Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Role of Mast Cells in Shaping the Tumor Microenvironment

Daniel Elieh Ali Komi, Frank A. Redegeld

Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology · 2019 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1007/s12016-019-08753-w

Abstract

Early mast cell (MC) infiltration has been reported in a wide range of human and animal tumors particularly malignant melanoma and breast and colorectal cancer. The consequences of their presence in the tumor microenvironment (TME) or at their margins still remain unclear as it is associated with a good or poor prognosis based on the type and anatomical site of the tumor. Within the tumor, MC interactions occur with infiltrated immune cells, tumor cells, and extracellular matrix (ECM) through direct cell-to-cell interactions or release of a broad range of mediators capable of remodeling the TME. MCs actively contribute to angiogenesis and induce neovascularization by releasing the classical proangiogenic factors including VEGF, FGF-2, PDGF, and IL-6, and nonclassical proangiogenic factors mainly proteases including tryptase and chymase. MCs support tumor invasiveness by releasing a broad range of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). MC presence within the tumor gained additional significance when it was assumed that controlling its activation by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib and masitinib) and tryptase inhibitors (gabexate and nafamostat mesylate) or controlling their interactions with other cell types may have therapeutic benefit.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

In addition to tumor cells, a variety of cells (such as stromal cells and fibroblasts), extracellular matrix (ECM), a complicated network of blood-supplying vessels, and molecules (including signaling molecules) together shape the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME could be depicted as a smoldering site of inflammation where a large number of infiltrated or resident cells produce and release cytokines, chemokines, and enzymes such as TNF-α, MMP-9, Cox-2, IL-6, iNOS, and VEGF, capable of mediating the inflammatory responses. Maintenance, growth, metastasis, or eradication of tumors depends strongly on external signals received from surrounding immune and non-immune cells of TME. The final consequence of such orchestration of the immune response may be the malignant progression in the TME. The abnormal vasculature system of a tumor cannot sufficiently meet the oxygen requirement of the tumor cells. In return, hypoxic cancer cells release angiogenesis-inducing factors, mainly vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), which engages VEGFR2 expressed by endothelial cells (ECs). MCs localize at the margins of tumors and the TME, commonly around the vessels. The presence of MCs in the tumor structure is not a new finding as Paul Ehrlich already described them in his doctoral thesis in 1878. MCs are FcεRI+/CD117+ innate immune cells that differentiate from bone marrow–residing hematopoietic progenitor cells. To complete their cycle, the progenitors circulate in the blood to reach target organs by a well-organized trafficking induced by chemoattraction of mediators released from each organ. In addition to stem cell factor (SCF)—the main mast cell (MC) survival cytokine—CXCL12, IL-3, IL-4, IL-9, IL-10, IL-33, and TGF-β are other modulators of survival and growth of MCs. Although most of our knowledge in MC biology is obtained from studying their role in allergic events, a new picture of them as a source of proinflammatory and angiogenic mediators within the tumor has emerged (Table 1). Within the TME, MCs possess both pro- and antitumorigenic properties. Upon activation and degranulation, they become highly proinflammatory and actively recruit cells of the innate immune system mainly neutrophils, macrophages, and eosinophils and cells of the acquired immune system (B and T cells) to orchestrate antitumor immune responses. Conversely, the outcome of their presence could be in favor of tumor progression through releasing VEGF to support angiogenesis and MMP9 to degrade ECM and facilitate the metastasis. The inconsistent and conflicting prognostic value of MC presence in TME may stem in the heterogeneous nature of investigated tumors and animal models.

MCs accumulate into tumor microenvironment by the help of tumor cell-released chemoattractants such as SCF or CCL15. Within the tumor, MCs release angiogenic compounds including IL-8, VEGF, FGF-2, NGF, heparin, tryptase, chymase, and TGF-β. Additionally, MMP-2 and MMP-9 released by MCs are capable of facilitating the tumor vascularization and promoting tumor invasiveness, respectively. A variety of cytokines released by MCs including IL-1, IL-4, IL-8, IL-6, MCP-3, MCP-4, TNF-α, IFN-γ, LTB4, TGF-β, and chymase contribute to developing inflammation, inhibiting tumor cell growth, and inducing tumor cell apoptosis. In some settings depending on the type of tumor, MCs can have an immunosuppressive role by releasing IL-10, histamine, and TNF-α. Additionally, MCs may suppress T cells and NK cells by releasing adenosine into the microenvironment. Upon infiltration of MCs into the tumor stroma, the expansion and activation of Tregs are promoted. Consequently, Tregs stimulate immune tolerance leading to tumor progression (Fig. 1). Our current knowledge regarding the role of MCs in shaping the TME has been obtained from analyzing the cytology of both animal and human tumors (in vivo) and also co-culturing tumor cell lines with primary MC and MC cell lines (mainly HMC-1 and LAD2) in vitro (Table 2). A great number of mast cell mediators can influence the TME by stimulating angiogenesis, inducing the breakdown of the extracellular matrix, and stimulating tumor growth (Table 3).

Cells of the Adaptive Immune System in TME

To generate an effective antitumor response by T cells, they need to be activated by tumor-associated antigens (TAA) presented by dendritic cells (DCs) that reside in peripheral lymph nodes (LNs). CD8+ T cells activated after recognizing TAA presented by MHC class I molecules on cancer cells can eliminate tumor cells via the action of perforin–granzyme or the Fas ligand (FasL)/TRAIL pathway. Activated Th1 cells release IFNγ, which is a well-known antitumor cytokine that activates macrophage, promotes antigen processing and presentation by APCs, and inhibits angiogenesis. Additionally, Th1 cells along with cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) produce IFNγ to induce the ability of monocytes and macrophages to produce CXCL9 and CXCL10, which act as angiostatic factors. IFNγ is capable of inhibiting tumor angiogenesis by hampering the proliferation of ECs. Tumor-infiltrating Th2 cells secrete IL-4, which supports the differentiation of tumor-infiltrating monocytes and macrophages into M2-like TAMs (tumor-associated macrophages). Th2 cells also induce the production of IgG by B cells, which promotes the production of angiogenic factors by FcγR activation on macrophages via.

Cells of Innate Immune System in TME

The presence of natural killer cells (NK cells) and natural killer T cells in the majority of solid tumors often means a good prognosis. Within the TME, NK cells and CTLs are capable of recognizing malignant cells owing to the expression of NKG2D and T cell receptors, respectively. Monocytes are recruited from the circulation and differentiate into macrophages within the TME where stromal and tumor cells provide chemokines and growth factors mainly CCL2, CSF1, CCL18, CCL20, CXCL12, and VEGF-A. After being recruited to the hypoxic TME, monocytes give rise to other cell types mainly MDSC, TAM, and tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) and induce a differential and functional immature phenotype of DCs. DCs participate in antitumor immune responses by cross-presentation of antigens and generation of antitumor CTLs. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) may have a protumoral role by promoting the processes of angiogenesis and metastasis and hampering T cell–dependent antitumor responses. There are two determined phenotypes of TAMs: M1-like TAMs orchestrate immune response and normalize abnormal tumor vascular system through which they make chemotherapy agent accessible to tumor cells and contribute to the regression of tumor growth. Unlike them, M2-like TAMs promote immunosuppression and support the formation of abnormal vessels in TME that lead to tumor progression. Cytokines released from tumor-residing cells including tumor cell–derived IL-4, IL-10, CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, and CSF1; Treg-derived IL-10; B cell–produced immunoglobulins; Th2-derived IL-4 and IL-13; and MSC-derived MFG-E8 promote the polarization into a protumor phenotype. Additionally, TAMs residing in the TME can produce MIF, IL-10, and CXCL12 which may further promote the polarization. Interestingly, hypoxic cells inside the tumor—in return—release a variety of cytokines including sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), IL-6, eotaxin, and oncostatin M through which they induce M2 macrophage/TAM polarization. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are commonly found in different types of cancers and within the TME. They are capable of suppressing NK and T cells through different mechanisms including direct cell-to-cell interactions and through cytokine release. MDSC-released PGE2 promotes the development of Tregs, induces the production of immunosuppressive chemokines, and promotes barrier function of ECs through the inhibition of transendothelial T cell migration. Interestingly, MCs were reported to mobilize and promote the infiltration of MDSCs via the CCL2/CCR2 axis in TME where they produce IL-17 through which Tregs accumulate onsite. Treg-released IL-9 completes this positive loop by supporting MC survival. Neutrophils can be recruited to the TME by MC-derived chemokines including CCL1, CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, and CXCL8. Neutrophils secrete VEGF-A, FGF2, and CXCL8 that promote angiogenesis. Under the influence of CCL11 (eotaxin-1) that binds to CCR3, eosinophils are recruited to the TME. Although eosinophils possess tumoricidal activity by releasing granzyme A and TNF-α, after activation by IL-5, they also release VEGF and can promote angiogenesis. In addition to immune cells, tumor-residing fibroblasts and stromal cells act as a source of cytokines mainly hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGFs), and CXCL12 that are capable of supporting the growth and survival of malignant cells and promoting the infiltration of variety of cells (Fig. 2).

Mast Cell Recruitment to Tumor

MCs have a strictly regulated trafficking to the TME owing to interactions of locally produced chemokines and receptors expressed on MCs. One of the main chemoattractant factors produced by tumor cells is SCF, which is also the main survival factor for MCs. Furthermore, a variety of other chemokine/receptor interactions such as LTB4 with BLT1 and BLT2, PGE2 with the EP2 receptor, VEGF via VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, angiopoietin 1 (Ang1) which acts on Tie2 receptor, and also CXCL8/IL-8 interactions with CXCR1 and CXCR2 play a crucial role in the attraction of MCs to the sites of chronic inflammation including TME. Localization of MCs in the TME is determined by interactions of CCR2, CXCR2, and CXCR3 with their respective ligands CCL2, CXCL1, and CXCL10. Roy et al. investigated the recruitment pattern of MCs to glioma tumors and reported that glioma-derived plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) promotes MC recruitment and that the level of PAI-1 correlates with the rate of MC recruitment. Additionally, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) released by glioma cells contributes to the recruitment of MCs by inducing phosphorylation of STAT5. Also, glioma cells release CXCL12 that acts as MC chemotaxin by engaging CXCR4 (Fig. 3a). Huang et al. showed that both anti-SCF and anti-c-Kit antibodies suppressed the infiltration of injected bone marrow–cultured mast cells into inoculated H22 tumors in mice (Fig. 3b).

Role of MCs in Angiogenesis

The tumor vasculature system does not support the growing mass of cells with adequate blood flow. Therefore, tumor cells face an imparted supply of nutrients, gas exchange, and drainage of tumor-produced metabolites. This situation consequently leads to the creation of a hypoxic and acidotic TME through which angiogenesis and the formation of heterogeneous new vessels are induced to compensate the shortage of blood supply. Additionally, endothelial cells (ECs) that form the tumor vessels are capable of suppressing the recruitment, adhesion, and activity of circulating T cells by acting as physical barriers to immune cells. There is a number of angiogenic mediators released by MCs in the tumor microenvironment including IL-8, NGF, TNF-α, TGF-β, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (PA). MC tryptase promotes the proliferation of endothelial cells, facilitates the in vitro vascular tube formation, and degrades the matrix of connective tissue to create adequate space for neovascular development. Additionally, histamine acting on H1R and H2R stimulates the formation of new vessels. In addition to playing a role in angiogenesis via VEGF-A and VEGF-B, MCs are also involved in lymphangiogenesis by releasing VEGF-C and VEGF-D. Blair et al. investigated in a co-culture model of the human MC cell line (HMC-1) and dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC) the impact of MC mediators on tube formation. Calcium ionophore–activated MCs were found to promote the formation of tubes. Tryptase was shown as the main mediator involved in neovascularization and endothelial cell proliferation, and tube formation was suppressed by tryptase inhibitors, recombinant leech–derived tryptase inhibitor, and bis(5-amidino-2-benzimidazo-lyl) methane. Guo et al. assessed in a similar approach the effects of tryptase released by human recombinant lung MC on the proliferation and tube formation ability of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). It was shown that the incubation of the cells with tryptase significantly increased their viability and proliferation. Additionally, treating the cells with nafamostat, a tryptase inhibitor, reversed this effect. PD98059, an inhibitor of ERK phosphorylation, suppressed the promoting effects of tryptase. Moreover, MC tryptase did not only induce the proliferation of HUVECs, but it even promoted the tube formation. In addition, it was shown that MC tryptase induced the tumorigenesis and angiogenesis in vivo after inoculation of PANC-1 (pancreatic cancer cell line) into nude mice. Tumor cells injected together with tryptase were larger than those developed in non-treated mice and nafamostat was able to suppress these tumorigenetic effects of tryptase.

Evidence of MC Involvement in Tumor Biology: Lessons from Mouse Models

Studies revealing possible mechanisms by which MCs support tumorigenesis or suppress tumor growth largely used mouse strains deficient for a specific receptor or receptor ligand. Specifically, reconstitution of MC-deficient mice with MCs obtained from WT mice or knock-out mice demonstrated the crucial role of specific receptor/ligand in such a model on the progression of tumor growth. He et al. investigated the effects of MC deficiency on the development of mammary tumors through crossing the KitW-sh/W-sh with the mammary tumor transgenic mouse (Tg) strain MMTV-polyomavirus middle T antigen best known as PyMT model. Female Kit+/W-sh and male PyMT/Kit+/W-sh mice were used to generate female PyMT/wild-type (WT) and PyMT/KitW-sh/W-sh littermates. They found that tumor progression and further metastasis were significantly reduced in PyMT/KitW-sh/W-sh mice when compared with PyMT/wild-type mice (WT). In a similar protocol, Bodduluri et al. mated ACKR2−/− mice with ApcMin/+ mice (determined by having a mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene) to generate ACKR2−/−ApcMin/+. Atypical chemokine receptor 2 (ACKR2) is a decoy receptor that binds to and internalizes inflammatory chemokines. Generated ACKR2−/−ApcMin/+ mice were found to develop tumors with infiltrated MCs. ACKR2−/−BLT1−/−ApcMin/+ mice, which lack the LTB4 receptor, showed impaired CD8+ recruitment into tumors, and this made them highly susceptible to develop intestinal tumors. These studies indicated that LTB4 produced by MC may support CTL recruitment to TME and antitumor responses. Melillo et al. showed that MCs are able to enhance the growth of human thyroid cancer cells in athymic nu/nu mice. Co-injection of 8505-C cells and HMC-1 cells resulted in earlier tumor formation with a higher tumor volume when compared with tumors formed after injection of 8505-C cells alone.

MC Interactions with Tumor Cells

MCs through releasing IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, and TNF-α can actively participate in the elimination of tumor cells and rejection of tumors. Conversely, mediators released by MC such as FGF-2, NGF, PDGF, VEGF, IL-8, and IL-10 promote the expansion of tumor cells. Additionally, histamine induces tumor cell proliferation by acting on tumor surface expressed H1 receptors (H1R). In the TME, MCs are main contributors to S1P production along with tumor cells. S1P promotes proliferation, migration, and survival of tumor cells. In solid tumors such as thyroid tumors, histamine engagement of H1R and H2R results in tumor cell proliferation. Moreover, CXCL1/GRO-α and CXCL10/IP-10 have been reported to support invasion, proliferation, and survival of tumor cells by acting on CXCR2 and CXCR3, respectively. Cell-to-cell interactions between MCs and tumor cells may result in MC activation and release of mediators. Such interactions induce the formation of adenosine in an autocrine manner by MCs via a CD73-dependent mechanism. Adenosine then engages the adenosine A3R through which ERK1/2 MAP kinases are activated and IL-8 is produced and released by MCs into the TME (Fig. 4). Chen et al. investigated the role of MCs in the progression of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the possible mutual interaction of MCs and tumor cells. First, they added conditioned medium (CM) from RCC OSRC-2 cells or from OSRC-2 plus HMC-1 into the lower chamber of a Transwell system, while human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were placed in the upper chamber. With this setup, they showed that HMC-1 CM promoted the OSRC-2-induced HUVEC recruitment. Using bevacizumab or cromolyn to inhibit MC degranulation suppressed HUVEC recruitment and the formation of capillary tubes in vitro. To determine the ability of MCs in enhancing the angiogenesis, OSRC-2 cells and HMC-1 cells were injected subcutaneously into the dorsal region of nude mice. Co-injection of HMC-1 and OSRC-2 promotes the formation of microvessels as compared with the injection of OSRC-2 alone. It was suggested that PI3K → AKT → GSK3β (a downstream substrate of PI3K/Akt pathway) signaling pathway induces the expression of adrenomedullin (AM) through which MCs are recruited to TME, where they recruit endothelial cells by releasing VEGF and FGF-2, induce tissue remodeling by secreting tryptase and MMPs, and consequently promote angiogenesis in RCC.

MC and Extracellular Matrix During Tumor Development

ECM regulates a variety of biological functions of both normal and tumor cells including cellular migration and adhesion. In return, the resident tumor cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, recruited inflammatory cells, and pericytes secrete ECM proteins. MC-derived tryptase may promote neovascularization by activating MMPs. These enzymes play a key role in degrading the ECM and discharging angiogenic factors. Tryptase may activate the plasminogen activator and induce the release of VEGF and FGF-2 from their extracellular matrix-bound state. Maniga et al. reported the accumulation of MCs in tumors of breast cancer and that MC-derived tryptase is capable of initiating fibroblast differentiation and promoting stromal remodeling. MMP-9 is one of the main MMPs capable of degrading and remodeling ECM leading to an alteration of the cellular microenvironment. Under the influence of MC chymase, E-cadherin molecules that connect epithelial cells at adherent junctions are cleaved and their expression is decreased. It is also reported that chymase increases the expression of MMP-9 in tumor cells. Chymase therefore promotes the separation, proliferation, and relocation of cell clusters through acting directly and indirectly on ECM to support metastasis.

MCs as Therapeutic Targets

The relationship between MC density of tumors, the progression of angiogenesis, and tumor development may highlight the possible role of MCs in tumor biology. Therefore, the possibility of targeting MC activation, inhibiting the release of mediators using c-Kit receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (including imatinib, masitinib), or using tryptase inhibitors (mainly gabexate mesylate and nafamostat mesylate, both inhibitors of trypsin-like serine proteases) may be valuable therapeutic approaches to control the tumor development. Masitinib, a TKI that targets c-kit receptors (CD117), has been used in veterinary medicine for years, and lately, human clinical trials were initiated to test its clinical efficacy as single or add-on treatment human cancers such as mastocytosis, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (NCT00998751), colon cancer (NCT03556956), prostate cancer (NCT03761225), and pancreatic cancer (NCT03766295). Imatinib due to its property of inhibiting the protein tyrosine kinase BCR/ABL is used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Additionally, silymarin inhibits the recruitment of MCs and reduces the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9. It is generally believed that inflammation promotes tumor growth and accelerates metastasis and the process of angiogenesis. MCs are an important source of proinflammatory cytokines in TME. Agents that hamper their ability to produce proinflammatory cytokines may be of therapeutic importance in controlling the tumor growth. Most recently, Nam et al. reported that Dp44mT is able of blocking caspase-1 and NF-κB and consequently mitigate the production of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) by MC. VEGF-centered anti-angiogenic tumor therapy could fail due to resistance. It has been reported that upon therapy, MCs release granzyme B, which mobilizes proangiogenic factors from the tumor matrix mainly laminin- and vitronectin-bound FGF-1 and GM-CSF. Wroblewski et al. showed that MCs release FGF-2 that acts on ECs and induces their proliferation and promotes angiogenesis. The combination of cromolyn to prevent MC degranulation along with anti-angiogenic therapy promoted the therapeutic efficacy. The engagement of TLR2 on MC has shown to stimulate tumor growth, and blocking this pathway may be promising in designing of immunotherapeutic strategies. In a 3D co-culture setup, FSL-1-mediated TLR2 stimulation of MCs supported the growth of colon cancer spheroids. On the other hand, it was shown in an orthotopic B16.F10 melanoma model that TLR2-activated MC could also inhibit tumor growth by an IL-6-dependent mechanism.

Parallels with Autoimmunity

The role of MCs in tumor development draws parallels with their projected role in autoimmunity and chronic inflammatory diseases. The chance of initiation of autoimmune disease depends largely on the disruption of the balance between the pro- and anti-inflammatory cell populations and their released cytokines. MCs not only release a wide range of proinflammatory mediators but also are considered as the cells producing immunosuppressive cytokines. One possible pathway is the ability of MCs in the production of IL-10 thus supporting the increase in the number of Tregs in the draining lymph nodes. Tregs counteract the proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 cells. The role of MCs in the pathology of a variety of autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), multiple sclerosis (MS), type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and systemic lupus erythematosus has been investigated. MC-derived TNF, IL-1β, IL-17, and tryptase have been reported to play a role in the pathogenesis of RA. Tryptase for instance, through acting on PAR2, activates synovial fibroblasts to express more proteases that degrade cartilage and bone. Furthermore, MCs in response to anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and TLR ligands become activated and release IL-8, TNF-α, and LTs which act as neutrophil chemoattractants to synovial fluid which results in the aggravation of inflammation. In MS, autoreactive T cells after becoming activated in the periphery infiltrate the CNS and act as effector cells in the pathology of the disease. The detrimental role of MCs in MS includes (1) supporting the recruitment of autoreactive T cells by releasing CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, and IL-16, (2) activating and promoting the differentiation of Th1, Th2, and Th17 subsets by releasing IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, TGF-β, and TNF-α, (3) increasing brain–blood barrier (BBB) permeability by releasing histamine, and (4) degrading myelin by releasing proteases. The initiation and development of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) depends on the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β cells. Interestingly, individuals with T1D have higher levels of circulating IgE when compared with healthy individuals. Additionally, the number of MCs increases in pancreatic lymph nodes. These cells show an overrepresentation of mediators including IL-5, protease 1, trypsinogen, carboxypeptidase A, and phospholipase Cγ. Activation pathways and MC mediators involved in autoimmunity certainly have similarities with those found in tumor biology, although the specific microenvironment will ultimately determine the production and role of specific MC mediators in the pathophysiology of the disease.

Conclusion and Discussion

The nature of the interaction between tumor cells and TME-resident cells is mutual in which the behavior of tumor cells determines the fate of tumor and influences the biology of cells of TME, and conversely, the TME-resident cells may affect the way a tumor initiates, grows locally, or spreads throughout the body. The interaction of MCs with other cell types in TME should be extensively investigated to clarify other possible interactions and potential prognostic significance. In this regard, Leni et al. studied MC–neutrophil interactions within heterotypic aggregations in TME of patients with gastric carcinoma and reported that MCs are able to release their mediators in small amounts through a mechanism called kiss-and-run fusion. Most recently, researchers benefitted from a novel computer-aided tissue analysis method for identifying and counting MCs in TME for the purpose of eliminating the operator bias. Using this method, Eder et al. reported the infiltration of MCs in different zones of cutaneous T cell lymphomas. Shikotra et al. focused on the cytotoxic activity of MCs and their ability to express TNFα and reported that the presence of TNFα releasing MCs in non-small cell lung cancer tumors may be related to extended survival of patients. Promoting the cytotoxic activity of MCs seems to be a possible approach to control some tumors which needs to be further investigated. Focusing on the mechanisms of MC activation in tumors and releasing inflammatory cytokines could provide novel tumor controlling strategies. Of the mechanisms described for MC activation, free light chains (FLC) have been investigated in several models. The inhibition of FLC-mediated MC activation was reported in a murine B16F10 melanoma model to reduce the tumor growth. In other studies, the spatial distribution of MCs around vessels and glands in gastric carcinoma(GC) was investigated using IHC and computer-assisted analysis of tissue specimen and it was concluded that in GC grade II, there is a spatial association of chymase+ MCs showing that MCs were located at a shorter distance from the vessels. Investigations aimed to reveal the architecture and spatial distribution of may give more detailed information regarding role of MCs in tumor biology. Assessing MC heterogeneity in benign and malignant solid tumors may be helpful for targeting them and avoid further MC-orchestrated tumor angiogenesis. In this regard, Globa et al. reported phenotype heterogeneity of MCs in prostate cancer. They concluded that tryptase+/CD117+/chymase− and tryptase−/chymase+/CD117+ phenotypes were located in peritumoral areas of patients with benign lesions, while tryptase+/chymase+/CD117+ MCs were frequently found in malignant lesions. Most recently, Molderings et al. analyzed German and American individuals with systemic MC activation syndrome (MCAS) and reported a higher chance of developing solid tumors especially melanoma, breast cancer, thyroid, ovary, lung, and cervix uteri. According to the high tissue burden of infiltrating MCs in these patients, they may need further investigations to reveal the prevalence of solid tumors in MCAS patients of other ethnic backgrounds and the mechanism by which they become more susceptible to develop solid tumors. In addition, special effort is needed to determine the MC mast cell make-up in the tumor environment, because interaction with the complex tumor environment may alter the functional expression of various membrane receptors. In this regard, Yu et al. reported the increased expression of Siglec-6 (a sialic acids binding receptor) on MC in vitro models for human colon cancer. Upon co-incubation with colon cancer cells or hypoxia, Siglec-6 is upregulated on MCs and reduces MC activation. Based on our current knowledge about the involvement of MCs in inducing inflammation and angiogenesis in the TME, they may be promising targets in the adjuvant treatment of cancers by—on the one hand—selective inhibition of angiogenesis and tissue remodeling, targeting the release of tumor-promoting molecules, and targeting MC-orchestrated immune-suppression, and—on the other hand—stimulating their ability to produce cytotoxic cytokines resulting in an enhanced tumor degradation.

References 87

  1. 1.

    Hui L, Chen Y. Tumor microenvironment: sanctuary of the devil. Cancer Lett. 2015;368(1):7-13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2015.07.039

  2. 2.

    Huang B, Lei Z, Zhang GM, Li D, Song C, Li B, Liu Y, Yuan Y, Unkeless J, Xiong H, Feng ZH. SCF-mediated mast cell infiltration and activation exacerbate the inflammation and immunosuppression in tumor microenvironment. Blood. 2008;112(4):1269-1279.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2008-03-147033

  3. 3.

    De Palma M, Biziato D, Petrova TV. Microenvironmental regulation of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17(8):457-474.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc.2017.51

  4. 4.

    Tamma R, Guidolin D, Annese T, Tortorella C, Ruggieri S, Rega S, Zito FA, Nico B, Ribatti D. Spatial distribution of mast cells and macrophages around tumor glands in human breast ductal carcinoma. Exp Cell Res. 2017;359(1):179-184.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.07.033

  5. 5.

    Ribatti D, Crivellato E. Mast cells, angiogenesis, and tumour growth. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(1):2-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.11.010

  6. 6.

    Ribatti D, Crivellato E. The controversial role of mast cells in tumor growth. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2009;275:89-131.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1937-6448(09)75004-x

  7. 7.

    Elieh Ali Komi D, Bjermer L. Mast cell-mediated orchestration of the immune responses in human allergic asthma: current insights. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018;56:234-247.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12016-018-8720-1

  8. 8.

    Elieh-Ali-Komi D, Cao Y. Role of mast cells in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016;52:436-445.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12016-016-8595-y

  9. 9.

    Komi Daniel Elieh Ali, Rambasek Todd, Wöhrl Stefan. Mastocytosis: from a Molecular Point of View. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology. 2017;54(3):397-411.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12016-017-8619-2

  10. 10.

    Hempel HA, Cuka NS, Kulac I, Barber JR, Cornish TC, Platz EA, De Marzo AM, Sfanos KS. Low intratumoral mast cells are associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer recurrence. Prostate. 2017;77(4):412-424.

    Not in our library10.1002/pros.23280

  11. 11.

    Fu H, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Zhang J, Wang Z, Xie H, Dai B, Xu J, Ye D. Tumor infiltrating mast cells (TIMs) confers a marked survival advantage in nonmetastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(5):1435-1442.

    Not in our library10.1245/s10434-016-5702-5

  12. 12.

    Ghouse SM, Polikarpova A, Muhandes L, Dudeck J, Tantcheva-Poor I, Hartmann K, Lesche M, Dahl A, Eming S, Muller W, Behrendt R, Roers A. Although abundant in tumor tissue, mast cells have no effect on immunological micro-milieu or growth of HPV-induced or transplanted tumors. Cell Rep. 2018;22(1):27-35.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.010

  13. 13.

    Shikotra A, Ohri CM, Green RH, Waller DA, Bradding P. Mast cell phenotype, TNFalpha expression and degranulation status in non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38352.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep38352

  14. 14.

    Molin D, Edstrom A, Glimelius I, Glimelius B, Nilsson G, Sundstrom C, Enblad G. Mast cell infiltration correlates with poor prognosis in Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2002;119(1):122-124.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03768.x

  15. 15.

    Malfettone A, Silvestris N, Saponaro C, Ranieri G, Russo A, Caruso S, Popescu O, Simone G, Paradiso A, Mangia A. High density of tryptase-positive mast cells in human colorectal cancer: a poor prognostic factor related to protease-activated receptor 2 expression. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17(8):1025-1037.

    Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.12073

  16. 16.

    Dantas RCM, de Souza RO, Valverde LF, Vidal MTA, Sales CBS, Sousa LP, Dos Santos JN, Ramos EAG, Gurgel Rocha CA. Evaluation of mast cell density in the tumor microenvironment in oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2017;25(10):e83-e88.

    Not in our library10.1097/pai.0000000000000587

  17. 17.

    Mangia A, Malfettone A, Rossi R, Paradiso A, Ranieri G, Simone G, Resta L. Tissue remodelling in breast cancer: human mast cell tryptase as an initiator of myofibroblast differentiation. Histopathology. 2011;58(7):1096-1106.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03842.x

  18. 18.

    Ranieri G, Ammendola M, Patruno R, Celano G, Zito FA, Montemurro S, Rella A, Di Lecce V, Gadaleta CD, Battista De Sarro G, Ribatti D. Tryptase-positive mast cells correlate with angiogenesis in early breast cancer patients. Int J Oncol. 2009;35(1):115-120.

    Not in our library10.3892/ijo_00000319

  19. 19.

    Foroozan M, Roudi R, Abolhasani M, Gheytanchi E, Mehrazma M. Clinical significance of endothelial cell marker CD34 and mast cell marker CD117 in prostate adenocarcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2017;213(6):612-618.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.prp.2017.04.027

  20. 20.

    Eder J, Rogojanu R, Jerney W, Erhart F, Dohnal A, Kitzwogerer M, Steiner G, Moser J, Trautinger F. Mast cells are abundant in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: results from a computer-aided quantitative immunohistological study. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0163661.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0163661

  21. 21.

    Mukherjee S, Bandyopadhyay G, Dutta C, Bhattacharya A, Karmakar R, Barui G. Evaluation of endoscopic biopsy in gastric lesions with a special reference to the significance of mast cell density. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2009;52(1):20-24.

    Not in our library10.4103/0377-4929.44956

  22. 22.

    Ammendola Michele, Sacco Rosario, Zuccalà Valeria, Luposella Maria, Patruno Rosa, Gadaleta Pietro, Zizzo Nicola, Gadaleta Cosmo, De Sarro Giovambattista, Sammarco Giuseppe, Oltean Mihai, Ranieri Girolamo. Mast Cells Density Positive to Tryptase Correlate with Microvascular Density in both Primary Gastric Cancer Tissue and Loco-Regional Lymph Node Metastases from Patients That Have Undergone Radical Surgery. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016;17(11):1905.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms17111905

  23. 23.

    Guidolin D, Marinaccio C, Tortorella C, Annese T, Ruggieri S, Finato N, Crivellato E, Ribatti D. Non-random spatial relationships between mast cells and microvessels in human endometrial carcinoma. Clin Exp Med. 2017;17(1):71-77.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10238-016-0407-4

  24. 24.

    Chen Y, Li C, Xie H, Fan Y, Yang Z, Ma J, He D, Li L. Infiltrating mast cells promote renal cell carcinoma angiogenesis by modulating PI3K-->AKT-->GSK3beta-->AM signaling. Oncogene. 2017;36(20):2879-2888.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2016.442

  25. 25.

    Tuna B, Yorukoglu K, Unlu M, Mungan MU, Kirkali Z. Association of mast cells with microvessel density in renal cell carcinomas. Eur Urol. 2006;50(3):530-534.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.040

  26. 26.

    Guo Xiangjie, Zhai Liqin, Xue Ruobing, Shi Jieru, Zeng Qiang, Gao Cairong. Mast Cell Tryptase Contributes to Pancreatic Cancer Growth through Promoting Angiogenesis via Activation of Angiopoietin-1. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016;17(6):834.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms17060834

  27. 27.

    Melillo RM, Guarino V, Avilla E, Galdiero MR, Liotti F, Prevete N, Rossi FW, Basolo F, Ugolini C, de Paulis A, Santoro M, Marone G. Mast cells have a protumorigenic role in human thyroid cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29(47):6203-6215.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2010.348

  28. 28.

    Cherdantseva TM, Bobrov IP, Avdalyan AM, Klimachev VV, Kazartsev AV, Kryuchkova NG, Klimachev IV, Myadelets MN, Lepilov AV, Lushnikova EL, Molodykh OP. Mast cells in renal cancer: clinical morphological correlations and prognosis. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2017;163(6):801-804.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10517-017-3907-7

  29. 29.
  30. 30.

    Mizuno H, Nakayama T, Miyata Y, Saito S, Nishiwaki S, Nakao N, Takeshita K, Naoe T. Mast cells promote the growth of Hodgkin’s lymphoma cell tumor by modifying the tumor microenvironment that can be perturbed by bortezomib. Leukemia. 2012;26(10):2269-2276.

    Not in our library10.1038/leu.2012.81

  31. 31.

    Visciano C, Liotti F, Prevete N, Cali G, Franco R, Collina F, de Paulis A, Marone G, Santoro M, Melillo RM. Mast cells induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell features in human thyroid cancer cells through an IL-8-Akt-Slug pathway. Oncogene. 2015;34(40):5175-5186.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2014.441

  32. 32.

    Gorzalczany Y, Akiva E, Klein O, Merimsky O, Sagi-Eisenberg R. Mast cells are directly activated by contact with cancer cells by a mechanism involving autocrine formation of adenosine and autocrine/paracrine signaling of the adenosine A3 receptor. Cancer Lett. 2017;397:23-32.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2017.03.026

  33. 33.

    Jiang Y, Wu Y, Hardie WJ, Zhou X. Mast cell chymase affects the proliferation and metastasis of lung carcinoma cells in vitro. Oncol Lett. 2017;14(3):3193-3198.

    Not in our library10.3892/ol.2017.6487

  34. 34.

    Attarha S, Roy A, Westermark B, Tchougounova E. Mast cells modulate proliferation, migration and stemness of glioma cells through downregulation of GSK3beta expression and inhibition of STAT3 activation. Cell Signal. 2017;37:81-92.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.06.004

  35. 35.

    Ammendola M, Leporini C, Marech I, Gadaleta CD, Scognamillo G, Sacco R, Sammarco G, De Sarro G, Russo E, Ranieri G. Targeting mast cells tryptase in tumor microenvironment: a potential antiangiogenetic strategy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:154702.

    Not in our library10.1155/2014/154702

  36. 36.

    Ribatti D, Ranieri G. Tryptase, a novel angiogenic factor stored in mast cell granules. Exp Cell Res. 2015;332(2):157-162.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.11.014

  37. 37.

    Hu G, Wang S, Cheng P. Tumor-infiltrating tryptase(+) mast cells predict unfavorable clinical outcome in solid tumors. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(4):813-821.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.31099

  38. 38.

    Ribatti D, Crivellato E, Roccaro AM, Ria R, Vacca A. Mast cell contribution to angiogenesis related to tumour progression. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(11):1660-1664.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02104.x

  39. 39.

    Ieni A, Barresi V (2016) Mast cell interaction with neutrophils in human gastric carcinomas: ultrastructural observations. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2016:6891971

    Not in our library10.1155/2016/6891971

  40. 40.

    Jachetti E, Rigoni A, Bongiovanni L, Arioli I, Botti L, Parenza M, Cancila V, Chiodoni C, Festinese F, Bellone M, Tardanico R, Tripodo C, Colombo MP. Imatinib spares cKit-expressing prostate neuroendocrine tumors, whereas kills seminal vesicle epithelial-stromal tumors by targeting PDGFR-beta. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16(2):365-375.

    Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0466

  41. 41.

    Pittoni P, Tripodo C, Piconese S, Mauri G, Parenza M, Rigoni A, Sangaletti S, Colombo MP. Mast cell targeting hampers prostate adenocarcinoma development but promotes the occurrence of highly malignant neuroendocrine cancers. Cancer Res. 2011;71(18):5987-5997.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1637

  42. 42.

    Rodriguez YI, Campos LE, Castro MG, Aladhami A, Oskeritzian CA, Alvarez SE. Sphingosine-1 phosphate: a new modulator of immune plasticity in the tumor microenvironment. Front Oncol. 2016;6:218.

    Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2016.00218

  43. 43.
  44. 44.

    Jensen-Jarolim E, Bax HJ, Bianchini R, Capron M, Corrigan C, Castells M, Dombrowicz D, Daniels-Wells TR, Fazekas J, Fiebiger E, Gatault S, Gould HJ, Janda J, Josephs DH, Karagiannis P, Levi-Schaffer F, Meshcheryakova A, Mechtcheriakova D, Mekori Y, Mungenast F, Nigro EA, Penichet ML, Redegeld F, Saul L, Singer J, Spicer JF, Siccardi AG, Spillner E, Turner MC, Untersmayr E, Vangelista L, Karagiannis SN. AllergoOncology - the impact of allergy in oncology: EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2017;72(6):866-887.

    Not in our library10.1111/all.13119

  45. 45.

    Taylor JG, Gribben JG. Microenvironment abnormalities and lymphomagenesis: immunological aspects. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;34:36-45.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.07.004

  46. 46.
  47. 47.
  48. 48.

    Ansell SM, Vonderheide RH. Cellular composition of the tumor microenvironment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013;33:e91-e97.

    Not in our library10.14694/edbook_am.2013.33.e91

  49. 49.
  50. 50.

    Paolino G, Belmonte M, Trasarti S, Santopietro M, Bizzoni L, Riminucci M, Cardarelli L, Iannella E, Albanesi M, Moliterni E, Didona D, Calvieri S, Foa R, Giona F. Mast cell disorders, melanoma and pancreatic carcinoma: from a clinical observation to a brief review of the literature. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2017;25(2):112-119.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.
  52. 52.

    Godot V, Arock M, Garcia G, Capel F, Flys C, Dy M, Emilie D, Humbert M. H4 histamine receptor mediates optimal migration of mast cell precursors to CXCL12. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(4):827-834.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jaci.2007.05.046

  53. 53.
  54. 54.

    Roy A, Coum A, Marinescu VD, Polajeva J, Smits A, Nelander S, Uhrbom L, Westermark B, Forsberg-Nilsson K, Ponten F, Tchougounova E. Glioma-derived plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) regulates the recruitment of LRP1 positive mast cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6(27):23647-23661.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.4640

  55. 55.

    Polajeva J, Bergstrom T, Edqvist PH, Lundequist A, Sjosten A, Nilsson G, Smits A, Bergqvist M, Ponten F, Westermark B, Pejler G, Forsberg Nilsson K, Tchougounova E. Glioma-derived macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) promotes mast cell recruitment in a STAT5-dependent manner. Mol Oncol. 2014;8(1):50-58.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molonc.2013.09.002

  56. 56.
  57. 57.

    Kabiraj A, Jaiswal R, Singh A, Gupta J, Singh A, Samadi FM. Immunohistochemical evaluation of tumor angiogenesis and the role of mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(3):495-502.

    Not in our library10.4103/0973-1482.163693

  58. 58.

    Visciano C, Prevete N, Liotti F, Marone G. Tumor-associated mast cells in thyroid cancer. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:705169.

    Not in our library10.1155/2015/705169

  59. 59.

    Detoraki A, Staiano RI, Granata F, Giannattasio G, Prevete N, de Paulis A, Ribatti D, Genovese A, Triggiani M, Marone G. Vascular endothelial growth factors synthesized by human lung mast cells exert angiogenic effects. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(5):1142-1149.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jaci.2009.01.044

  60. 60.

    Blair RJ, Meng H, Marchese MJ, Ren S, Schwartz LB, Tonnesen MG, Gruber BL. Human mast cells stimulate vascular tube formation. Tryptase is a novel, potent angiogenic factor. J Clin Invest. 1997;99(11):2691-2700.

    Not in our library10.1172/jci119458

  61. 61.

    He L, Zhu Z, Chen S, Wang Y, Gu H. Mammary tumor growth and metastasis are reduced in c-Kit mutant Sash mice. Cancer Med. 2016;5(6):1292-1297.

    Not in our library10.1002/cam4.696

  62. 62.

    Bodduluri SR, Mathis S, Maturu P, Krishnan E, Satpathy SR, Chilton PM, Mitchell TC, Lira S, Locati M, Mantovani A, Jala VR, Haribabu B. Mast cell-dependent CD8(+) T-cell recruitment mediates immune surveillance of intestinal tumors in Apc(min/+) mice. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018;6:332-347.

    Not in our library10.1158/2326-6066.cir-17-0424

  63. 63.

    Cimpean AM, Tamma R, Ruggieri S, Nico B, Toma A, Ribatti D. Mast cells in breast cancer angiogenesis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;115:23-26.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.04.009

  64. 64.
  65. 65.

    Rigoni A, Colombo MP, Pucillo C. The role of mast cells in molding the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron. 2015;8(3):167-176.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12307-014-0152-8

  66. 66.

    Ammendola M, Gadaleta CD, Frampton AE, Piardi T, Memeo R, Zuccala V, Luposella M, Patruno R, Zizzo N, Gadaleta P, Pessaux P, Sacco R, Sammarco G, Ranieri G. The density of mast cells c-Kit(+) and tryptase(+) correlates with each other and with angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8(41):70463-70471.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.19716

  67. 67.

    Faustino-Rocha AI, Gama A, Oliveira PA, Vanderperren K, Saunders JH, Pires MJ, Ferreira R, Ginja M. Modulation of mammary tumor vascularization by mast cells: ultrasonographic and histopathological approaches. Life Sci. 2017;176:35-41.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2017.03.013

  68. 68.

    Faustino-Rocha AI, Gama A, Neuparth MJ, Oliveira PA, Ferreira R, Ginja M. Mast cells in mammary carcinogenesis: host or tumor supporters? Anticancer Res. 2017;37(3):1013-1021.

    Not in our library10.21873/anticanres.11411

  69. 69.

    Ammendola M, Sacco R, Sammarco G, Luposella M, Patruno R, Gadaleta CD, Sarro GD, Ranieri G. Mast cell-targeted strategies in cancer therapy. Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy: offizielles. Transfus Med Hemother. 2016;43(2):109-113.

    Not in our library10.1159/000444942

  70. 70.

    Cimpean AM, Raica M. The hidden side of disodium cromolyn: from mast cell stabilizer to an angiogenic factor and antitumor agent. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2016;64(6):515-522.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00005-016-0408-8

  71. 71.

    Marech I, Ammendola M, Gadaleta C, Zizzo N, Oakley C, Gadaleta CD, Ranieri G. Possible biological and translational significance of mast cells density in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(27):8910-8920.

    Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.8910

  72. 72.

    Ribatti D. Mast cells as therapeutic target in cancer. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;778:152-157.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.02.056

  73. 73.

    Nam SY, Han NR, Yoon KW, Kim HM, Jeong HJ. Di-2-pyridylketone 4,4-dimethyl-3-thiosemicarbazone (Dp44mT), an anticancer agent, exerts an anti-inflammatory effect in activated human mast cells. Inflamm Res. 2017;66(10):871-879.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00011-017-1067-x

  74. 74.

    Wroblewski M, Bauer R, Cubas Cordova M, Udonta F, Ben-Batalla I, Legler K, Hauser C, Egberts J, Janning M, Velthaus J, Schulze C, Pantel K, Bokemeyer C, Loges S. Mast cells decrease efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy by secreting matrix-degrading granzyme B. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):269.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-017-00327-8

  75. 75.

    Oldford SA, Haidl ID, Howatt MA, Leiva CA, Johnston B, Marshall JS. A critical role for mast cells and mast cell-derived IL-6 in TLR2-mediated inhibition of tumor growth. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2010;185(11):7067-7076.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1001137

  76. 76.

    Eller K, Rosenkranz AR. Mast cells: subordinates or masterminds in autoimmunity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(12):1913-1914.

    Not in our library10.1681/asn.2012101025

  77. 77.

    Xu Y, Chen G. Mast cell and autoimmune diseases. Mediat Inflamm. 2015;2015:246126.

    Not in our library10.1155/2015/246126

  78. 78.

    Elieh-Ali-Komi D, Cao Y. Role of mast cells in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2017;52(3):436-445.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12016-016-8595-y

  79. 79.

    Theoharides TC, Kempuraj D, Kourelis T, Manola A. Human mast cells stimulate activated T cells: implications for multiple sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1144:74-82.

    Not in our library10.1196/annals.1418.029

  80. 80.

    Dietsch GN, Hinrichs DJ. Mast cell proteases liberate stable encephalitogenic fragments from intact myelin. Cell Immunol. 1991;135(2):541-548.

    Not in our library10.1016/0008-8749(91)90297-o

  81. 81.

    Svensson J, Eising S, Mortensen HB, Christiansen M, Laursen I, Lernmark A, Nilsson A, Simonsen LB, Carstensen B, Pociot F, Johannesen J. High levels of immunoglobulin E and a continuous increase in immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M by age in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Hum Immunol. 2012;73(1):17-25.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.humimm.2011.10.019

  82. 82.

    Geoffrey R, Jia S, Kwitek AE, Woodliff J, Ghosh S, Lernmark A, Wang X, Hessner MJ. Evidence of a functional role for mast cells in the development of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the BioBreeding rat. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2006;177(10):7275-7286.

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7275

  83. 83.

    Groot Kormelink T, Powe DG, Kuijpers SA, Abudukelimu A, Fens MH, Pieters EH, Kassing van der Ven WW, Habashy HO, Ellis IO, Blokhuis BR, Thio M, Hennink WE, Storm G, Redegeld FA, Schiffelers RM. Immunoglobulin free light chains are biomarkers of poor prognosis in basal-like breast cancer and are potential targets in tumor-associated inflammation. Oncotarget. 2014;5(10):3159-3167.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.1868

  84. 84.

    Guidolin D, Ruggieri S, Annese T, Tortorella C, Marzullo A, Ribatti D. Spatial distribution of mast cells around vessels and glands in human gastric carcinoma. Clin Exp Med. 2017;17(4):531-539.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10238-017-0452-7

  85. 85.

    Globa T, Saptefrti L, Ceausu RA, Gaje P, Cimpean AM, Raica M. Mast cell phenotype in benign and malignant tumors of the prostate. Pol J Pathol. 2014;65(2):147-153.

    Not in our library10.5114/pjp.2014.43965

  86. 86.

    Molderings GJ, Zienkiewicz T, Homann J, Menzen M, Afrin LB. Risk of solid cancer in patients with mast cell activation syndrome: results from Germany and USA. F1000Research. 2017;6:1889.

    Not in our library10.12688/f1000research.12730.1

  87. 87.

    Yu Y, Blokhuis BRJ, Diks MAP, Keshavarzian A, Garssen J, Redegeld FA. Functional inhibitory Siglec-6 is upregulated in human colorectal Cancer-associated mast cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2138.

    Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2018.02138

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.