Comparison of single-site and multi-site stochastic models for streamflow generation

Almost all water resources projects require past record of streamflow data and longer the record, the better the decision that can be taken during design or operation stage. However, in most of the cases, a long record of streamflow data is not available and it becomes essential to synthetically generate sequence of streamflow those are statistically similar to the observed data. Models to generate such sequences are available for a single river (single-site) and for both river and its tributaries (multi-site); however, comparative studies of these models needs to be done, before implementation to actual system. This study deals with the comparison of the performances of single-site and multi-site, seasonal streamflow generation models, applied to an existing river with tributary across which reservoirs were constructed. Since cross-correlation structure of the flows in a river–tributary system plays an important role in the integrated operation of the reservoirs, multi-site models are developed, as the cross-correlation cannot be preserved by the single-site models. Performances of the developed single-site and multi-site models are compared in terms of mean, standard deviation, skewness, serial correlation and cross-correlation of the observed and the generated series. The results indicated that cross-correlations are well preserved by the multi-site models only, whereas other statistical parameters, except serial correlation, are well preserved by both the single-site and multi-site models.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

35 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.