Is short-term debt a substitute for or complementary to good governance?
Deniz Anginer, Asli Demirguc-Kunt, Serif Aziz Simsir and 1 more
Borsa Istanbul Review · 2022
doi:10.1016/j.bir.2021.05.004 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Short-term debt can reduce potential agency conflicts between managers and shareholders by exposing managers to more frequent monitoring by the credit market. Using an international dataset, we examine whether internal monitoring can substitute for external monitoring through the use of short-term debt. We find that the relationship between debt maturity and governance depends on the institutional environment in a given country. In common-law countries and in countries with stronger investor protection rights, governance and short-term debt act as substitutes. The extent of creditor rights, state-level governance quality, cultural characteristics, and economic development levels of countries also play a role in explaining the relationship between governance and debt maturity.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References65
40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
All 65 referencesReads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.