Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

Precision medicine in human heart modeling

M. Peirlinck, F. Sahli Costabal, J. Yao and 8 more

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1007/s10237-021-01421-z

Abstract

Precision medicine is a new frontier in healthcare that uses scientific methods to customize medical treatment to the individual genes, anatomy, physiology, and lifestyle of each person. In cardiovascular health, precision medicine has emerged as a promising paradigm to enable cost-effective solutions that improve quality of life and reduce mortality rates. However, the exact role in precision medicine for human heart modeling has not yet been fully explored. Here, we discuss the challenges and opportunities for personalized human heart simulations, from diagnosis to device design, treatment planning, and prognosis. With a view toward personalization, we map out the history of anatomic, physical, and constitutive human heart models throughout the past three decades. We illustrate recent human heart modeling in electrophysiology, cardiac mechanics, and fluid dynamics and highlight clinically relevant applications of these models for drug development, pacing lead failure, heart failure, ventricular assist devices, edge-to-edge repair, and annuloplasty. With a view toward translational medicine, we provide a clinical perspective on virtual imaging trials and a regulatory perspective on medical device innovation. We show that precision medicine in human heart modeling does not necessarily require a fully personalized, high-resolution whole heart model with an entire personalized medical history. Instead, we advocate for creating personalized models out of population-based libraries with geometric, biological, physical, and clinical information by morphing between clinical data and medical histories from cohorts of patients using machine learning. We anticipate that this perspective will shape the path toward introducing human heart simulations into precision medicine with the ultimate goals to facilitate clinical decision making, guide treatment planning, and accelerate device design.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

A brief history of cardiac modeling

The human heart beats 100,000 times a day, 40 million times a year, and three billion times throughout an average lifetime. Four centuries BC, Aristotle recognized the heart as the most important organ of our body and this observation still holds true today. In the early 17th century, William Harvey proved the function of the heart and the circulation of blood, a discovery that is considered the greatest medical achievement of all time. Throughout the past three decades, our understanding of the human heart has become much more quantitative, made possible by the close collaboration between medical scientists, biologists, and mathematical modelers. Today, we are at a critical turning point where we can confidently assume that, within the next decade, we will be able to model and simulate anybody’s individual personalized history of the heart. We take this opportunity to revisit what is possible to model and simulate today, what may become reality in the near future, and how mathematical modeling will guide medical device design and clinical decision making in the era of precision medicine.

History of anatomic models

The art of mathematical modeling is to reduce a problem to the simplest possible mathematical description that is still manageable and, at the same time, detailed enough to capture the relevant effects. Figure 1 illustrates the art of human heart modeling through the hierarchy of models of increasing complexity. The first and simplest models of the heart are idealized cylindrical models that only focus on cross-sections of the left ventricle to rapidly develop and test constitutive models under physiological and pathological conditions (Guccione et al.; Rodriguez et al. ). The next slightly more complex family of models are idealized elliptical left ventricular models with easy reproducibility and popular applications in benchmarking constitutive models (Nielsen et al.; Eriksson et al.; Land et al. ). The simplest models to study the interaction between both ventricles are idealized elliptical biventricular models, which can illustrate the effects of pulmonary and systemic hypertension, while still utilizing a generic geometry (Göktepe and Kuhl ). A major advantage of all three types of models is that their geometric simplicity provides an analytical representation of the fiber orientation, which is relevant to realistically model cardiac contraction, growth, and remodeling. The next more complex class of models, although geometrically simpler, are axisymmetric left ventricular models that can be constructed by rotationally sweeping a cross section of the left ventricular anterior free wall represented through a set of epi- and endocardial points with discrete fiber orientations (Guccione et al. ). More recent studies that focus on regional heterogeneities, for example introduced through prestrain, abandon the assumption of axisymmetry altogether and use full anatomic left ventricular models from personalized geometries (Genet et al. ). For electrophysiological simulations, where we are interested in extracting electrocardiograms under physiological and pathological conditions, we usually have to simulate both ventricles using anatomic bi-ventricular models (Sahli Costabal et al. ). Anatomic bi-ventricular models are also frequently used to simulate pressure-volume loops (Krishnamurthy et al. ) or to predict realistic excitation patterns in response to different treatment scenarios (Ramírez et al. ). The most complex models of the heart are undoubtedly anatomic whole heart models from real personalized geometries (Zygote ) that become unavoidable when studying the interaction between the atria and the ventricles, for example in all medical conditions that involve the valves. While enormous progress has been made since the first anatomic heart models in the early 1990s, creating personalized whole heart models, with all four chambers, the valves, the papillary muscles, and the chordae tendineae, with personalized excitation and contraction systems of Punkinje fibers and heart muscle fibers, and realistic in- and outflow conditions for the blood, remains one of the major challenges in bringing computational modeling closer to clinical use (Smith et al. ).

History of physical models

Fortunately, not all simulations of the heart require complex whole heart modeling. The choice of the model depends strongly on the medical condition of interest, or, more precisely, on the relevant physics that govern this medical condition. Problems associated with the excitation of the heart, arrhythmias, or pacing, are represented through the integral equations of action potential propagation, in the simplest case through monodomain models (Aliev and Panfilov ). Monodomain models are usually sufficient for most excitation problems (Potse et al. ). Yet, there are specific conditions where differences in anisotropic conduction in the intra- and extracellular spaces are essential and bidomain models become necessary (Pathmanathan et al. ), for example when studying the transmembrane potential during unipolar stimulation or the magnetic field at the wave front (Luther et al. ). While electrical problems have historically been solved on a fixed grid using finite difference methods, more recent studies have adopted finite element methods with a view toward a monolithic coupling of excitation and contraction (Göktepe and Kuhl ). However, the electrical excitation problem typically requires a much finer resolution than the mechanical contraction problem, both in space and in time, and usually benefits from simple, high-resolution, regular grids. Problems associated with the contraction of the heart, heart failure, growth and remodeling, and pretty much all surgical procedures are represented through mechanical models characterized through the equations of motion or Newton’s second law (Nash and Hunter ). To study how cardiac excitation translates into mechanical contraction, it can be useful to adopt electro-mechanical models of excitation-contraction coupling (Cherubini et al.; Quarteroni et al. ). For many practical applications, especially in the healthy heart, it can be sufficient to couple both phenomena weakly, first calculate the spatio-temporal excitation pattern, and then simulate the mechanical contraction. Under pathological conditions, however, mechano-electrical feedback and fully coupled solutions can become critical to correctly identify excitation wave trajectories, for example in ablation therapies (Sahli Costabal et al. ). Even more sophisticated chemo-electro-mechanical models trace the origin of the electrical excitation back to ionic currents across individual cells, for example, to understand the effects of drugs on the heart Sahli (Costabal et al. ). For many medical conditions, it is sufficient to model the heart as a deformable solid and represent the effects of the blood through transient pressure changes in both ventricles (Baillargeon et al. ). Yet, for conditions that are dominated by shear stresses, either across the endocardium or the heart valve leaflets, computational fluid dynamics models that represent details of the fluid flow become necessary (Taylor et al. ). However, fluid models alone are rarely used in cardiac simulations, mainly because the beating heart itself is a complex moving domain. This is why most recent studies focus on fluid-structure interaction models that capture not only the fluid flow within the contracting atria and ventricles, but also its interplay with the endocardium and the valves (Kaiser et al. ). Applications of fluid–structure interaction phenomena are abundant in cardiac medicine and range from surgical procedures (Mao et al. ), valve replacement (Ghosh et al. ), or valve repair (Rausch et al. ) to improved medical device design (Rotman et al. ).

History of constitutive models

The beauty of most constitutive models of the heart is that they are hierarchical and modular in nature and easy to expand or combine with one another. For the electrical behavior, the simplest phenomenological model for excitable cells is the Fitz Hugh-Nagumo model (FitzHugh; Nagumo et al. ) and its popular modification for cardiac cells, the Aliev-Panfilov model (Aliev and Panfilov ). More mechanistic ionic models represent the behavior of individual ion channels through transient gating variables and ionic currents (Karma; Corrado and Niederer; Fenton and Cherry ). The most popular model of this class for human ventricular cardiomyocytes is probably the ten Tusscher model ten (Tusscher et al. ) with several more recent modifications and a prominent benchmark study (Niederer et al. ). For the mechanical behavior, passive myocardial models have been developed for more than three decades, both isotropic and anisotropic (Guccione et al. ), and a recent benchmark study compares the different results (Land et al. ). In the spirit of modular models, depending on the type of application, numerous studies have added active behavior, either through active stress (Hunter et al. ) or active strain (Ambrosi et al.; Göktepe et al.; Rossi et al. ), prestrain ((Genet et al. ), and growth (Rodriguez et al. ) to the baseline passive elastic response to simulate realistic cardiac contraction and realistic pressure volume loops under physiological and pathological conditions. Interestingly, calibrating these models ex vivo (Sommer et al. ) versus in vivo (Genet et al. ) results in material parameter values that can differ by an order of magnitude or more (Aguado-Sierra et al.; Rausch et al. ). This difference can obviously have massive implications when translating simulations into clinical practice (Chabiniok et al. ).

What’s next?

Clearly, the ultimate objective of human heart modeling is the individualized prediction of different treatment outcomes with the goal to virtually select the most promising strategy within the paradigm of precision medicine (Taylor et al. ). Cardiac simulations are algorithmically challenging and computationally expensive; they naturally involve complex tasks such as mesh refinement, preconditioning, optimization, and parallelization (Hurtado and Rojas; Jilberto and Hurtado; Mei et al. ). With the rapid developments in machine learning, data-driven modeling, and physics-based simulation (Alber et al. ), we can now risk-stratify large patient groups and improve tailored cardiovascular therapies using machine learning strategies (Bom et al.; Lyon et al. ). Intriguingly, precision medicine in cardiac health does not necessarily require a fully personalized, high-resolution whole heart model (Trayanova and Winslow ) with an entire personalized medical history (Gray and Pathmanathan ). Instead, precision human heart simulation can create a personalized model out of a population-based library with geometric, biological, physical, and clinical information (Segars et al. ), by morphing between real medical and clinical data from actual patients encoded in a finite number of fully reconstructed four-dimensional human heart models. This review will highlight first steps in this direction, not only as a purely academic exercise, but also as a translational path towards clinical decision making in full alignment with and endorsed by the regulatory agencies and guidelines.

Motivation

In the USA alone, over 850,000 people die as a result of cardiovascular disease and more than 370,000 sudden cardiac deaths are related to arrhythmias (American Heart Association ). Arrhythmias are a leading risk factor for stroke which, in turn, is the leading cause of long-term disability and the second leading cause of death worldwide (World Health Organization ). Modeling cardiac excitation is critical to understand the origin of heart rhythm disorders and their treatment through anti-arrhythmic drugs, medical procedures, implantable devices, and surgical procedures (Sahli Costabal et al. ). In addition to the heart muscle itself, a critical component of the cardiac excitation system is the Purkinje network (Sahli Costabal et al. ). Composed of specialized fast-conducting cells, the Purkinje network is located in the subendocardium, right beneath the inner lining of the heart. Purkinje cells are larger than cardiomyocytes, with fewer myofibrils and more mitochondria. They are less contractile than cardiomyocytes; their main function is to conduct the excitation wave efficiently and more rapidly than any other cell in the heart. A functional Purkinje network is essential to create synchronized contractions of the left and right ventricles and maintain a consistent cardiac rhythm (Dubin ). The electric activation of our heart originates in the sinoatrial node located in the right atrium. From here, it spreads through the atria and reaches the atrioventricular node, the only electric connection between the atria and the ventricles. The bundle of His connects the atrioventricular node to the Purkinje network, which branches from the basal septum into the left and right ventricles. Although Purkinje fibers were first observed more than a century ago (Tawara ), there is still no in vivo imaging technique to fully reconstruct their geometry (Çetingül et al. ). This limitation has given rise to various methods to create model systems of the Purkinje network (Cherry and Fenton ) for both visualization purposes and computational simulations (Ijiri et al.; Bordas et al.; Sebastian et al. ). However, creating a Purkinje network on an irregular endocardial surface is challenging, but at the same time crucial for realistic physiological simulations.

Simulation

We create the Purkinje network for rapid cardiac excitation as a random fractal tree (Sahli Costabal et al. ). This fractal tree grows in the left and right endocardial ventricular surfaces, starting from the left posterior and anterior fascicles and the right bundle branch. For the electrophysiology of the cardiac tissue, we adopt a bidomain model (Dal et al. ) with a modified Aliev Panfilov electrophysiology (Hurtado et al. ). We use the Living Heart Model (Baillargeon et al. ) as a baseline geometry and discretize the ventricles with 384,371 linear tetrahedral elements and 82,594 nodes. Within the heart, we create a Purkinje network with 1,868 branches and 1,046 terminals discretized by 10,757 line elements and 10,758 nodes. Here, instead of using a fixed-point iteration to solve the coupled problem of the myocardium and the Purkinje network (Landajuela et al. ), we directly connect the 1046 terminals of the Purkinje network to the endocardial surface using multi-point constraints (Abaqus ). We use Abaqus/Standard to simulate the heart throughout multiple cardiac cycles and initiate excitation by applying an external stimulus to the Purkinje network in the location of the atrioventricular node. From the simulation, we post-process the results to create a virtual electrocardiogram by placing electrodes in the left and right arms and the left leg. To compare healthy and diseased conditions, we simulate the baseline case and the condition of right bundle branch block for which we reduce the conduction velocity in the right bundle branch. This allows us to compare the healthy and diseased activation patterns, side by side, and identify the organ-level effects of local pathological alterations.

Discussion

Figure 2 shows the importance of the Purkinje network in the electrical activity of the heart. This structure is key to predict a realistic activation sequence that will impact the mechanical response of the heart. We can see this in the electrocardiograms, which displays a sharp QRS complex, a feature that the simulation cannot capture without a fast conduction system. When including the Purkinje network, it is straightforward to simulate conduction pathologies, for example, right bundle branch block (Sahli Costabal et al. ). An accurate prediction of the heart’s electrophysiology under both physiological and pathological conditions is especially relevant when evaluating treatments such as cardiac ablation or resynchronization therapy, where it is not immediately clear which patients will benefit from the intervention (Strauss et al. ). A remaining challenge is the personalization of the Purkinje network. Since there is no method to image the Purkinje cells in a living heart, the identification of this structure relies on indirect electrical measurements including electroanatomical maps and electrocardiograms (Vergara et al. ). Truly personalized electrophysiology models would enable personalized treatment planning to address and prevent deadly arrhythmias and improve the mechanical performance of the heart (Prakosa et al. ). A typical example is ablation in atrial fibrillation, a procedure that selectively scars or destroys specific tissue regions to disrupt rhythm disorders in the upper chambers of the heart (Narayan et al. ). In a hybrid clinical-computational study of 15 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, our personalized models found rotational activation, which was undetectable with conventional methods. Our findings suggest that computational modeling can identify non-local deflections to improve activation mapping and explain how and where ablation can terminate persistent atrial fibrillation (Sahli Costabal et al. ). Innovative technologies that enable real-time interactive simulations of cardiac electrophysiology (Kaboudian et al.; Vasconcellos et al. ), for example based on physics-informed neural networks for cardiac activation mapping (Sahli Costabal et al. ), are an important step to translate these computational tools into clinical practice.

Motivation

Drugs can induce changes in cardiac electrophysiology by interacting with specific ionic channels. Undesirable side effects of some of these compounds include cardiac arrhythmias. A particularly lethal type of arrhythmia is torsades de pointes (Dessertenne ), a condition associated with drugs that prolong the repolarization of the action potential (Po et al. ). Pro-arrhythmic risk evaluation is critical to avoid the introduction of potentially dangerous drugs to the market (Navarrete et al.; Redfern et al. ). Yet, the high cost and long time needed to test new compounds hinders the discovery of new drugs. Current paradigms to evaluate cardiac safety are sensitive but not specific. This implies that they unnecessarily screen out potentially useful compounds. A recent paradigm shift to address this problem is the inclusion of high-fidelity computational models to quantify the effect of drugs in cardiac electrophysiology (Colatsky et al. ).

Simulation

Multiscale modeling can help to characterize the effects of drugs in cardiac electrophysiology (Sahli Costabal et al. ). To compute the electrical activity under different pharmacological conditions, we adopt a monodomain model (Sahli Costabal et al. ) and simulate the excitation across the ventricular geometry of the Living Heart Model (Baillargeon et al. ). The model discriminates between four different cell types, Purkinje cells with 14 ionic currents and 20 internal variables to model the fast excitation (Stewart et al. ) and cardiomyocytes of the endocardium, midwall, and epicardium with 15 ionic currents and 39 internal variables (O’Hara et al. ). The anatomic bi-ventricular model consists of a regular mesh with cubic elements of size 0.3 mm, resulting in a mesh with 6,878,459 regular linear hexagonal finite elements, 7,519,918 nodes, and 268,259,901 internal variables. At the beginning of the simulation, we excite the Purkinje network in the location of the atrioventricular node, and use the automaticity of the Purkinje cells to drive the cardiac activation sequence for five seconds. We study the resulting activation sequence for three pharmacological conditions: baseline without drugs, and with the drugs ranolazine and quinidine. We simulate the effect of each drug at the cellular level by selectively blocking specific ionic currents using reported block-concentration measurements (Crumb et al. ). Ranolazine is a low-risk drug that selectively blocks the rapid delayed potassium rectifier current and the late component of the sodium current. Quinidine is a high-risk drug that blocks the rapid and slow delayed potassium rectifier currents and the transient outward potassium current (Colatsky et al. ).

Discussion

Figure 3 illustrates how multi-scale modeling can provide insight into the emergence of drug-induced arrhythmias, from the subcellular scale of individual ion channels to the organ scale of the entire heart. The simulation predicts slightly altered activation patterns with prolonged QT intervals for the low risk-drug ranolazine and the spontaneous development of torsades de pointes for the high-risk drug quinidine. These multi-scale simulations correlate mechanistically what a pharmacologist sees in a single cell action potential to what a physician sees in a clinical electrocardiogram. They allow us to quantify the interaction between specific compounds and ionic currents at the cellular scale and compute the overall response in terms of global activation profiles and electrocardiograms at the whole organ scale. We validated this approach experimentally by analyzing isolated cardiomyocytes exposed to the drugs dofetilide and nifedipine at different concentrations, predicting the whole heart response, and comparing the prediction against electrocardiograms of Langendorff perfused heart preparations exposed to both drugs (Sahli-Costabal et al. ). A major challenges of this mechanistic multiscale approach is the high computational cost to evaluate a single drug at a single concentration. We have recently embedded this model into a physics-based machine learning framework (Alber et al. ) to reduce the computational cost and predict the risk categories of 22 drugs (Sahli-Costabal et al. ). We have successfully created surrogate models that combine the high-fidelity three-dimensional simulations with low-fidelity one-dimensional strands of cells and used this multi-fidelity approach for uncertainty quantification (Mirams et al. ) and sensitivity analysis (Sahli Costabal et al. ). Recently, we have extended this technique towards a classification setting to detect the presence or absence of arrhythmias (Sahli Costabal et al. ). On a fundamental level, this approach provides mechanistic insights that can help researchers, pharmaceutic companies, and regulatory agencies to accelerate drug development and design effective and safe drugs. With a view towards precision medicine, our technology could be used for personalized drug safety evaluation (Margara et al. ). To incorporate population variability, we simply need to know the individual cellular electrophysiology of different patients or patient populations, and can then predict their individual arrhythmic risk. An important immediate application would be sex-specific drug safety evaluation.

Motivation

The main function of the heart is to pump blood through the cardiovascular system to continuously supply all other organs with oxygen and nutrients while removing carbon dioxide and other waste products. Upon electrical depolarization, the muscle cells in the heart release calcium ions, which activate actin-myosin interaction, sarcomere shortening, and active muscle contraction. An in-depth biophysical insight into the ventricular mechanics through multi-scale computational modeling requires realistic constitutive models that characterize this nonlinear, anisotropic, passive, and active tissue behavior, as well as the in vivo geometry, microstructural architecture, hemodynamic loading, and kinematic constraints of the heart. With a view toward personalized simulations, we need to calibrate all model parameters, loads, initial conditions, and boundary conditions to accurately match the physiological response.

Simulation

Figure 4 illustrates an anatomically accurate, whole heart model of a human heart (Baillargeon et al. ) created from high-resolution magnetic resonance images of a healthy, 50th percentile U.S. male (Zygote ). Data acquisition and image reconstruction were performed at 70% diastole from 0.75-mm-thick slices using a medium soft-tissue kernel with retrospective electrocardiogram gating. The model includes all four chambers, the tricuspid, mitral, pulmonary, and aortic valves, and the chordae tendinae. It also includes the major vessels, the aorta, the pulmonary arteries, and the superior vena cava, together with the coronary arteries and veins and some cardiac fat tissue. The muscle fiber orientation follows rule-based algorithms motivated by histological observations and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images (Lombaert et al.; Bayer et al. ). To simulate the dynamic response of the heart, we adopt the theory of finite elasticity and characterize the mechanical behavior of the heart using the conservation laws of mass, linear momentum, and angular momentum. In addition, we introduce constitutive equations that define the relation between stress and strain, active contraction, prestrain, growth, and remodeling. We adopt a quasi-static approach and postulate that inertia and damping effects are negligible (Baillargeon et al. ). To characterize the response during passive filling, we adopt an orthotropic invariant-based constitutive model (Holzapfel and Ogden; Propp et al. ). To describe the response during active contraction in the ventricles, the atria, and the chordae tendineae, we adopt the concept of time-varying elastance (Walker et al. ) and introduce the active stress as a function of the regional action potential and the cardiomyocyte stretch according to Frank-Starling’s law (Peirlinck et al. ). For simplicity, instead of embedding the heart in the pericardium through spring-type boundary conditions (Pfaller et al. ), we constrain the heart kinematically through homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions at the outlets of the proximal vasculature (Peirlinck et al. ). To characterize the hemodynamic boundary conditions, we couple the beating heart model to a lumped-parameter representation of the arterial and venous systemic and pulmonary circulations. This coupling allows for a closed-loop characterization of the cardiovascular flow through unidirectional fluid exchanges driven by pressure gradients which, in turn, are a result of the mechanically contraction of the heart (Baillargeon et al. ). Within this computational framework that describes the interaction between the beating heart and the circulatory system, we calibrate the constitutive parameters for the ventricles, the atria, the valves, and the proximal vasculature to match the experimentally measured stiffnesses and global clinical metrics including the ejection fraction and the left ventricular twist (Peirlinck et al. ). Specifically, from magnetic resonance images of the left ventricle of five normal human subjects, we extract left ventricular volumes and compare them against strain measurements from tagged magnetic resonance imaging to identify the passive and active material parameters (Genet et al. ). Since the geometry of the heart is constructed at 70% diastole with the heart already hemodynamically loaded, we estimate the in vivo stress state at the beginning of the simulation using an inverse method (Gee et al.; Peirlinck et al. ). We simulate five consecutive cardiac cycles during which we initiate contraction using the electrical activation sequence from Sect. 2. After three cycles, the heart reaches a cyclic steady-state equilibrium.

Discussion

Figure 4 illustrates the overall deformation of the heart and the evolution of the fiber stretch throughout a cardiac cycle. The graphs summarize the pressure evolution in time and the pressure-volume relationship. The simulated volumes ranging from 69-148ml and the pressures up to 122mmHg agree well with clinical observations (Klingensmith ). Our simulated ejection fraction of 56% agrees well with the physiological ranges of 50-65% (Phibbs ). Our maximum left-ventricular apex-base shortening of 13.4 mm is well in the range of commonly reported values of 11.2 ± 3.8 mm (Rogers et al. ) and the left ventricular twist of agrees with reported ranges of (Takeuchi et al. ). This suggests that we can confidently and robustly model the physiology of the healthy beating human heart. In a next step, we can use this simulation tool to probe pathological conditions and guide device design and treatment planning in cardiac diseases such as stenosis (Wisneski et al. ), regurgitation, ischemia (Sack et al. ), or heart failure (Peirlinck et al. ). With a view towards precision medicine, it would be relatively straightforward, although probably time intensive, to personalize the heart geometry from individual magnetic resonance images. It would be more complex, but possible, to personalize simple sets of material parameters (Genet et al. ). While personalizing more complex features like fiber directions, prestrain, or growth might not be entirely possible non-invasively with the available acquisition techniques today, it remains questionable whether this level of personalization is really necessary to improve treatment planning.

Motivation

For patients who suffer from arrhythmias, an irregular or abnormal beating of the heart, implantable cardioverter defibrillators and artificial pacemakers continue to be life-saving devices. While implantable cardioverter defibrillators treat fast or chaotic rhythm disorders (Luther et al. ), pacemakers generally correct heart beats that are too slow or out of synch. They require a battery-powered unit that is placed in the chest, underneath the skin, where it is easily accessible for battery replacement (Kotsakou et al. ). Pacemaker leads are electrodes that connect the device to the regions within the heart that require the additional stimulus. As such, they are permanent implants that are expected to perform for many years, in an environment that contracts 100,000 times a day, without failure (Trohman et al. ). Naturally, the durability of the leads is of critical importance. Current research seeks to design soft devices with properties similar to the surrounding tissues to optimize seamless integration and minimize damage (Sim et al. ). Mechanical damage can result in pacing lead failure and the loss of electrical function (Mulpuru et al. ). However, it is difficult to measure the deformations and forces of the pacemaker leads in vivo. Simulating pacemaker leads in the living heart provides unique insight into the mechanical deformation of the electrodes throughout the cardiac cycle (Zhou et al. ). Knowing this mechanical deformation is critical to access the long-term durability of the implant. The noninvasive nature of this assessment provides a physiologically accurate method to test new and existing devices without exposing the patient to unnecessary risk.

Simulation

The pacemaker lead is a long flexible wire of a length on the order of 150 mm. In a finite element setting, we can represent it with beam elements. It has a cross sectional area of 3.0 mm, which is magnified in Fig. 5 for illustrative purposes. The lead’s moment of inertia is 0.5, the axial stiffness is 9 N/mm, the bending stiffness is 17, and the torsional stiffness is 30 Nmm/rad. To simulate the mechanical deformation that the pacemaker lead experiences during the cardiac cycle, we adopt the Living Heart model from Sect. 4. The simulation uses Abaqus/Explicit (Abaqus ) and begins with filling the heart with blood up to 70% of the diastolic phase. During this process, which lasts 0.3 seconds, we virtually insert the pacemaker from the right atrium into the right ventricle through the superior vena cava. To facilitate the positioning of the pacemaker lead, we introduce an axial connector element between the distal end of the lead and the epicardial surface of the right ventricular apex. This location marks the region of the heart where the electrical stimulus is needed. We guide the placement through a rigid tubular structure which ensures that the lead follows a natural insertion path. By shortening the connector element to a final length close to 0 mm, we effectively pull the pacemaker lead tip from the superior vena cava to the right ventricular apex. Figure 5 illustrates the placement of the pacemaker lead within the beating heart. Once the insertion process is complete, we fix the distal end of the lead to the epicardial surface and pin the proximal end. We then simulate three consecutive cardiac cycles to establish a cyclic steady-state equilibrium. During these three beats, we model the interaction between the pacemaker lead and the heart using a general contact approach. Specifically, we specify contact between the pacemaker lead and the epicardial surfaces of the right atrium and ventricle. In addition, we specify contact between the pacemaker lead tip and the pacemaker lead path structure to ensure the proper final location of the tip.

Discussion

A pacemaker lead is a thin flexible wire. During the cardiac cycle, its main mode of mechanical deformation is bending. The pacemaker lead curvature is the primary kinematic quantity of interest to quantify this deformation mode. We can characterize the curvature through the section curvature, the curvature change about two orthogonal planes. Figure 5 illustrates the curvature along the lead at various time points throughout the cardiac cycle. The curvature increases as the heart contracts. It takes maximum values of 0.03 in the upper third of the pacing wire. This corresponds to bending the wire around a sphere with a minimum radius of 3.3 mm, about one third of the dimensions of the heart. This agrees well with the deformation of the wire at 400 ms and 600 ms, in the middle two images of Fig. 5, during which the heart is contracting. At 200 ms and 1000 ms, when the heart is relaxing, the curvature in the same region decreases to 0.015, corresponding to a sphere with a radius of 6.6 mm, roughly on the order of the width of the heart. Simulating the deformation of the wire allows us to visualize how the curvature, and with it the stress in the wire, changes along the length and throughout the cardiac cycle. It allows us to virtually probe how the wire deformation would change upon changing the wire length, diameter, stiffness, or material. With a view towards precision medicine, it would be straightforward to personalize the final pacemaker lead location, the length of the lead, and the dimensions of the heart. A better understanding of pacing wire deformations is critical to reduce high cycle fatigue, prevent pacing lead failure, and improve wire durability with the ultimate goal to improve the lifetime of pacemaker leads and reduce the need for replacement surgery.

Motivation

Heart failure is a progressive chronic condition in which the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body’s oxygen demand. With a five-year mortality rate of 50%, heart failure remains–and will remain in the foreseeable future–one of the most common, costly, disabling, and deadly medical conditions worldwide (World Health Organization ). Most cases of heart failure result from adverse cardiac growth and remodeling in response to increased hemodynamic loading (Ambrosi et al.; Göktepe et al. ), for example, provoked by the leakage or stenosis of one of the valves or by myocardial infarction (Saez and Kuhl ). In many cases, cardiac growth and remodeling is a compensatory, useful, and protective mechanism to restore homeostatic equilibrium (Cyron and Humphrey ). It some cases, however, it can become non-compensatory and initiate negative feedback mechanisms (Grossman ). The underlying structural response to cardiac growth and remodeling manifests itself in two major patterns: eccentric hypertrophy associated with myocyte lengthening caused by a chronic overload in volume and concentric hypertrophy associated with myocyte thickening caused by a chronic overload in pressure (Niestrawska et al. ). In both cases, these mechanisms lead to pathological structural alterations that compromise the heart’s electrical and mechanical function (Sahli Costabal et al. ). Despite recent advancements of pharmaceutical, surgical, device, and tissue engineered therapeutic strategies, heart-failure-induced morbidity and mortality rates remain high (Udelson and Stevenson ). One of the most pertinent clinical questions in treatment planning is to anticipate and predict the rate of disease progression (Witzenburg and Holmes ). Cardiac growth models have the potential to provide mechanistic insight in disease onset and progression (Rausch et al. ) and guide clinical decision-making or the design of emerging therapies (Chabiniok et al. ). However, since disease progression is highly sensitive to the personal history, and with it, personal model parameters (Kassab ), the timeline of heart failure varies significantly among affected individuals. This suggests that, ideally, calibrating cardiac growth models and quantifying growth and remodeling propensity should be done on an individual, personalized basis (Peirlinck et al. ).

Simulation

Cardiac growth models typically build on the theory of finite growth (Rodriguez et al. ), which postulates a multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient into an elastic tensor and a growth tensor (Göktepe et al. ). Here, we assume that the growth tensor is transversely isotropic with respect to the cardiomyocyte direction and can be parameterized in terms of scalar longitudinal and transverse growth multipliers. These growth multipliers represent the serial deposition of new sarcomeres and the parallel deposition of new myofibrils. Within the finite element setting (Abaqus ), we represent the growth multipliers as internal variables and store and update the current growth state locally, on the integration point level, at each point in time. We assume stretch-driven growth kinetics for both longitudinal and transverse growth (Kerckhoffs et al. ). We simulate the timeline of these two pathologies within the Living Heart (Baillargeon et al. ) through a combination of eccentric and concentric hypertrophy triggered by left ventricular overload. To model the physiological end-diastolic state and the homeostatic local stretch state, we apply a left ventricular and atrial pressure of 4 mmHg and a right ventricular and atrial pressure of 2 mmHg. To model systemic overload, we double the left ventricular and atrial pressures to 8 mmHg while keeping the right ventricular and atrial pressures at their baseline value of 2mmHg. We gradually increase the pressure, keep it at its maximum value to allow the ventricles to grow, and then unload the heart to explore the effects of eccentric or concentric hypertrophy Genet et al..

Discussion

Our results in Fig. 6 not only agree qualitatively with the primary effects of heart failure (Göktepe et al. )–ventricular dilation in systolic heart failure and wall thickening in diastolic heart failure–but also allow us to predict characteristic secondary effects of papillary muscle dislocation, mitral annular dilation, regurgitant flow, and outflow obstruction (Rausch et al. ). These results agree favorably with clinical observations in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure. In contrast to previous macroscopic growth models that prescribe a phenomenological rule to drive the remodeling process (Rodriguez et al. ), these personalized models induce growth as a natural consequence of overload, which is self-regulated and converges toward a homeostatic equilibrium state. This implies that the emerging growth pattern is heterogeneous, and naturally incorporates the regionally varying response under personalized baseline conditions as the homeostatic state. Implementing this framework in a four-chamber whole heart model allows us to couple primary geometric changes to secondary effects that drive changing in-and out-flow conditions and enable predicting disease progression with its characteristic negative and positive feedback loops (Genet et al. ). Upon appropriate calibration, the cardiac growth models have the potential to link cell level characteristics, e.g., an increase in the serial sarcomere number, to whole organ form and function, e.g., an increase in end-diastolic volume and a decrease in ejection fraction, with the ultimate goal to estimate the risk of heart failure and support decision making on an individualized, personalized basis. We have prototyped this correlation by combining hierarchical modeling, Bayesian inference, and Gaussian process regression using an eight-week long study of volume overload in six pigs. By correlating overload-induced alterations on the subcellular, cellular, and organ scales we found that the serial sarcomere number explained 88% of cardiomyocyte lengthening, which, in turn, explained 54% of cardiac dilation (Sahli Costabal et al. ). However, stretch-driven growth is only one of the many proposed mechanobiological stimuli that regulate cardiac hypertrophy (Opie et al. ). To calibrate and validate the stretch-driven growth model, we analyzed chronic heart failure in pigs using subject-specific growth models and physics-based machine learning. Our study revealed that stretch-driven growth alone explained 52.7% of the observed changes in cardiomyocyte morphology (Peirlinck et al. ). With a view toward precision medicine, studies like these are vital to reveal the intersubject variability of growth, which emphasizes the importance of personalized growth parameters to accurately predict the timeline of heart failure for an individual patient. Knowing the individual timeline of a failing heart is critical for personalized treatment planning, as shown in Sect. 7, 8, and 9 and on ventricular assist devices, edge-to-edge repair, and annuloplasty.

Motivation

A ventricular assist device is a battery-operated, mechanical pump that is used for end-stage heart failure patients to help their left ventricle pump blood to the rest of the body (Rose et al. ). In recent years, left ventricular assist devices have become increasingly popular as more than just a bridge-to-transplant therapy. The high incidence of right ventricular failure following left ventricular assistance reflects an undesired consequence of treatment, which has been hypothesized to be related to the mechanical interdependence between the two ventricles (Kavarana et al.; Dang et al.; Maeder et al. ). Although the potential implications of ventricular interactions on right ventricular function during left ventricular assist device support are well-appreciated, no study has yet proven, in any setting, that left ventricular unloading and septal shift can lead to right ventricular failure. This is because it is physically impossible to separate the hemodynamic effects of the serial and parallel contributions of right-left ventricular interactions in a patient or even in experimental preclinical studies. Predictive computation models offer the potential to uncover the mechanisms of treatments whose actions cannot be easily determined by experimental or imaging techniques (Kerckhoffs et al.; Baillargeon et al. ). Computational modeling is well-suited to investigate and elucidate the individual contributions of hemodynamic factors and explore left ventricular assist device complications. However, research efforts have been impeded by the substantial complexities involved in coupling a simulated circulatory system with geometrically realistic models of the heart. Only recently have computational models had the necessary sophistication to model this coupled behavior (Lim et al.; Sack et al. ). Consequently, very limited research has been undertaken to explore the effect of left ventricular assist device function on ventricular mechanics (Sack et al. ), and no study has investigated the important issue of right heart failure.

Simulation

We previously created a model of a failing left ventricle supported with partial left ventricular assistance in a four-chamber generic heart model (Sack et al. ). We then modified this representation to include a biventricular model of a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy (Sack et al. ) using an explicit, dynamic, mechanical simulation with ten-noded tetrahedral elements (Abaqus ). We simulate left ventricular assist device therapy using realistic pressure-flow relations of a commonly used left ventricular assist device to capture assisted flow for device operation over a broad range of rotational speeds. By analyzing the resulting changes in left ventricular pressure generation, total blood flow, myocardial stress, and septal wall motion, we quantify the relative influences of these factors on right ventricular function (Sack et al. ). The model of chronic heart failure without left ventricular assist device support represents a critical patient with advanced heart failure (Solomon et al. ). The left ventricle is substantially overloaded with an end-diastolic volume of 254 ml, an end-diastolic pressure of 23 mmHg, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 12%. The support through the left ventricular assist device improves these functional metrics: The diastolic loading of the left ventricle decreases and the left ventricular ejection fraction increases with increasing rotational speed of the device. Figure 7 illustrates the overall geometry and the myofiber stress distributions at end diastole to showcase stresses and the deformed configuration at maximum volume loading. The four images contrast the dilated cardiomyopathy state without treatment and with implanted left ventricular assist device operating at rotational speeds of 8000, 10,000, and 12,000 revolutions per minute. The resulting stress distributions reveal geometrically relevant stress characteristics that evolve with increased left ventricular assist device operation. Interestingly, the large stresses in the left ventricular endocardium caused by volumetric loading at end diastole decrease with left ventricular assist device support and appear to dissipate with maximum left ventricular assist device operation of 12,000 revolutions per minute. However, a localized region of tensile myofiber stresses appears and grows with increased assist device support on the left ventricular side of the septal wall near the base. In addition, the assist device promotes a localized region of compressive myofiber stresses on the right ventricular side of the septal wall.

Discussion

Computational simulations provide a window into the effects of left ventricular assist devices on myocardial dynamics. The contour plots of the free wall and septal stresses illustrate the potential of computational modeling to quantitatively compare the myofiber stress in the ventricular wall for varying rotational speeds of the assist device. Specifically, we have created a geometrically and physically realistic model of an end-stage failing heart with representative systolic and diastolic myocardial material properties coupled to lumped parameter Windkessel-like models of the pulmonary and systemic circulations (Sack et al. ). This allows us to study cardiac mechanics and dynamics under realistic loading conditions, including preload and afterload in both ventricles. The simulation successfully reproduces the effects of left ventricular assist device support and can be personalized by apply individualized pressure-flow characteristics of any commonly used device. The present simulation represents a significant improvement over previous modeling efforts (Sack et al. ) in that it precisely quantifies the effects of a left ventricular assist device on a chronically rather than acutely failing heart, based on a personalized anatomically accurate biventricular model and device-specific pressure-flow characteristics, rather than constant flow rates. The study shows that left ventricular assist device support significantly reduces the stress in the left ventricular wall and, to a lesser extent, the stress in the septal wall (Sack et al. ). Unexpectedly, these improvements induce secondary negative effects on the right ventricle, which experiences a rightward shift toward higher end-diastolic pressures and larger end-diastolic volumes with left ventricular assist device support. This keeps the right ventricular stresses high. Additionally, we observed potentially negative effects on the interventricular septum. Left ventricular assist device support introduces an unnatural bending of the septum, which results in increased localized myofiber stresses. Such deformations are similar to those of a plate subjected to bending. As Fig. 7 reveals, this induces device-speed-dependent regions of tensile stress on the left ventricular side and regions of compressive stress on the right ventricular side of the septal wall. Chronically elevated stresses are critical as they can modulate important myocardial properties including gene expression, molecular makeup, structure, and function. It remains unknown to which extent these abnormal stresses in the myocardium or septum have implications for myocardial function. With a view towards precision medicine, it is critical to personalize the biventricular geometry to reflect the patient’s individual disease state and personalize the optimal rotational speed of the assist device to strike the right balance between supporting the heart and, at the same time, reducing device-induced wall stresses and septal bending.

Motivation

Understanding the in vivo loading and boundary conditions for cardiovascular implants remains a major challenge for device design manufacturers. Characterizing these conditions is not only critical to guide the design specifications for cardiac implants but also to select the optimal device and device placement for each individual patient. Typically, device design and placement are studied using benchtop cadaveric tests, animal studies, and clinical imaging. The precise quantification of the forces between the device and the tissue is virtually impossible, especially in the beating heart. Mitral regurgitation is a chronic condition of the left heart during which the mitral valve does not close completely in the systole and allows leakage of blood back to the left atrium. Edge-to-edge mitral valve leaflet approximation, the so-called Alfieri procedure, is often performed for patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation (Fucci et al. ). Because of the success of this procedure, transcatheter devices to perform leaflet approximation are gaining increasing attention. Understanding the loads these implants have to endure under physiological conditions is critical to develop an effective and long-lasting device. In developing these implants, the Alfieri stitch tension forms an important design specification. Traditionally, this tension is measured using animal models (Nielsen et al.; Timek et al. ) and benchtop simulators (Jimenez et al. ). Here we illustrate an alternative approach that uses a computational human heart model to estimate the forces on the mitral valve leaflet (Baillargeon et al., ). Concomitantly, this approach allows us to non-invasively investigate the effect of physiological parameters and dimensional changes associated with structural heart disease including systolic blood pressure, left ventricular dimension, and annular dilation.

Simulation

We use the Living Heart Model (Baillargeon et al. ) to evaluate the leaflet approximation force. We create a degenerative mitral regurgitation model by disconnecting several marginal chordae from the anterior leaflet. We use a connector element, a discrete structural element in Abaqus/Explicit, to prescribe specific kinematic behavior between two nodes of the model (Abaqus ). When placed between two nodes in the A2-P2 regions of both mitral leaflets, the connector element forms a simplified representation of a leaflet approximation device. We approximate the leaflet anatomy by prescribing the final length of the connector and represent the device’s compliance by assigning an elastic stiffness to the connector element. The force in the connector element throughout the entire cardiac cycle serves as an estimate of the approximation force during both systole and diastole.

Discussion

Figure 8 illustrates the deformation and the maximum principal stretches of the leaflets at multiple time points throughout the cardiac cycle. The stretch distribution during diastole indicates the location of elevated stresses around the A2-P2 region as a result of leaflet approximation. From the connector element, can directly extract the simulated leaflet approximation force and compare it to experimentally measured forces from animal studies. The simulated approximation force directly depends on the selected connector stiffness that represents the stiffness of the device. For a compliant device, our simulation estimates a peak diastolic force of 0.22 N, while an entirely rigid device results in a peak diastolic stitch tension of up to 0.31 N. These results are in good agreement with animal studies, where the peak diastolic force ranges from 0.26 N (Nielsen et al. ) to 0.28 N (Timek et al. ). In addition, the simulations reveal a second peak during the systolic part of the cardiac cycle, whereas the animal studies only report a single peak during diastole. The systolic peak of the simulation occurs during isovolumetric contraction. This can be attributed to several different factors including device placement, i.e., location of the connector, anatomical artifacts, and device behavior. While experimental studies to understand the effect of these factors on the approximation forces are not straightforward to perform, computational simulations can easily screen the landscape of different process parameters. By using personalized geometries and a personalized representation of the current regurgitation state, we can optimize the device and its location for each individual patient. Using personalized physics-based simulations to augment benchtop and animal studies is critical to understand the interaction between cardiac implants and anatomy. Simulations can provide insight into the in vivo device mechanics, guide the design of efficient cardiovascular implants, and optimize treatment on a personalized basis.

Motivation

In the healthy heart, the mitral valve manages unidirectional blood flow from the left atrium to the left ventricle by opening and closing in a precisely coordinated manner. Functional mitral regurgitation, a back flow of blood from the ventricle into the atrium, is a clinical condition that can occur in response to myocardial infarction (Glower et al. ). In this situation, even though the mitral valve leaflets themselves are healthy, the valve fails to close properly because of geometric changes induced by the infarct such as papillary muscle displacement or ventricular enlargement (Rausch et al. ). The gold standard treatment to restore mitral valve function is to surgically implant an annuloplasty ring that constricts the mitral valve annulus and ensures sufficient leaflet coaptation (Amini et al. ). However, studies have shown that regurgitation recurs in more than half of the patients within three to five years after mitral valve repair (Flameng et al. ). A better understanding of the parameters that affect the mitral valve behavior would allow for a more efficient design by directly addressing the patient’s needs to improve the long-term repair outcome. The Living Heart Model (Baillargeon et al. ) allows us to simulate the integrated dynamic response of the heart in terms of its electrical, mechanical, and flow physics response. Because of its modular nature, we can easily modify and adjust the healthy baseline model to introduce personalized disease states and evaluate treatment opportunities by virtually implanting various types of devices.

Simulation

We induce functional mitral regurgitation through myocardial infarction in the Living Heart Model by modifying the active material properties in the infarcted region while leaving the passive material properties unchanged. By varying the size of the modified region, we can induce degrees levels of myocardial infarction causing different degrees of mitral regurgitation. Figure 9 shows the infarcted region of our simulation affecting the lateral left ventricular wall. This type of myocardial infarction results in an asymmetric behavior of the mitral valve because it selectively displaces a group of chordae, while others remain in their physiological position. In response, as Fig. 9 suggests, the mitral valve no longer closes properly. To virtually reduce the degree of regurgitation and repair the leaking valve, we implant an annuloplasty ring. We select a ring with a sub-valvular component (Baillargeon et al. ) to restore mitral valve function. We approximate the ring as rigid to focus on the deformation of the valve. We insert the ring into the 70% diastolic heart and then suture it onto to the mitral annulus using axial connecter elements (Rausch et al. ). Following the implantation, we optimize the degree of leakage using Isight to adjust three geometrical parameters of the ring, the height and length of the subvalvular element and the radius of curved segment (Isight ). We define the degree of leakage as the number of particles passing through a threshold plane parallel to the annulus using smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations. Since this analysis is a post-processing step, the particles from the smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations do not affect the behavior of the mitral valve and purely serve to quantify the degree of the leakage (Abaqus ). The number of passing particles defines the objective function, which we minimize throughout the optimization process.

Discussion

Our device design study indicates that, among the three design variables, the strongest effect is from changing the length, which is likely due to different chordae being engaged with various lengths. This highlights the importance of identifying the appropriate chordae that need to be included or excluded in the engagement with the ring to minimize mitral regurgitation. Based on the myocardial infarction model and the ring design in this study, the engagement of marginal chordae that attach to the P3 scallop seems to affect the A3-P3 coaptation segment while the basal posterior chordae are engaged to improve the A2-P2 coaptation. After the initial optimization study, we selected the best design with the smallest objective function as the new starting point for further design optimization using the downhill simplex method (Isight ). This secondary optimization constrains the three design variables within of their initial best design values. Figure 9 summarizes the results of the optimization. It suggests that the degree of mitral regurgitation was significantly reduced after virtually implanting the device with the best design. This study demonstrates that personalized finite element simulations–embedded in a systematic optimization algorithm–provide a powerful technology to better understand valvular functioning in healthy hearts and introduce mitral regurgitation to optimize device dimensions and repair efficiency. Predictive personalized simulations of surgical intervention, like the one we have shown here, have the potential to optimize surgical procedures, improve device design, and guide treatment planning on an individual personalized basis.

Motivation

In understanding physiological and pathological conditions of the human heart, high fidelity multi-physics models of hemodynamic phenomena are of critical importance. Depending on the type of application, it is often sufficient to represent the pump function of the heart through one-dimensional fluid network models that accurately capture the dynamic pressure-volume changes in the intra- and extra-cardiac circulation (Baillargeon et al. ). However, when shear stresses on the cardiac wall, the leaflets, the annuli, or newly implanted devices play a relevant role (Cherubini et al. ), it is crucial to correctly capture hemodynamic phenomena and their impact on the relevant structures (Gizzi et al. ). Multiphysics simulations of the heart that include both solid and fluid (Nordsletten et al. ) often build on technologies developed for other engineering applications including aerospace, energy, or defense. From a purely computational fluid dynamics perspective, the major challenges of cardiac simulations consist of the discretization of space and time, the characterization of initial and boundary conditions, and the large deformations associated with the contraction and relaxation of the heart. Fluid structure interaction introduces additional challenges associated with mapping between non-conforming computational grids, accurate surface modeling, and computational efficiency. The integration of a fully Navier-Stokes based commercial computational fluid dynamics software, FlowVision, with Abaqus/Explicit proposes several solutions for these challenges in cardiac simulations (Aksenov ). This approach uses a sub-grid geometry resolution method (Aksenov et al. ) from the native computational fluid dynamics simulation and constructs a new mesh at every discrete time point throughout the cardiac cycle. The time-dependent boundary conditions follow the inlet and outlet conditions of the original Living Heart Model (Baillargeon et al. ). For the fluid structure interaction calculations, an explicit coupling scheme is combined with pressure exchange surface management. For simplicity, the initial integration between the computational fluid dynamics software and the heart model does not include the valves. While this simplification does not impact the practical applicability of the model for device design or surgical procedures, it presents several opportunities for future upgrades: First a fully three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulation coupled with the whole heart model that includes mechanically deformable valves (Pisano et al. ), which move as a result of hemodynamic forces and second a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model in which the flow causes the motion of the valves (Meschini et al. ), which move and deform and influence the fluid flow. Including deformable valves in a fully two-directional, strongly coupled approach has been a major milestone that made the simulated fluid-structure interaction a readily usable tool for many scientific applications (Aksenov et al..

Simulation

In the fluid structure interaction approach (Aksenov et al.; Aksenov; Sodhani et al. ) the solid deformable parts such as the heart valves are allowed to move and come closer together. A recent overview of blood flow modeling in the beating human heart (D’Souza et al. ) discusses different computational fluid dynamics strategies including Navier-Stokes, Lattice-Boltzman, and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Of these, Navier Stokes based approaches seem best suited for complex valve geometries with tiny gaps, complex mesh generation, and large deformations. To simulate the heart valve dynamics in the living human heart we divide the computational domain dynamically into two or more substructures to accurately model partial or full contact and closure. When the opening ratio, the ratio between the largest and the smallest opening section, is too large, the computational fluid dynamics algorithm encounters dimensionality problems. To accurately resolve the flow, the discretization needs to be extremely fine. To address this problem, the Navier Stokes based three-dimensional fluid algorithm uses a reduced order approach referred to as Gap Model. Originally developed for screw compressor applications (Ozturk et al. ), the Gap Model approach has been validated under different flow conditions. In our simulation, when two solid structures come close to one another and eventually exceed the proximity threshold, the Gap Model is activated automatically. This allows us to conduct fluid structure interaction studies in practically feasible time ranges. In Fig. 10, we combine a one-way fluid structure interaction to estimate myocardial movements and a two-way strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction to ensure high accuracy of the device simulations.

Discussion

To understand the forces that act on heart valve leaflets, it is critical to not only study the fluid or the structure in complete isolation, but to understand how the blood flow modulates the shape of the leaflets and, in turn, how the motion of the leaflets modulates the flow conditions. A recent study that compared finite element analysis and fluid structure interaction found that, in agreement with in-vitro studies of artificial aortic heart valves, the fluid structure interaction approach predicts higher effective stresses in the leaflet belly and edge regions (Sodhani et al. ). These higher stresses are a result of the hammer effect, which naturally cannot be captured by decoupled finite element analyses. A similar comparative study revealed that only the fluid structure interaction approach was able to accurately capture the asymmetric opening and closing of the valve (Luraghi et al. ). A recent study investigated the performance and complications of a fluid structure interaction approach in combination with the Living Heart Model to study transcatheter aortic valve replacement (Ghosh et al. ). To validate the model, the study used personalized post transcatheter aortic valve replacement echo Doppler measurements. This suggests that we can use computer tomography images to reconstruct personalized models and adopt a fluid structure interaction approach to study the effect of valve deployment and positioning on stent anchorage in both self-expanding and balloon inflated transcatheter aortic valves. Another important problem that requires high resolution fluid simulations is thrombogenicity. From a computational fluid dynamics perspective, characterizing thrombogenic risk requires an accurate prediction of wall shear stresses and fluid shear stresses. This is often achieved by using the exact finite element surface in a finite volume representation to augment the spatial resolution (Aksenov et al. ). Alternatively, several studies have proposed to use smoothed particle hydrodynamics (Mao et al.,; Caballero et al. ). These studies suggest that wall shear stresses and velocity gradients are not satisfactorily resolved, which makes this approach unsuitable for thrombogenic risk assessment. Other factors, including the inability to model incompressibility and limitations regarding flow and pressure waveforms, are additional common points of criticism. A recent thrombogenic analysis of a 29 mm (Medtronic, Santa Rosa), deployed at annular versus supra-annular locations, of a personalized heart geometry found notable differences in the hemodynamics in the ascending aorta and the coronary arteries (Kandail et al. ). The study identified regions of high wall shear stresses at locations of para-valvular flow. In conclusion, the rapid developments in cardiac simulations throughout the past decade now enable us to perform practically suitable multiphysics simulations. While most the studies have been validated in an in-vitro setting, an urgent need remains to validation the simulations in vivo, for example, by using four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. The non-invasive nature and high resolution make four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging ideally suited to personalize the fluid-structure-interaction simulations with a view towards personalized thrombogenic risk assessment and personalized device selection.

Motivation

Coronary artery disease is the number one cause of death for both men and women in the United States every year (Go et al. ). Medical imaging is integral to the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease fueling the development of new technologies and applications. As new techniques emerge, a major challenge is how to devise their most effective use to optimally benefit the patient while minimizing any potential harm. Clinical trials are the best avenue to evaluate imaging devices and methods, but the ever-expanding number of technologies and parameters make a trial for every application or protocol unfeasible, both pragmatically and financially. Simulation-based virtual imaging trials can address this growing critical need. Virtual imaging trials involve the use of computational tools to perform experiments entirely on the computer. Such techniques are being widely investigated for breast imaging research (Das et al.; Gong et al.; Young et al. ). In a virtual imaging trial, realistic patient models or phantoms are imaged with validated simulation algorithms, modeling the imaging process and device, to emulate imaging examinations under different devices and parameters. From simulated images, we can investigate how differing patient attributes and imaging conditions impact dose, image quality, and the depiction of pre-defined known conditions. As such, virtual imaging trials can perform preclinical optimization on a growing number of new technologies with diverse attributes, helping to identify the most promising systems or system parameters for further clinical validation. To be truly effective, virtual imaging trials require realistic computational models of patients to serve as the known truth as well as accurate imaging simulation tools with which to image the virtual patients. Such tools are currently lacking in cardiac imaging research as existing phantoms do not realistically simulate variations in cardiac anatomy or function indicative of the population at large. In addition, current simulation tools are limited in their ability to model modern imaging devices. Our goal is to develop the essential tools to conduct virtual imaging trials in cardiac imaging research. Initially, we focus on computed tomography as it has great potential to provide high spatial and temporal resolution for the optimized evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Simulation

To create realistic, anatomically variable computational phantoms to conduct virtual imaging trials in cardiac imaging, we combine the Living Heart Model (Baillargeon et al. ) with a four-dimensional extended cardiac-torso phantom library. This library showcased in Fig. 11 left, consists of a population of 150 computational whole-body models that represent both sexes with different ages, heights, and weights (Segars et al., ). To create anatomically variable heart models to use with the extended cardiac-torso, we utilize warping methods to non-rigidly deform the original heart model to fit diverse cardiac geometries based on four dimensional computed tomography patient data (Veress et al. ), see Fig. 11 middle. We incorporate the new heart models into different extended cardiac-torso phantom anatomies using an established mapping pipeline (Segars et al. ). The result is a library of whole-body anatomies with realistic, anatomically variable cardiac models with an added physiological basis, provided within the original Living Heart Model framework, as described, in the previous sections, to simulate variations in cardiac function. To image the cardiac-torso virtual patients, we develop and validate an analytical computed tomography simulator (Segars et al. ) as well as a next generation simulator, called DukeSim (Abadi et al. ) that combines analytical and Monte Carlo techniques to more accurately model the geometry and physics of commercial computed tomography scanners. Both simulators can generate data from dynamic four-dimensional computational phantoms and enable studies in the context of motion. Figure 11, right, shows an example computed tomography simulation from such a cardiac-torso phantom (Segars et al. ). We added a plaque of 50% blockage within the right coronary artery of an adult male extended cardiac-torso model and imaged it with and without an average cardiac motion during mid-diastole. The motion of the heart, although reduced during mid-diastole, can still be seen to cause a reduction in the contrast of the plaque.

Discussion

This study offers a major advance to enable realistic virtual imaging trials in cardiac imaging. Combining a prototype human heart model with extended cardiac-torso whole body models, we created a new series of realistic four dimensional computational phantoms. We have shown that different hearts can be integrated into different background anatomies to provide a diverse collection of phantoms capable of simulating a range of normal and abnormal cardiac anatomies and functions. To image the phantoms, we created an accurate computed tomography simulation package capable of simulating realistic cardiac computed tomography data from various manufacturers. This computational platform provides the essential tool to quantitatively optimize clinical cardiac technologies in terms of image quality and radiation dose for more precise and personalized imaging of the heart. As illustrated in Fig. 11, this platform can be used to investigate imaging methods in comparison to a known ground truth, for example, the precise location and size of a plaque. With a view towards precision medicine, we can easily adjust the anatomical, physiological, and imaging parameters of our model and quantify their effects by comparing the simulated images to the known truth defined within the phantom or virtual patient. Such studies are not feasible using real human subjects because of ethical concerns over radiation exposure and the lack of a ground truth. Initially, this study focusses on computed tomography due to its potential importance in coronary artery disease evaluation. Long term, our goal is to extend our platform towards introducing precision medicine into other cardiac conditions, imaging modalities, and simulation technologies.

Motivation

Digital twins, virtual patients based on computational modeling and simulation, have advanced as an important technology to improve efficiency of clinical trials for new device designs (Madni et al.; Corral-Acero et al. ). In the context of cardiac device design, efforts are underway to explore the potential of human heart simulators as a digital evidence for new cardiovascular device approvals. The objectives of these in silico clinical trials are to reduce animal testing and to minimize the number of required patients while still ensuring safety and efficacy of the novel device (Sturla et al. ). A major advantage of this new digital process is that it is more efficient and less expensive than current excessive clinical trials whose delays and costs often impede patient access to novel treatments. At the same time, it is critical that the digital process is designed without loss of rigor or confidence in the safety and efficacy of the new device. Regulatory agencies are increasingly recognizing the public health benefits of modeling and simulation and the potential for in silico clinical trials to safely advance medical products more efficiently, from preclinical studies through clinical trials to market: Modeling and simulation can help to inform clinical trial designs, support evidence of effectiveness, identify the most relevant patient groups to study, and assess product safety (Alber et al. ). In some cases, in silico clinical trials have already shown to produce similar results as human clinical trials. For decades, in silico trails have been successfully used in regulated industries such as aerospace and automotive. In biomedicine, we are now recognizing the power of virtual patients to develop therapies for the heart, the vasculature, or the brain by eliminating traditional cost and time bottlenecks (Madni et al. ).

The ENRICHMENT trial, a new in silico clinical trial for cardiac device design, combines digital evidence from simulations with physical evidence from real patients and assesses model credibility in accordance with engineering standards. Figure 12 illustrates the workflow of the trial based on early in silico testing in realistic human environments and later animal validation and device prototyping. The trial focuses on functional mitral regurgitation and its treatment using edge-to-edge repair (Fucci et al. ). The (Abbott, Santa Clara) is currently the sole percutaneous device that is commercially approved to treat functional mitral regurgitation and more than 80,000 patients have undergone repair with this device in the past decade (Abbott ). To reduce regurgitation, the device approximates the anterior and posterior mitral valve leaflets to create a double-barrel mitral orifice, a process that is relatively straightforward to simulate in a finite element setting (Zhang et al. ). The process to assess credibility of these simulations can be classified into three categories: First, the approach should show a general agreement between the expected behavior and the predicted metrics. Second, for appropriately calibrated model parameters, the approach should produce agreement between model and experiment. Third, for general validation, the model should agree with the experiment for no specific context of use. Ultimately, this implies that the model should demonstrate predictive behavior for a specific context of use (Gray and Pathmanathan ).

Simulation

The objective of the ENRICHMENT trial is to explore the merits of designing and virtually testing a medical device in its end-use environment before building and physically testing prototypes. At the same time, it studies the possibility of utilizing data generated in virtual patients as credible evidence in a regulatory device review. The trial uses physics-based computational models and simulations of the device, implanted within a cohort of beating heart models, constructed to represent the disease state and other inclusion criteria in a virtual patient population. To create and validate these virtual patient models, the trial uses clinical information from real patients. Statistical variations from the validation set will be used to represent the target patient population. Initially, for proof of concept, the ENRICHMENT trial focuses on the condition of functional mitral regurgitation and on a patient population that shows acute success: Patients with severe mitral regurgitation, small ventricles, good ejection fraction, and a history with optimized medical management of heart failure. To accurately simulate the clinical endpoints of these functional mitral regurgitation patients, their computational models include their annulus, their mitral valve, their papillary muscles, their chordae, and their left ventricle simulated through the complete cardiac cycle. The constitutive behavior, hemodynamic loading, initial and boundary conditions are similar to the baseline model in Sect. 4. Figure 12 shows an anterolateral slice of the heart with its leaflets throughout the cardiac cycle. The color code indicates the fiber stretch. The antero-lateral view highlights the coaptation length and the zoom in shows the corresponding contact pressure on the leaflets at 250ms, at peak systole. The simulated mitral valve has mid-diastolic and mid-systolic anterio-posterior diameters of 35.4mm and 28.6mm, intercomissural diameters of 40.3mm and 37.2mm, circumferences of 121mm and 110mm, and areas of and. These dimensions are consistent with the clinically observed norms of healthy patients (Grewal et al.; Lee et al.; Sturla et al. ). The billowing and tenting heights of 1.6mm and 4.4mm and the coaptation length of 10mm at peak systole also agree with the healthy reported ranges (Mihaila et al.; Sturla et al. ). The ENRICHMENT trial personalizes this healthy human heart model by accounting for each patient’s individual degree of ventricular dilation, ejection fraction, annular dilation, and papillary muscle displacement. To incorporate the backward flow of regurgitation, the personalized hemodynamic model accounts for the individual dynamics of the regurgitant orifice area and the shape of the mitral valve (Cohen and Gorlin ). Each personalized model undergoes a virtual edge-to-edge repair with the virtual device, under the guidance of a clinical advisory board to replicate the judgement used in a real clinical trial (Dabiri et al. ). For each virtual repair process, the ENRICHMENT trial evaluates the relevant clinical readouts including the coaptation height, the residual regurgitation, the spreading force on the clipping device, and the left atrial pressure. The in silico clinical trial also allows access to other metrics that are not immediately accessible in a physical clinical trial, but can provide valuable physiological insight to quantify the success of the repair process.

Discussion

The general objective of this study is to raise awareness and capability for others to perform in silico clinical trials, agnostic to the software tools. In contrast to classical clinical trials that use simulation as a post-processing tool for data analysis, the ENRICHMENT trial uses silico testing early on in the workflow to put less patients at risk, save time and resources, and provide better designs with a faster turnaround time. The specific objective of the trial is to demonstrate how digital evidence, in the form of virtual patients, can be used to significantly reduce the time, cost, and risk with human clinical trial data collection. On a broader scale, this study demonstrates that a collaborative product lifecycle management platform can significantly improve the robustness, response time, and transparency of the medical device review process. It enables regulators with full digital access to all relevant information and people required to make science-based, informed regulatory decisions. Several limitations of the current study design point towards potential future improvements. An important missing link is the longitudinal assessment of chronic disease management. From an analysis point of view, this involves not only simulate and analyze the acute changes in the stretch and stress profiles in response to the intervention (Zhang et al. ), but to predict and understand the chronic changes in form and function (Rausch et al. ). Another future direction is to integrate simulation results, animal models, and clinical data using physics-based machine learning towards a more holistic understanding of disease progression and the long-term effects of intervention. Bringing together researchers, medical doctors, surgeons, device design manufacturers, and regulatory agencies is a first step in this direction with the common goal to safely improve device design, accelerate device approval, and, ultimately, improving human health.

Conclusion

With the rapid developments in machine learning, data-driven modeling, and physics-based simulation, we can confidently assume that, within the next decade, we will be able to simulate each person’s individual heart. Within this perspectives article, we show what is already possible today, what will be possible in the near future, and what will probably never be possible. We have identified the missing pieces to create fully personalized, high-resolution whole heart models that encode a fully personalized medical history. While conceptually possible, this process is technically cumbersome, computationally expensive, and labor intensive. Instead, we propose to create personalized human heart models out of population-based libraries with geometric, biological, physical, and clinical information by morphing between a finite number of fully reconstructed four-dimensional human heart models using machine learning. We propose to analyze these personalized human heart models by combining physics-based multiscale modeling and machine learning. This allows us to learn the underlying physics, infer the model parameters, analyze parameter sensitivities, and quantify model uncertainties. We have outlined the challenges and opportunities for precision medicine in human heart modeling, not only as a purely academic exercise, but also as a translational path towards clinical decision making in full alignment with the regulatory agencies. Our examples highlight the potential for personalized human heart simulations in medical device design, clinical decision making, and personalizing treatment planning.

References 180

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2018.2886530

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10439-012-0524-5

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2019.0233

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.06.014

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.04.001

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13239-015-0216-z

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10439-012-0593-5

  18. 18.
  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.05.002

  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13239-017-0324-z

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2011.2116119

  22. 22.
  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.013

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/0002-8703(72)90080-4

  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.002

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mbs.2016.08.010

  29. 29.
  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.vascn.2016.03.009

  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11012-016-0472-5

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mechrescom.2019.04.009

  33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1080/10255842.2011.554410

  34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.healun.2005.07.008

  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1118/1.3116902

  36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/cnm.2575

  40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(61)86902-6

  42. 42.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.cir.0000058703.26715.9d

  43. 43.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/eurjhf/hfr029

  44. 44.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1010-7940(05)80107-1

  45. 45.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1152/japplphysiol.00255.2014

  47. 47.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.012

  48. 48.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10439-015-1351-2

  49. 49.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10237-020-01304-9

  50. 50.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.83.031902

  51. 51.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.062

  52. 52.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1161/cir.0b013e31828124ad

  53. 53.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.04.023

  55. 55.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmps.2014.07.015

  57. 57.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1118/1.2174127

  58. 58.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s12265-018-9792-2

  59. 59.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.109.901181

  60. 60.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/0002-9343(80)90471-4

  61. 61.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1115/1.2894084

  62. 62.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/0021-9290(94)00174-3

  63. 63.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsta.2009.0091

  64. 64.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0079-6107(98)00013-3

  65. 65.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.2170/physiolsci.rp003208

  68. 68.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  69. 69.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2018.01513

  70. 70.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.008

  71. 71.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aav6019

  72. 72.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10237-021-01516-7

  73. 73.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.032

  74. 74.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1115/1.3200909

  76. 76.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03406-3

  77. 77.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10439-006-9212-7

  78. 78.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.11.004

  79. 79.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.02.06

  81. 81.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcp.2012.09.015

  82. 82.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/cnm.2984

  83. 83.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspa.2015.0641

  84. 84.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.112.118083

  85. 85.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2009.2031629

  86. 86.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2012.2192743

  87. 87.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.004

  88. 88.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10216

  89. 89.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.morpho.2019.09.001

  90. 90.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.007

  92. 92.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0184729

  93. 93.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.06.007

  94. 94.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13239-016-0285-7

  95. 95.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  97. 97.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/ehjci/jev301

  98. 98.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsta.2020.0119

  99. 99.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.061

  100. 100.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  101. 101.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.022

  102. 102.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.112.000570

  104. 104.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsta.2011.0139

  105. 105.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpheart.1991.260.4.h1365

  106. 106.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.010

  108. 108.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2009.11.001

  109. 109.
  110. 110.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68074-4

  111. 111.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  112. 112.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.05.006

  113. 113.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.032

  114. 114.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10237-019-01190-w

  115. 115.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/cnm.3151

  116. 116.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10237-018-1098-4

  117. 117.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  118. 118.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.21037/jtd.2020.03.122

  119. 119.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1097/00005344-199902000-00002

  120. 120.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1109/tbme.2006.880875

  121. 121.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41551-018-0282-2

  122. 122.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10237-019-01237-y

  123. 123.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  124. 124.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-69900-4

  125. 125.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmps.2013.04.005

  126. 126.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10237-012-0462-z

  127. 127.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/cnm.2788

  128. 128.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00846-5

  129. 129.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.01.014

  130. 130.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/0021-9290(94)90021-3

  131. 131.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.cir.84.2.721

  132. 132.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa012175

  133. 133.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/cnm.2473

  134. 134.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1080/17434440.2018.1536427

  135. 135.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.5301/ijao.5000520

  136. 136.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2018.00520

  137. 137.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.033

  138. 138.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1080/10255842.2015.1105965

  139. 139.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.025

  140. 140.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cma.2017.03.015

  141. 141.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/cnm.2964

  142. 142.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10439-017-1969-3

  143. 143.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cma.2019.01.033

  144. 144.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.053

  145. 145.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  146. 146.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2020.01.012

  147. 147.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1109/tmi.2012.2221474

  149. 149.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1118/1.4794178

  150. 150.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1118/1.2955743

  151. 151.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1118/1.4926847

  152. 152.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1109/trpms.2018.2823060

  153. 153.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsfs.2010.0048

  155. 155.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.018

  156. 156.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehq522

  157. 157.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.031

  158. 158.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsta.2008.0283

  159. 159.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.11.010

  160. 160.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.013

  161. 161.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.echo.2006.04.011

  162. 162.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  163. 163.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.083

  164. 164.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpheart.00794.2003

  165. 165.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  166. 166.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.110.223610

  167. 167.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17358-3

  168. 168.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.116.023518

  169. 169.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/cpe.5528

  170. 170.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  171. 171.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11517-014-1183-5

  172. 172.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpheart.01226.2004

  173. 173.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  174. 174.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  175. 175.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2020.574211

  176. 176.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10659-017-9631-8

  177. 177.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1118/1.4800501

  178. 178.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0223472

  179. 179.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13239-017-0292-3

  180. 180.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.