No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.
Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2009
The Registration Committee for Esophageal Cancer of the Japan Esophageal Society, Yuji Tachimori, Soji Ozawa and 8 more
Esophagus · 2016 · Case report
Abstract
institutions in Japan.Tumor locations were cervical: 4.4 %, upper thoracic: 11.9 %, middle thoracic: 48.0 %, lower thoracic: 27.7 % and EG junction: 6.6 %.Superficial carcinomas (Tis, T1a, T1b) were 36.7 %.As for the histologic type of biopsy specimens, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma accounted for 90.5 and 3.8 %, respectively.Regarding clinical results, the 5-year survival rates of patients treated using endoscopic mucosal resection, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, or esophagectomy were 86.2, 27.9, 20.2, 5.8, and 55.9 %, respectively.Esophagectomy was performed in 3844 cases.Concerning the approach used for esophagectomy, 24.9 % of the cases were treated thoracoscopically.The operative mortality (within 30 days after surgery) was 1.01 % and the hospital mortality was 4.76 %.We hope that this Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2009 will help to improve all aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer in Japan. Preface 2009We deeply appreciate the great contributions of many physicians in the registry of esophageal cancer cases.The Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2009 was published here, despite some delay.The registry complies with the Act for the Protection of Personal Information.The encryption with a HASH function is used for ''anonymity in an unlinkable fashion''.We briefly summarized the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2009.Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer 10th and UICC TNM Classification 6th were used for cancer staging according to the subjected year.A total of 6260 cases were registered from These data were first made available on January 2016, as the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2009.Not all the tables and figures are reprinted here.The authors were members of the Registration Committee for Esophageal Cancer, the Japan Esophageal Society, and made great contributions to the preparation of this material.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Preface 2009
We deeply appreciate the great contributions of many physicians in the registry of esophageal cancer cases. The Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2009 was published here, despite some delay. The registry complies with the Act for the Protection of Personal Information. The encryption with a HASH function is used for ‘‘anonymity in an unlinkable fashion’’.
We briefly summarized the Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2009. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer 10th and UICC TNM Classification 6th were used for cancer staging according to the subjected year. A total of 6260 cases were registered from 276 institutions in Japan. Tumor locations were cervical: 4.4 %, upper thoracic: 11.9 %, middle thoracic: 48.0 %, lower thoracic: 27.7 % and EG junction: 6.6 %. Superficial carcinomas (Tis, T1a, T1b) were 36.7 %. As for the histologic type of biopsy specimens, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma accounted for 90.5 and 3.8 %, respectively. Regarding clinical results, the 5-year survival rates of patients treated using endoscopic mucosal resection, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, or esophagectomy were 86.2, 27.9, 20.2, 5.8, and 55.9 %, respectively. Esophagectomy was performed in 3844 cases. Concerning the approach used for esophagectomy, 24.9 % of the cases were treated thoracoscopically. The operative mortality (within 30 days after surgery) was 1.01 % and the hospital mortality was 4.76 %.
We hope that this Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2009 will help to improve all aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer in Japan.
Contents
Clinical factors of esophageal cancer patients treated in 2009Institution-registered cases in 2009Patient BackgroundTable1Age and genderTable2Primary treatmentTable3Tumor locationTable4Histologic types of biopsy specimensTable5Depth of tumor invasion, cT (UICC TNM 6th)Table6Lymph node metastasis, cN (UICC TNM 6th)Table7Distant metastasis, cM (UICC TNM 6th)Table8Clinical stage (UICC TNM 6th)Results of endoscopically treated patients in 2009Table9Details of endoscopic treatmentTable10Complications of EMR/ESDTable11Pathological depth of tumor invasion of EMR/ESD specimensFigure1Survival of patients treated with EMR/ESDFigure2Survival of patients treated with EMR/ESD according to the pathological depth of tumor invasion (pT)Figure3Survival of patients treated with EMR/ESD according to the lymphatic and venous invasionResults in patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in 2009Table12Dose of radiation (non-surgically treated cases)Table13Dose of radiation (surgically treated cases)Figure4Survival of patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (cStage I-IIA)Figure5Survival of patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (cStage IIB-IVB)Results in patients underwent esophagectomy in 2009Table14Treatment modalities of esophagectomyTable15Tumor locationTable16Approaches to tumor resectionTable17Video-assisted surgeryTable18Fields of lymph node dissection according to the location of the tumorTable19Reconstruction routeTable20Organs used for reconstructionTable21Histological classificationTable22Depth of tumor invasion, pT (JES 10th)Table23Pathological grading of lymph node metastasis, pN (JES 10th)Table24Numbers of the metastatic nodesTable25Pathological findings of distant organ metastasis, pM (JES 10th)Table26Residual tumor, RTable27Causes of deathFigure6Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomyFigure7Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to clinical stage (JES TNM 10th)Figure8Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to clinical stage (UICC TNM 6th)Figure9Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to the depth of tumor invasion (JES 10th: pT)Figure10Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to the depth of tumor invasion (UICC TNM 6th: pT)Figure11Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to lymph node metastasis (JES 10th: pN)Figure12Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to lymph node metastasis (UICC TNM 6th: pN)Figure13Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to number of metastatic nodesFigure14Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to pathological stage (JES 10th)Figure15Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to pathological stage (UICC TNM 6th)Figure16Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to residual tumor (R)
Clinical factors of esophageal cancer patients treated in 2009Institution-registered cases in 2009Patient BackgroundTable1Age and genderTable2Primary treatmentTable3Tumor locationTable4Histologic types of biopsy specimensTable5Depth of tumor invasion, cT (UICC TNM 6th)Table6Lymph node metastasis, cN (UICC TNM 6th)Table7Distant metastasis, cM (UICC TNM 6th)Table8Clinical stage (UICC TNM 6th)
Institution-registered cases in 2009
Patient BackgroundTable1Age and genderTable2Primary treatmentTable3Tumor locationTable4Histologic types of biopsy specimensTable5Depth of tumor invasion, cT (UICC TNM 6th)Table6Lymph node metastasis, cN (UICC TNM 6th)Table7Distant metastasis, cM (UICC TNM 6th)Table8Clinical stage (UICC TNM 6th)
Table1Age and gender
Table2Primary treatment
Table3Tumor location
Table4Histologic types of biopsy specimens
Table5Depth of tumor invasion, cT (UICC TNM 6th)
Table6Lymph node metastasis, cN (UICC TNM 6th)
Table7Distant metastasis, cM (UICC TNM 6th)
Table8Clinical stage (UICC TNM 6th)
Results of endoscopically treated patients in 2009Table9Details of endoscopic treatmentTable10Complications of EMR/ESDTable11Pathological depth of tumor invasion of EMR/ESD specimensFigure1Survival of patients treated with EMR/ESDFigure2Survival of patients treated with EMR/ESD according to the pathological depth of tumor invasion (pT)Figure3Survival of patients treated with EMR/ESD according to the lymphatic and venous invasion
Table9Details of endoscopic treatment
Table10Complications of EMR/ESD
Table11Pathological depth of tumor invasion of EMR/ESD specimens
Figure1Survival of patients treated with EMR/ESD
Figure2Survival of patients treated with EMR/ESD according to the pathological depth of tumor invasion (pT)
Figure3Survival of patients treated with EMR/ESD according to the lymphatic and venous invasion
Results in patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in 2009Table12Dose of radiation (non-surgically treated cases)Table13Dose of radiation (surgically treated cases)Figure4Survival of patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (cStage I-IIA)Figure5Survival of patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (cStage IIB-IVB)
Table12Dose of radiation (non-surgically treated cases)
Table13Dose of radiation (surgically treated cases)
Figure4Survival of patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (cStage I-IIA)
Figure5Survival of patients treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (cStage IIB-IVB)
Results in patients underwent esophagectomy in 2009Table14Treatment modalities of esophagectomyTable15Tumor locationTable16Approaches to tumor resectionTable17Video-assisted surgeryTable18Fields of lymph node dissection according to the location of the tumorTable19Reconstruction routeTable20Organs used for reconstructionTable21Histological classificationTable22Depth of tumor invasion, pT (JES 10th)Table23Pathological grading of lymph node metastasis, pN (JES 10th)Table24Numbers of the metastatic nodesTable25Pathological findings of distant organ metastasis, pM (JES 10th)Table26Residual tumor, RTable27Causes of deathFigure6Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomyFigure7Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to clinical stage (JES TNM 10th)Figure8Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to clinical stage (UICC TNM 6th)Figure9Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to the depth of tumor invasion (JES 10th: pT)Figure10Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to the depth of tumor invasion (UICC TNM 6th: pT)Figure11Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to lymph node metastasis (JES 10th: pN)Figure12Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to lymph node metastasis (UICC TNM 6th: pN)Figure13Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to number of metastatic nodesFigure14Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to pathological stage (JES 10th)Figure15Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to pathological stage (UICC TNM 6th)Figure16Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to residual tumor (R)
Table14Treatment modalities of esophagectomy
Table15Tumor location
Table16Approaches to tumor resection
Table17Video-assisted surgery
Table18Fields of lymph node dissection according to the location of the tumor
Table19Reconstruction route
Table20Organs used for reconstruction
Table21Histological classification
Table22Depth of tumor invasion, pT (JES 10th)
Table23Pathological grading of lymph node metastasis, pN (JES 10th)
Table24Numbers of the metastatic nodes
Table25Pathological findings of distant organ metastasis, pM (JES 10th)
Table26Residual tumor, R
Table27Causes of death
Figure6Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy
Figure7Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to clinical stage (JES TNM 10th)
Figure8Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to clinical stage (UICC TNM 6th)
Figure9Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to the depth of tumor invasion (JES 10th: pT)
Figure10Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to the depth of tumor invasion (UICC TNM 6th: pT)
Figure11Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to lymph node metastasis (JES 10th: pN)
Figure12Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to lymph node metastasis (UICC TNM 6th: pN)
Figure13Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to number of metastatic nodes
Figure14Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to pathological stage (JES 10th)
Figure15Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to pathological stage (UICC TNM 6th)
Figure16Survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy according to residual tumor (R)
Cited by papers we hold 4
- Long-term outcomes of an esophagus-preserving chemoradiotherapy strategy for patients with endoscopically unresectable stage I thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma · 2021Not checked
- Efficacy of virtual block objects in reducing the lung dose in helical tomotherapy planning for cervical oesophageal cancer: a planning study · 2018Not checked
- Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2 · 2018Corrected
- Efficacy of lymph node dissection by node zones according to tumor location for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma · 2015No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.