Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 29, 2026.

Plant Surfaces: Structures and Functions for Biomimetic Innovations

Wilhelm Barthlott, Matthias Mail, Bharat Bhushan and 1 more

Nano-Micro Letters · 2017 · Review

doi:10.1007/s40820-016-0125-1

Abstract

An overview of plant surface structures and their evolution is presented. It combines surface chemistry and architecture with their functions and refers to possible biomimetic applications. Within some 3.5 billion years biological species evolved highly complex multifunctional surfaces for interacting with their environments: some 10 million living prototypes (i.e., estimated number of existing plants and animals) for engineers. The complexity of the hierarchical structures and their functionality in biological organisms surpasses all abiotic natural surfaces: even superhydrophobicity is restricted in nature to living organisms and was probably a key evolutionary step with the invasion of terrestrial habitats some 350–450 million years ago in plants and insects. Special attention should be paid to the fact that global environmental change implies a dramatic loss of species and with it the biological role models. Plants, the dominating group of organisms on our planet, are sessile organisms with large multifunctional surfaces and thus exhibit particular intriguing features. Superhydrophilicity and superhydrophobicity are focal points in this work. We estimate that superhydrophobic plant leaves (e.g., grasses) comprise in total an area of around 250 million km2, which is about 50% of the total surface of our planet. A survey of structures and functions based on own examinations of almost 20,000 species is provided, for further references we refer to Barthlott et al. (Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 374: 20160191, 1). A basic difference exists between aquatic non-vascular and land-living vascular plants; the latter exhibit a particular intriguing surface chemistry and architecture. The diversity of features is described in detail according to their hierarchical structural order. The first underlying and essential feature is the polymer cuticle superimposed by epicuticular wax and the curvature of single cells up to complex multicellular structures. A descriptive terminology for this diversity is provided. Simplified, the functions of plant surface characteristics may be grouped into six categories: (1) mechanical properties, (2) influence on reflection and absorption of spectral radiation, (3) reduction of water loss or increase of water uptake, moisture harvesting, (4) adhesion and non-adhesion (lotus effect, insect trapping), (5) drag and turbulence increase, or (6) air retention under water for drag reduction or gas exchange (Salvinia effect). This list is far from complete. A short overview of the history of bionics and the impressive spectrum of existing and anticipated biomimetic applications are provided. The major challenge for engineers and materials scientists, the durability of the fragile nanocoatings, is also discussed.

References 203

  1. 1.

    Barthlott W, Mail M, Neinhuis C. Superhydrophobic hierarchically structured surfaces in biology: evolution, structural principles and biomimetic applications. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2016;374(2073):20160191.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsta.2016.0191

  2. 2.

    Barthlott W, Ehler N. Raster-Elektronenmikroskopie der Epidermis-Oberflächen von Spermatophyten. Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt. 1977;19:1-105.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    S. Blackmore, K. Ferguson (eds.), in Pollen and Sres: Form and Function, vol. 12. Linnean Society Symposium Series (Academic Press, London, 1986)

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Agashe SN, Caulton E. Pollen and Spores: Application with Special Emphasis on Aerobiology and Allergy. 2009.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Koch K, Bhushan B, Barthlott W, Bhushan B. Multifunctional plant surfaces and smart materials. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. 2010;1399-1436.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Bhushan B. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. 2010.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann. Bot. Lond. 1997;79:667-677.

    Not in our library10.1006/anbo.1997.0400

  8. 8.

    Porembski S, Martens-Aly B, Barthlott W. Surface/volume-rations of plants with special consideration of succulents. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen. 1992;66:189-209.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Suttie JM, Reynolds SG, Batello C. Grasslands of the World. 2005.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Koch K, Blecher IC, König G, Kehraus S, Barthlott W. The superhydrophilic and superoleophilic leaf surface of Ruellia devosiana (Acanthaceae): a biological model for spreading of water and oil on surfaces. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009;36:339-350.

    Not in our library10.1071/fp08295

  11. 11.

    Barthlott W, Rafiqpoor D, Erdelen W, Knippers J, Nickel K, Speck T. Bionics and Biodiversity- Bio-Inspired Technical Innovation for a Sustainable Future. Biomimetic Research for Architecture and Building Construction-Biological Design and Integrative Structures. 2016.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Ripley RL, Bhushan B. Bioarchitecture: bioinspired art and architecture—a perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2016;374:20160192.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsta.2016.0192

  13. 13.

    R.H. Francé, Die Pflanze als Erfinder. Stuttgart, Germany: Franckh’sche Verlagshandlung (Engl. edition: Plants as inventors. London: Simpkin and Marshall, 1920)

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    J.C. Robinette (ed.), Living Prototypes–the Key to New Technology, in Proceeding of the Symposium. (Wright Air Development Division, 13–15 September 1960)

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta. 1997;202:1-8.

    Not in our library10.1007/s004250050096

  16. 16.

    von Baeyer HC. The Lotus effect. The Sciences. 2000;40(1):12-15.

    Not in our library10.1002/j.2326-1951.2000.tb03461.x

  17. 17.

    Bechert DW, Dinkelacker A, Reif W-E. On the fluid dynamic of the shark skin. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 1983.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Bechert DW, Bruse M, Hage W, Meyer R. Fluid mechanics of biological surfaces and their technological application. Naturwissenschaften. 2000;87:157-171.

    Not in our library10.1007/s001140050696

  19. 19.

    Bhushan B. Biomimetics-Bioinspired Hierarchical-Structured Surfaces for Green Science and Technology. 2016.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Forbes P. The Gecko’s Foot. 2005.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Barthlott W, Mail M, Bhushan B, Koch K, Bhushan B. Plant Surfaces: Structures and Functions for Biomimetic Applications. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. 2017.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Cutler D, Ditsch F, Meusel I, Theisen I, Wilhelmi H. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 1998;126:237-260.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02529.x

  23. 23.

    Dommisse A, Wirtz J, Koch K, Wandelt K, Barthlott W, Kolter T. Synthesis of Snonacosan-10-ol, the main component of plant surface tubular wax crystals. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007;2007:3508-3511.

    Not in our library10.1002/ejoc.200700262

  24. 24.

    Riederer M, Markstädter C, Kerstiens G. Cuticular Waxes: A Critical Assessment of Current Knowledge. Plant Cuticles an Integrated Functional Approach. 1996;189-200.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Kunst L, Samuels AL. Biosynthesis and secretion of plant cuticular wax. Prog. Lip. Res. 2003;42:51-80.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0163-7827(02)00045-0

  26. 26.

    Jeffree CE, Riederer M, Müller C. The Fine Structure of the Plant Cuticle. Biology of the Plant Cuticle. 2006;11-125.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Jetter R, Schäffer S. Chemical composition of the Prunus laurocerasus leaf surface. Dynamic changes of the epicuticular wax film during leaf development. Plant Phys. 2001;126:1725-1737.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.126.4.1725

  28. 28.

    Koch K, Barthlott W, Koch S, Hommes A, Wandelt K, Mamdouh W, De-Feyter S, Broekmann P. Structural analysis of wheat wax (Triticum aestivum, c.v. ‘Naturastar’ L.): from the molecular level to three dimensional crystals. Planta. 2005;223:258-270.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00425-005-0081-3

  29. 29.

    Jetter R, Kunst L, Samuels AL, Riederer M, Müller C. Composition of Plant Cuticular Waxes, in Biology of the Plant Cuticle. Annual Plant Reviews. 2006;145-175.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Baker EA, Cutler DF, Alvin KL, Price CE. Chemistry and Morphology of Plant Epicuticular Waxes. The Plant Cuticle. 1982;139-165.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Shepherd T, Griffiths DW. The effects of stress on plant cuticular waxes. New Phytol. 2006;171:469-499.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01826.x

  32. 32.

    Koch K, Hartmann KD, Schreiber L, Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Influence of air humidity on epicuticular wax chemical composition, morphology and wettability of leaf surfaces. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2006;56:1-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.09.013

  33. 33.

    Markstädter C, Federle W, Jetter R, Riederer M, Hölldobler B. Chemical composition of the slippery epicuticular wax blooms on Macaranga Thouars. (Euphorbiaceae) ant-plants. Chemoecology. 2000;10:33-40.

    Not in our library10.1007/s000490050005

  34. 34.

    Riedel M, Eichner A, Jetter R. Slippery surfaces of carnivorous plants: composition of epicuticular wax crystals in Nepenthes alata Blanco pitchers. Planta. 2003;218:87-97.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00425-003-1075-7

  35. 35.

    Wen M, Buschhaus C, Jetter R. Nanotubules on plant surfaces: chemical composition of epicuticular wax crystals on needles of Taxus baccata L. Phytochemistry. 2007;67:1808-1817.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.01.018

  36. 36.

    Ensikat H, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. Direct access to plant epicuticular wax crystals by a new mechanical isolation method. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2000;161:143-148.

    Not in our library10.1086/314234

  37. 37.

    Frölich D, Barthlott W. Die mikromorphologie der epicuticularen wachse und das system der monocotylen. Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt. 1988;63:1-135.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Hallam ND, Juniper BE, Preece TF, Dickinson CH. The Anatomy of the Leaf surface. The Ecology of Leaf Surface Micro-organisms. 1971;3-37.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Jeffree CE, Juniper BE, Southwood R. The Cuticle, Epicuticular Waxes and Trichomes of Plants, with Reference to Their Structure, Functions and Evolution. Insects and the Plant Surface. 1986;23-63.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Koch K, Neinhuis C, Ensikat HJ, Barthlott W. Self-assembly of epicuticular waxes on living plant surfaces imaged by atomic force microscopy (AFM). J. Exp. Bot. 2004;55:711-718.

    Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erh077

All 203 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.