIV-1 Env antigens at 2 μg/ml in PBS overnight at 4°C. Wells were blocked with 3% BSA (Sigma Aldrich) in PBS for 60 min at 37°C. HIV-1 antibodies were diluted in PBS and incubated for 60 min at RT, followed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-human IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) diluted 1:1,000 in 3% BSA in PBS for 60 min at room temperature (RT). Absorbance was determined on a microplate reader (Tecan) after addition of ABTS solution (Thermo Fisher). Plates were washed with 0.05% Tween 20 (Carl Roth) in PBS between each step.
Competition ELISAs
Antibodies of interest were biotinylated using the EZ Link Sulfo NHS Biotin and Labeling Kit (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by a buffer exchange to PBS using Amicon 10 kDa centrifugation filter membranes (Millipore). High-binding ELISA plates (Corning) were coated with anti-6x His tag antibody (Abcam) at 2 μg/ml overnight at 4°C. Wells were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 60 min at 37°C, and incubated with BG505SOSIP.664-His at 2 μg/ml in PBS for 60 min at 37°C. Competing antibodies were incubated in a 1:3 dilution series starting at a concentration of 32 μg/ml in PBS for 60 min at RT. Biotinylated antibodies of interest were diluted to 0.5 μg/ml in 3% BSA in PBS and incubated for 60 min at RT, followed by peroxidase-streptavidin (Jackson ImmunoResearch) diluted 1:5,000 in 1% BSA/0.05%Tween 20 in PBS. Absorbance at 415 nm was determined on a microplate reader (Tecan) after addition of ABTS solution (Thermo Fisher). Plates were washed with 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS between each step.
Generation of HIV-1YU2 and HIV-1BG505 Pseudovirus Mutants
Point mutations were introduced into HIV-1YU2 and HIV-1BG505 envelope expression plasmids using either the QuikChange II XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent) or the Q5 Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (New England Biolabs). Pseudoviruses were produced as described above.
Recombinant HIV-1 Production
Replication-competent recombinant HIV-1 (YU2 env in NL4-3 backbone) was produced by transfection of HEK293T cells using FuGENE 6 Transfection Reagent (Promega). Harvested viral supernatants were stored at −80°C to −150°C.
HIV-1-Infected Humanized Mice and Viral Load Measurements
Humanized NRG mice were challenged with replication-competent HIV-1 intraperitoneally. HIV-1-infected mice were treated using 0.22 μm-filtered monoclonal antibodies diluted in PBS, starting 25–26 days after viral challenge. Antibodies were injected subcutaneously. Following a 1-mg loading dose per antibody, doses of 0.5 mg per antibody were injected every 3-4 days. Plasma RNA was extracted from EDTA plasma samples using the MinElute Virus Mini Spin Kit (QIAGEN), including an on-column DNase I (QIAGEN) digestion step. Viral loads were determined by quantitative real-time PCR using pol-specific primers 5′-TAATGGCAGCAATTTCACCA and 5′-GAATGCCAAATTCCTGCTTGA, and 5′-/56-FAM/CCCACCAACARGCRGCCTTAACTG/ZenDQ/ as probe, as previously described. qPCR was performed on a LightCycler 480 II (Roche) using the Taqman RNA-to-Ct 1-Step-Kit (Thermo Fisher). An HIV-1YU2 standard produced by infection of SupT1-R5 cells was included for every PCR run, and HIV-1 copy number of the standard was determined using the quantitative cobas 6800 HIV-1 kit (Roche). The limit of accuracy of the qPCR was determined as 384 copies/ml. Log10 changes for viral loads < 384 copies/ml were calculated by assigning a copy number of 383 copies/ml.
Humanized Mouse Plasma RNA-Derived Single Genome Sequencing
Single genome sequencing has been described previously. Plasma RNA was extracted using the MinElute Virus Spin Kit (QIAGEN), including a DNase I (QIAGEN) digestion step. cDNA was generated from plasma RNA using the antisense primer YB383 5′-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTRAAGCAC and Superscript IV (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, followed by incubation with 0.25 U/μl RNase H (Thermo Fisher) at 37°C for 20 min. Env cDNA was subsequently amplified by nested PCR at dilutions that yield < 30% positive PCR reactions so that > 80% of positive reactions would be amplified from a single virion (based on Poisson distribution). First-round PCR was conducted using primers YB383 5′-TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTRAAGCAC and YB50 5′-GGCTTAGGCATCTCCTATGGCAGGAAGAA, and run at 94°C for 2 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 4 min; and 72°C for 15 min. 1 μL of first-round PCR product was used as template for the second-round PCR that was conducted using primers YB49 5′-TAGAAAGAGCAGAAGACAGTGGCAATGA and YB52 5′-GGTGTGTAGTTCTGCCAATCAGGGAAGWAGCCTTGTG, and run at 94°C for 2 min; 45 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 4 min; and 72°C for 15 min. PCR was performed using the Platinum Taq Green Hot Start DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher) or Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs).
Illumina Dye Sequencing of Humanized Mouse SGS-Derived env Amplicons
Libraries of purified PCR products were prepared for Illumina dye sequencing as described before with modifications. In brief, PCR products were cleaved by tagmentation using the Nextera DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina). Indices (Nextera Index Kit, Illumina) were added by limited cycle PCR using the KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Roche), followed by adaptor addition (P1, 5′-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGA; P2, 5′-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGA) by limited cycle PCR using the KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix. PCR products were purified using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter), pooled, and sequenced using the MiSeq 300-cycle Nano Kit v2 (Illumina) spiked with approximately 10% PhiX. Paired-end reads were assembled as previously described. For further analyses, a consensus sequence was generated and nucleotides with < 75% identity across reads were defined as ambiguities. Only full-length envelope sequences with high base call quality, less than 10 ambiguities, and no early stop-codons (unless due to ambiguities) were analyzed. Otherwise acceptable sequences showing ambiguities resulting in stop-codons or a frameshift were corrected manually.
Human Plasma RNA-Derived Single Genome Sequencing
Plasma RNA was extracted using the MinElute Virus Spin Kit (QIAGEN), including a DNase I (QIAGEN) digestion step. cDNA was generated using the antisense primer envB3out 5′-TTGCTACTTGTGATTGCTCCATGT and SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher), followed by an RNase H digest (Thermo Fisher). Env cDNA was subsequently amplified as described previously with modifications. PCR was performed using the Phusion Hot Start Flex DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs). First-round PCR was run at 98°C for 45 s; 35 cycles of 98°C for 15 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 4 min; and 72°C for 15 min. 1 μL of first-round PCR product was used as template for the second-round PCR which was run at 98°C for 45 s; 45 cycles of 98°C for 15 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 4 min; and 72°C for 15 min. Purified PCR products were sequenced using Sanger sequencing and analyzed using Geneious software (Geneious).
Bulk Viral Outgrowth Cultures
CD4+ T cells were isolated from PBMCs of HIV-1-infected individuals using the CD4+ T cell isolation MACS kit (Miltenyi Biotec) and stimulated by co-culture with irradiated (50 Gy) healthy donor PBMCs in T cell medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 300 mg/l L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher), 10% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher)) in the presence of 1 μg/ml PHA-M (Sigma-Aldrich) and 100 U/ml interleukin-2 (IL-2) (Miltenyi Biotec). One day later, medium was changed to T cell medium supplemented with 100 U/ml IL-2 and 5 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich). In addition, healthy donor PBMCs were added that had been stimulated for two days in T cell medium supplemented with 1 μg/ml PHA-M and 100 U/ml IL-2. Before addition, donor PBMCs were depleted of CD8+ T cells using CD8 MACS microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Additional CD8+ T cell-depleted donor PBMCs were added weekly. Culture supernatants were monitored for p24 production using the Architect HIV Ag/Ab combo assay (Abbott), and p24-positive culture supernatants were stored at −80°C to −150°C after harvesting.
In vivo Antibody Pharmacokinetic Analysis
NOD.Cg-Rag1tm1mom Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ mice (The Jackson Laboratory) aged 33-42 weeks were intravenously injected (tail vein) with 0.5 mg of purified antibody in PBS. Total serum concentrations of human IgG were determined by ELISA as previously described with minor modifications. In brief, high-binding ELISA plates (Corning) were coated with anti-human IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) at a concentration of 2.5 μg/ml overnight at RT. Subsequently, wells were blocked with blocking buffer (2% BSA (Carl Roth), 1 μM EDTA (Thermo Fisher), and 0.1% Tween 20 (Carl Roth) in PBS). To generate a standard curve, human IgG1 kappa purified from myeloma plasma (Sigma-Aldrich) was diluted in PBS. Serial dilutions of the IgG standard (in duplicates) and serum samples in PBS were incubated for 90 min at RT, followed by HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) diluted 1:1,000 in blocking buffer for 90 min at RT. Following the addition of ABTS (Thermo Fisher), optical density at 415 nm was determined using a microplate reader (Tecan). Plates were washed with 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS between each step. Serum samples obtained before the antibody injection confirmed baseline absence of human serum IgG.
For determination of bNAb-levels following treatment interruption in HIV-1-infected humanized mice, high-binding ELISA plates (Corning) were coated overnight with BG505SOSIP.664 at a concentration of 2 μg/ml at 4°C. Subsequently, wells were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 5 h at RT. Plasma samples were inactivated in 1% Triton X-100 (Carl Roth) for 1 h at RT. Triton X-100-treated 1-18 diluted in PBS was used as standard in duplicates. Serial dilutions of plasma samples in PBS and standard were incubated for 90 min at RT, followed by HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) diluted 1:2,000 in 3% BSA in PBS for 90 min at RT. Following the addition of ABTS (Thermo Fisher), optical density at 415 nm was determined using a microplate reader (Tecan). Plates were washed with 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS between each step.
HEp-2 Cell Assay
HEp-2 cell autoreactivity analysis was performed using the NOVA Lite Hep-2 ANA Kit (Inova Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions using monoclonal antibodies at a concentration of 100 μg/ml in PBS. Images were acquired using a DMI 6000 B fluorescence microscope (Leica) with 3 s exposure at 100% intensity and gain 10.
Unbiased B Cell Repertoire Analyses
B cells were isolated from PBMCs using CD19 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and stained with DAPI (Thermo Fisher), CD20-AF 700, IgG-APC, IgD-Pe-Cy7, IgM-FITC, and CD27-PE (all BD Biosciences) for 30 min on ice. 200,000 CD20+IgG+IgM-IgD-CD27- B cells were sorted into FBS (Sigma-Aldrich) using a BD FACSAria Fusion, and RNA of sorted B cells was isolated with the RNeasy Micro Kit (QIAGEN). cDNA was generated by template-switch reverse transcription according to the SMARTer RACE 5′/3′ manual using the SMARTScribe Reverse Transcriptase (Takara) with a template-switch oligo including an 18-nucleotide unique molecular identifier. Heavy-chain variable regions were amplified with an IgG-specific nested PCR and amplicons were used for library preparation and MiSeq 2x300 bp sequencing (Illumina). Raw NGS reads were pre-processed and assembled to final sequences as previously described.
Mutational Antigenic Profiling
Mutational antigenic profiling has been previously described. Briefly, 5x105 infectious units of two independently generated HIV-1BG505 mutant virus libraries were neutralized with both 4 μg/ml or 8 μg/ml of 1-18 for one hour. Neutralized libraries were then used to infect 1x106 SupT1.CCR5 cells in R10 (RPMI (GE Life Sciences) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 100 U/ml of penicillin and streptomycin) containing 100 μg/ml DEAE-dextran. Three hours post infection, the cells were resuspended in 1 mL R10. At twelve hours post infection, the non-integrated viral cDNA was isolated from cells via a miniprep. Each mutant virus library was also subjected to a mock selection, and four 10-fold serial dilutions of each mutant virus library were infected into 1x106 cells to serve as an infectivity standard curve from which the overall fraction of the library that survived antibody neutralization was quantified using qPCR. Viral cDNA from antibody- and mock-selected samples was then sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq using the previously described barcoded subamplicon sequencing approach. Details on the analysis of the resulting data are provided in the Quantification and Statistical Analysis and Data and Code Availability subsections below.
Protein Expression and Purification for Cryo-EM Structures
1-18 IgG was expressed by transient transfection in Expi293 cells (Thermo Fisher) and purified from transfected cell supernatants using a HiTrap MabSelect Protein A column (GE Life Sciences). Fab fragments were isolated as described after papain cleavage of 1-18 IgG, removal of Fc by protein A chromatography, and then purification by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) on a Superdex-200 Increase 10/300 column (GE Life Sciences) equilibrated with TBS (20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl). 1-55 Fab was expressed as a light-chain C-terminal His6-tagged Fab by transient transfection in 293-6E cells (National Research Council of Canada) and purified from supernatants using Ni2+-NTA affinity chromatography (GE Life Sciences) followed by SEC purification with a Superdex-200 Increase 10/300 column equilibrated with TBS. All Fabs were stored at 4°C.
BG505SOSIP.664 trimer was stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (kind gift of J.P. Moore and A. Cupo) as described and purified from cell culture supernatant over a 2G12 immunoaffinity column followed by SEC purification on a Superdex-200 16/60 column (GE Life Sciences) equilibrated with TBS. RC1SOSIP.664 was expressed by transient transfection in 293-6E cells and purified as described. Individual SEC fractions of each SOSIP trimer were stored at 4°C.
Cryo-EM Sample Preparation
1-18 or 1-55 Fab and 10-1074 Fab were incubated with BG505SOSIP.664 or RC1 in a 3:3:1 molar ratio per protomer overnight at room temperature and then purified by SEC on a Superdex-200 Increase 10/300 column. Fab–Env complexes were concentrated to 2.2 mg/ml (1-18 complex) or 0.75 mg/mL (1-55 complex) in TBS, and 3 μL was added to a Quantifoil grid (R2/2 Cu 400 mesh for the 1-18 complex and R1.2/1.3 Cu 300 mesh for 1-55 complex; Electron Microscopy Services) that had been freshly glow-discharged using a PELCO easiGLOW (Ted Pella). Samples were vitrified in 100% liquid ethane using a Mark IV Vitrobot (Thermo Fisher) after blotting for 3-3.5 s with Whatman No. 1 filter paper at 22°C and 100% humidity.
Cryo-EM Data Collection and Processing
For the 1-18–BG505–10-1074 complex, micrographs were collected on a Titan Krios transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher) operating at 300 kV using EPU automated software (Thermo Fisher). Movies were obtained on a Gatan K2 Summit direct electron detector operating in counting mode at a nominal magnification of 130,000x (1.057 Å/pixel calibrated) using a defocus range of −1 to −2.6 μm. Movies were collected with an 8 s exposure time with a rate of 8 e-/pix/s, which resulted in a total dose of ~60 e-/Å2 over 40 fractions. Movies were motion corrected including dose-weighting using Motioncor2 within Relion-3. The non-dose-weighted images were used for CTF estimation using Gctf, and micrographs with power spectra that showed poor CTF fits or signs of crystalline ice were discarded. Particles were then picked in a reference-free manner using the Laplacian-of-Gaussian auto-picking function in Relion-3. A total of 352,598 particles were extracted, binned 4x4 (4.23 Å/pixel), and subjected to reference-free 2D classification in Relion-3. Particles corresponding to good classes were re-extracted and un-binned (1.057 Å/pixel). An ab initio volume was generated in cryoSPARC from micrographs that were collected from the same grid in a Talos Arctica that was used as an initial model for homogeneous 3D-refinement in Relion 3 (assuming C1 symmetry). Particles were then subjected to 3D classification (C1 symmetry), and classes with low-resolution features were removed. Selected classes that appeared 3-fold symmetric were thus subjected to homogeneous 3D refinement assuming C3 symmetry with a soft mask applied that did not include the Fab CHCL domains. Per-particle motion correction and CTF refinement were performed in Relion-3, followed by a final homogeneous 3D refinement. A masked post-processed volume of 230,924 particles resulted in a gold-standard FSC (GSFSC) calculation of 2.5 Å.
For the 1-55–RC1–10-1074 complex, data collection on a Thermo Fisher 200 kV Talos Arctica cryo-electron microscope equipped with a Falcon 3EC camera, and 10-1074 interactions with RC1 were previously described. For analysis of the 1-55–RC1 interaction, we reprocessed the data using Relion-3, following a similar procedure as described above for the 1-18–BG505–10-1074 complex. Compared to the original reconstruction, per-particle motion correction and CTF refinement were done in Relion-3, followed by a final homogeneous 3D refinement. A masked post-processed volume of 110,126 particles resulted in a GSFSC calculation of 3.9 Å.
Structure Modeling and Refinement
Initial coordinates were generated by docking individual chains from reference structures into cryo-EM density using UCSF Chimera. The following PDB coordinates were used: gp120: 5T3Z; gp41: 6MTJ; 10-1074: 5T3Z; 1-18 and 1-55: 4RWY. These initial models were then refined into cryo-EM maps using one round of rigid body refinement followed by real space refinement. Sequence-updated models were built manually in Coot and then refined using iterative rounds of refinement in Coot and Phenix. Glycans were modeled at PNGSs in Coot using ‘blurred’ maps processed with a variety of B-factors. Water molecules were added to the 1-18–BG505–10-1074 model based on local density and distance to hydrogen bonding partners. Validation of model coordinates was performed using MolProbity and is reported in Table S6.
Structural Analyses
Structural figures were made using PyMOL (Version 1.8.2.1 Schrodinger, LLC) or UCSF Chimera. Electrostatic calculations were done using the APBS and PDB2PQR servers. Buried surface areas (BSAs) were calculated using the PDBePISA server. Local resolution maps were calculated using the Local Res program embedded in Relion-3.
Quantification and Statistical Analysis
The mutational antigenic profiling data were analyzed with dms_tools2 version 2.5.1 (https://jbloomlab.github.io/dms_tools2/; ). The fraction surviving and excess fraction surviving statistics have been previously described and are documented at https://jbloomlab.github.io/dms_tools2/fracsurvive.html. Sequencing wild-type DNA plasmid served as the error control during the calculation of the fraction surviving. The HIV Antibody Database was used for the calculation of Env conservation in 1-18 contact residues and for the analysis of neutralization panel data. Clade B reference sequences were obtained through the Los Alamos National Laboratory HIV Database (Filtered Web Alignment, https://www.hiv.lanl.gov/). Median germline nucleotide identity and CDRH3 lengths of HIV-1 Env-reactive and total IgG+ B cells of IDC561 were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test in Python 3 using the “stats” module in the “scipy” package. For the correlation of the neutralizing activity of 1-18 and serum IgG of IDC561, spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated in Prism (GraphPad). The neutralizing activity of 1-18 and 1-18Δins was compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test in Prism (GraphPad).
Data and Code Availability
Heavy and light chain sequences of tested monoclonal antibodies have been deposited at GenBank (accession numbers MN867951 - MN868062). SGS-derived HIV-1 env obtained from HIV-1YU2-infected humanized mice and from individual IDC561 have been deposited at GenBank (accession numbers MN870987 - MN871327 and MN871328 - MN871333, respectively). Density maps and atomic coordinates for the 1-18–BG505–10-1074 and 1-55–RC1–10-1074 complexes were deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) and Protein Data Bank (PDB) with accession numbers EMD-20739 and PDB 6UDJ (1-18 complex) and EMD-20740 and PDB 6UDK (1-55 complex). The entire mutational antigenic profiling analysis is available at https://github.com/jbloomlab/MAP_118, and the accompanying Illumina sequencing data is on the NCBI SRA with accession numbers SRX6752366 - SRX6752371.
References 126
- 1.
- 2.
Anderson J.P., Rodrigo A.G., Learn G.H., Madan A., Delahunty C., Coon M., Girard M., Osmanov S., Hood L., Mullins J.I. Testing the hypothesis of a recombinant origin of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype E. J. Virol. 2000;74:10752-10765.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.74.22.10752-10765.2000
- 3.
Balazs A.B., Chen J., Hong C.M., Rao D.S., Yang L., Baltimore D. Antibody-based protection against HIV infection by vectored immunoprophylaxis. Nature. 2011;481:81-84.
Not in our library10.1038/nature10660
- 4.
Bar K.J., Sneller M.C., Harrison L.J., Justement J.S., Overton E.T., Petrone M.E., Salantes D.B., Seamon C.A., Scheinfeld B., Kwan R.W. Effect of HIV Antibody VRC01 on Viral Rebound after Treatment Interruption. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:2037-2050.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1608243
- 5.
Bar-On Y., Gruell H., Schoofs T., Pai J.A., Nogueira L., Butler A.L., Millard K., Lehmann C., Suárez I., Oliveira T.Y. Safety and antiviral activity of combination HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies in viremic individuals. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1701-1707.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-018-0186-4
- 6.
Barouch D.H., Whitney J.B., Moldt B., Klein F., Oliveira T.Y., Liu J., Stephenson K.E., Chang H.W., Shekhar K., Gupta S. Therapeutic efficacy of potent neutralizing HIV-1-specific monoclonal antibodies in SHIV-infected rhesus monkeys. Nature. 2013;503:224-228.
Not in our library10.1038/nature12744
- 7.
- 8.
Bonsignori M., Zhou T., Sheng Z., Chen L., Gao F., Joyce M.G., Ozorowski G., Chuang G.Y., Schramm C.A., Wiehe K., NISC Comparative Sequencing Program. Maturation Pathway from Germline to Broad HIV-1 Neutralizer of a CD4-Mimic Antibody. Cell. 2016;165:449-463.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.022
- 9.
Caskey M., Klein F., Lorenzi J.C., Seaman M.S., West A.P., Buckley N., Kremer G., Nogueira L., Braunschweig M., Scheid J.F. Viraemia suppressed in HIV-1-infected humans by broadly neutralizing antibody 3BNC117. Nature. 2015;522:487-491.
Not in our library10.1038/nature14411
- 10.
Caskey M., Schoofs T., Gruell H., Settler A., Karagounis T., Kreider E.F., Murrell B., Pfeifer N., Nogueira L., Oliveira T.Y. Antibody 10-1074 suppresses viremia in HIV-1-infected individuals. Nat. Med. 2017;23:185-191.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.4268
- 11.
Caskey M., Klein F., Nussenzweig M.C. Broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies in the clinic. Nat. Med. 2019;25:547-553.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-019-0412-8
- 12.
- 13.
Chuang G.Y., Zhou J., Acharya P., Rawi R., Shen C.H., Sheng Z., Zhang B., Zhou T., Bailer R.T., Dandey V.P. Structural Survey of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the HIV-1 Env Trimer Delineates Epitope Categories and Characteristics of Recognition. Structure. 2019;27:196-206.e6.
Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2018.10.007
- 14.
Chung N.P., Matthews K., Kim H.J., Ketas T.J., Golabek M., de Los Reyes K., Korzun J., Yasmeen A., Sanders R.W., Klasse P.J. Stable 293 T and CHO cell lines expressing cleaved, stable HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimers for structural and vaccine studies. Retrovirology. 2014;11:33.
Not in our library10.1186/1742-4690-11-33
- 15.
Cohen Y.Z., Lorenzi J.C.C., Krassnig L., Barton J.P., Burke L., Pai J., Lu C.L., Mendoza P., Oliveira T.Y., Sleckman C. Relationship between latent and rebound viruses in a clinical trial of anti-HIV-1 antibody 3BNC117. J. Exp. Med. 2018;215:2311-2324.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20180936
- 16.
Cohen Y.Z., Lorenzi J.C.C., Seaman M.S., Nogueira L., Schoofs T., Krassnig L., Butler A., Millard K., Fitzsimons T., Daniell X. Neutralizing Activity of Broadly Neutralizing Anti-HIV-1 Antibodies against Clade B Clinical Isolates Produced in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. J. Virol. 2018;92:e01883-17.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01883-17
- 17.
Crowell T.A., Colby D.J., Pinyakorn S., Sacdalan C., Pagliuzza A., Intasan J., Benjapornpong K., Tangnaree K., Chomchey N., Kroon E., RV397 Study Group. Safety and efficacy of VRC01 broadly neutralising antibodies in adults with acutely treated HIV (RV397): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2019;6:e297-e306.
Not in our library10.1016/s2352-3018(19)30053-0
- 18.
de Taeye S.W., Ozorowski G., Torrents de la Peña A., Guttman M., Julien J.P., van den Kerkhof T.L., Burger J.A., Pritchard L.K., Pugach P., Yasmeen A. Immunogenicity of Stabilized HIV-1 Envelope Trimers with Reduced Exposure of Non-neutralizing Epitopes. Cell. 2015;163:1702-1715.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.056
- 19.
deCamp A., Hraber P., Bailer R.T., Seaman M.S., Ochsenbauer C., Kappes J., Gottardo R., Edlefsen P., Self S., Tang H. Global panel of HIV-1 Env reference strains for standardized assessments of vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies. J. Virol. 2014;88:2489-2507.
Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02853-13
- 20.
Didigu C.A., Wilen C.B., Wang J., Duong J., Secreto A.J., Danet-Desnoyers G.A., Riley J.L., Gregory P.D., June C.H., Holmes M.C., Doms R.W. Simultaneous zinc-finger nuclease editing of the HIV coreceptors ccr5 and cxcr4 protects CD4+ T cells from HIV-1 infection. Blood. 2014;123:61-69.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2013-08-521229
- 21.
Dingens A.S., Haddox H.K., Overbaugh J., Bloom J.D. Comprehensive Mapping of HIV-1 Escape from a Broadly Neutralizing Antibody. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21:777-787.e4.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.003
- 22.
Dingens A.S., Arenz D., Weight H., Overbaugh J., Bloom J.D. An Antigenic Atlas of HIV-1 Escape from Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies Distinguishes Functional and Structural Epitopes. Immunity. 2019;50:520-532.e3.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.017
- 23.
Diskin R., Scheid J.F., Marcovecchio P.M., West A.P., Klein F., Gao H., Gnanapragasam P.N., Abadir A., Seaman M.S., Nussenzweig M.C., Bjorkman P.J. Increasing the potency and breadth of an HIV antibody by using structure-based rational design. Science. 2011;334:1289-1293.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1213782
- 24.
Diskin R., Klein F., Horwitz J.A., Halper-Stromberg A., Sather D.N., Marcovecchio P.M., Lee T., West A.P., Gao H., Seaman M.S. Restricting HIV-1 pathways for escape using rationally designed anti-HIV-1 antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 2013;210:1235-1249.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20130221
- 25.
Doria-Rose N.A., Altae-Tran H.R., Roark R.S., Schmidt S.D., Sutton M.S., Louder M.K., Chuang G.Y., Bailer R.T., Cortez V., Kong R. Mapping Polyclonal HIV-1 Antibody Responses via Next-Generation Neutralization Fingerprinting. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006148.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.ppat.1006148
- 26.
Dosenovic P., Pettersson A.K., Wall A., Thientosapol E.S., Feng J., Weidle C., Bhullar K., Kara E.E., Hartweger H., Pai J.A. Anti-idiotypic antibodies elicit anti-HIV-1-specific B cell responses. J. Exp. Med. 2019;216:2316-2330.
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20190446
- 27.
- 28.
Ehrhardt S.A., Zehner M., Krähling V., Cohen-Dvashi H., Kreer C., Elad N., Gruell H., Ercanoglu M.S., Schommers P., Gieselmann L. Polyclonal and convergent antibody response to Ebola virus vaccine rVSV-ZEBOV. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1589-1600.
Not in our library10.1038/s41591-019-0602-4
- 29.
- 30.
Escolano A., Gristick H.B., Abernathy M.E., Merkenschlager J., Gautam R., Oliveira T.Y., Pai J., West A.P., Barnes C.O., Cohen A.A. Immunization expands B cells specific to HIV-1 V3 glycan in mice and macaques. Nature. 2019;570:468-473.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1250-z
- 31.
- 32.
Gama L., Koup R.A. New-Generation High-Potency and Designer Antibodies: Role in HIV-1 Treatment. Annu. Rev. Med. 2018;69:409-419.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-med-061016-041032
- 33.
Gao F., Bonsignori M., Liao H.X., Kumar A., Xia S.M., Lu X., Cai F., Hwang K.K., Song H., Zhou T. Cooperation of B cell lineages in induction of HIV-1-broadly neutralizing antibodies. Cell. 2014;158:481-491.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.022
- 34.
- 35.
Gaudinski M.R., Houser K.V., Doria-Rose N.A., Chen G.L., Rothwell R.S.S., Berkowitz N., Costner P., Holman L.A., Gordon I.J., Hendel C.S., VRC 605 study team. Safety and pharmacokinetics of broadly neutralising human monoclonal antibody VRC07-523LS in healthy adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation clinical trial. Lancet HIV. 2019;6:e667-e679.
Not in our library10.1016/s2352-3018(19)30181-x
- 36.
Gautam R., Nishimura Y., Pegu A., Nason M.C., Klein F., Gazumyan A., Golijanin J., Buckler-White A., Sadjadpour R., Wang K. A single injection of anti-HIV-1 antibodies protects against repeated SHIV challenges. Nature. 2016;533:105-109.
Not in our library10.1038/nature17677
- 37.
Goddard T.D., Huang C.C., Ferrin T.E. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. J. Struct. Biol. 2007;157:281-287.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2006.06.010
- 38.
Gruell H., Klein F. Progress in HIV-1 antibody research using humanized mice. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS. 2017;12:285-293.
Not in our library10.1097/coh.0000000000000368
- 39.
Gruell H., Klein F. Antibody-mediated prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection. Retrovirology. 2018;15:73.
Not in our library10.1186/s12977-018-0455-9
- 40.
Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010;59:307-321.
Not in our library10.1093/sysbio/syq010
Cited by papers we hold 1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.