Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

Nanozymes: Versatile Platforms for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy

Xiaodong Zhang, Xiaokai Chen, Yanli Zhao

Nano-Micro Letters · 2022 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1007/s40820-022-00828-2

Abstract

Natural enzymes usually suffer from high production cost, ease of denaturation and inactivation, and low yield, making them difficult to be broadly applicable. As an emerging type of artificial enzyme, nanozymes that combine the characteristics of nanomaterials and enzymes are promising alternatives. On the one hand, nanozymes have high enzyme-like catalytic activities to regulate biochemical reactions. On the other hand, nanozymes also inherit the properties of nanomaterials, which can ameliorate the shortcomings of natural enzymes and serve as versatile platforms for diverse applications. In this review, various nanozymes that mimic the catalytic activity of different enzymes are introduced. The achievements of nanozymes in different cancer diagnosis and treatment technologies are summarized by highlighting the advantages of nanozymes in these applications. Finally, future research directions in this rapidly developing field are outlooked."Image missing"

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Cancer is a notorious disease worldwide with nearly 20 million new cases and 10 million deaths in 2020. Due to the rapid increase in cancer incidence and mortality, novel remedies and therapeutic agents are in urgent need. Additionally, early diagnosis of cancer with high sensitivity and accuracy is of great importance. As a frontier science, nanotechnology has become a cutting-edge tool for solving a variety of world-class scientific issues including cancer theranostics. Compared to conventional medicine, nanoparticle formulations usually have improved biodistribution and enhanced accumulations in tumors, thus exhibiting elevated therapeutic efficiencies with reduced side effects. Moreover, taking advantage of their unique properties, nanoparticles can function as imaging agents for tumor tracking, remodel the tumor microenvironment, and even serve as drug-free therapeutics, providing versatile platforms for cancer diagnosis and therapy.

On the other hand, enzymes are biocatalysts that mediate a wide variety of reactions during biological processes such as signal transduction, metabolism, and digestion. In particular, specific enzymes are closely related to diseases. For instance, proteolytic enzymes (e.g., matrix metalloproteinases, serine proteases, and cysteine cathepsins) have been demonstrated to facilitate tumor progression. In addition to vital roles in organisms, enzymes are broadly applicable for commercial purposes due to their high specificity and efficiency. As an example, protease, amylase, lipase, and mannanase are auxiliary components of detergents for decontamination of corresponding substrates. Nevertheless, the widespread application of enzymes is severely hindered by several limitations. First, enzymes are proteins or RNA that can be easily degraded by protease and ribonuclease respectively, making them difficult to store and transport. Second, the catalysis specificity of enzymes relies on their unique three-dimensional structures that are sensitive to the environment. As a result, when exposed to extreme conditions such as strong acid/alkali and high temperature, enzymes are easily denatured and inactivated. Third, enzymes are usually extracted from living cells, leading to costly and cumbersome separation and purification processes.

To solve these problems, the development of artificial enzymes is considered a potential method. Particularly, nanozymes with both enzyme-mimicking capability and nanometer size have emerged as a rising star in the field of artificial enzymes. Nanozymes are defined as nanomaterials that can catalyze chemical reactions involving enzyme substrates under physiological conditions by following enzyme kinetics. Similar to natural enzymes, nanozymes possess high catalytic activities and can accelerate biochemical reactions. By featuring the nature of nanomaterials, nanozymes usually have good stability, low production cost, and simple preparation/purification procedures. Up to now, a large number of nanomaterials such as metal nanoparticles, metal oxide nanoparticles, carbon-based nanomaterials, and metal–organic frameworks have been proven to be able to behave like natural enzymes. Furthermore, these nanozymes show distinct advantages in biomedical applications, especially cancer theranostics. In this review, we introduce the role of enzymes in biological systems and summarize which nanomaterials have enzyme-mimicking capability. Then, the recent representative advances of nanozymes in different cancer diagnostic and therapeutic methods are highlighted (Fig. 1).

Classification of Nanozymes

Generally, according to their different mechanisms, enzymes can be classified into seven types, including oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases, lyases, isomerases, ligases, and translocases. Most nanozymes can mimic the activity of oxidoreductases such as peroxidase (POD), oxidase (OXD), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), and a small part of them have a similar catalytic ability with hydrolases or others. Since almost all nanozymes reported for cancer theranostics possess oxidoreductase-like activities, we mainly introduce this type of nanozymes in this section (Fig. 2).

POD-like Nanozymes

PODs typically catalyze the oxidation of the substrates with the consumption of H2O2 or organic peroxides (Fig. 2a). Most natural PODs are ferric heme proteins that can activate H2O2 and generate intermediate species with high valence, capable of abstracting electrons from different substrates. As a result, a large number of iron-based nanomaterials have been found to have POD-mimicking ability.

For instance, the pioneering work by Gao and coworkers in 2007 indicated that Fe3O4 nanoparticles possessed an intrinsic catalytic activity toward classical POD substrates including 3,3,5,5-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), di-azo-aminobenzene (DAB), and o-phenylenediamine (OPD). Similar to Fe3O4 nanoparticles, other iron-containing nanomaterials can also serve as POD mimics, in which iron usually exists in the form of Fe2O3, iron chalcogenides, Prussian blue, single iron site (i.e., Fe–N–C), hemin, and other compounds. As an example, Lu and coworkers prepared Janus γ-Fe2O3/SiO2 nanocomposites (JFSNs), whose catalytic activity was higher and more stable in a broad range of pH and temperature than that of the natural enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Fig. 3). JFSNs had a lower Michaelis constant (Km) value and a higher Vmax value than natural HRP when TMB served as the substrate, indicating that JFSNs possessed a higher affinity and a stronger enzymatic activity (Table 1). Geng et al. developed the biomimetic nanozymes formed by the coassembly of hemin and amphiphilic 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc)-L-histidine (FH). The size and morphology of the nanozymes could be tuned by adjusting the ratio of the two components, further tailoring their POD-mimicking activities.

Furthermore, the nanomaterials that contain other transition metals including V, Zn, Co, Mn, Mo, W, Cu, Au, Ag, Pt, Pd, Ir, Os, and Ru can also behave as PODs. André et al. found that V2O5 nanowires with intrinsic POD-like activity could catalyze the oxidation of the POD substrates including 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and TMB with the help of H2O2. Their Km values for ABTS oxidation and H2O2 at pH 4.0 were determined to be 2.9 and 0.4 μM, respectively, which are remarkably lower than those of the natural enzyme HRP and vanadium-dependent haloperoxidase (V-HPO). The above results indicated that V2O5 nanowires possessed a higher affinity to the POD substrates. In another work, Ghosh and coworkers prepared four kinds of GPx-mimicking V2O5-based nanomaterials with different morphologies including nanowires, nanosheets, nanoflowers, and nanospheres. They revealed that the GPx-like activities of the nanozymes were not only related to their size and morphology, but also depended on the crystal faces exposed on their surface.

Although some natural enzymes contain metal ions as cofactors, metal elements are not required by most other enzymes to exhibit catalytic activity. In this manner, nonmetallic element-based nanomaterials, especially carbon-based nanomaterials, can also be POD mimics. Song and coworkers found that single-walled carbon nanotubes had the intrinsic POD-like property and could catalyze the formation of oxidized TMB to produce a color change. This phenomenon was successfully utilized for detecting disease-associated single-nucleotide polymorphism without further labeling. Similarly, they also observed that graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets could mimic the activity of PODs. Taking advantage of this property, an easy and cheap colorimetric approach for glucose detection with high sensitivity and selectivity was built by GO nanozymes and GOx. As zero-dimensional carbon nanomaterials, carbon/graphene quantum dots can also have a similar activity to PODs. Zhong et al. prepared wood soot-derived carbon quantum dots to catalyze the TMB oxidation with the aid of H2O2. Recent work by Wang and coworkers uncovered that the POD-mimicking enzymic activity of specific oxygenated groups enriched graphene quantum dots was much higher than that of classic graphene quantum dots, because the former had more carbonyl and carboxyl groups acting as catalytic sites and binding sites.

OXD-like Nanozymes

OXDs are usually involved in oxidation–reduction reactions at the expense of molecular oxygen (O2), which is reduced to H2O2 or H2O (Fig. 2b). In 2004, Comott et al. reported that small-sized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) could promote the transformation of glucose into gluconate, behaving like GOx. Since then, ultrasmall nanomaterials based on noble metals such as Cu, Au, Ag, Pt, and Ir have been proven to have OXD-mimicking ability. For example, Luo et al. designed a self-limiting system using GOx-like AuNPs as both seeds and catalysts. Typically, AuNPs with a size of 13 nm showed a slightly lower affinity but a higher reaction rate for glucose than that of natural GOx (Table 2). Cui et al. synthesized Ir nanoparticles with a small diameter of 2.5 ± 0.5 nm, which could catalyze the oxidation of TMB to form a blue product in the aerobic environment. Taking advantage of their OXD-like property, Ir nanoparticles could be used for detecting dissolved oxygen. In another work, Wang and coworkers prepared GSHOx-like nanozymes based on single-site copper (copper hexacyanoferrate, Cu-HCF), which could catalyze the generation of H2O2 when consuming glutathione (GSH).

Cerium oxide nanoparticles (also called nanoceria or ceria nanoparticles) are also widely investigated nanozymes with OXD-like catalytic capability. Asati et al. reported that nanoceria promoted the oxidation of different substrates when placed in acidic conditions (Fig. 4a), exhibiting their inherent OXD-like activity. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the activity of nanoceria increased upon decreasing the size (Fig. 4b).

Besides inorganic nanomaterials, organic nanoassemblies can also be OXD mimics. For example, Li and coworkers found that phthalocyanine could be assembled with FH to fabricate photooxidase-like nanovesicles. The self-aggregation of phthalocyanine was reduced after the formation of nanovesicles, thus enhancing its photosensitization activity and photostability. The nanovesicles behaved like OXDs under light irradiation for improved dopamine photooxidation.

CAT-like Nanozymes

CAT is a typical biological catalyst that exists in almost all living systems and fosters the decomposition of H2O2 into H2O and O2 (Fig. 2c). The natural enzyme CAT comprises four iron-containing heme moieties that endow it to have strong interaction with the substrate H2O2.

To mimic the enzymatic activity of CAT, many metal-containing and carbon-based nanomaterials have been developed. For instance, Dan and coworkers designed indocyanine green-loaded ultrasmall gold nanoclusters (Au NCs-ICG) that had a similar catalytic capability to CAT but not POD or SOD (Fig. 5a, b). The as-prepared Au NCs-ICG exhibited high substrate affinity (Km ≈ 2.02 mM) and superior CAT-like activity (Vmax ≈ 4.55 × 10−3 mM s−1) (Fig. 5c). Li et al. reported that Fe3+ could drive the self-assembly of Fmoc-protected cysteine. After entering the cells, the nanoassemblies would be disassembled, releasing Fe3+ for catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2 into O2. Similarly, Fe3+ and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) were reported to be able to form coordination nanoparticles (CPs) with strong CAT-mimicking activity. Compared with the natural CAT, the Fe3+/AMP CPs had a lower Km value and a higher kcat/Km ratio (Table 3), indicating that CPs possessed higher affinity and catalytic efficiency for degrading H2O2. In another work, gas bubbles were observed when graphene oxide quantum dots were incubated with H2O2, indicating that the graphene oxide quantum dots had similar functions with CAT to catalytically decompose H2O2 to generate O2. Furthermore, the authors found that the enzymatic activity of 100 µg L−1 graphene oxide quantum dots was comparable to that of 4 U L−1 natural enzyme CAT, indicating the high activity of the graphene oxide quantum dots.

SOD-like Nanozymes

SOD catalyzes the dismutation of the superoxide radical (O2·−) into O2 and H2O2 (Fig. 2d), constituting an important antioxidant defense against oxidative stress in the body. Natural SODs usually belong to metalloproteins, and can be divided into three types depending on the protein fold and the metal cofactor, including the Cu/Zn type (which contains Cu and Zn), Fe and Mn types (which contains Fe or Mn), and the Ni type.

Nanomaterials containing these metal elements have been constructed with SOD-like activity. For instance, Korschelt et al. synthesized water-dispersible glycine-functionalized Cu(OH)2 nanoparticles (Gly-Cu(OH)2 NPs) whose O2·− decomposition ability was demonstrated using iodonitrotetrazolium chloride as an O2·− sensitive indicator. Moreover, Gly-Cu(OH)2 NPs had stronger SOD-like activity than the natural enzyme CuZn SOD and bulk Cu(OH)2 (Table 4). In another work, Mu et al. utilized hierarchical NiO nanoflowers to scavenge O2·− and generate O2 with high efficiency, demonstrating good SOD-mimicking enzymatic activity of the NiO nanoflowers.

Other nanomaterials also show distinct SOD-mimicking capability. Korsvik and coworkers reported that ceria nanoparticles with a high ratio of Ce3+/Ce4+ had a strong SOD-mimicking ability, which was because the high Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio in nanoparticles correlates with higher oxygen and electron vacancy. Samuel et al. found that nanomolar concentrations of hydrophilic carbon clusters were able to rapidly scavenge micromolar to millimolar concentrations of toxic O2·−, and the major catalytic products were proven as H2O2 and O2, making the nanosystem a suitable biomimetic SOD.

Nanozymes for Cancer Diagnosis

To fight against cancer, early diagnosis is a key to successful treatment. Delayed diagnosis has a greatly negative impact on the survival rate, which is illustrated by the example of patients with renal cancers. The survival rate of patients with early-stage renal cancer is up to 99%, which is much higher than that of patients with second or higher stage renal cancer (16%). Hence, the main benefit of early diagnosis is the augmentation in the proportion of survived patients with cancers, and developing early diagnosis methods with high sensitivity and selectivity is highly significant. On the other hand, selective tumor imaging with high accuracy is of vital importance for different cancer remedies such as surgery, radiotherapy (RT), phototherapy, and sonodynamic therapy (SDT). Featuring the merits of superior catalytic activity, low cost, high stability, and multifunctionality, nanozymes have been successfully utilized for the detection of cancer-related genes, molecules, and cells, and can serve as probes for accurate imaging due to their intrinsic properties of nanomaterials (Table 5).

GSH Detection

GSH is a ubiquitous tripeptide in which glutamate and glycine are linked by a cysteine residue. It is an important antioxidant and the most abundant low-molecular thiol in living systems, whose concentration in cancer cells is normally higher than that in normal ones. Up to now, a series of GSH detection systems based on nanozymes have been developed, which can realize the distinguishment of cancer cells from normal ones.

For instance, Liu and coworkers designed a photosensitized metal–organic framework (PSMOF) with photo-controlled OXD-mimicking ability. The PSMOF effectively catalyzed the oxidation of TMB under visible light irradiation, obtaining the product (oxidized TMB) with a strong absorption peak at 652 nm (Fig. 6a, b). Interestingly, the absorbance of oxidized TMB at 652 could decrease with the increasing concentration of GSH (Fig. 6c), making the system a colorimetric probe for GSH detection. Moreover, the system was used to analyze the GSH level in the lysates of normal (LO2) and cancer (HeLa) cells. The GSH concentration in cancer cells was determined as about 2-folds higher than that in normal ones, which was in accordance with the results measured by a commercial GSH detection kit (Fig. 6d). In another work, Pang et al. constructed a lateral flow plasmonic biosensor (LFPB) based on gold-viral biomineralized nanoclusters (AuVCs) with POD-like activity. In the presence of HAuCl4 and H2O2, the AuVCs could catalyze the formation of AuNPs, generating colored patterns. Moreover, GSH could inhibit the POD-like activity of the AuVCs and further hinder the formation of AuNPs. Taking advantage of this phenomenon, the LFPB was successfully used for GSH detection. In addition, the authors proved that the intracellular GSH concentration was closely related to the drug resistance of cancer cells, and higher GSH levels were detected in cancer cells with high drug resistance than those with low drug resistance.

Detection of Other Biomarkers

Cancer biomarkers are biological molecules produced by the body or tumor in a person with cancer. In addition to GSH, biomarkers can be DNA, RNA, or proteins that are specific to the tumor. With the excellent enzyme-mimicking ability, nanozymes have been used for detecting different biomarkers.

Wang et al. designed Pt@mesoporous silica (Pt@mSiO2) core–shell nanoparticles whose POD-like ability was blocked after probe DNA (P1) adsorption (Fig. 7a). After incubation with the complementary single-stranded target DNA (T0), the POD-like enzymatic ability of Pt@mSiO2 would be recovered, thus catalyzing the color reaction of TMB. Based on this system, a single-base mutation associated with the breast cancer gene BRCA1 was successfully identified. DNA methylation is related to the malignant phenotype of colorectal adenomas. To detect the global methylation with high sensitivity, Bhattacharjee et al. extracted the target DNA and obtained single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) after denaturation followed by direct adsorption onto the surface of a bare screen-printed gold electrode (SPGE). They also designed the POD mimetic activity of 5-methylcytosine antibody (5mc) functionalized mesoporous iron oxide (5mc-MIO) nanoparticles, in which 5mc was used to recognize the methylcytosine groups in DNA on the SPGE. 5mc-MIO could catalyze the TMB solution in the presence of H2O2 to give the colorimetric and electrochemical detection of DNA methylation (Fig. 7b). The method could detect as low as 10% difference in the global DNA methylation level in synthetic samples and cell lines with good reproducibility and specificity.

Besides DNA, protein-based cancer biomarkers can be detected using nanozymes. Kim et al. prepared antibody-conjugated nanocomposites with POD-like ability due to the presence of Fe3O4 and Pt nanoparticles in the nanocomposites. Taking advantage of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique, they developed a rapid, robust, and convenient antigen detection system based on the nanocomposites (Fig. 7c). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a well-known breast cancer marker, could be detected using the colorimetric immunoassay with a limit of detection of 1.5 ng/mL, which was much lower than its clinical cutoff value (15 ng mL−1). In another work, POD-like PdCu hydrogel nanozymes with a hierarchically porous structure were employed to load the natural enzyme HRP to obtain PdCu@HRP. In addition to the improved stability and reusability, PdCu@HRP showed higher enzymatic activities than HRP and PdCu hydrogels alone due to the synergistic effect. Combined with the GOx-encapsulated zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 conjugated with antibody (GOx@ZIF-8-Ab2), the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a cell surface glycoprotein related to lung, liver, pancreas, breast, cervix, and prostate cancer, was detected using colorimetric biosensing via catalytic cascade reactions (Fig. 7d), whose sensitivity was more than 6 times higher than that of HRP-based ELISA.

Cancer Cell Detection

Conjugation with targeting molecules on the surface can endow the nanozymes with tumor-targeting capability. Combined with their excellent enzyme-mimicking properties, nanozyme-based systems can realize selective cancer cell detection.

For instance, Maji and coworkers prepared the hybrids (GSF@AuNPs) composed of Au nanoparticles, mesoporous silica-coated nanosized reduced graphene oxide, and folic acid for cancer cell targeting. On basis of the unprecedented POD-like activity, the hybrid could serve as a colorimetric nanoprobe for selective, quantitative, and fast detection of cancerous HeLa cells, but not normal HEK 293 cells (Fig. 8). Similarly, ferritin-based cobalt nanozymes (HccFn(Co3O4)) with intrinsic POD-like activity were modified with the SP94 peptide that can specifically bind to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. The nanozymes could catalyze the transformation of the colorless POD substrate diaminobenzidine (DAB) into dark-brown products to visualize HCC tumor tissues with a sensitivity of 63.5% and specificity of 79.1%, which was comparable with that of the clinically used HCC-specific marker.

In Vivo Cancer Diagnosis

Inheriting the unique physical and chemical properties of nanomaterials, nanozymes have been widely employed for in vivo tumor imaging through different imaging techniques such as fluorescence, ultrasound, magnetic resonance (MR), photoacoustic (PA), photothermal (PT), and computed tomography (CT) imaging. Moreover, combined with their enzyme-mimicking capability, smart cancer diagnosis systems can be developed based on nanozymes.

As an example, Gong et al. synthesized a nanoprobe (FeTIR) in which TMB and a near-infrared dye (IR780) were coloaded on POD-like FeWOX nanosheets for multimodal imaging. Owing to the strong X-ray attenuation ability of the W element, the high MR contrast ability of the Fe element, and the superior fluorescence properties of IR780, the nanoprobe could be used for CT, MR, and fluorescence imaging of tumors (Fig. 9). Owing to the high level of H2O2 in the tumor microenvironment, the loaded TMB in the FeTIR could be oxidized after reaching the tumor, leading to the remarkable increase in the PA signal at 900 nm (PA900). Combined with the loaded IR780 that had a PA signal at 800 nm (PA800) serving as the internal reference, the FeTIR nanoprobe could be used for ratio-metric PA imaging according to the ratio of PA900 to PA800.

Nanozymes for Cancer Therapy

Nanozymes play versatile roles in cancer therapy. As nanomaterials, they can serve as drug carriers and passively target the tumor through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Similar to other nanomaterials, nanozymes can also be therapeutic agents such as photosensitizers, sonosensitizers, and radiosensitizers for diverse cancer treatments. On the other hand, with distinct enzyme-mimicking ability, nanozymes can be used for catalytic therapy and starvation therapy to directly kill tumor cells or inhibit tumor growth. Moreover, nanozymes can improve the anticancer performance by O2 supply and GSH depletion. Additionally, in situ activation of therapeutic agents can be realized under the catalysis of nanozymes. In this section, we emphasize the enzyme-mimicking property of nanozymes in cancer therapy (Table 6).

Catalytic Therapy and Cascade Catalytic Therapy

In catalytic therapy, cancer cells or tumors are inhibited by toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are generated from the catalytic reactions mediated by enzymes. Inheriting the merits of both natural enzymes and nanomaterials, nanozymes have been promising systems for cancer catalytic therapy.

POD-mimicking nanozymes can promote the degradation of H2O2 to produce highly toxic hydroxyl radicals (·OH) for cell killing, As an example, Wang et al. synthesized MnPc nanoparticles (MnPcNPs) by the supramolecular assembling of manganese phthalocyanine (MnPc). The MnPcNPs with metal–N–C active centers had size-dependent POD-like activity. Their suitable size endowed the nanozymes with favorable tumor accumulation capability through the EPR effect. Moreover, MnPcNPs displayed higher catalytic activity in the acidic tumor microenvironment than in normal tissues and thus effectively killed cancer cells with the low side effect.

To improve the therapeutic efficiency of POD-like nanozymes, increasing the H2O2 level in the tumor is a feasible way. For instance, both POD-like Pd–C single-atom nanozymes (SAzymes) and camptothecin (CPT) were encapsulated into agarose hydrogels for H2O2 self-supply based catalytic therapy. The generated heat by Pd–C SAzymes upon NIR light irradiation could accelerate CPT release by promoting hydrogel degradation. Moreover, the released CPT could activate nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase, thus producing H2O2 for enhanced catalytic therapy. As OXDs and OXD-like nanozymes can catalyze the generation of H2O2, the combination of OXD- and POD-like nanozymes can lead to a cascade system for enhanced therapy. For this purpose, ultrasmall Au and Fe3O4 nanoparticles were packed into dendritic mesoporous silica (DMSN) to act as GOx- and POD-like nanozymes, respectively. The loaded Au nanoparticles could promote the oxidation of glucose into H2O2 in the presence of dissolved oxygen, and the generated H2O2 was subsequently decomposed into ·OH with the help of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Compared to the single nanozyme-loaded DMSN, the Au and Fe2O3-coloaded DMSN showed significantly enhanced anticancer performance. Recently, Meng and coworkers prepared a self-cascade pyrite nanozyme that integrated both POD- and OXD-mimicking abilities into one nanoparticle. As a POD mimic, the nanozyme with high H2O2 affinity possessed a three-order of magnitude higher catalytic activity than the classical Fe3O4 nanozyme and HRP, which could be beneficial for ·OH generation (Fig. 10a). Acting as GSHOx, the nanozyme could catalyze the oxidation of GSH accompanied by H2O2 formation, strengthening their anticancer ability (Fig. 10b). To further increase the efficiency of the OXD-POD cascade system, Chen et al. designed a cancer cell membrane-coated and GOx-carrying hollow mesoporous Prussian blue (mGPB) with multi-enzyme activities. When reaching the tumor region through the homologous targeting ability of the cancer cell membrane, the mGPB with SOD/CAT-like catalytic activity could first use the intracellular O2·− and H2O2 to generate O2. Then, the mGPB would further exhaust the produced O2 and the intratumoral glucose to generate plenty of H2O2 due to the presence of GOx in the system. Finally, the high level of H2O2 was transformed into massive ·OH under the catalysis of the POD-like mGPB.

Besides POD mimics, OXD-mimicking nanozymes could consume O2 to generate toxic O2·−, which is theoretically a feasible method for cancer treatment. However, due to the intrinsic hypoxic environment in the tumor, OXD-mimicking nanozymes are usually in combination with CAT or CAT mimics that can provide sufficient O2 for cascade catalytic therapy. For example, Wang et al. prepared highly ordered MnO2@PtCo nanoflowers by the direct growth of MnO2 on PtCo nanoparticles. Taking advantage of the CAT-like MnO2 and OXD-mimicking PtCo, the MnO2@PtCo nanoflowers could supply O2 to relieve the hypoxic conditions and boost ROS generation in the tumors, therefore exhibiting good therapeutic outcomes against cancer. Similarly, Hu et al. designed biodegradable molybdenum oxide nanourchins (MoO3−x NUs) with both CAT- and OXD-mimicking abilities (Fig. 10c). In the tumor microenvironment, the MoO3−x NUs behaved like CAT to catalyze the decomposition of H2O2, supplying abundant O2 for the following reaction. Substantial cytotoxic·O2·− was produced to induce cancer cell apoptosis, thanks to the high OXD-like enzymatic activity of the nanozymes (Fig. 10d, e). In sharp contrast, MoO3−x nanosheets (NSs) with low OXD-like activity had little influence on tumor growth. Interestingly, when placed in blood or normal tissues that have a neutral pH, MoO3−x NUs would quickly be degraded with the loss of catalytic activity, endowing the nanozymes with suitable safety (Fig. 10f).

Additionally, OXD- and POD-mimicking nanozymes can be integrated into a system for combined catalytic therapy. Fan and coworkers reported the synthesis of nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanospheres with multiple enzyme-like activities. Once localized in an acidic environment such as lysosomes, the nanozymes could behave like OXD and POD, transferring O2 and H2O2 into toxic O2·− and ·OH, respectively. Interestingly, the nanozymes also performed CAT- and SOD-like activities under a neutral pH environment, which might reduce their cytotoxicity to normal tissues.

Starvation Therapy

Starvation therapy which cuts off energy supply for inhibiting tumor growth has become an alternative cancer treatment. As a consequence of their rapid metabolism and proliferation, cancer cells usually need more energy than normal ones, making them more sensitive to energy. Hence, the depletion of energy can be used to inhibit tumor growth. As the most important source of energy in a living system, glucose can be oxidized into gluconic acid and H2O2 by GOx or GOx-like nanozymes with the help of O2, which can be used for starvation therapy. However, the tumor has a hypoxic microenvironment, which weakens the activity of O2-dependent GOx and its mimics. To overcome the limitation, O2-supply enzymes or nanozymes are often used in starvation therapy.

Liu et al. designed dual-nanozyme-based nanosystems (termed P@Pt@P-Au-FA) composed of platinum nanoparticles, AuNPs, and porphyrin metal–organic frameworks (PCN). The CAT-like Pt nanoparticles could catalyze the generation of O2 for promoting the oxidation of glucose by GOx-like Au nanoparticles for starvation therapy. Yang et al. designed biomimetic mesoporous silica nanorod (MSNR)@MnO2–Au nanozymes, in which MnO2 and Au nanoparticles had CAT- and GOx-like activity (Fig. 11a). Under the catalysis of MnO2, the H2O2 in the tumor was degraded into O2, which could enhance the Au-catalyzed glucose oxidation (Fig. 11b) and the radiotherapeutic effect. Moreover, acute glucose consumption could not only be used for starvation therapy, but also downregulate the expression of heat shock proteins including HSP70 and HSP90 (Fig. 11c), realizing starvation-promoted mild photothermal therapy (PTT). As a result, the nanozymes exhibited a significant tumor inhibition effect combined with PTT and RT.

Oxygen Supply

Oxygen plays an important role in different cancer treatments such as photodynamic therapy (PDT), SDT, RT, and even immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the intrinsic hypoxia in the tumor hinders the efficacy of these treatments. Nanozymes with CAT- or SOD-like activity can catalyze the generation of O2 and alleviate the hypoxia tumor microenvironment, and thus have been broadly used.

For example, in type II PDT, O2 is converted into highly toxic singlet oxygen (1O2) with the help of photosensitizers under light/laser irradiation, which can be used for tumor therapy. For improving the efficiency of PDT, Pt nanozymes were decorated on porphyrinic Zr-based metal–organic frameworks (Zr-MOFs) via in situ reduction. The loaded Pt nanozymes with high CAT-like activity could induce the degradation of H2O2 into O2 in the tumor, accelerating the generation of 1O2 to kill cancer cells after laser irradiation. Similarly, Wang and coworkers integrated single-atom ruthenium and photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) into Mn3[Co(CN)6]2 metal–organic frameworks to form OxgeMCC-r single-atom enzyme (SAE), in which single-atom ruthenium served as the active catalytic site (Fig. 12a). Under the catalysis of the CAT-like nanozymes, the endogenous H2O2 in the tumor could be converted into O2, leading to the increase in ROS generation and cancer cell death after PDT. To further accelerate the O2 generation, Yang et al. reported a biomimetic hybrid nanozyme (named rMGB) containing natural GOx and MnO2 nanozymes. The encapsulated GOx could catalyze the oxidation of glucose into gluconic acid, depleting energy for starvation therapy and generating H+ to improve the catalytic efficiency of CAT-like MnO2. Thus, the H+/O2 self-supply rMGB realized enhanced starvation therapy and PDT against hypoxic tumors.

Similar to PDT, SDT, in which ultrasound is used to activate sonosensitizers to generate toxic ROS for cancer treatment, is also O2 concentration-dependent. To mitigate the tumor hypoxia for improved SDT, Liang and coworkers designed a Pt-CuS Janus system composed of hollow CuS and Pt nanozymes. The hollow CuS showed a large inner cavity for loading sonosensitizers. The deposition of Pt not only enhanced photothermal performance, but also provided CAT-like ability for catalyzing the production of O2 that can overcome tumor hypoxia for enhanced cancer therapy (Fig. 12b). More interestingly, the heat generated by laser irradiation of Pt-CuS could improve the enzymatic activity of Pt and accelerate the generation of O2, which further improved the anticancer efficiency of SDT (Fig. 12c). In recent work, they developed a Pt–TiO2 heterostructure with an oxygen-deficient layer as a bilaterally enhanced sonosensitizer. The hollow cavity of TiO2 could serve as a reservoir to carry doxorubicin, a chemotherapeutic agent and sonosensitizer. The Pt nanoparticles behaved like CAT to promote the decomposition of H2O2, providing sufficient O2 for subsequent SDT.

In RT, external beam radiation or internal radiation is locally administrated at the tumor site to destroy cancer cells by generating ROS. Thus, the radiotherapeutic efficacy is affected by the level of available O2 within the tumor. However, the low O2 level in the tumor microenvironment usually leads to cancer radio-resistance or failure of RT. To overcome this dilemma, Wang et al. doped Mn2+ into second near-infrared (NIR-II)-emitting Ag2Se quantum dots to endow the system with CAT-like activity. By the catalysis of Mn2+ in the quantum dots, H2O2 was decomposed into O2. Owing to the surface modification of the tumor-targeting arginine-glycine-aspartate unit, the nanozymes could be accumulated in the tumor region. Combined with the radiosensitive activity of the element Ag, the nanozyme realized enhanced imaging-guided RT of tumors. In recent work, Zhang et al. found that ferrihydrite, especially 2-line ferrihydrite, possessed the strongest CAT-like activity among the main forms of iron oxide nanomaterials, without POD- or SOD-like activities. Combined with its excellent biosafety and steady activity, the ferrihydrite showed a great potential for enhanced cancer RT by producing O2 and alleviating hypoxia. To control the O2 generation in the tumor, ultrasmall iridium nanocrystals with CAT-like activity were encapsulated into liposomes, endowing the system with near-infrared light responsivity. Under NIR light irradiation, the obtained Ir@liposome would show increased catalytic activity to trigger O2 generation, which together with the intrinsic radio-sensitizing ability of Ir would enable remarkably enhanced cancer RT.

In addition to participating in ROS generation during PDT, SDT, and RT, O2 can also mediate the immune system. The tumor hypoxia impairs anticancer immunity by altering the functions of immune cells or by increasing cancer resistance to immune effectors. To reverse the tumor immunosuppressive environment, iron manganese silicate nanozymes (IMSNs) were fabricated. Loading with TGF-β inhibitor (TI) after polyethylene glycol (PEG) modification formed IMSN-PEG-TI (Fig. 12d). The nanozymes exhibited CAT-like activity to catalyze O2 generation to overcome tumor hypoxia and regulate the immune microenvironment (including increasing the level of M1 macrophages) (Fig. 12e, f). In addition, the nanozymes also had POD-like activity to decompose both the endogenous H2O2 and the H2O2 generated by M1 macrophages into ·OH for catalytic therapy.

GSH Depletion

As we discussed above, GSH, as the detoxification and antioxidant agent by deactivating radicals and reactive oxidants, is responsible for cancer drug resistance and severely affects the cancer treatment outcome. To overcome the limitation, a large number of nanomaterials with GSH-depleting ability have been developed to enhance the anticancer efficiency of different ROS-generated therapeutics such as chemotherapy, RT, PDT, chemodynamic therapy (CDT), and SDT. For nanozymes with GPx- or GSHOx-mimicking ability, they can catalyze the oxidation of GSH, thus consuming the intracellular GSH for enhanced cancer therapy.

For example, Zhong et al. reported the synthesis of multifunctional PtCu3 nanocages that could simultaneously act as sonosensitizers as well as POD- and GPx-like nanozymes. As sonosensitizers and POD-like nanozymes, PtCu3 nanocages could generate massive ROS to kill cancer cells, especially when exposed to ultrasound. Moreover, the intratumoral GSH could be depleted by the GPx-like PtCu3 nanocages, thus weakening the GSH-mediated ROS-scavenging capacity of cancer cells. In another work, Feng et al. introduced the SnFe2O4 (SFO) nanozymes with both CAT- and GPx-like activities for synergistic therapy (Fig. 13a). Like CAT, the nanozymes could trigger the degradation of H2O2 into O2 to meliorate the tumor hypoxia, which is beneficial for PDT. In addition, SFO nanozymes could also generate ·OH, not only for CDT but also for consuming the GSH to relieve the antioxidant capability of the tumors (Fig. 13b). Jana et al. reported the preparation of ultrasmall trimetallic (Pd, Cu, and Fe) alloy nanozymes (PCF-a) with dynamic active-site synergism. The presence of Cu and Fe active sites endowed the nanozymes with POD-mimicking activity to produce ·OH radicals at neutral pH, and the nanozymes showed enhanced ROS generation when exposed to NIR and ultrasound (Fig. 13c). Furthermore, PCF-a exhibited the GPx-like property to exhaust GSH (Fig. 13d), protecting the generated ROS from being consumed by the GSH of cancer cells. Recently, Wang et al. synthesized copper hexacyanoferrate (Cu-HCF) nanozyme with active single-site copper for cascade enzymatic therapy (Fig. 13e). Their GSHOx-like activity enabled the Cu-HCF single-site nanozymes to deplete intracellular GSH and convert single-site CuII species into CuI (Fig. 13f, g). The generated CuI could trigger the subsequent decomposition of H2O2 into ·OH. Thus, the Cu-HCF with both GSHOx- and POD-like activities could accumulate massive ROS in the tumor for efficient cancer therapy.

Activation of Therapeutics

Conventional therapeutic agents exhibit cell-killing ability in all parts of the body where they accumulate, causing undesirable side effects. The employment of activable therapeutics is an effective method to overcome the problem. Owing to their enzymatic property, nanozymes can catalyze the activation of the therapeutic agents for cancer therapy.

HRP, as a kind of POD, can catalyze the oxidation of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and its derivatives into cytotoxic species, which can inhibit cancer cell growth effectively. Inspired by this property, a phosphorous- and nitrogen-codoped porous hollow carbon sphere nanozymes (PNCNzyme) with POD-mimicking activity in acidic conditions was developed, and IAA was loaded via π–π stacking interactions. Furthermore, folate was introduced on the surface of the nanozyme to enhance its tumor-targeting ability and promote its endocytosis by folate receptor-overexpressed cancer cells. When reaching the lysosomes with an acidic environment, the loaded IAA was activated by the PNCNzyme to generate sufficient free radical intermediates, causing the apoptosis of cancer cells.

Recently, Ma and coworkers rationally designed a nanoreactor (TMB/MOF/PtAu-PEG, TMPAs) in which TMB and PtAu nanozymes were encapsulated into a metal–organic framework decorated with PEG (Fig. 14a). The nanoreactor stayed inactivated during blood circulation and healthy tissues. When arriving at the acidic tumor microenvironment, the loaded PtAu nanozymes could act as PODs and promote the production of ROS in the presence of the endogenous H2O2 for catalytic therapy. Moreover, the nanoreactor could catalyze the oxidation of TMB with no NIR absorption into cationic TMB having broadband NIR absorption (Fig. 14b), which was beneficial for tumor-specific PA imaging (Fig. 14c) and PTT (Fig. 14d–f).

Conclusions and Perspectives

To date, a large number of nanozymes have been developed to mimic natural enzymes such as POD, OXD, CAT, and SOD. The activities of nanozymes can be modulated by altering their physicochemical properties such as composition, size, morphology, crystal face, surface modification, valence, and active site. By integrating the properties of natural enzymes and nanomaterials, nanozymes own the advantage of superior catalytic activity, low production cost, high stability, good controllability, and multifunctionality, making them suitable for cancer diagnoses including cancer-related gene/molecule/cell detection and tumor imaging. Moreover, nanozymes can serve as drug-free formulations to directly kill cancer cells, remodel the tumor environment for enhanced cancer therapy, and/or catalyze the in situ formation of therapeutic agents. Although significant progress has been made in recent years, there is still room for advancement in the research of nanozymes in cancer theranostics. Here, we put forward several critical issues and research directions that can be studied in the future to increase the possibility of clinical translation of nanozymes.

First of all, besides mimicking the activity of oxidoreductases, nanozymes can act as hydrolases. For instance, Guan et al. prepared the ceria/polyoxometalate nanohybrid that not only behaved like protease to degrade amyloid-β peptides but also acted as SOD to reduce ROS. Chen and coworkers constructed a DNase-mimetic artificial enzyme (DMAE) composed of AuNPs with multiple cerium (IV) complexes on the surface of Fe3O4/SiO2 core/shell particles. Both genomic DNA and extracellular DNA could be effectively cleaved by DMAE. The hydrolase-like nanozymes can be employed to activate probes or prodrugs for nanozyme-triggered cancer theranostics. Moreover, since some natural hydrolases such as L-asparaginase (AspNase) show intrinsic anticancer ability, it is envisioned to develop AspNase-like nanozymes as chemotherapeutics for directly inhibiting tumors. Second, natural enzymes are classified into seven types based on their activities including oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases, lyases, isomerases, ligases, and translocases. More efforts should be devoted to developing novel nanozymes with diverse enzymatic activities and employing them for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Third, most nanozymes have multiple enzyme-mimicking capabilities, which may create a competitive relationship. For example, as both CAT and POD can catalyze the decomposition of H2O2, the nanozymes with both CAT- and POD-like abilities may have reduced enzymatic activities as compared to those with a single enzyme-mimicking ability. To solve the problem, it is expected to find general principles to guide the design of nanozymes and develop more nanozymes with excellent single enzyme-mimicking ability. Fourth, nanozymes that mimic multiple enzymes can realize cascade reactions for cancer diagnosis or cascade therapy. It is still of great challenge to rationally design the nanozymes with excellent multi-enzyme-like activities. Fifth, to further improve the stability, biocompatibility, selectivity, and/or subcellular/tumor-targeting ability of nanozymes, surface modification is commonly used. However, it may hinder the interaction between the surface of nanozymes and substrates, leading to unsatisfying catalytic performance. Thus, the surface modification methods should be optimized and it is needed to develop a strategy that can minimize the influence of surface modification on the activity of nanozymes. Sixth, only a few recent studies utilize nanozymes to “turn on” the therapeutic agents. More nanozyme-based activable systems should be developed. Seventh, for efficient catalytic reactions with high selectivity and effective cancer treatment with negligible side effects, the activity of nanozymes should be controllable. Up to now, a number of nanozymes have been designed, which are sensitive to different stimuli such as pH, light, thermal, and ultrasound. More nanozyme systems with high controllability are highly desirable. Eighth, owing to the presence of tumor heterogeneity, it is still challenging to design a nanozyme-based system for the accurate diagnosis and treatment of different types of tumors. Ninth, drug resistance is one of the main reasons for the failure of cancer chemotherapy. Although specific nanozymes have been demonstrated to kill chemotherapeutics-resistant cancer cells, it remains unknown whether the nanozyme-based treatment leads to the drug resistance. Tenth, some nanozymes are highly stable and hard to be excreted from the body, while others are easy to be metabolized and also prone to inactivate in the living system. As a result, the design of nanozymes for in vivo applications should balance stability and biosafety. Finally but not least, the toxicology and biosafety data of nanozymes are still lacking. Before future clinical uses, the nanozymes should meet the demands of biosafety with high enzymatic efficiency. It is worthwhile to evaluate the long-term biocompatibility and catalytic efficiency of nanozymes. Thus, this review article is expected to stimulate the further development of the nanozyme field.

References 154

  1. 1.

    Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249.

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.21660

  2. 2.

    Tasciotti E, Liu X, Bhavane R, Plant K, Leonard AD, et al. Mesoporous silicon particles as a multistage delivery system for imaging and therapeutic applications. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008;3:151-157.

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2008.34

  3. 3.

    Lammers T, Aime S, Hennink WE, Storm G, Kiessling F. Theranostic nanomedicine. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011;44(10):1029-1038.

    Not in our library10.1021/ar200019c

  4. 4.

    Ashley CE, Carnes EC, Phillips GK, Padilla D, Durfee PN, et al. The targeted delivery of multicomponent cargos to cancer cells by nanoporous particle-supported lipid bilayers. Nat. Mater. 2011;10:389-397.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat2992

  5. 5.

    Zhang X, Chen X, Guo Y, Gao G, Wang D, et al. Dual gate-controlled therapeutics for overcoming bacterium-induced drug resistance and potentiating cancer immunotherapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60(25):14013-14021.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.202102059

  6. 6.

    Yuan Y, Zhang J, Qi X, Li S, Liu G, et al. Furin-mediated intracellular self-assembly of olsalazine nanoparticles for enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and tumour therapy. Nat. Mater. 2019;18:1376-1383.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41563-019-0503-4

  7. 7.

    Zhang X, Chen X, Guo Y, Jia HR, Jiang YW, et al. Endosome/lysosome-detained supramolecular nanogels as an efflux retarder and autophagy inhibitor for repeated photodynamic therapy of multidrug-resistant cancer. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020;5(3):481-487.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9nh00643e

  8. 8.

    Li S, Su W, Wu H, Yuan T, Yuan C, et al. Targeted tumour theranostics in mice via carbon quantum dots structurally mimicking large amino acids. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020;4:704-716.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41551-020-0540-y

  9. 9.

    Zhang X, Chen X, Song J, Zhang J, Ren X, et al. Size-transformable nanostructures: from design to biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 2020;32(48):2003752.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.202003752

  10. 10.

    Liu J, Huang J, Zhang L, Lei J. Multifunctional metal−organic framework heterostructures for enhanced cancer therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50(2):1188-1218.

    Not in our library10.1039/d0cs00178c

  11. 11.

    Yao S, Liu Z, Li L. Recent progress in nanoscale covalent organic frameworks for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021;13:176.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40820-021-00696-2

  12. 12.

    Mohamed MM, Sloane BF. Cysteine cathepsins: Multifunctional enzymes in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006;6:764-775.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1949

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Kirk O, Borchert TV, Fuglsang CC. Industrial enzyme applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002;13(4):345-351.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0958-1669(02)00328-2

  15. 15.

    Wang X, Hu Y, Wei H. Nanozymes in bionanotechnology: from sensing to therapeutics and beyond. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016;3(1):41-60.

    Not in our library10.1039/c5qi00240k

  16. 16.

    Wang D, Wu H, Lim WQ, Phua SZF, Xu P, et al. A mesoporous nanoenzyme derived from metal-organic frameworks with endogenous oxygen generation to alleviate tumor hypoxia for significantly enhanced photodynamic therapy. Adv. Mater. 2019;31(27):1901893.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201901893

  17. 17.

    Jiang D, Ni D, Rosenkrans ZT, Huang P, Yan X, et al. Nanozyme: new horizons for responsive biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48(14):3683-3704.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8cs00718g

  18. 18.

    Wei H, Gao L, Fan K, Liu J, He J, et al. Nanozymes: a clear definition with fuzzy edges. Nano Today. 2021;40:101269.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101269

  19. 19.

    Liang M, Yan X. Nanozymes: from new concepts, mechanisms, and standards to applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52(8):2190-2200.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00140

  20. 20.

    Wu J, Wang X, Wang Q, Lou Z, Li S, et al. Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): next-generation artificial enzymes (II). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48(4):1004-1076.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8cs00457a

  21. 21.

    Huang Y, Ren J, Qu X. Nanozymes: classification, catalytic mechanisms, activity regulation, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2019;119(6):4357-4412.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00672

  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.

    Liu X, Gao Y, Chandrawati R, Hosta-Rigau L. Therapeutic applications of multifunctional nanozymes. Nanoscale. 2019;11(44):21046-21060.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9nr06596b

  26. 26.

    Han J, Yoon J. Supramolecular nanozyme-based cancer catalytic therapy. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020;3(11):7344-7351.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsabm.0c01127

  27. 27.

    Li M, Zhang H, Hou Y, Wang X, Xue C, et al. State-of-the-art iron-based nanozymes for biocatalytic tumor therapy. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020;5(2):202-217.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9nh00577c

  28. 28.

    Ma J, Qiu J, Wang S. Nanozymes for catalytic cancer immunotherapy. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020;3(6):4925-4943.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsanm.0c00396

  29. 29.

    Wang D, Jana D, Zhao Y. Metal−organic framework derived nanozymes in biomedicine. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020;53(7):1389-1400.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00268

  30. 30.

    Wang D, Zhao Y. Single-atom engineering of metal−organic frameworks toward healthcare. Chem. 2021;7(10):2635-2671.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chempr.2021.08.020

  31. 31.

    Zhang W, Liu J, Li X, Zheng Y, Chen L, et al. Precise chemodynamic therapy of cancer by trifunctional bacterium-based nanozymes. ACS Nano. 2021;15(12):19321-19333.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.1c05605

  32. 32.

    Dong S, Dong Y, Liu B, Liu J, Liu S, et al. Guiding transition metal-doped hollow cerium tandem nanozymes with elaborately regulated multi-enzymatic activities for intensive chemodynamic therapy. Adv. Mater. 2022;34(7):2107054.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.202107054

  33. 33.

    Kim MI, Ye Y, Woo MA, Lee J, Park HG. A highly efficient colorimetric immunoassay using a nanocomposite entrapping magnetic and platinum nanoparticles in ordered mesoporous carbon. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2014;3(1):36-41.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.201300100

  34. 34.

    Gong F, Yang N, Wang Y, Zhuo M, Zhao Q, et al. Oxygen-deficient bimetallic oxide fewox nanosheets as peroxidase-like nanozyme for sensing cancer via photoacoustic imaging. Small. 2020;16(46):2003496.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.202003496

  35. 35.

    Hu X, Li F, Xia F, Guo X, Wang N, et al. Biodegradation-mediated enzymatic activity-tunable molybdenum oxide nanourchins for tumor-specific cascade catalytic therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(3):1636-1644.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.9b13586

  36. 36.

    Liu C, Xing J, Akakuru OU, Luo L, Sun S, et al. Nanozymes-engineered metal−organic frameworks for catalytic cascades-enhanced synergistic cancer therapy. Nano Lett. 2019;19(8):5674-5682.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02253

  37. 37.

    Jana D, Wang D, Bindra AK, Guo Y, Liu J, et al. Ultrasmall alloy nanozyme for ultrasound- and near-infrared light-promoted tumor ablation. ACS Nano. 2021;15(4):7774-7782.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.1c01830

  38. 38.
  39. 39.

    Wang Z, Zhen X, Upputuri PK, Jiang Y, Lau J, et al. Redox-activatable and acid-enhanced for second near-infrared photoacoustic tomography and combined photothermal tumor therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(5):5816-5825.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.9b01411

  40. 40.

    Gao L, Zhuang J, Nie L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, et al. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotech. 2007;2:577-583.

    Not in our library10.1038/nnano.2007.260

  41. 41.

    Lu C, Liu X, Li Y, Yu F, Tang L, et al. Multifunctional Janus hematite-silica nanoparticles: mimicking peroxidase-like activity and sensitive colorimetric detection of glucose. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(28):15395-15402.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.5b03423

  42. 42.

    Huang X, Xia F, Nan Z. Fabrication of FeS2/SiO2 double mesoporous hollow spheres as an artificial peroxidase and rapid determination of H2O2 and glutathione. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(41):46539-46548.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.0c12593

  43. 43.

    Chen J, Wang Q, Huang L, Zhang H, Rong K, et al. Prussian blue with intrinsic heme-like structure as peroxidase mimic. Nano Res. 2018;11:4905-4913.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12274-018-2079-8

  44. 44.

    Liu W, Chu L, Zhang C, Ni P, Jiang Y, et al. Hemin-assisted synthesis of peroxidase-like Fe-N-C nanozymes for detection of ascorbic acid-generating bio-enzymes. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;415:128876.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2021.128876

  45. 45.

    Geng R, Chang R, Zou Q, Shen G, Jiao T, et al. Biomimetic nanozymes based on coassembly of amino acid and hemin for catalytic oxidation and sensing of biomolecules. Small. 2021;17(19):2008114.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.202008114

  46. 46.

    André R, Natálio F, Humanes M, Leppin J, Heinze K, et al. V2O5 nanowires with an intrinsic peroxidase-like activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011;21(3):501-509.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201001302

  47. 47.

    Sahar S, Zeb A, Ling C, Raja A, Wang G, et al. A hybrid VOx incorporated hexacyanoferrate nanostructured hydrogel as a multienzyme mimetic via cascade reactions. ACS Nano. 2020;14(3):3017-3031.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.9b07886

  48. 48.

    Sajjad A, Bhatti SH, Ali Z, Jaffari GH, Khan NA, et al. Photoinduced fabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticles: transformation of morphological and biological response on light irradiance. ACS Omega. 2021;6(17):11783-11793.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsomega.1c01512

  49. 49.

    Wen SH, Zhong XL, Wu YD, Liang RP, Zhang L, et al. Colorimetric assay conversion to highly sensitive electrochemical assay for bimodal detection of arsenate based on cobalt oxyhydroxide nanozyme via arsenate absorption. Anal. Chem. 2019;91(10):6487-6497.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05121

  50. 50.

    Wu J, Yang Q, Li Q, Li H, Li F. Two-dimensional MnO2 nanozyme-mediated homogeneous electrochemical detection of organophosphate pesticides without the interference of H2O2 and color. Anal. Chem. 2021;93(8):4084-4091.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05257

  51. 51.

    Wang Y, Jia G, Cui X, Zhao X, Zhang Q, et al. Coordination number regulation of molybdenum single-atom nanozyme peroxidase-like specificity. Chem. 2021;7(2):436-449.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chempr.2020.10.023

  52. 52.

    Chen TM, Wu XJ, Wang JX, Yang GW. WSe2 few layers with enzyme mimic activity for high-sensitive and high-selective visual detection of glucose. Nanoscale. 2017;9(32):11806-11813.

    Not in our library10.1039/c7nr03179c

  53. 53.

    Liu Y, Nie N, Tang H, Zhang C, Chen K, et al. Effective antibacterial activity of degradable copper-doped phosphate-based glass nanozymes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13(10):11631-11645.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.0c22746

  54. 54.

    Navyatha B, Singh S, Nara S. Auperoxidase nanozymes: promises and applications in biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021;175:112882.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bios.2020.112882

  55. 55.

    Wang D, Zhang B, Ding H, Liu D, Xiang J, et al. TiO2 supported single Ag atoms nanozyme for elimination of SARS-CoV2. Nano Today. 2021;40:101243.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101243

  56. 56.

    Jin L, Meng Z, Zhang Y, Cai S, Zhang Z, et al. Ultrasmall Pt nanoclusters as robust peroxidase mimics for colorimetric detection of glucose in human serum. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9(11):10027-10033.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.7b01616

  57. 57.

    Huang Q, Zhang J, Li W, Fu Y. A heparin-modified palladium nanozyme for photometric determination of protamine. Microchim. Acta. 2020;187:226.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00604-020-4208-9

  58. 58.

    Yim G, Kim CY, Kang S, Min DH, Kang K, et al. Intrinsic peroxidase-mimicking Ir nanoplates for nanozymatic anticancer and antibacterial treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(37):41062-41070.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.0c10981

  59. 59.

    He S, Yang L, Balasubramanian P, Li S, Peng H, et al. Osmium nanozyme as peroxidase mimic with high performance and negligible interference of O2. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020;8(47):25226-25234.

    Not in our library10.1039/d0ta09247a

  60. 60.

    He L, Li Y, Wu Q, Wang DM, Li CM, et al. Ru(III)-based metal−organic gels: Intrinsic horseradish and NADH peroxidase-mimicking nanozyme. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11(32):29158-29166.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.9b09283

  61. 61.

    Ghosh S, Roy P, Karmodak N, Jemmis ED, Mugesh G. Nanoisozymes: crystal-facet-dependent enzyme-mimetic activity of V2O5 nanomaterials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57(17):4510-4515.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201800681

  62. 62.

    Zhang R, Yan X, Fan K. Nanozymes inspired by natural enzymes. Acc. Mater. Res. 2021;2(7):534-547.

    Not in our library10.1021/accountsmr.1c00074

  63. 63.

    Wang H, Li P, Yu D, Zhang Y, Wang Z, et al. Unraveling the enzymatic activity of oxygenated carbon nanotubes and their application in the treatment of bacterial infections. Nano Lett. 2018;18(6):3344-3351.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b05095

  64. 64.

    Song Y, Wang X, Zhao C, Qu K, Ren J, et al. Label-free colorimetric detection of single nucleotide polymorphism by using single-walled carbon nanotube intrinsic peroxidase-like activity. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16(12):3617-3621.

    Not in our library10.1002/chem.200902643

  65. 65.

    Song Y, Qu K, Zhao C, Ren J, Qu X. Graphene oxide: intrinsic peroxidase catalytic activity and its application to glucose detection. Adv. Mater. 2010;22(19):2206-2210.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.200903783

  66. 66.

    Zhong Q, Chen Y, Su A, Wang Y. Synthesis of catalytically active carbon quantum dots and its application for colorimetric detection of glutathione. Sens. Actuators B. 2018;273:1098-1102.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.026

  67. 67.

    Wang H, Liu C, Liu Z, Ren J, Qu X. Specific oxygenated groups enriched graphene quantum dots as highly efficient enzyme mimics. Small. 2018;14(13):1703710.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.201703710

  68. 68.

    Comotti M, Pina CD, Matarrese R, Rossi M. The catalytic activity of "naked" gold particles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43(43):5812-5815.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.200460446

  69. 69.

    Liu C, Cai Y, Wang J, Liu X, Ren H, et al. Facile preparation of homogeneous copper nanoclusters exhibiting excellent tetraenzyme mimetic activities for colorimetric glutathione sensing and fluorimetric ascorbic acid sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(38):42521-42530.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.0c11983

  70. 70.

    Hafez ME, Ma H, Ma W, Long YT. Unveiling the intrinsic catalytic activities of single-gold-nanoparticle-based enzyme mimetics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58(19):6327-6332.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201901384

  71. 71.

    Luo W, Zhu C, Su S, Li D, He Y, et al. Self-catalyzed, self-limiting growth of glucose oxidase-mimicking gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010;4(12):7451-7458.

    Not in our library10.1021/nn102592h

  72. 72.

    Wang GL, Jin LY, Wu XM, Dong YM, Li ZJ. Label-free colorimetric sensor for mercury(II) and DNA on the basis of mercury(II) switched-on the oxidase-mimicking activity of silver nanoclusters. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2015;871:1-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.aca.2015.02.027

  73. 73.

    Yu CJ, Chen TH, Jiang JY, Tseng WL. Lysozyme-directed synthesis of platinum nanoclusters as a mimic oxidase. Nanoscale. 2014;6(16):9618-9624.

    Not in our library10.1039/c3nr06896j

  74. 74.

    Qiu N, Liu Y, Guo R. Electrodeposition-assisted rapid preparation of Pt nanocluster/3D graphene hybrid nanozymes with outstanding multiple oxidase-like activity for distinguishing colorimetric determination of dihydroxybenzene isomers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12(13):15553-15561.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.9b23546

  75. 75.

    Cui M, Zhao Y, Wang C, Song Q. The oxidase-like activity of iridium nanoparticles, and their application to colorimetric determination of dissolved oxygen. Microchim. Acta. 2017;184:3113-3119.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00604-017-2326-9

  76. 76.

    Wang D, Wu H, Wang C, Gu L, Chen H, et al. Self-assembled single-site nanozyme for tumor-specific amplified cascade enzymatic therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60(6):3001-3007.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.202008868

  77. 77.

    Asati A, Santra S, Kaittanis C, Nath S, Perez JM. Oxidase-like activity of polymer-coated cerium oxide nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48(13):2308-2312.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.200805279

  78. 78.

    Pautler R, Kelly EY, Huang PJ, Cao J, Liu B, et al. Attaching DNA to nanoceria: regulating oxidase activity and fluorescence quenching. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2013;5(15):6820-6825.

    Not in our library10.1021/am4018863

  79. 79.

    Cheng H, Lin S, Muhammad F, Lin YW, Wei H. Rationally modulate the oxidase-like activity of nanoceria for self-regulated bioassays. ACS Sens. 2016;1(11):1336-1343.

    Not in our library10.1021/acssensors.6b00500

  80. 80.

    Huang L, Zhang W, Chen K, Zhu W, Liu X, et al. Facet-selective response of trigger molecule to CeO2 110 for up-regulating oxidase-like activity. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;330:746-752.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.026

  81. 81.

    Cao F, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Wang Z, Zhang L, et al. Ultrasmall nanozymes isolated within porous carbonaceous frameworks for synergistic cancer therapy: enhanced oxidative damage and reduced energy supply. Chem. Mater. 2018;30(21):7831-7839.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03348

  82. 82.

    Han J, Liu K, Chang R, Zhao L, Yan X. Photooxidase-mimicking nanovesicles with superior photocatalytic activity and stability based on amphiphilic amino acid and phthalocyanine co-assembly. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58(7):2000-2004.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201811478

  83. 83.

    Zhang Y, Wang F, Liu C, Wang Z, Kang L, et al. Nanozyme decorated metal−organic frameworks for enhanced photodynamic therapy. ACS Nano. 2018;12(1):651-661.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.7b07746

  84. 84.
  85. 85.

    Li S, Shang L, Xu B, Wang S, Gu K, et al. A nanozyme with photo-enhanced dual enzyme-like activities for deep pancreatic cancer therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58(36):12624-12631.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201904751

  86. 86.

    Dan Q, Hu D, Ge Y, Zhang S, Li S, et al. Ultrasmall theranostic nanozymes to modulate tumor hypoxia for augmenting photodynamic therapy and radiotherapy. Biomater. Sci. 2020;8(3):973-987.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9bm01742a

  87. 87.

    Li Y, Sun P, Zhao L, Yan X, Ng DKP, et al. Ferric ion driven assembly of catalase-like supramolecular photosensitizing nanozymes for combating hypoxic tumors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59(51):23228-23238.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.202010005

  88. 88.

    Zhang R, Chen L, Liang Q, Xi J, Zhao H, et al. Unveiling the active sites on ferrihydrite with apparent catalase-like activity for potentiating radiotherapy. Nano Today. 2021;41:101317.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101317

  89. 89.

    Cheng Y, Cheng C, Yao J, Yu Y, Liu Y, et al. Mn3O4 nanozyme for inflammatory bowel disease therapy. Adv. Therap. 2021;4(9):2100081.

    Not in our library10.1002/adtp.202100081

  90. 90.

    Wang C, Li Y, Yang W, Zhou L, Wei S. Nanozyme with robust catalase activity by multiple mechanisms and its application for hypoxic tumor treatment. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2021;10(19):2100601.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.202100601

  91. 91.

    Li Q, Gao Y, Shen J, Mu X, Wang J, et al. Catalase-like quantum dots of L-lysine polymerization as free radical scavengers for hypoxic brain injury. Mater. Today Commum. 2021;27:102286.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102286

  92. 92.

    Jiao M, Li Z, Li X, Zhang Z, Yuan Q, et al. Solving the H2O2 by-product problem using a catalase-mimicking nanozyme cascade to enhance glycolic acid oxidase. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;388:124249.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cej.2020.124249

  93. 93.

    Huang Y, Liu Z, Liu C, Ju E, Zhang Y, et al. Self-assembly of multi-nanozymes to mimic an intracellular antioxidant defense system. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55(23):6646-6650.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201600868

  94. 94.

    Mu J, Zhao X, Li J, Yang EC, Zhao XJ. Novel hierarchical NiO nanoflowers exhibiting intrinsic superoxide dismutase-like activity. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2016;4(31):5217-5221.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6tb01390b

  95. 95.

    Zhang W, Hu S, Yin JJ, He W, Lu W, et al. Prussian blue nanoparticles as multienzyme mimetics and reactive oxygen species scavengers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138(18):5860-5865.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.5b12070

  96. 96.

    Korschelt K, Ragg R, Metzger CS, Kluenker M, Oster M, et al. Glycine-functionalized copper(II) hydroxide nanoparticles with high intrinsic superoxide dismutase activity. Nanoscale. 2017;9(11):3952-3960.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6nr09810j

  97. 97.

    Singh N, Savanur MA, Srivastava S, D'Silva P, Mugesh G. A redox modulatory Mn3O4 nanozyme with multi-enzyme activity provides efficient cytoprotection to human cells in a Parkinson's disease model. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56(45):14267-14271.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201708573

  98. 98.

    Ren X, Wang M, He X, Li Z, Zhang J, et al. Superoxide dismutase mimetic ability of Mn-doped ZnS QDs. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018;29(12):1865-1868.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cclet.2018.12.007

  99. 99.

    Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Cao F, Sang Y, et al. Constructing metal–organic framework nanodots as bio-inspired artificial superoxide dismutase for alleviating endotoxemia. Mater. Horiz. 2019;6(8):1682-1687.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9mh00339h

  100. 100.

    Yan BC, Cao J, Liu J, Gu Y, Xu Z, et al. Dietary Fe3O4 nanozymes prevent the injury of neurons and blood-brain barrier integrity from cerebral ischemic stroke. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021;7(1):299-310.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01312

  101. 101.

    Korsvik C, Patil S, Seal S, Self WT. Superoxide dismutase mimetic properties exhibited by vacancy engineered ceria nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2007;10:1056-1058.

    Not in our library10.1039/b615134e

  102. 102.

    Samuel EL, Marcano DC, Berka V, Bitner BR, Wu G, et al. Highly efficient conversion of superoxide to oxygen using hydrophilic carbon clusters. PNAS. 2015;112(8):2343-2348.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1417047112

  103. 103.

    Linehan WM, Bratslavsky G, Pinto PA, Schmidt LS, Neckers L, et al. Molecular diagnosis and therapy of kidney cancer. Annu. Rev. Med. 2010;61:329-343.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.med.042808.171650

  104. 104.

    Zhang X, Wu FG, Liu P, Gu N, Chen Z. Enhanced fluorescence of gold nanoclusters composed of HAuCl4 and histidine by glutathione: glutathione detection and selective cancer cell imaging. Small. 2014;10(24):5170-5177.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.201401658

  105. 105.

    Liu Y, Zhou M, Cao W, Wang X, Wang Q, et al. Light-responsive metal−organic framework as an oxidase mimic for cellular glutathione detection. Anal. Chem. 2019;91(13):8170-8175.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00512

  106. 106.

    Pang HH, Ke YC, Li NS, Chen YT, Huang CY, et al. A new lateral flow plasmonic biosensor based on gold-viral biomineralized nanozyme for on-site intracellular glutathione detection to evaluate drug-resistance level. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020;165:112325.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bios.2020.112325

  107. 107.

    Wang Z, Yang X, Feng J, Tang Y, Jiang Y, et al. Label-free detection of DNA by combining gated mesoporous silica and catalytic signal amplification of platinum nanoparticles. Analyst. 2014;139(23):6088-6091.

    Not in our library10.1039/c4an01539h

  108. 108.

    Bhattacharjee R, Tanaka S, Moriam S, Masud MK, Lin J, et al. Porous nanozymes: the peroxidase-mimetic activity of mesoporous iron oxide for the colorimetric and electrochemical detection of global DNA methylation. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2018;6(29):4783-4791.

    Not in our library10.1039/c8tb01132j

  109. 109.

    Huang J, Jiao L, Xu W, Fang Q, Wang H, et al. Immobilizing enzymes on noble metal hydrogel nanozymes with synergistically enhanced peroxidase activity for ultrasensitive immunoassays by cascade signal amplification. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13(28):33383-33391.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.1c09100

  110. 110.

    Maji SK, Mandal AK, Nguyen KT, Borah P, Zhao Y. Cancer cell detection and therapeutics using peroxidase-active nanohybrid of gold nanoparticle-loaded mesoporous silica-coated graphene. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(18):9807-9816.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.5b01758

  111. 111.

    Jiang B, Yan L, Zhang J, Zhou M, Shi G, et al. Biomineralization synthesis of the cobalt nanozyme in SP94-ferritin nanocages for prognostic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11(10):9747-9755.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.8b20942

  112. 112.

    Z. Wang, Z. Li, Z. Sun, S. Wang, Z. Ali et al., Visualization nanozyme based on tumor microenvironment “unlocking” for intensive combination therapy of breast cancer. Sci. Adv. 6(48), eabc8733 (2020). 10.1126/sciadv.abc8733

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.abc8733

  113. 113.

    Teng L, Han X, Liu Y, Lu C, Yin B, et al. Smart nanozyme platform with activity-correlated ratiometric molecular imaging for predicting therapeutic effects. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60(50):26142-26150.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.202110427

  114. 114.

    Yang F, Hu S, Zhang Y, Cai X, Huang Y, et al. A hydrogen peroxide-responsive O2 nanogenerator for ultrasound and magnetic-resonance dual modality imaging. Adv. Mater. 2012;24(38):5205-5211.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201202367

  115. 115.

    Feng L, Liu B, Xie R, Wang D, Qian C, et al. An ultrasmall SnFe2O4 nanozyme with endogenous oxygen generation and glutathione depletion for synergistic cancer therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;31(5):2006216.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.202006216

  116. 116.

    Cao C, Zou H, Yang N, Li H, Cai Y, et al. Fe3O4/Ag/Bi2MoO6 photoactivatable nanozyme for self-replenishing and sustainable cascaded nanocatalytic cancer therapy. Adv. Mater. 2021;33(52):2106996.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.202106996

  117. 117.

    Liang S, Deng X, Chang Y, Sun C, Shao S, et al. Intelligent hollow Pt-CuS Janus architecture for synergistic catalysis-enhanced sonodynamic and photothermal cancer therapy. Nano Lett. 2019;19(6):4134-4145.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01595

  118. 118.

    Zhong X, Wang X, Cheng L, Tang YA, Zhan G, et al. GSH-depleted PtCu3 nanocages for chemodynamic- enhanced sonodynamic cancer therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;30(4):1907954.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201907954

  119. 119.

    Wang M, Chang M, Chen Q, Wang D, Li C, et al. Au2Pt-PEG-Ce6 nanoformulation with dual nanozyme activities for synergistic chemodynamic therapy/phototherapy. Biomaterials. 2020;252:120093.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120093

  120. 120.

    Ma Z, Foda MF, Liang H, Zhao Y, Han H. In situ nanozyme-amplified NIR-II phototheranostics for tumor-specific imaging and therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31(37):2103765.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.202103765

  121. 121.

    Wang J, Gao S, Wang X, Zhang H, Ren X, et al. Self-assembled manganese phthalocyanine nanoparticles with enhanced peroxidase-like activity for anti-tumor therapy. Nano Res. 2022;15:2347-2354.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12274-021-3854-5

  122. 122.

    Zhu D, Chen H, Huang C, Li G, Wang X, et al. H2O2 self-producing single-atom nanozyme hydrogels as light-controlled oxidative stress amplifier for enhanced synergistic therapy by transforming “cold” tumors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.202110268

  123. 123.
  124. 124.

    Liu J, Wang A, Liu S, Yang R, Wang L, et al. A titanium nitride nanozyme for pH-responsive and irradiation-enhanced cascade-catalytic tumor therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60(48):25328-25338.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.202106750

  125. 125.
  126. 126.

    Meng X, Li D, Chen L, He H, Wang Q, et al. High-performance self-cascade pyrite nanozymes for apoptosis-ferroptosis synergistic tumor therapy. ACS Nano. 2021;15(3):5735-5751.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.1c01248

  127. 127.

    Chen Y, Li ZH, Hu JJ, Peng SY, Rong L, et al. Remote-controlled multi-enzyme system for enhanced tumor therapy via dark/light relay catalysis. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020;5(2):283-293.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9nh00583h

  128. 128.

    Zhu Y, Wang W, Cheng J, Qu Y, Dai Y, et al. Stimuli-responsive manganese single-atom nanozyme for tumor therapy via integrated cascade reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60(17):9480-9488.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.202017152

  129. 129.
  130. 130.
  131. 131.

    Wei C, Liu Y, Zhu X, Chen X, Zhou Y, et al. Iridium/ruthenium nanozyme reactors with cascade catalytic ability for synergistic oxidation therapy and starvation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Biomaterials. 2020;238:119848.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119848

  132. 132.

    Yang L, Ren C, Xu M, Song Y, Lu Q, et al. Rod-shape inorganic biomimetic mutual-reinforcing MnO2-Au nanozymes for catalysis-enhanced hypoxic tumor therapy. Nano Res. 2020;13:2246-2258.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12274-020-2844-3

  133. 133.

    Yang X, Yang Y, Gao F, Wei JJ, Qian CG, et al. Biomimetic hybrid nanozymes with self-supplied H+ and accelerated O2 generation for enhanced starvation and photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumors. Nano Lett. 2019;19(7):4334-4342.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00934

  134. 134.

    Liang S, Deng X, Xu G, Xiao X, Wang M, et al. A novel Pt–TiO2 heterostructure with oxygen-deficient layer as bilaterally enhanced sonosensitizer for synergistic chemo-sonodynamic cancer therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30(13):1908598.

    Not in our library10.1002/adfm.201908598

  135. 135.

    Zhou X, You M, Wang F, Wang Z, Gao X, et al. Multifunctional graphdiyne-cerium oxide nanozymes facilitate microrna delivery and attenuate tumor hypoxia for highly efficient radiotherapy of esophageal cancer. Adv. Mater. 2021;33(24):2100556.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.202100556

  136. 136.

    Wang M, Li H, Huang B, Chen S, Cui R, et al. An ultra-stable, oxygen-supply nanoprobe emitting in near-infrared-II window to guide and enhance radiotherapy by promoting anti-tumor immunity. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2021;10(12):2100090.

    Not in our library10.1002/adhm.202100090

  137. 137.

    Feng L, Dong Z, Liang C, Chen M, Tao D, et al. Iridium nanocrystals encapsulated liposomes as near-infrared light controllable nanozymes for enhanced cancer radiotherapy. Biomaterials. 2018;181:81-91.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.049

  138. 138.

    Xu B, Cui Y, Wang W, Li S, Lyu C, et al. Immunomodulation-enhanced nanozyme-based tumor catalytic therapy. Adv. Mater. 2020;32(33):2003563.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.202003563

  139. 139.

    Ling X, Chen X, Riddell IA, Tao W, Wang J, et al. Glutathione-scavenging poly(disulfide amide) nanoparticles for the effective delivery of Pt(IV) prodrugs and reversal of cisplatin resistance. Nano Lett. 2018;18(7):4618-4625.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01924

  140. 140.

    Zhang X, Chen X, Jiang YW, Ma N, Xia LY, et al. Glutathione-depleting gold nanoclusters for enhanced cancer radiotherapy through synergistic external and internal regulations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10(13):10601-10606.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsami.8b00207

  141. 141.

    Fan H, Yan G, Zhao Z, Hu X, Zhang W, et al. A smart photosensitizer-manganese dioxide nanosystem for enhanced photodynamic therapy by reducing glutathione levels in cancer cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55(18):5477-5482.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201510748

  142. 142.

    Lin LS, Song J, Song L, Ke K, Liu Y, et al. Simultaneous fenton-like ion delivery and glutathione depletion by MnO2-based nanoagent to enhance chemodynamic therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57(18):4902-4906.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201712027

  143. 143.

    Geng B, Xu S, Li P, Li X, Fang F, et al. Platinum crosslinked carbon dot@TiO2-x p-n junctions for relapse-free sonodynamic tumor eradication via high-yield ROS and GSH depletion. Small. 2022;18(6):2103528.

    Not in our library10.1002/smll.202103528

  144. 144.

    Wang W, Zhang X, Huang R, Hirschbiegel CM, Wang H, et al. In situ activation of therapeutics through bioorthogonal catalysis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021;176:113893.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2021.113893

  145. 145.

    Folkes LK, Wardman P. Oxidative activation of indole-3-acetic acids to cytotoxic species—a potential new role for plant auxins in cancer therapy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001;61(2):129-136.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-2952(00)00498-6

  146. 146.

    Liang Q, Xi J, Gao XJ, Zhang R, Yang Y, et al. A metal-free nanozyme-activated prodrug strategy for targeted tumor catalytic therapy. Nano Today. 2020;35:100935.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100935

  147. 147.

    Wang Z, Zhang R, Yan X, Fan K. Structure and activity of nanozymes: inspirations for de novo design of nanozymes. Mater. Today. 2020;41:81-119.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mattod.2020.08.020

  148. 148.

    Guan Y, Li M, Dong K, Gao N, Ren J, et al. Ceria/POMs hybrid nanoparticles as a mimicking metallopeptidase for treatment of neurotoxicity of amyloid-β peptide. Biomaterials. 2016;98:92-102.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.005

  149. 149.

    Chen Z, Ji H, Liu C, Bing W, Wang Z, et al. A multinuclear metal complex based dnase-mimetic artificial enzyme: matrix cleavage for combating bacterial biofilms. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55(36):10732-10736.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201605296

  150. 150.

    Chen Z, Zhao C, Ju E, Ji H, Ren J, et al. Design of surface-active artificial enzyme particles to stabilize pickering emulsions for high-performance biphasic biocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2016;28(8):1682-1688.

    Not in our library10.1002/adma.201504557

  151. 151.

    Xu H, Liu M, Huang X, Min Q, Zhu JJ. Multiplexed quantitative MALDI MS approach for assessing activity and inhibition of protein kinases based on postenrichment dephosphorylation of phosphopeptides by metal-organic framework-templated porous CeO2. Anal. Chem. 2018;90(16):9859-9867.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01938

  152. 152.

    Shrivastava A, Khan AA, Khurshid M, Kalam MA, Jain SK, et al. Recent developments in L-asparaginase discovery and its potential as anticancer agent. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2016;100:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.01.002

  153. 153.
  154. 154.

    Ma Z, Wu L, Han K, Han H. Pt nanozyme for O2 self-sufficient, tumor-specific oxidative damage and drug resistance reversal. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019;4(5):1124-1131.

    Not in our library10.1039/c9nh00088g

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.