Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.

Glycomics using mass spectrometry

Manfred Wuhrer

Glycoconjugate Journal · 2012 · Review

doi:10.1007/s10719-012-9376-3

Abstract

Mass spectrometry plays an increasingly important role in structural glycomics. This review provides an overview on currently used mass spectrometric approaches such as the characterization of glycans, the analysis of glycopeptides obtained by proteolytic cleavage of proteins and the analysis of glycosphingolipids. The given examples are demonstrating the application of mass spectrometry to study glycosylation changes associated with congenital disorders of glycosylation, lysosomal storage diseases, autoimmune diseases and cancer.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Mass spectrometry (MS) based glycomics techniques are broadly used to analyze free oliogsaccharides, glycosaminoglycans as well as the glycan portions of glycoproteins, proteoglycans and glycolipids. A wide range of MS equipments are available for glycoconjugate analysis. Both matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization (MALDI) and electrospray ionization (ESI) are commonly applied. MS may be used as a stand-alone technique, or coupled online to separation methods such as HPLC and capillary electrophoresis (CE). Carbohydrate and glycoconjugate analysis by MALDI-MS has been comprehensively reviewed by Harvey. Other useful review articles, which cover a range of analytical techniques including tandem MS (MS/MS) of glycoconjugates have appeared in recent years.

This review aims at giving a concise overview of MS based glycomics technology, together with selected applications in clinical research.

Analysis of free glycans

Protein-linked N-glycans and O-glycans are typically released by enzymatic and chemical methods, respectively. Also glycosaminoglycans are generally degraded by chemical or enzymatic means for subsequent analysis. Analysis of released (or “free”) glycans may be achieved by a variety of techniques such as mass spectrometry, HPLC of reductively aminated glycans employing fluorescence or UV detection and capillary gel electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection (CGE-LIF) of labeled glycans. MS is particularly advantageous for analyzing very complex glycan mixtures containing unusual oligosaccharide structures for which the standardized migration positions in HPLC or CGE-LIF have not yet been determined. Importantly, the mass of the analyzed glycan – when determined with sufficient accuracy or accompanied by a tandem MS experiment – will directly provide information on the glycan composition in terms of hexoses, N-acetylhexosamines, deoxyhexoses, etc. By contrast, this direct link between the observed glycan species and its molecular composition is not inherently present for HPLC and CGE-LIF experiments and additional efforts are required such as the use of glycan standards or exoglycosidase treatments for the determination of terminal monosaccharides. On the other hand, separation-based methods for glycan analysis will often resolve structural isomers such as the 6-arm and 3-arm isomers of monogalactosylated biantennary glycans, while their distinction is not easily achieved by MS and requires additional efforts such as tandem MS analysis.

Therefore, while very complex pools of oligosaccharides can be analyzed by MS(/MS) without separation, many researchers choose to perform glycan analysis by LC-MS or - less frequently - CE-MS coupling. (Normalized) retention and migration times, precursor masses and fragmentation spectra may then be used for structural elucidation as in the case of O-glycan alditol analysis by porous graphitized carbon (PGC) HPLC coupled online to MS. PGC-HPLC appears to have a particularly high power in separating oligosaccharide structural isomers, which makes this method very useful for in-depth structural analysis of complex oligosaccharide mixtures. Another popular separation technique hyphenated with MS for oligosaccharide analysis is HILIC, which likewise features isomer separation. High-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC) coupled with online-desalting and online-ESI-MS is another approach which is particularly useful for the analysis of underivatized oligosaccharides.

Derivatization is often useful to support mass spectrometric detection and identification of carbohydrates. For example, oligosaccharides may be reduced to alditols resulting in a 2 Da mass tag on the innermost monosaccharide which facilitates fragment assignment in tandem MS. Analysis of O-glycan alditols obtained by reductive beta-elimination may be achieved by porous graphitized carbon (PGC) HPLC coupled via online, negative-mode electrospray ionization to ion trap-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). An online database has been made available by the UniCarb-DB partners allowing structural assignment of O-glycan alditols on the basis of MS and MS/MS spectra in addition to retention times (http://www.unicarb-db.com/). Similarly, N-glycans may be structurally assigned on the basis of mass and retention time in PGC-ESI-MS. This approach has been introduced by Altmann and coworkers.

Within the range of mass spectrometric techniques, negative-mode MS of glycans has recently obtained increased attention, both for MALDI and ESI ionization. There are several attractive features of analyzing glycans in negative-ion mode. Negative-mode ionization is particularly effective for acidic glycan structures. In this respect, labeling of glycans at the reducing end with an acidic tag such as 2-aminobenzoic acid (anthranilic acid; AA) is advantageous, as it confers acidic properties to all glycans including neutral species, thereby allowing the efficient detection of both sialylated and non-sialylated AA-labeled oligosaccharides in negative-mode MALDI-time of flight (TOF)-MS. In addition, negative-mode MS/MS of oligosaccharides has attractive features, for example that the glycosidic linkages of fucose are rather stable, in contrast to their labile behavior in positive-ion mode. Harvey has described several diagnostic ions, which are observed in negative-ion mode MS/MS of N-glycans and allow the elucidation of antenna compositions as well as the differentiation between the 6-branch and 3-branch of the glycan.

Alternatively, oligosaccharides may be analyzed after permethylation. Permethylation converts all the hydroxyl groups into methyl ethers. Moreover, the carboxylic acid groups of sialylated glycans are protected by methyl esterification, which stabilizes the sialic acids and enables MALDI-TOF-MS profiling of permethylated neutral and acidic glycans simultaneously. By contrast, sialic acids are labile when analyzing native glycans, leading to the observation of degradation products in MALDI-TOF-MS spectra. Analysis of the sodium adducts of permethylated glycans by tandem MS is a very useful approach for detailed structural characterization as - next to cleavages of glycosidic bonds - diagnostic cross-ring cleavages are observed, which reveal linkage positions. These analyses may be performed by high-energy collision-induced dissociation (CID) MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS resulting in very complex yet informative fragmentation spectra. MALDI-ion trap-MS of permethylated N-glycans released from total plasma glycoproteins has recently been established by Guillard et al.. This approach allows in-depth analysis of glycans by multistage-tandem mass spectrometry as exemplified in Fig. 1: MS2 (Fig. 1a) and MS3 experiments (Fig. 1b) provided evidence for the occurrence of a sialyl-Lewis X structure on a plasma N-glycan.

Analysis of permethylated glycans in combination with ESI-ion trap-MS is particularly attractive. When this approach is combined with multistage fragmentation of permethylated glycans, the combination of various characteristic fragmentation spectra of sub-structures of the precursor oligosaccharides allows the unambiguous structural assignment of large oligosaccharide structures as impressively demonstrated by Reinhold and coworkers.

Internal standards for MS may be obtained by isotope labeling during the derivatization step. For example reductive amination or permethylation using deuterated or C13-labeled versions of the tag / chemicals have been shown to be advantageous for oligosaccharide quantification and the detailed comparison of glycan profiles. It has to be noted, however, that most of these isotope labeling strategies have not yet been applied to clinical glycomics research questions.

Analysis of glycopeptides

In addition to the analysis of released glycans studying protein glycosylation at the level of glycopeptides is rapidly gaining importance. The peptide portion may be seen as a tag, which potentially allows the assignment of the glycan to a specific N- or O-glycosylation site on a specific protein. However, this approach is complicated by several obstacles. First, proteolytic cleavage is often hindered in highly glycosylated proteins, resulting in very large, highly and heterogeneously glycosylated peptide moieties, which are hardly accessible for MS analysis. Second, a variety of glycans are generally found attached to one specific glycosylation site (microheterogeneity of glycosylation), and different N-glycosylation sites on one protein often have different glycan patterns. Therefore, glycopeptides generally occur substoichiometrically, making them difficult to analyze by MS in the presence of a majority of non-glycosylated peptides. Various enrichment techniques including lectin affinity chromatography are available to purify glycopeptides for MS analysis. A very promising technique for enriching N-glycopeptides is hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-solid phase extraction (HILIC-SPE), which may be performed using silica-based or carbohydrate-based stationary phases. Third, depending on the size of the glycan moiety and the chosen MS/MS approach, it is often hard to obtain peptide sequence information, which is in most cases needed for unambiguous assignment of the glycan to a specific protein. Popular approaches are electron capture dissociation (ECD) and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) of glycopeptides as well as various types of (multistage) CID. In ECD and ETD the glycan portion is generally stable, and peptide backbone cleavages tend to provide (some) peptide sequence information. Single stage low-energy CID (as occurring on an ion trap) is generally characterized by fragmentation of glycosidic bonds, and peptide backbone cleavages are usually minor, if detectable at all. Fragmentation of the peptide portion may be achieved by performing ion trap-multistage MS/MS, and has been successfully applied in various cases for the identification of glycosylated proteins and glycosylation sites. Alternatively, fragmentation of glycopeptides at elevated energies in MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS and MALDI- or ESI-quadrupole-TOF-MS has been reported to provide peptide sequence information next to information on glycan composition and structure.

Glycopeptide analysis is almost exclusively performed on protonated species in positive-ion mode. It has been observed that under these conditions glycan moieties may undergo rearrangements in MS/MS, of which prominent examples are the migration of fucoses between N-glycan antennae, or from the core to outer portions of the N-glycan structure. These rearrangements may not only be observed for N-glycopeptides, but also for O-glycopeptides. Obviously, awareness of these processes is required for avoiding misinterpretation of glycopeptide fragmentation spectra.

The major bottle-neck in glycopeptidomics-based proteomics of complex samples is data analysis. Software supporting data analysis is desperately needed, and several promising approaches have recently been reported ( and references cited therein). Yet additional, concerted efforts in developing data analysis tools are needed to boost the impact of this analytical approach.

Analyzing protein glycosylation at the glycopeptide level may be categorized as part of a bottom-up glycoproteomics approach. The analysis of the intact mass of glycoproteins, together with a bottom-up analysis, often allows the detailed structural assignment of protein species such as monoclonal antibodies. In addition, top-down glycoproteomics, i.e., the MS analysis of intact glycoproteins followed by their tandem MS analysis for the characterization of posttranslational modifications including glycosylation, has high potential but needs to be further developed.

Glycopeptide analysis by MS can be performed in a high-throughput mode. IgG glycopeptide profiling by MALDI-TOF-MS has been performed to determine the changes in IgG1 and IgG2 Fc glycosylation features with pregnancy and rheumatoid arthritis as well as with longevity and healthy aging. MALDI-FTICR-MS was likewise evaluated for IgG Fc glycopeptides profiling and was found to be particularly useful for analyzing changes in sialylation. MALDI-FTICR-MS analysis of IgG Fc glycopeptides is characterized by reduced losses of sialic acid, which is most probably due to the higher pressure in the source and the resulting collisional cooling, in combination with the lower extraction voltages as compared to MALDI-TOF-MS. Recently, using a sheath-flow ESI sprayer, a robust nanoLC-MS method for IgG Fc glycosylation profiling was established (Fig. 2). Notably, the sheath-flow ESI sprayer setup was found to significantly increase the long-term stability of the system while keeping the sensitivity of the system in the same range as with conventional nano-ESI-MS. High-sensitivity IgG Fc glycosylation analysis is particularly valuable when analyzing affinity-purified, antigen-specific IgGs, which may be present at low concentrations. For the most common applications, however, such as glycosylation analysis of total plasma IgG and biotechnologically produced IgG the available sample amounts are generally plenty and sensitivity is not an issue. The sheath flow setup was used in combination with trifluoracetic acid containing running solvents resulting in the coelution of sialylated and non-sialylated IgG Fc glycopeptides. In contrast, conventional nano-LC-MS with formic acid-containing running solvents features early-eluting glycopeptides with neutral glycans and late-eluting ones with sialylated glycans. This set-up was used to study IgG Fc glycosylation changes during pregnancy. It was found that galactosylation, sialylation were increased whilst fucosylation and the incidence of bisecting GlcNAc were decreased during pregnancy. The observed glycosylation changes may contribute to the immune suppression occurring during pregnancy in order to protect the fetus from alloimmune reactions of the mother.

Analysis of glycolipids

Next to glycoproteins, glycolipids play an important role in cellular interaction and cellular differentiation. The majority of glycolipids observed in humans have a ceramide portion (sphingoid base carrying an amide-linked fatty acid) and are, therefore, categorized as glycosphingolipids. They occur mainly in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane and also in the inner membranes. Glycosphingolipids show a marked tissue- and cell type-specific expression pattern. This is for example reflected by the fact that various human cluster of differentiation (CD) markers, which are differentially expressed between leukocytes, are glycolipids such as CD60a (GD3; Neu5Ac(α2-8)Neu5Ac(α2-3)Gal(β1-4)Glc(β1-1)ceramide), CD60b (9-O-acetyl GD3), CD60c (7-O-acetyl GD3), CD77 (Gb3; globotriaosylceramide; Gal(α1-4)Gal(β1-4)Glc(β1-1)ceramide)) (http://www.hcdm.org/).

Glycosphingolipids are generally subjected to MS in intact form. Recently, chip-based approaches for glycosphingolipid analysis have been reviewed. Importantly, there is also technology available to combine the most commonly applied separation technique in lipid, as well as glycolipid analysis, high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC), with MS. For example, glycosphingolipids separated by HPTLC can be probed by overlay detection using carbohydrate-binding proteins such as lectins, bacterial toxins, and antibodies, followed by the MS analysis of positive bands, either directly from the HPTLC plate or after lipid extraction, as reviewed recently by Meisen et al.. Alternatively, glycolipids may be analyzed by HILIC-nano-LC-MS using slightly adjusted solvent conditions when compared to methods used for glycan and glycopeptide separation. Using this approach, it has been demonstrated that α2-3-sialylated and α2-6-sialylated isomers of lactoneotetraosylceramides can be baseline separated from complex mixtures and characterized individually by tandem MS.

Clinical glycomics applications

The importance of the above described techniques is illustrated by their application in clinical studies. Glycosylation changes play important roles in the cellular mechanisms of health and disease, and glycans have a great potential as biomarkers for different types of cancer. There is a vast range of studies of human glycobiology in healthy and diseased people employing MS, and some selected examples will be presented demonstrating the potential of mass spectrometric approaches for clinical glycomics.

MS has been shown to be useful to type congenital disorders of glycosylation. Guillard et al. established an approach that relies on N-glycan release from total plasma, permethylation, and MALDI-ion trap-MS measurement, allowing in-depth analysis of glycans by tandem MS (Fig. 1). This approach was applied to determine plasma N-glycan profiles of congenital disorder of glycosylation (CDG) type II patients, as well as controls. A total of 38 peaks were assigned in terms of molecular composition, and changes in the N-glycan profiles were found to be useful to distinguish between the patient groups. The authors also successfully addressed the challenge of differentiating CDG type II diseases from other diseases with secondary causes of underglycosylation. This method is now being successfully applied in clinical research, including research on patients with defects in 1-4-galactosyltransferase I (B4GAT1), which leads to the expression of largely truncated glycans on plasma proteins.

Another application field for MS is represented by the analysis of lysosomal storage disorders. Lysosomal defects of glycoconjugate degradation may lead to the secretion of glycopeptides, glycolipids or oligosaccharides in patient urine. These secreted molecules are potential markers of the diseases. Molecular analysis of these degradation products by MS often directly pinpoints to the genetic defect. In Schindler’s disease, which is a hereditary N-acetylhexosaminidase deficiency, characteristic O-glycosylated amino acids and O-linked glycopeptides were detected from patients’ urines. In Fabry’s disease, the causative enzymatic defect leads to elevated levels of globotriaosylceramide and lyso-globotriaosylceramide species in urine and plasma, which can be detected by LC-MS with good diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. A very powerful approach for the analysis of urinary oligosaccharides is HPAEC, which was applied in capillary-scale with online-desalting and ESI-ion trap-MS/MS analysis to study urinary oligosaccharides of patients with GM1-gangliosidosis and galactosialidosis. On the basis of literature knowledge of N-glycan biosynthesis, this approach allowed the structural assignment of chromatographically separated isomeric N-glycan degradation products in GM1-gangliosidosis (Fig. 3). The observation of N-glycans with terminal galactose residues points to a deficiency of β-galactosidase activity. When the same analytical setup was applied to study urinary glycans in galactosialidosis, novel degradation products were observed such as glycolipid-derived oligosaccharides, both in reducing form and with C1-oxidation of the innermost glucose. These results indicate the presence of an alternative glycolipid degradation pathway in galactosialidosis patients involving a hitherto not described endoglycoceramidase activity.

The analysis of protein degradation products from bio fluids has repeatedly led to the identification of glycopeptides, thereby shedding new light on protein glycosylation. For example, apolipoprotein CIII-derived O-glycopeptides were found in the urine of Schistosoma mansoni infected individuals. Remarkably, these glycopeptides did not exhibit the sialylated T-antigen glycan structures found on apolipoprotein CIII from human serum, but instead carried larger O-glycan structures with a high degree of sialylation. In another study, an O-glycosylated peptide stemming from the C-terminus of the fibrinogen α-chain was found to be increased in the urine during urinary tract infection with Escherichia coli. Recently, O-glycosylated amyloid β-peptides representing a potential disease biomarker were characterized from cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer patients using both CID and ECD fragmentation.

Cancer glycomics biomarker discovery has recently been reviewed, and MS is becoming an important research tool in this field. Novotny and Mechref with coworkers chose to analyze serum N-glycan profiles after permethylation using MALDI-TOF-MS. Using this approach, they demonstrated vastly different N-glycan profiles in metastatic prostate cancer as compared to healthy tissue. A variety of mainly fucosylated, complex-type N-glycans were found to be increased in cancer vs. control. In another study the relative abundances of a set of 8 complex-type serum N-glycans were found to be indicative of the progression of breast cancer. Other studies have focused on the glycosylation analysis of specific acute-phase proteins. For example, MALDI-MS of 2-aminobenzoic acid-labeled N-glycans showed that the N-glycan fucosylation of α-1-acid glycoprotein is significantly increased in ovarian cancer. Notably, most of the reported cancer glycomics studies focus on the analysis of the total plasma or serum N-glycome or certain acute-phase proteins. While these approaches are promising, an increase in sensitivity and specificity may be expected when tumor-derived antigens isolated from body fluids are characterized together with their specific glycosylation profiles.

Still another glycomics application area for MS is the study of the genetic and environmental regulation and dysregulation of protein glycosylation in health and diseases. For example, various novel aspects of the regulation of immunoglobulin G Fc glycosylation have only recently been revealed by high-sensitivity glycosylation profiling at the glycopeptide level. Employing this analysis technique, in vitro studies have shown that soluble factors such as cytokines and toll-like receptor ligands modulate the degree of IgG Fc galactosylation, sialylation and the incidence of bisecting GlcNAc. Likewise, fucosylation of IgG Fc glycans appears to be regulated in humans: IgG Fc glycan fucosylation in humans is known to be generally above 90 %, yet recently pathogenic alloantibodies with a low degree of fucosylation (50 % and below) have been described for patients with fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT). Figure 4 shows the total serum IgG1 Fc glycosylation profile of a patient and the corresponding profile of the pathogenic anti-human plate antigen (HPA) 3a alloantibodies. While the total serum IgG1 shows 9 % afucosylated structures (A), the afucosylation is 38 % for the alloantibodies of this patient (B). Importantly, these IgG Fc glycosylation changes are known to be functionally relevant. Low fucosylation has been associated with enhanced cellular cytocoxicity, whilst high degrees of sialylation confer anti-inflammatory properties to IgGs.

Perspectives

In the coming years the field of mass spectrometric analysis of protein glycosylation is expected to show an increase in measurement sensitivity and precision as well as sample throughput, allowing the in-depth analysis of biological systems, with data analysis being a major challenge.

Despite the limitations mentioned in this review, glycoproteomics approaches focusing on the glycopeptide level will gain in popularity. Mass spectrometric analyses of (tryptic) glycopeptides are rewarding as they have intrinsically the potential of assigning specific glycan structures to a specific site on a specific protein. This information is often of utmost importance, as the primary role of glycans is modulating the properties (such as function, activity, stability, targeting) of their carrier proteins. Notably, approaches based on the analysis of released N-glycans often fail to provide this information on protein- and site-specificity and are, therefore, of limited value.

Another important aspect is the analysis of intact glycoproteins by MS, which is expected to gain importance in the next years. On the one hand, MS analysis of intact glycoproteins allows the integration of the information obtained at the glycopeptide and released glycan level to obtain an overall view of protein glycosylation. On the other hand intact protein analysis may be accompanied by top-down tandem mass spectrometric analysis for characterization of posttranslational modifications, including glycosylation.

It is anticipated that the concept of a specific protein having specific functions will undergo refinement, and specific proteins will be perceived as an assembly of isoforms (including glycoforms) that are caused by a variety of posttranslational modifications including glycosylation. Defining such “protein species” is of utmost importance for functional proteomics supporting systems biology and will require bioinformatics tools and databases to facilitate posttranslational modification analysis at the glycopeptide level.

References 86

  1. 1.

    Pabst M, Altmann F. Glycan analysis by modern instrumental methods. Proteomics. 2011;11:631-643.

    Not in our library10.1002/pmic.201000517

  2. 2.

    Ruhaak LR, Deelder AM, Wuhrer M. Oligosaccharide analysis by graphitized carbon liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009;394:163-174.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00216-009-2664-5

  3. 3.

    Wuhrer M, Deelder AM, Hokke CH. Protein glycosylation analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B. 2005;825:124-133.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.01.030

  4. 4.

    Wuhrer M, Catalina MI, Deelder AM, Hokke CH. Glycoproteomics based on tandem mass spectrometry of glycopeptides. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007;849:115-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.09.041

  5. 5.

    Zaia J. On-line separations combined with MS for analysis of glycosaminoglycans. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2009;28:254-272.

    Not in our library10.1002/mas.20200

  6. 6.

    Mechref Y. Analysis of glycans derived from glycoconjugates by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis. 2011;32:3467-3481.

    Not in our library10.1002/elps.201100342

  7. 7.

    Mechref Y, Novotny MV. Glycomic analysis by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2009;28:207-222.

    Not in our library10.1002/mas.20196

  8. 8.

    Harvey, D.J.: Analysis of carbohydrates and glycoconjugates by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry: an update for 2007–2008. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 31, 183–311 (2012)

    Not in our library10.1002/mas.20333

  9. 9.

    Harvey DJ. Analysis of carbohydrates and glycoconjugates by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry: an update for the period 2005–2006. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2011;30:1-100.

    Not in our library10.1002/mas.20265

  10. 10.

    Zaia J. Mass spectrometry and the emerging field of glycomics. Chem. Biol. 2008;15:881-892.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.07.016

  11. 11.

    North SJ, Hitchen PG, Haslam SM, Dell A. Mass spectrometry in the analysis of N-linked and O-linked glycans. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009;19:498-506.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2009.05.005

  12. 12.

    Morelle W, Canis K, Chirat F, Faid V, Michalski JC. The use of mass spectrometry for the proteomic analysis of glycosylation. Proteomics. 2006;6:3993-4015.

    Not in our library10.1002/pmic.200600129

  13. 13.

    Morelle W, Michalski JC. Analysis of protein glycosylation by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 2007;2:1585-1602.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2007.227

  14. 14.

    Mechref Y, Novotny MV. Structural investigations of glycoconjugates at high sensitivity. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:321-369.

    Not in our library10.1021/cr0103017

  15. 15.

    An HJ, Lebrilla CB. Structure elucidation of native N- and O-linked glycans by tandem mass spectrometry (tutorial). Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2011;30:560-578.

    Not in our library10.1002/mas.20283

  16. 16.

    Ruhaak LR, Zauner G, Huhn C, Bruggink C, Deelder AM, Wuhrer M. Glycan labeling strategies and their use in identification and quantification. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010;397:3457-3481.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00216-010-3532-z

  17. 17.

    Huang Y, Shi X, Yu X, Leymarie N, Staples GO, Yin H, Killeen K, Zaia J. Improved liquid chromatography-MS/MS of heparan sulfate oligosaccharides via chip-based pulsed makeup flow. Anal. Chem. 2011;83:8222-8229.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac201964n

  18. 18.

    Geyer H, Geyer R. Strategies for analysis of glycoprotein glycosylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006;1764:1853-1869.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbapap.2006.10.007

  19. 19.

    Domann PJ, Pardos-Pardos AC, Fernandes DL, Spencer DI, Radcliffe CM, Royle L, Dwek RA, Rudd PM. Separation-based glycoprofiling approaches using fluorescent labels. Proteomics. 2007;7(Suppl 1):70-76.

    Not in our library10.1002/pmic.200700640

  20. 20.

    Ruhaak, L.R., Hennig, R., Huhn, C., Borowiak, M., Dolhain, R.J., Deelder, A.M., Rapp, E., Wuhrer, M.: Optimized workflow for preparation of APTS-labeled N-glycans allowing high-throughput analysis of human plasma glycomes using 48-channel multiplexed CGE-LIF. J. Proteome Res. (2010)

    Not in our library10.1021/pr100802f

  21. 21.

    Vanderschaeghe D, Szekrenyes A, Wenz C, Gassmann M, Naik N, Bynum M, Yin H, Delanghe J, Guttman A, Callewaert N. High-throughput profiling of the serum N-glycome on capillary electrophoresis microfluidics systems: toward clinical implementation of GlycoHepatoTest. Anal. Chem. 2010;82:7408-7415.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac101560a

  22. 22.

    Marino K, Bones J, Kattla JJ, Rudd PM. A systematic approach to protein glycosylation analysis: a path through the maze. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010;6:713-723.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.437

  23. 23.

    Royle L, Campbell MP, Radcliffe CM, White DM, Harvey DJ, Abrahams JL, Kim YG, Henry GW, Shadick NA, Weinblatt ME, Lee DM, Rudd PM, Dwek RA. HPLC-based analysis of serum N-glycans on a 96-well plate platform with dedicated database software. Anal. Biochem. 2008;376:1-12.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ab.2007.12.012

  24. 24.

    Ahn J, Bones J, Yu YQ, Rudd PM, Gilar M. Separation of 2-aminobenzamide labeled glycans using hydrophilic interaction chromatography columns packed with 1.7 microm sorbent. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2010;878:403-408.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.12.013

  25. 25.

    Prien JM, Ashline DJ, Lapadula AJ, Zhang H, Reinhold VN. The high mannose glycans from bovine ribonuclease B isomer characterization by ion trap MS. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2009;20:539-556.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jasms.2008.11.012

  26. 26.

    Stumpo KA, Reinhold VN. The N-glycome of human plasma. J. Proteome Res. 2010;9:4823-4830.

    Not in our library10.1021/pr100528k

  27. 27.

    Karlsson NG, Wilson NL, Wirth HJ, Dawes P, Joshi H, Packer NH. Negative ion graphitised carbon nano-liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry increases sensitivity for glycoprotein oligosaccharide analysis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2004;18:2282-2292.

    Not in our library10.1002/rcm.1626

  28. 28.

    Karlsson NG, Schulz BL, Packer NH. Structural determination of neutral O-linked oligosaccharide alditols by negative ion LC-electrospray-MSn. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004;15:659-672.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jasms.2004.01.002

  29. 29.

    Pabst M, Bondili JS, Stadlmann J, Mach L, Altmann F. Mass + retention time = structure: a strategy for the analysis of N-glycans by carbon LC-ESI-MS and its application to fibrin N-glycans. Anal. Chem. 2007;79:5051-5057.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac070363i

  30. 30.

    Wuhrer M, de Boer AR, Deelder AM. Structural Glycomics using Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography (HILIC) with Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2009;28:192-206.

    Not in our library10.1002/mas.20195

  31. 31.

    Zauner G, Deelder AM, Wuhrer M. Recent advances in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) for structural glycomics. Electrophoresis. 2011;32:3456-3466.

    Not in our library10.1002/elps.201100247

  32. 32.

    Bruggink C, Wuhrer M, Koeleman CA, Barreto V, Liu Y, Pohl C, Ingendoh A, Hokke CH, Deelder AM. Oligosaccharide analysis by capillary-scale high-pH anion-exchange chromatography with on-line ion-trap mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B. 2005;829:136-143.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.10.006

  33. 33.

    Harvey DJ. Derivatization of carbohydrates for analysis by chromatography; electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2011;879:1196-1225.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.11.010

  34. 34.

    Qian J, Liu T, Yang L, Daus A, Crowley R, Zhou Q. Structural characterization of N-linked oligosaccharides on monoclonal antibody cetuximab by the combination of orthogonal matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization hybrid quadrupole-quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry and sequential enzymatic digestion. Anal. Biochem. 2007;364:8-18.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ab.2007.01.023

  35. 35.

    Wuhrer M, Deelder AM. Negative-mode MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS of oligosaccharides labeled with 2-aminobenzamide. Anal. Chem. 2005;77:6954-6959.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac051117e

  36. 36.

    Harvey DJ. Fragmentation of negative ions from carbohydrates: part 3. Fragmentation of hybrid and complex N-linked glycans. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005;16:647-659.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jasms.2005.01.006

  37. 37.

    Harvey DJ, Jaeken J, Butler M, Armitage AJ, Rudd PM, Dwek RA. Fragmentation of negative ions from N-linked carbohydrates, part 4. Fragmentation of complex glycans lacking substitution on the 6-antenna. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010;45:528-535.

    Not in our library10.1002/jms.1736

  38. 38.

    Mechref Y, Novotny MV, Krishnan C. Structural characterization of oligosaccharides using MALDI-TOF/TOF tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003;75:4895-4903.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac0341968

  39. 39.

    Guillard M, Gloerich J, Wessels HJ, Morava E, Wevers RA, Lefeber DJ. Automated measurement of permethylated serum N-glycans by MALDI-linear ion trap mass spectrometry. Carbohydr. Res. 2009;344:1550-1557.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carres.2009.06.010

  40. 40.

    Halim, A., Nilsson, J., Ruetschi, U., Hesse, C., Larson, G.: Human urinary glycoproteomics; attachment site specific analysis of N-and O-linked glycosylations by CID and ECD. Mol. Cell. Proteomics (2011)

    Not in our library10.1074/mcp.m111.013649

All 86 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.