Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Older adults looking at dog pictures - psychobiological effects

Catia Correia-Caeiro, Teresa Romero, Kun Guo and 1 more

Acta Psychologica · 2025

doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105221 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Dogs are often used therapeutically (e.g., Pets at Therapy - PAT dogs) to visit elderly residents and those in care to promote social engagement and quality of life. Earlier studies reported that mutual gaze between dogs and owners induces a mutual change in physiology, with the release of oxytocin being a crucial mediator. However, it is not exactly known which types of cues trigger this mechanism, in particular whether these beneficial effects necessarily derive from the direct eye contact when gazing at a real-life dog or if it can be caused by the visual stimulus of a dog's eyes only in a picture. Therefore, in this study we tested if looking at static dog images could have physiological and/or psychological effects in older adults, by collecting salivary oxytocin, heart rate, optimism scores, testing cooperativeness/competitiveness, and examining gaze patterns when looking at dog pictures in three conditions: dogs facing the observer, dogs facing sideways, or control pixelated pictures. Contrary to our main predictions, we did not find any significant changes in oxytocin, optimism scores, nor cooperation levels associated with the pictures per se. However, older participants made less competitive decisions after looking at the dog's face and men also experienced a reduction in heart rate when looking at these pictures. These results indicate that simply direct eye contact via a picture of a dog is sufficient for some significant effects, which may be gender dependent, but does not trigger the expected full psychobiological effects reported in previous studies with real-life dogs.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.