The Cohesin Ring Uses Its Hinge to Organize DNA Using Non-topological as well as Topological Mechanisms

Abstract

As predicted by the notion that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by entrapment of sister DNAs inside cohesin rings, there is perfect correlation between co-entrapment of circular minichromosomes and sister chromatid cohesion. In most cells where cohesin loads without conferring cohesion, it does so by entrapment of individual DNAs. However, cohesin with a hinge domain whose positively charged lumen is neutralized loads and moves along chromatin despite failing to entrap DNAs. Thus, cohesin engages chromatin in non-topological, as well as topological, manners. Since hinge mutations, but not Smc-kleisin fusions, abolish entrapment, DNAs may enter cohesin rings through hinge opening. Mutation of three highly conserved lysine residues inside the Smc1 moiety of Smc1/3 hinges abolishes all loading without affecting cohesin's recruitment to CEN loading sites or its ability to hydrolyze ATP. We suggest that loading and translocation are mediated by conformational changes in cohesin's hinge driven by cycles of ATP hydrolysis.

References 45

1. 1.

   Arumugam P., Gruber S., Tanaka K., Haering C.H., Mechtler K., Nasmyth K. ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin’s association with chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:1941-1953.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.036

2. 2.

   Aze A., Sannino V., Soffientini P., Bachi A., Costanzo V. Centromeric DNA replication reconstitution reveals DNA loops and ATR checkpoint suppression. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016;18:684-691.

   Not in our library10.1038/ncb3344

3. 3.

   Beckouët F., Srinivasan M., Roig M.B., Chan K.L., Scheinost J.C., Batty P., Hu B., Petela N., Gligoris T., Smith A.C. Releasing activity disengages cohesin’s Smc3/Scc1 interface in a process blocked by acetylation. Mol. Cell. 2016;61:563-574.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.026

4. 4.

   Bürmann F., Shin H.C., Basquin J., Soh Y.M., Giménez-Oya V., Kim Y.G., Oh B.H., Gruber S. An asymmetric SMC-kleisin bridge in prokaryotic condensin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013;20:371-379.

   Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.2488

5. 5.

   Bürmann F., Basfeld A., Vazquez Nunez R., Diebold-Durand M.L., Wilhelm L., Gruber S. Tuned SMC arms drive chromosomal loading of prokaryotic condensin. Mol. Cell. 2017;65:861-872.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.026

6. 6.

   Chan K.L., Gligoris T., Upcher W., Kato Y., Shirahige K., Nasmyth K., Beckouët F. Pds5 promotes and protects cohesin acetylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:13020-13025.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1306900110

7. 7.

   Ciosk R., Shirayama M., Shevchenko A., Tanaka T., Toth A., Shevchenko A., Nasmyth K. Cohesin’s binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell. 2000;5:243-254.

   Not in our library10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80420-7

8. 8.

   Eng T., Guacci V., Koshland D. Interallelic complementation provides functional evidence for cohesin-cohesin interactions on DNA. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2015;26:4224-4235.

   Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e15-06-0331

9. 9.

   Fudenberg G., Imakaev M., Lu C., Goloborodko A., Abdennur N., Mirny L.A. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Rep. 2016;15:2038-2049.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.085

10. 10.

    Giardine B., Riemer C., Hardison R.C., Burhans R., Elnitski L., Shah P., Zhang Y., Blankenberg D., Albert I., Taylor J. Galaxy: A platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res. 2005;15:1451-1455.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.4086505

11. 11.

    Gligoris T.G., Scheinost J.C., Bürmann F., Petela N., Chan K.L., Uluocak P., Beckouët F., Gruber S., Nasmyth K., Löwe J. Closing the cohesin ring: Structure and function of its Smc3-kleisin interface. Science. 2014;346:963-967.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1256917

12. 12.

    Gruber S., Haering C.H., Nasmyth K. Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell. 2003;112:765-777.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00162-4

13. 13.

    Gruber S., Arumugam P., Katou Y., Kuglitsch D., Helmhart W., Shirahige K., Nasmyth K. Evidence that loading of cohesin onto chromosomes involves opening of its SMC hinge. Cell. 2006;127:523-537.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.048

14. 14.

    Guacci V., Hogan E., Koshland D. Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 1994;125:517-530.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.125.3.517

15. 15.

    Haering C.H., Gruber S. SnapShot: SMC Protein Complexes Part I. Cell. 2016;164:326.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.026

16. 16.

    Haering C.H., Schoffnegger D., Nishino T., Helmhart W., Nasmyth K., Löwe J. Structure and stability of cohesin’s Smc1-kleisin interaction. Mol. Cell. 2004;15:951-964.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.030

17. 17.

    Haering C.H., Farcas A.M., Arumugam P., Metson J., Nasmyth K. The cohesin ring concatenates sister DNA molecules. Nature. 2008;454:297-301.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07098

18. 18.

    Hirano T., Kobayashi R., Hirano M. Condensins, chromosome condensation protein complexes containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila Barren protein. Cell. 1997;89:511-521.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80233-0

19. 19.

    Hu B., Itoh T., Mishra A., Katoh Y., Chan K.L., Upcher W., Godlee C., Roig M.B., Shirahige K., Nasmyth K. ATP hydrolysis is required for relocating cohesin from sites occupied by its Scc2/4 loading complex. Curr. Biol. 2011;21:12-24.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.004

20. 20.
    Biological chromodynamics: a general method for measuring protein occupancy across the genome by calibrating ChIP-seq · 2015

    No notice
21. 21.
    Structural Basis for a Safety-Belt Mechanism That Anchors Condensin to Chromosomes · 2017

    No notice
22. 22.

    Kueng S., Hegemann B., Peters B.H., Lipp J.J., Schleiffer A., Mechtler K., Peters J.M. Wapl controls the dynamic association of cohesin with chromatin. Cell. 2006;127:955-967.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.040

23. 23.

    Kurze A., Michie K.A., Dixon S.E., Mishra A., Itoh T., Khalid S., Strmecki L., Shirahige K., Haering C.H., Löwe J., Nasmyth K. A positively charged channel within the Smc1/Smc3 hinge required for sister chromatid cohesion. EMBO J. 2011;30:364-378.

    Not in our library10.1038/emboj.2010.315

24. 24.

    Lafont A.L., Song J., Rankin S. Sororin cooperates with the acetyltransferase Eco2 to ensure DNA replication-dependent sister chromatid cohesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:20364-20369.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1011069107

25. 25.

    Langmead B., Salzberg S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:357-359.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1923

26. 26.

    Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., Marth G., Abecasis G., Durbin R., 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078-2079.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

27. 27.

    Li S., Yue Z., Tanaka T.U. Smc3 deacetylation by Hos1 facilitates efficient dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion during early anaphase. Mol. Cell. 2017;68:605-614.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.009

28. 28.

    Liu Y., Sung S., Kim Y., Li F., Gwon G., Jo A., Kim A.K., Kim T., Song O.K., Lee S.E., Cho Y. ATP-dependent DNA binding, unwinding, and resection by the Mre11/Rad50 complex. EMBO J. 2016;35:743-758.

    Not in our library10.15252/embj.201592462

29. 29.
    DNA Entry into and Exit out of the Cohesin Ring by an Interlocking Gate Mechanism · 2015

    No notice
30. 30.

    Nasmyth K. Disseminating the genome: Joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2001;35:673-745.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.091334

31. 31.

    Nicol J.W., Helt G.A., Blanchard S.G., Raja A., Loraine A.E. The Integrated Genome Browser: Free software for distribution and exploration of genome-scale datasets. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2730-2731.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp472

32. 32.

    Nishiyama T., Ladurner R., Schmitz J., Kreidl E., Schleiffer A., Bhaskara V., Bando M., Shirahige K., Hyman A.A., Mechtler K., Peters J.M. Sororin mediates sister chromatid cohesion by antagonizing Wapl. Cell. 2010;143:737-749.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.031

33. 33.

    Palecek J.J., Gruber S. Kite proteins: A superfamily of SMC/Kleisin partners conserved across bacteria, Archaea, and eukaryotes. Structure. 2015;23:2183-2190.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.str.2015.10.004

34. 34.

    Panizza S., Tanaka T., Hochwagen A., Eisenhaber F., Nasmyth K. Pds5 cooperates with cohesin in maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 2000;10:1557-1564.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00854-x

35. 35.

    Petela N., Gligoris T., Metson J., Lee B., Voulgaris M., Hu B., Kikuchi S., Chapard C., Chen W., Rajendra E. Multiple interactions between Scc1 and Scc2 activate cohesin’s DNA dependent ATPase and replace Pds5 during loading. bioRxiv. 2017.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Sanborn A.L., Rao S.S., Huang S.C., Durand N.C., Huntley M.H., Jewett A.I., Bochkov I.D., Chinnappan D., Cutkosky A., Li J. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E6456-E6465.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1518552112

37. 37.

    Schleiffer A., Kaitna S., Maurer-Stroh S., Glotzer M., Nasmyth K., Eisenhaber F. Kleisins: A superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners. Mol. Cell. 2003;11:571-575.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00108-4

38. 38.

    Shen D., Skibbens R.V. Temperature-dependent regulation of rDNA condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:1118-1127.

    Not in our library10.1080/15384101.2017.1317409

39. 39.

    Takahashi T.S., Yiu P., Chou M.F., Gygi S., Walter J.C. Recruitment of Xenopus Scc2 and cohesin to chromatin requires the pre-replication complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004;6:991-996.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb1177

40. 40.

    Takahashi T.S., Basu A., Bermudez V., Hurwitz J., Walter J.C. Cdc7-Drf1 kinase links chromosome cohesion to the initiation of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1894-1905.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1683308

Cited by papers we hold 4

• Bridging-induced phase separation induced by cohesin SMC protein complexes · 2021
  No notice
• Absolute quantification of cohesin, CTCF and their regulators in human cells · 2019
  No notice
• Scc2 Is a Potent Activator of Cohesin’s ATPase that Promotes Loading by Binding Scc1 without Pds5 · 2018
  No notice
• Emerging Evidence of Chromosome Folding by Loop Extrusion · 2017
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.