Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Morphomechanical Innovation Drives Explosive Seed Dispersal

Hugo Hofhuis, Derek Moulton, Thomas Lessinnes and 12 more

Cell · 2016 · CC BY

doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.002

Abstract

How mechanical and biological processes are coordinated across cells, tissues, and organs to produce complex traits is a key question in biology. Cardamine hirsuta, a relative of Arabidopsis thaliana, uses an explosive mechanism to disperse its seeds. We show that this trait evolved through morphomechanical innovations at different spatial scales. At the organ scale, tension within the fruit wall generates the elastic energy required for explosion. This tension is produced by differential contraction of fruit wall tissues through an active mechanism involving turgor pressure, cell geometry, and wall properties of the epidermis. Explosive release of this tension is controlled at the cellular scale by asymmetric lignin deposition within endocarp b cells—a striking pattern that is strictly associated with explosive pod shatter across the Brassicaceae plant family. By bridging these different scales, we present an integrated mechanism for explosive seed dispersal that links evolutionary novelty with complex trait innovation.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Understanding how morphological novelties evolved is a major goal of biology. Rapid plant movements, such as the “snap” of a Venus fly trap, are striking character gains that have led to trait innovations such as carnivory. However, the majority of fast motions in plants and fungi are adaptations for dispersal. Catapulted pollen or synchronous puffs of fungal spores are evolutionary solutions to the problem drag poses to getting small particles airborne. While the mechanics of these rapid movements are well described, little is known about the cellular basis of such novel phenotypes and how they have evolved.

Although plants are sessile, they can move by swelling, shrinking, or growing; for example, surface stomata open and close and leaves move with a circadian rhythm. These movements are water-driven and are constrained by the timescale of water transport through cells and tissues. To overcome this constraint and generate rapid motion requires a mechanism that stores elastic energy gradually but releases it rapidly. Such physical mechanisms can be diverse and fascinating: for example, the snap-buckling of a Venus flytrap or the cavitation catapult of a fern sporangium, but the biological processes by which they are produced are unknown. A key problem is that rapid movements are relatively rare and model species where the experimental tools for detailed functional studies exist, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, do not exhibit such movements. A fundamental theoretical challenge is that rapid movements are the culmination of activities integrated across different spatial scales, hence a complete understanding requires biomechanical models that link causal events at the cell and tissue levels to the macroscopic organ and plant response. To address these issues, we used experimental and theoretical approaches to analyze explosive seed dispersal in Cardamine hirsuta, a close relative of A. thaliana, commonly described as popping cress for the explosive shatter of its fruit pods. We took advantage of the genetic tractability of C. hirsuta combined with biophysical experiments, high-speed videography, quantitative imaging, and multi-scale mathematical modeling, in order to investigate and fully explain the biological and physical basis of explosive seed dispersal.

Explosive seed dispersal is a rapid movement found in various flowering plants and was likely a key innovation for the invasiveness of species such as C. hirsuta, Impatiens glandulifera, and the dynamite tree, Hura crepitans. Seed launch speeds have been previously calculated using a variety of techniques including advanced high-speed cameras, which were used to record mean speeds ranging from 1–6 ms−1. Seed dispersal occurs via a process called pod shatter in both the explosive fruit of C. hirsuta and the non-explosive fruit of A. thaliana and relies on the precise patterning of fruit tissues. Fruits of these species look very similar, with a fruit wall comprised of two valves that enclose the seeds, attached to the replum. The fruit splits open by dehiscence along a thin line of specialized tissues at the valve margins to allow pod shatter. In A. thaliana, this occurs as the fruit dries out, separating the valves from the replum and exposing the seeds for dispersal. However, in C. hirsuta, explosive pod shatter occurs while the fruit is turgid, not dry. This observation contradicts the established view that drying generates the energy for explosive seed dispersal by causing fruit tissues to deform and suggests that the C. hirsuta fruit uses a previously undescribed mechanism to generate tension actively.

Here, we uncover this mechanism through a comprehensive experimental and theoretical study of explosive seed dispersal in C. hirsuta. By combining analyses at different scales of magnitude, we identify specific cellular features that cause the tissue-level mechanics underpinning explosive dispersal. We demonstrate that tension is actively generated in C. hirsuta fruit by the anisotropic deformation of living cells that sustain turgor pressure. This unusual mechanism relies on a combination of three-dimensional cellular geometry and anisotropic cell wall properties of the fruit epidermis. Moreover, we show that the stored potential energy giving rise to tissue tension is released explosively via coiling of the fruit valves. This coiling mechanism requires the asymmetric localization of lignin in a single cell layer of the valve and represents an evolutionary novelty associated with explosive seed dispersal across the genus Cardamine.

Seed Dispersal Dynamics

To quantify explosive seed dispersal in C. hirsuta at the plant and organ level, we recorded the shatter of fruit pods using high-speed videography, extrapolated the trajectories of launched seeds, and measured the distribution of seeds dispersed around parent plants. During explosive pod shatter the two valves curl back from the fruit pod, initially peeling the seeds off the inner septum and launching them at speeds in excess of 10 ms−1 (Figures 1A–1C; Movie S1). This process is rapid, taking less than 3 ms, and fires the small seeds upon ballistic trajectories to land within a 2-m radius of the parent plant (Figures 1D and 1E). The exploded valves come to rest in a curled configuration of three or four coils (Figure 1C). We identified key properties of the valve associated with explosive pod shatter by comparing the valves of non-explosive A. thaliana and explosive C. hirsuta fruit. Two striking features differentiated these fruit. First, C. hirsuta valves contain more lignin, localized asymmetrically to cell walls on the inner side of the endocarp b layer (Figures 1F and 1G). Lignin is a complex phenylpropanoid polymer that adds stiffness to secondary cell walls, suggesting that this inner valve layer is considerably stiffer in the explosive fruit of C. hirsuta. Second, shallow incisions to the outside of the turgid valve caused wounds that gaped instantly in C. hirsuta but not in A. thaliana (Figures S1A–S1D). This observation implies that, in C. hirsuta, the outer tissue layer is under tension while the valve is flat, prior to explosion.

To examine the mechanical properties of different tissues within the C. hirsuta valve, we performed simple dissections. A valve curves lengthwise both in water (Figure 1H) and in air (Figures 1A–1C) when released from the fruit. However, when we separate the lignified tissue from the rest of the valve, this curvature vanishes (Figures 1I and S1M). Moreover, when we separate the outer valve tissues from the inner lignified layer, the outer layer shortens while the lignified layer does not (Table S1). Based on these findings, we considered the C. hirsuta valve as three mechanical layers: an active soft outer layer, a passive middle layer, and a stiff inner layer. The exocarp (active outer layer) is attached to the inextensible secondary cell wall of the endocarp b (stiff inner layer) through the mesocarp and the non-lignified part of the endocarp b (middle layer), which act as a passive buffer (Figure 1G). Therefore, a shortening of the exocarp, while the stiff endocarp b conserves its length, causes the valve to naturally coil when released from the fruit.

These observations suggest a mathematical model for the whole valve based on three elastic layers, each with a different reference geometry, attached together so that, in the flat state, the outer layer is in tension and the other two are in compression. The elastic energy stored in this trilayer is determined by the deformation of underlying tissues and can be expressed as a function of the curvature along the length of the valve (an explicit energy description is given in Supplemental Experimental Procedures). The parameters required for the model consist of geometric parameters measured in live fruit and fresh sections (Supplemental Experimental Procedures) and material parameters characterizing the stiffness of each layer. The Young’s modulus of lignin is readily available in the literature and characterizes the stiffness of the endocarp b layer. We obtained the tissue-level stiffness of the exocarp and middle layers from extensometer measurements of the valve (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Initially, the trilayered valve is flat, storing elastic energy. Upon dehiscence, the valve is free to coil on itself, transforming elastic potential energy to kinetic energy. We described the dynamics of the coiling using classical mechanics and found that the model closely matched our observations of valve coiling (Figures 1A–1C and 1J; Movie S2; Supplemental Experimental Procedures). We validated the spatio-temporal accuracy of this model by directly comparing model simulations with measured trajectories of distinct points along the valve tracked from high-speed movies of explosive pod shatter (Figure 1K). The striking agreement we observed between model and data confirms that the dynamics of explosive pod shatter are captured correctly and suggests that this tissue-scale model should be predictive of seed dispersal at the plant scale.

To test this hypothesis, we used the model dynamics of a single valve to obtain the ballistic trajectories of seeds explosively dispersed away from the parent plant. Taking from the model the initial velocity of each seed catapulted from the valve and a spatial orientation of the valve on the plant, we computed the motion and probability distribution of multiple seeds through Monte Carlo simulations (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). In high speed movies we observed a transient adhesion between seeds and valve (Figure 1B, arrow), which we modeled via a linear viscoelastic force provided by a pectic cell surface. This means that the force of attachment depends linearly on both time and the distance between seed and valve. When the distance between seed and valve exceeds a critical length, this attachment breaks and the seed is released to follow a ballistic trajectory under the influence of aerodynamic drag. Comparing seed distributions and seed launch angles between theoretical predictions and direct measurements, we found the assumption of viscoelastic adhesion to be the only mechanism consistent with the data (Figure 1E; Supplemental Experimental Procedures). We also found that the distance of dispersed seeds had a plateau in its distribution (Figure 1E), suggesting that this launch mechanism appears tuned to spread seeds over a maximal area, rather than to achieve a maximal distance.

Endocarp b Deletion Mutant Is Non-explosive

To investigate whether the endocarp b layer is strictly required for explosive pod shatter, we took a genetic approach. Having shown that this stiff layer plays a mechanical role in generating valve curvature, we reasoned that an endocarp b deletion mutant should reveal how important this layer is for explosive shatter. This class of mutant had not been previously identified in A. thaliana, so rather than follow a targeted genome editing approach we conducted a mutant screen. We screened a population of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-treated C. hirsuta plants for mutants with less lignified valves. In one such mutant, less lignin2 (lig2), the entire endocarp b cell layer was missing (Figures 2A–2F). We showed that lig2 is a loss-of-function mutant caused by a premature stop codon before the nuclear localization signal in the C. hirsuta ortholog of the DNA-binding protein BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE4 (At5g24630; Figures 2G–2K). LIG2 is expressed in endocarp b cells and throughout the fruit, and the lig2 mutation prevents nuclear accumulation of LIG2, resulting in loss of endocarp b layer integrity through mechanisms that remain to be determined (Figure S2). Importantly, pod shatter in the lig2 mutant was non-explosive (Figure 2D), providing genetic evidence that the endocarp b layer is indeed necessary for explosive pod shatter.

Secondary Cell Wall Geometry Enables Explosive Energy Release

We have shown that the lignified endocarp b layer is required for explosive pod shatter and has a mechanical role in generating valve curvature. However, explosive pod shatter also requires a means of rapid energy release. To identify this mechanism, we investigated the role of the fruit valve geometry and the geometry of the lignified secondary cell walls of the endocarp b layer. During fruit maturation, the growing seeds deform the valve, so that the valve cross-section is not flat but rather is bowed outward (Figures 3A, S3A, and S3B). In order to release valve tension by coiling lengthwise, the valve must first flatten in cross-section (Figure 3A). The same principle is in action in so-called “slap bracelets” (these bracelets are made out of a strip of metal with a curved cross section when the central axis is straight and a flat cross section when the central axis is coiled). For the fruit valve to deform from a curved to a flat cross-section, either the endocarp b layer must widen (Figure 3A, blue) or the exocarp layer must narrow (Figure 3A, red). We hypothesized that the geometry of the endocarp b secondary cell wall provides the key: lignin is deposited with subcellular precision to form three stiff rods connected by very thin hinges (Figures 2B and 2C; Figures S3C and S3D). We observed that these hinged cell walls open during explosion (Figures 3B and 3C), enabling the stiff endocarp b layer to widen passively at a negligible cost of mechanical energy (Figure 3A; Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Therefore, once sufficient tension is established along the length of the valve and the dehiscence zone weakens at the valve margins, this hinge mechanism allows the valve to change freely from a curved to a flat cross-section and release the tension by coiling (Figure 3D).

This mechanism for energy release can be quantified by modeling the energy landscape of the valve from the moment it detaches from the fruit (Figure 3E; Supplemental Experimental Procedures). For this analysis, we identified three valve configurations: the initial state with a curved cross-section, a transitory state with a flattened cross-section, and the final energy minimizing (equilibrium) state that is coiled lengthwise (Figure 3A). The energy in each valve configuration is the sum of the bending and stretching contributions due to the deformation of the three idealized tissue layers shown in Figure 3A. We found that the equilibrium configuration of the detached valve is a coiled structure with three to four coils, which matches well with experimental data for fully hydrated valves (Figures 3E and S3L). We also computed a drop in energy of ∼0.5 mJ from the initial valve configuration to the coiled state (Figure 3E). This energy, converted from elastic potential energy into kinetic energy, is what drives the explosive nature of pod shatter and seed dispersal in C. hirsuta. Our model suggests that the passive opening of the hinged secondary cell wall in the endocarp b layer during cross-sectional flattening of the valve is of fundamental importance in explosive pod shatter. Without hinges, the valve transition from a curved to a flat cross-section would require energy input, which would considerably alter the energy landscape during pod shatter. For example, the same computation using a “boxed” geometry for the lignified endocarp b cell wall results in a much smaller energy difference between the initial and the equilibrium states and fewer coils in the equilibrium state valve (Figures 3A and 3E; Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Notably, this boxed geometry is found in A. thaliana and Brassica crops, plausibly explaining why pod shatter is non-explosive in these related species.

Hinged Secondary Cell Wall Geometry Is an Evolutionary Novelty

To test our hypothesis that the hinged geometry of endocarp b cells provides the key mechanism for explosive energy release, we employed transgenic and phylogenetic analyses. We modified secondary cell wall patterning in endocarp b cells to create a boxed geometry that cannot “open,” and assessed explosive pod shatter. To do this, we expressed the A. thaliana VASCULAR-RELATED NAC-DOMAIN PROTEIN7 (VND7) gene, which induces secondary wall formation, using the promoter of the C. hirsuta NAC SECONDARY WALL THICKENING PROMOTING FACTOR3 (NST3) gene. This transgene initiates lignification of the endocarp b at a similar stage to wild-type and subsequently lignifies two adjacent mesocarp cell layers but not the endocarp a (Figures S3E–S3K). In comparison to wild-type, the secondary wall of endocarp b cells in NST3::VND7 lines was uniformly thickened and lignified, creating a stiff box around each cell (Figures 3G and 3H). This modified geometry prevented explosive pod shatter and dehisced valves formed only one coil, similar to our model predictions (Figures 3E, 3F, and S3L). Therefore, the hinged geometry of the endocarp b secondary cell wall is fundamental to the explosive release of energy stored in the valve.

To test whether the hinged geometry found in the endocarp b secondary cell wall of C. hirsuta may represent a morphomechanical innovation associated with trait evolution, we analyzed this character across a broad sample of species in the Brassicaceae. To our knowledge, Cardamine is the only genus in this large plant family where explosive seed dispersal is found, and we observed a hinged secondary cell wall in the endocarp b layer of all Cardamine species that we sampled with explosive pod shatter (Figure 4). Conversely, we observed a boxed secondary cell wall in the endocarp b layer of a wide sample of species with non-explosive pod shatter (Figures 4 and S4). Together with this phylogenetic association, we have provided genetic evidence that the endocarp b cell layer, and specifically the geometry of its secondary cell wall, is necessary for explosive pod shatter. Additionally, we have provided a model that explicitly describes how this cell wall geometry enables explosive pod shatter. Therefore, we conclude that the hinged geometry of endocarp b secondary cell walls in Cardamine is an evolutionary novelty that allows valves to release elastic potential energy stored in the valve trilayer to drive ballistic seed dispersal.

Turgor-Driven Shrinkage

We have identified the role of the endocarp b secondary cell wall in energy release; however, the other critical component for explosive pod shatter is the build-up of elastic energy in the system. To address this mechanism, we investigated the cellular basis for the differential shortening of the fruit valve that generates tension (Figures 1H and 1I). We measured a 20% reduction in cell length in the outermost exocarp layer between the flat valve, attached to the fruit, and the curled, detached valve (Figure 5A; Table S1). To understand the mechanics of this cell shortening, we challenged a previous proposal that shrinkage in the C. hirsuta valve is caused by passive loss of cell turgor pressure via drying. Under the “drying” hypothesis, detached valves would flatten out in pure water where cell turgor pressure is high due to osmosis. Yet, we observed higher curvature in water than in air, which then flattened out upon transfer to salt solution where the cells lost turgor (Figures S1H–S1J). Moreover, explosive shatter can be prevented by drying fruits with alcohol or freezing them (Figures S1E–S1G). These results show that drying is not the cause of exocarp cell shortening in C. hirsuta and suggest that exocarp shortening is an active process, requiring living cells that can sustain turgor pressure.

Turgor-induced shrinkage is counter-intuitive since turgor pressure drives plant cell expansion. To resolve this apparent contradiction, we compared the three-dimensional shape of exocarp cells at low turgor (1 M salt treatment) and high turgor (pure water). We found that exocarp cells in mature fruit responded to increased turgor by a 53% expansion in volume but a 12% shrinkage in length (along the fruit axis), accompanied by an expansion in depth (40%) and width (18%) (Figures 5B and 5C; Table S1). Therefore, as exocarp cells pump up, they shorten, analogous to artificial air muscles that contract when pressurized. However, while the valve is attached to the fruit, these cells are prevented from contracting because the stiff endocarp b layer is inextensible, so the valve is held flat in a state of tension. In this state, the system is building elastic energy. When the valve is detached from the fruit, exocarp cells are free to relax toward their reference dimensions and hence, in the energy-minimizing state, the valve is coiled.

To understand how contraction in one direction can occur during overall volumetric expansion, we considered the stresses that develop in the cell wall during an increase in turgor and explored which cellular parameters were responsible for this behavior. To approach this problem, we constructed a finite-element model of pressurized cells and used this model to identify the parameters required to mimic the cell deformations measured in response to osmotic treatments (Figures 5C–5F; Supplemental Experimental Procedures). First, we used rectangular boxes made of isotropic material to model typical plant cells, such as exocarp cells in A. thaliana (100 × 20 × 20 μm, length × width × depth). When these cells were inflated with an internal pressure of 0.7 MPa, we found that the cells lengthened, as expected (Figure 5D; Movie S3). However, when we used cellular dimensions for the exocarp of C. hirsuta fruit that are competent to explode (50 × 50 × 20 μm), the cells shortened slightly (Figure 5E; Movie S4). The increased surface area of the relatively shallow cells caused the surface and bottom walls to bulge out, increasing the depth and shortening the length of cells. However, the shortening was negligible and insufficient to reproduce the change in geometry observed in osmotic treatments (Figure 5C; Table S1). Next, we hypothesized that an anisotropic cell wall material, which is stiffer in the longitudinal direction of the fruit, might cause the cells to shorten. Using the same cell template, we implemented anisotropic material properties for the cell wall in our model. We found that a significantly higher Young’s modulus in the longitudinal compared to the transverse direction resulted in 12% shrinkage in length when cells increased in volume by 53%, which matched the deformations of exocarp cells measured during osmotic experiments (Figures 5C and 5F; Table S1; Movie S5). These results suggest that both cell shape and cell wall anisotropy play an important role in turgor-driven shrinkage and predict that changes in cell geometry or wall material properties during fruit development may contribute to explosive pod shatter.

We then tested whether turgor pressure increased in the valve during development, since valve tension requires turgid cells. Although the absolute stiffness measured by cellular force microscopy (CFM) was higher in the exocarp of mature rather than immature C. hirsuta fruits, we investigated whether this could simply be an effect of cell geometry (Figure 5G). This is because larger cells are expected to appear stiffer given the same turgor pressure. We performed finite element simulations of pressurized cells to model the exocarp of immature fruits, for which we assumed an isotropic cell wall material, as well as mature fruits with cell walls stiffer in the longitudinal direction (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). The cellular models could fit both the deformations measured during osmotic treatments and the stiffness data quantified by CFM. Mechanical parameters such as the Young’s moduli (Ewidth and Elength) and turgor pressure extracted from the model fit (Figure 5H) are within the ranges previously reported for plant cells. The value of the Young’s modulus for the stiffer direction (Elength) is approximate, as the simulation is less sensitive to variation of this parameter (Figure 5I). In contrast, the model is very sensitive to variations in turgor pressure (Figure 5I), so the value for this parameter is more precise. Because we were able to fit the data for both immature and mature fruits without invoking any substantial change in turgor pressure as the fruit developed (Figure 5H), we conclude that the increase in apparent stiffness as the fruit matures is due to the changes in cell geometry rather than an increase in turgor pressure. This suggests that tension develops in the valve while the cell turgor pressure remains relatively constant at 0.65–0.7 MPa.

Cellular Mechanics Play a Key Role in Turgor-Driven Shrinkage

A key prediction from the cellular model is that exocarp cell shortening can only occur in anisotropic cells. To test this, we estimated the degree of cell anisotropy that best fit the measurements from CFM and osmotic treatments in finite element simulations. Our results showed that exocarp cell walls became distinctly anisotropic during development, becoming stiffer in length (along the fruit axis) and softer in width directions (Figure 5H). Because plant cell walls are directionally reinforced by stiff cellulose microfibrils, these results predict a significant change in their net alignment in the cell walls of the exocarp layer during fruit development. Cortical microtubules (CMTs) act as tracks at the plasma membrane to guide cellulose deposition. In growing cells, the alignment of CMT arrays predicts the direction of minimal cell expansion, since stiff cellulose microfibrils restrict growth. We observed well-aligned CMT arrays in the exocarp that reoriented from transverse (45°–90°) to longitudinal (0°–30°) before valves were competent to curl (Figures 6A and 6B). We verified a similar reorientation in cellulose microfibril alignment (Figure S5). This reorientation increases longitudinal cell wall stiffness and switches the maximal direction of cell expansion to the width direction, contributing to the change in cell shape from rectangular to square.

To understand whether CMT reorientation and subsequent cell shape change might provide sufficient developmental inputs to cause cell shortening, we analyzed valve tension in situ. Specifically, we analyzed the development of tension in the valve by quantifying the magnitude and principal direction of shrinkage in the exocarp after excision at successive stages of fruit development (Figures 6C–6E, 6I, and S6). In valves that were full-length but not yet competent to curl, maximal tension was aligned across the valve, possibly exerted by expanding seeds (Figures 6C, S3A, S3B, and S6). The tension required to curl is exerted along the length of the valve and increased sharply once exocarp cells began to expand in width, coincident with thickening and lignification of endocarp b secondary cell walls (Figures 6D–6I and S6). In summary, our analysis suggests the following sequence of events: a change in cell wall anisotropy following CMT reorientation, coupled with tension in the direction of the fruit width, causes exocarp cell growth to switch from the length to the width direction. This reorientation drives a change in exocarp cell shape from rectangular to square. Subsequent anisotropic deformation of these cells results in their shortening, causing tension to rapidly establish along the length of the valve. This tension is harnessed to drive curvature by coincident stiffening of the endocarp b layer (Figure 6I).

Valve Extension Experiment Links Multi-scale Models

Our results show that the mechanism of explosive seed dispersal has important features at the organ, tissue, and cellular scales. We have developed a series of models to understand each of these features and how they are connected at different scales. To validate our multiscale approach, we devised a link between a mechanical experiment performed at the organ level with a theoretical model built from organ and tissue levels. We then compared the predictions provided independently by this model and our cell-level model (Figure 7; Supplemental Experimental Procedures).

To measure the force required to extend whole valves, we clamped a curled valve, freshly excised from the fruit, to a high precision extensometer and recorded force-displacement measurements as the clamps were moved apart, flattening the valve (Figures 7A and S7). We recorded five replicates of this experiment. We then used an organ-level model, treating the excised valve as a single elastic beam with intrinsic curvature, to fit the experimental force-displacement curves and extract the bending stiffness of the whole valve (Figure 7A). In our tissue-level model, we used this effective stiffness to compute the Young’s modulus of the exocarp layer (Figure 7B; Supplemental Experimental Procedures). This is an important parameter of our tissue-level model in determining the total energy available for coiling. Therefore, we used the close match that we obtained between the simulated and measured dynamics of valve coiling and seed launch (Figures 1E and 1K) to validate this parameter value. Hence, an additional outcome of this experiment to bridge different modeling scales was an experimentally determined value for the elasticity of the exocarp.

Next, we compared the value for the Young’s modulus of the exocarp layer, derived above, with an independent calculation from our cell-level model. The Young’s modulus was computed in the cell-level model by simulating a stretched file of turgid exocarp cells and measuring the force exerted at the ends of the file (Figure 7B). Parameters in the cell-level model are based on imaging experiments that were performed in water, where the cells are maximally turgid, therefore the force estimated from this model is expected to be slightly higher than that obtained from valve extension experiments, which were performed in air. The computed force acting on the exocarp layer before explosion in the tissue-level model (mean of five experimental replicates = 37 ± 20 mN, max = 75 mN) is in good agreement with the value obtained from the cellular model (61 ± 9 mN), showing that the predictive value of each model is consistent across scales. Note that this force corresponds to an approximate weight of 5 g; four orders of magnitude greater than a C. hirsuta seed, illustrating the considerable force required to disperse small projectiles that are dominated by drag.

Conclusions

Through a combined experimental and theoretical analysis, we have identified cellular innovations for the storage and rapid release of energy that underpin the evolution of explosive seed dispersal in C. hirsuta. Our study demonstrates the strength of combining a genetically tractable system with theoretical models at different spatial scales to obtain an integrated and comprehensive understanding of the developmental and mechanical basis of this rapid plant movement. In particular, we have shown that the mechanical catalyst for explosive energy release is the hinged cell wall of a single fruit layer, which appears to have evolved once in the Brassicaceae and promoted ballistic seed dispersal. A specific prediction from our work is that genes regulating secondary cell wall synthesis and patterning are likely targets of evolutionary modification. Additionally, we found that tissue shortening in the fruit valve does not arise from passive shrinkage as previously thought, but is an active, turgor-driven process dependent on the three-dimensional geometry and anisotropy of exocarp cells. It will be interesting to determine whether this cellular mechanism, that shares design principles with robotic “air muscles,” has been used by other organisms as a common evolutionary solution to power rapid movements.

Plant Material and Generation of Transgenic Plants

The C. hirsuta reference accession Oxford was used as wild-type in this study. The lig2 mutant was isolated from an EMS screen and the causal mutation identified by map-based cloning and whole genome sequencing. The following transgenes were constructed using multisite Gateway in the pGREENII125 binary vector containing norflurazon selection: pLIG2::gLIG2-vYFP, pLIG2::glig2-vYFP, ChpNST3::AtVND7-vYFP and ChpNST3::GUS. 35S::GFP:TUA6 was described previously. Constructs were transformed into C. hirsuta by floral dip using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Primers used for plasmid construction and gene expression analysis are listed in Table S2.

Image Analysis, Microscopy, and Osmotic Treatments

MorphoGraphX was used for quantitative image analysis. The main axes of cellular deformation were quantified using the algorithm normally used to compute principal directions of growth. The principal orientation of GFP-TUA6 signal was computed using the Fibril orientations algorithm. Images were acquired by confocal laser scanning microscopy, light microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Osmotic treatments were performed with segments of fruit valve pre-stained with propidium iodide (PI). Turgid cells were imaged in deionized water. These samples were then treated with 1 M NaCl, re-stained, and plasmolyzed cells were reimaged in deionized water. GUS, lignin, and cellulose microfibril staining were performed as previously described.

Force Measurements and High-Speed Videography

Cellular force microscopy was performed as previously described. A high precision extensometer was custom built from a miniature load cell and a piezoelectric micropositioner arm, which progressively stretched the whole fruit valve by increments of 50 μm. Explosive pod shatter was filmed with two synchronized high-speed cameras fitted either with 55 mm or 105 mm lenses and configured to save images at 1,500 frames per second (fps) and 256 × 1,024 pixels, or at 15,000 fps and 256 × 272 pixels. Seed trajectories were tracked manually using software custom-written in MATLAB.

Further details of these methods and a detailed description of all models can be found in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures.

Author Contributions

H.H., A.R-K., R.J.B., S.W., H.R., P.S., X.G., M.T., and A.H. produced experimental data. D.M., T.L., A.G., Y.V., G.M., and R.S. produced modeling data. R.J.B. and S.W. designed high-speed imaging experiments and R.J.B. analyzed this data. A.H. wrote the paper and designed the study together with D.M., T.L., A.G., and R.S. who designed modeling approaches. D.M. and R.S. wrote the modeling parts of the extended experimental procedures. H.H., D.M., T.L., A.R-K., and R.J.B. contributed equally to the study. All authors discussed results and commented on the manuscript.

References 48

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Barkoulas M., Hay A., Kougioumoutzi E., Tsiantis M. A developmental framework for dissected leaf formation in the Arabidopsis relative Cardamine hirsuta. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:1136-1141.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.189

  3. 3.

    Bassel G.W., Stamm P., Mosca G., Barbier de Reuille P., Gibbs D.J., Winter R., Janka A., Holdsworth M.J., Smith R.S. Mechanical constraints imposed by 3D cellular geometry and arrangement modulate growth patterns in the Arabidopsis embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:8685-8690.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1404616111

  4. 4.

    Beer T., Swaine M.D. On the theory of explosively dispersed seeds. New Phytol. 1977;78:681-694.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb01672.x

  5. 5.

    Breuer C., Stacey N.J., West C.E., Zhao Y., Chory J., Tsukaya H., Azumi Y., Maxwell A., Roberts K., Sugimoto-Shirasu K. BIN4, a novel component of the plant DNA topoisomerase VI complex, is required for endoreduplication in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:3655-3668.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.107.054833

  6. 6.

    Burgert I., Dunlop J.W.C., Wojtaszek P. Micromechanics of cell walls. Mechanical Integration of Plant Cells and Plants. 2011.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Clements D.R., Feenstra K.R., Jones K., Staniforth R. The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 9. Impatiens glandulifera Royle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2008;88:403-417.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Cosgrove D.J. Plant cell wall extensibility: connecting plant cell growth with cell wall structure, mechanics, and the action of wall-modifying enzymes. J. Exp. Bot. 2016;67:463-476.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erv511

  9. 9.

    Darwin C. Insectivorous Plants. 1875.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Deegan R.D. Finessing the fracture energy barrier in ballistic seed dispersal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:5166-5169.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1119737109

  11. 11.

    Dinneny J.R., Yanofsky M.F. Drawing lines and borders: how the dehiscent fruit of Arabidopsis is patterned. BioEssays. 2005;27:42-49.

    Not in our library10.1002/bies.20165

  12. 12.

    Edwards J., Whitaker D., Klionsky S., Laskowski M.J. Botany: a record-breaking pollen catapult. Nature. 2005;435:164.

    Not in our library10.1038/435164a

  13. 13.

    Forterre Y., Skotheim J.M., Dumais J., Mahadevan L. How the Venus flytrap snaps. Nature. 2005;433:421-425.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03185

  14. 14.

    Garrison W.J., Miller G.L., Raspet R. Ballistic seed projection in two herbaceous species. Am. J. Bot. 2000;87:1257-1264.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Hay A., Tsiantis M. The genetic basis for differences in leaf form between Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relative Cardamine hirsuta. Nat. Genet. 2006;38:942-947.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng1835

  16. 16.

    Hay A.S., Pieper B., Cooke E., Mandáková T., Cartolano M., Tattersall A.D., dello Ioio R., McGowan S.J., Barkoulas M., Galinha C. Cardamine hirsuta: a versatile genetic system for comparative studies. Plant J. 2014;78:1-15.

    Not in our library10.1111/tpj.12447

  17. 17.

    Hayashi M., Feilich K.L., Ellerby D.J. The mechanics of explosive seed dispersal in orange jewelweed (Impatiens capensis). J. Exp. Bot. 2009;60:2045-2053.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erp070

  18. 18.

    Hayashi M., Gerry S.P., Ellerby D.J. The seed dispersal catapult of Cardamine parviflora (Brassicaceae) is efficient but unreliable. Am. J. Bot. 2010;97:1595-1601.

    Not in our library10.3732/ajb.1000173

  19. 19.

    Hoshizaki T., Hamner K.C. Circadian leaf movements: persistence in bean plants grown in continuous high-intensity light. Science. 1964;144:1240-1241.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.144.3623.1240

  20. 20.

    Kim K., Yi H., Zamil M.S., Haque M.A., Puri V.M. Multiscale stress-strain characterization of onion outer epidermal tissue in wet and dry states. Am. J. Bot. 2015;102:12-20.

    Not in our library10.3732/ajb.1400273

  21. 21.

    Kirik V., Schrader A., Uhrig J.F., Hulskamp M. MIDGET unravels functions of the Arabidopsis topoisomerase VI complex in DNA endoreduplication, chromatin condensation, and transcriptional silencing. Plant Cell. 2007;19:3100-3110.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.107.054361

  22. 22.

    Kubo M., Udagawa M., Nishikubo N., Horiguchi G., Yamaguchi M., Ito J., Mimura T., Fukuda H., Demura T. Transcription switches for protoxylem and metaxylem vessel formation. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1855-1860.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1331305

  23. 23.

    Landrein B., Lathe R., Bringmann M., Vouillot C., Ivakov A., Boudaoud A., Persson S., Hamant O. Impaired cellulose synthase guidance leads to stem torsion and twists phyllotactic patterns in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2013;23:895-900.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.013

  24. 24.

    Liljegren S.J., Ditta G.S., Eshed Y., Savidge B., Bowman J.L., Yanofsky M.F. SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2000;404:766-770.

    Not in our library10.1038/35008089

  25. 25.

    Liljegren S.J., Roeder A.H., Kempin S.A., Gremski K., Østergaard L., Guimil S., Reyes D.K., Yanofsky M.F. Control of fruit patterning in Arabidopsis by INDEHISCENT. Cell. 2004;116:843-853.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00217-x

  26. 26.

    Mitsuda N., Iwase A., Yamamoto H., Yoshida M., Seki M., Shinozaki K., Ohme-Takagi M. NAC transcription factors, NST1 and NST3, are key regulators of the formation of secondary walls in woody tissues of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:270-280.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.106.047043

  27. 27.

    Noblin X., Rojas N.O., Westbrook J., Llorens C., Argentina M., Dumais J. The fern sporangium: a unique catapult. Science. 2012;335:1322.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1215985

  28. 28.

    Paredez A.R., Somerville C.R., Ehrhardt D.W. Visualization of cellulose synthase demonstrates functional association with microtubules. Science. 2006;312:1491-1495.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1126551

  29. 29.

    Pritchard J., Williams G., Jones R.G.W., Tomos A.D. Radial turgor pressure profiles in growing and mature zones of wheat roots - a modification of the pressure probe. J. Exp. Bot. 1989;40:567-571.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Randall R.P. A Global Compendium of Weeds. 2002.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Rich T.C.G. Crucifers of Great Britain and Ireland. 1991.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Roeder A.H., Ferrándiz C., Yanofsky M.F. The role of the REPLUMLESS homeodomain protein in patterning the Arabidopsis fruit. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:1630-1635.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2003.08.027

  33. 33.

    Roper M., Seminara A., Bandi M.M., Cobb A., Dillard H.R., Pringle A. Dispersal of fungal spores on a cooperatively generated wind. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:17474-17479.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1003577107

  34. 34.

    Routier-Kierzkowska A.L., Weber A., Kochova P., Felekis D., Nelson B.J., Kuhlemeier C., Smith R.S. Cellular force microscopy for in vivo measurements of plant tissue mechanics. Plant Physiol. 2012;158:1514-1522.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.111.191460

  35. 35.

    Schneider S., Fitting H. Untersuchungen ueber die Samenschleudermechanismen verschiedener Rhoeadales. Jahrbuecher fuer wissenschaftliche Botanik. 1935.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Schroeder J.I., Hedrich R., Fernandez J.M. Potassium-selective single channels in guard-cell protoplasts of vicia-faba. Nature. 1984;312:361-362.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Skotheim J.M., Mahadevan L. Physical limits and design principles for plant and fungal movements. Science. 2005;308:1308-1310.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1107976

  38. 38.

    Spence J., Vercher Y., Gates P., Harris N. ‘Pod shatter’ in Arabidopsis thaliana, Brassica napus and B-juncea. J. Microsc. 1996;181:195-203.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Swaine M.D., Beer T. Explosive seed dispersal in Hura-Crepitans L (Euphorbiaceae). New Phytol. 1977;78:695.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Tondu B. Modelling of the McKibben artificial muscle: a review. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2012;23:225-253.

    Not in our library

All 48 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.