Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Boosting ensembles for estimation of discharge coefficient and through flow discharge in broad-crested gabion weirs

Aliasghar Azma, Mohammad Tavakol Sadrabadi, Yakun Liu and 4 more

Applied Water Science · 2022

doi:10.1007/s13201-022-01841-x (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Gabion weirs are environment-friendly structures widely used for irrigation and drainage network purposes. These structures' hydraulic performance is fundamentally different from solid weirs' due to their porosity and the existence of a through-flow discharge. This paper investigates the reliability and suitability of a number of Machine learning models for estimation of hydraulic performance of gabion weirs. Generally, three different Boosting ensemble models, including Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and CatBoost, are compared to the well-known Random Forest and a Stacked Regression model, with respect to their accuracy in prediction of the discharge coefficient and through-flow discharge ratio of gabion weirs in free flow conditions. The Bayesian optimization approach is used to fine-tune model hyper-parameters automatically. Recursive feature elimination analysis is also performed to find optimum combination of features for each model. Results indicate that the CatBoost model has outperformed other models in terms of estimating the through flow discharge ratio ( Q in /Q t ) with R 2 = 0.982, while both XGBoost and CatBoost models have shown close performance in terms of estimating the discharge coefficient ( C d ) with R 2 of CatBoost equal to 0.994 and R 2 of XGBoost equal to 0.992. Weakest results were also produced by Decision tree regressor with R 2 = 0.821 and 0.865 for estimation of C d and Q in /Qt values.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

References53

  1. 32.

52 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.