No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.
Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Lineage and X Chromosome Dynamics in Human Preimplantation Embryos
Sophie Petropoulos, Daniel Edsgärd, Björn Reinius and 7 more
Cell · 2016 · CC BY
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.009
Abstract
(Cell 165, 1012–1026; May 5, 2016) Several errors occurred during the preparation of the above article analyzing the transcriptomes of single cells from human embryos at embryonic days (E) 3–7 and describing the segregation of prelineage (prelin) cells into trophectoderm (TE), primitive endoderm (PE), and epiblast (EPI) and X chromosome dynamics. We generated additional E3 and E4 cell data during revision that appeared within figures in the published text but were inadvertently omitted from Tables S2, S5, and S7. These tables have now been updated. To reflect the updated Table S7, the number of significantly differentially expressed genes between embryonic time points has also been updated in Figure S4A, as shown below. In Table S1, the subheadings of the mean and standard deviation columns were mislabeled as EPI and PE throughout the spreadsheet, even where the data presented were derived from other lineages. The correct column headings appear in the updated Table S1. In Table S5, we accidently inverted the prefixes “E5” and “E5_prelin” in labels of columns containing mean expression and standard deviation in the three sections with the subheadings “E5_prelinvsE5_EPI”, “E5_prelinvsE5_PE” and “E5_prelinvsE5_TE.” In addition, in sections comparing E5 vs E6 and E6 vs E7 cells in Table S5, we presented the data by lineage first and then time (EPI [E5vsE6, E6vsE7], PE [E5vsE6, E6vsE7], and TE [E5vsE6, E6vsE7]). However, the labels of these columns appeared as time first and then lineage (E5vsE6 [EPI, PE, TE] and E6vsE7 [EPI, PE, TE]), resulting in a mismatch between the label and the data columns. These have now been corrected. None of these changes, which appear in the article online, affect the conclusions of the article. We sincerely regret these mistakes and apologize for any confusion that may have arisen.Figure S4A. Preimplantation Developmental Progression of Lineage-Specific and Sex-Specific Genes, Related to Figure 4 (original)View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Lineage and X Chromosome Dynamics in Human Preimplantation EmbryosPetropoulos et al.CellApril 7, 2016In BriefA comprehensive transcriptional map of human preimplantation development reveals a concurrent establishment of trophectoderm, epiblast, and primitive endoderm lineages and unique features of X chromosome dosage compensation in human. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 21, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
(Cell 165, 1012–1026; May 5, 2016)
Several errors occurred during the preparation of the above article analyzing the transcriptomes of single cells from human embryos at embryonic days (E) 3–7 and describing the segregation of prelineage (prelin) cells into trophectoderm (TE), primitive endoderm (PE), and epiblast (EPI) and X chromosome dynamics.
We generated additional E3 and E4 cell data during revision that appeared within figures in the published text but were inadvertently omitted from Tables S2, S5, and S7. These tables have now been updated. To reflect the updated Table S7, the number of significantly differentially expressed genes between embryonic time points has also been updated in Figure S4A, as shown below.
In Table S1, the subheadings of the mean and standard deviation columns were mislabeled as EPI and PE throughout the spreadsheet, even where the data presented were derived from other lineages. The correct column headings appear in the updated Table S1.
In Table S5, we accidently inverted the prefixes “E5” and “E5_prelin” in labels of columns containing mean expression and standard deviation in the three sections with the subheadings “E5_prelinvsE5_EPI”, “E5_prelinvsE5_PE” and “E5_prelinvsE5_TE.” In addition, in sections comparing E5 vs E6 and E6 vs E7 cells in Table S5, we presented the data by lineage first and then time (EPI [E5vsE6, E6vsE7], PE [E5vsE6, E6vsE7], and TE [E5vsE6, E6vsE7]). However, the labels of these columns appeared as time first and then lineage (E5vsE6 [EPI, PE, TE] and E6vsE7 [EPI, PE, TE]), resulting in a mismatch between the label and the data columns. These have now been corrected.
None of these changes, which appear in the article online, affect the conclusions of the article. We sincerely regret these mistakes and apologize for any confusion that may have arisen.
Cited by papers we hold 9
- Complete human day 14 post-implantation embryo models from naive ES cells · 2023No notice
- Phosphoproteomics identifies a bimodal EPHA2 receptor switch that promotes embryonic stem cell differentiation · 2020Not checked
- Insights into epigenetic patterns in mammalian early embryos · 2020No notice
- Single-cell transcriptomics identifies divergent developmental lineage trajectories during human pituitary development · 2020No notice
- Vascularized human cortical organoids (vOrganoids) model cortical development in vivo · 2020No notice
- scPred: accurate supervised method for cell-type classification from single-cell RNA-seq data · 2019No notice
- X Inactivation and Escape: Epigenetic and Structural Features · 2019No notice
- Skewed X-inactivation is common in the general female population · 2018No notice
- A practical guide to single-cell RNA-sequencing for biomedical research and clinical applications · 2017No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.