No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.
Magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment
for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Avinash Chandra, George Dervenoulas and 1 more
Journal of Neurology · 2018 · Systematic review
Abstract
Research utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been crucial to the understanding of the neuropathological mechanisms behind and clinical identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MRI modalities show patterns of brain damage that discriminate AD from other brain illnesses and brain abnormalities that are associated with risk of conversion to AD from MCI and other behavioural outcomes. This review discusses the application of various MRI techniques to and their clinical usefulness in AD and MCI. MRI modalities covered include structural MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), arterial spin labelling (ASL), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and functional MRI (fMRI). There is much evidence supporting the validity of MRI as a biomarker for these disorders; however, only traditional structural imaging is currently recommended for routine use in clinical settings. Future research is needed to warrant the inclusion for more advanced MRI methodology in forthcoming revisions to diagnostic criteria for AD and MCI.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the prodromal form of AD and is characterized by neurocognitive dysfunction, but not to the extent of dementia, and minor difficulties in functional ability. The neuropathological hallmarks of AD include neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and beta-amyloid (Aβ) neuritic plaques. The AD brain contains increased levels of hyperphosphorylated tau. In this state, the main functions of normal tau are disrupted and the polymerization of paired helical filaments or NFTs, which are correlated with synaptic loss, occurs. Overproduction of amyloid precursor protein is also characteristic in AD, which results in elevated levels of Aβ42 and neuritic plaque formation. This exerts oxidative and inflammatory stress, which contributes to neuronal damage.
Through the in vivo visualization of neuropathology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) research has been paramount in the clinical identification of MCI and AD. Diagnostic criteria recommend the consideration of abnormalities on structural MRI. More advanced MR techniques include diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), arterial spin labelling (ASL), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which have not yet been established for routine clinical use. The aim of this review will be to provide an overview of the application of the various MR modalities in AD and MCI. Another clinically useful neuroimaging technology is positron emission tomography (PET); however, this is beyond the scope of the current work.
Structural imaging
Structural imaging modalities reveal brain atrophy and other static tissue abnormalities (Table 1; Fig. 1). Progression of atrophy follows Braak staging and is first observed in medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures, including the entorhinal cortex (ERC) and hippocampus. Compared to controls, hippocampal volumes for AD patients are reduced by 26–27% and ERC volumes by 38–40%. MCI patients show intermediate levels of MTL atrophy. The presence of diffuse hippocampal atrophy is related to deficits in executive functioning and memory for AD patients. As the disease progresses, atrophy advances to the remainder of the MTL where grey matter (GM) loss occurs in the medial temporal gyrus, parahippocampus, parahippocampal and fusiform gyri, and temporal pole. Nesteruk and colleagues found that MTL atrophy discriminates those who will convert from MCI to AD from non-converters. It also differentiates AD from dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson’s disease with dementia (PDD), where AD patients show the greatest reductions in hippocampal volume.
Additional limbic structures including the amygdala, olfactory bulb tract, cingulate gyrus, and thalamus are impacted in AD. GM loss in these regions is associated with cognitive dysfunction and neuropsychiatric symptomatology. As the disease progresses, atrophy spreads to cortical regions. Frontal, parietal, and temporal brain areas experience volumetric reductions, and so do the putamen and basal forebrain cholinergic system. Cholinergic abnormalities in AD have been further highlighted through the use of molecular imaging technologies. Atrophy is also found in the primary olfactory cortex, in addition to lower-level brain areas including the cerebellum and brainstem. MCI is notable for frontal and temporal GM loss, and atrophy in the primary olfactory cortex and some basal forebrain cholinergic system structures. No volumetric differences were found between AD patients with and without hypertension.
Structural MRI scans can also display white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), which indicate demyelination and axonal loss (Table 1; Fig. 2). Compared to controls, patients with AD demonstrate greater WMHs with the majority in frontal lobe. For patients along the AD spectrum, WMHs correlate with hippocampal atrophy, in addition to neuropsychological impairment and psychiatric disturbances. Considering differential diagnoses, patients with vascular dementia (VaD) have higher volumes of WMHs than in AD. Periventricular WMHs are predictive of progression from MCI to AD, with an increase of one point in WMH rating associated with a 59% increased risk of phenoconversion.
Advanced MR techniques
DTI utilizes the displacement of water molecules to measure white matter tract integrity (Table 2). The primary metrics of DTI include mean diffusivity (MD) or the average rate of water molecule diffusivity and fractional anisotropy (FA) or the variability associated with diffusion. In AD, increased MD is noted in frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal areas including the hippocampus; however, in MCI, these increases are absent in frontal and occipital regions. In AD, decreased FA is localized to the cingulum, corpus callosum, superior lateral fasciculus and uncinate fasciculus and throughout temporal, occipital and frontal white matter. Patients with MCI display a similar pattern, but with no FA irregularities in occipital and parietal areas. MD increases in the basal forebrain are associated with increased risk of progression from MCI to AD, and FA and MD abnormalities are associated with memory and executive dysfunction. Diffusivity metrics also discriminate AD from other dementias where reduced FA is present in frontal areas for frontotemporal dementia (FTD) compared to AD, and increased MD is present in parietal and temporal regions for AD in contrast to DLB. However, DTI technology shows particular sensitivity to motion, which could lead to artifacts that might skew results. Comparatively long scanning times could increase the probability of such errors, indicating that this technique may not be particularly well suited for practical clinical use.
Changes in the neurovasculature system, namely in cerebral blood flow (CBF), can be detected by MR imaging using ASL (Table 2). Notable hypoperfusion is present in the posterior cingulate, precuneus, and, occipital, temporal, parietal cortical areas in AD and MCI, and in frontal and orbitofrontal cortex, and the hippocampus in AD. AD patients demonstrate greater CBF declines in cortex found in temporal, parietal, frontal, and orbitofrontal areas, in addition to the thalamus and middle temporal structures including the hippocampus and amygdala when compared to those with MCI. Limited increases in CBF have been shown in the basal ganglia, amygdala, and hippocampus in MCI, and anterior cingulate in AD, which suggests compensatory mechanisms within the brain for cerebrovascular damage. Regarding disease-related outcomes, regional hypoperfusion is associated with progression from MCI to AD, in addition to cognitive and functional deterioration. Measures of perfusion on ASL also discriminate AD from VaD, DLB, and FTD. Differential patterns of CBF reduction were shown in frontal and temporal areas when comparing AD to VaD. Whilst demonstrating the highest degree of hypoperfusion throughout the brain, temporal regions are spared in DLB. In comparison, reduced temporal and frontal CBF is characteristic of AD and FTD, respectively. ASL utilizes magnetically labelled blood water as a tracer and individual differences in blood vessel properties could lead to variable transit times for its delivery. This might result in artificial changes in signal intensity, which a clinician might mistake as a disease-related abnormality in CBF. Another barrier to the employment of ASL in clinical practice is its low signal to noise ratio, which leads to reductions in image quality.
MRS assesses brain metabolite levels and its parameters are expressed as concentration or ratios to standardize values (Table 2). When examining region-specific changes in AD, lower N-acetylaspartate (NAA) and NAA/Creatine(Cr) and higher myo-Inositol (mI) and mI/Cr ratios are found in parietal regions. Parietal NAA/mI ratios are also deemed a valid discriminator of AD. In MCI, NAA/mI ratios are lowered and Choline(Cho)/Cr ratios are increased in the posterior cingulate gyrus, whereas mI/Cr ratios are increased in the hippocampus. Clinically, decreased NAA markers are predictive of phenoconversion to dementia and cognitive dysfunction. NAA/Cr and NAA/mI ratios discriminate AD from VaD, and glutamate/Cr ratios differentiate DLB from AD. Metabolic ratios are substantially lower in AD patients compared to VaD, but higher in widespread brain regions relative to DLB. Whilst MRS is able to study molecular processes in the brain non-invasively without exposure to ionizing radiation, this technique is limited by its low sensitivity. Resultant attenuated signal strength makes it difficult to recommend its use by clinicians for diagnostic purposes in AD and MCI.
Functional imaging
Functional MRI generates dynamic representations of brain activity through bold oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal, which measures changes in blood flow and volume (Table 3). On memory tasks, patients with AD show no or less activation of hippocampal and other medial temporal structures when compared to controls. Findings of increased brain activity during encoding in parietal and posterior cingulate areas indicate some degree of compensation by the brain in lieu of medial temporal dysfunction. Patients with MCI have demonstrated similar hippocampal deactivation to those with AD during recall, but with hyperactivation during encoding phases, which might underline mechanistic compensation in prodromal stages. fMRI findings in AD extend to tasks of working memory, visuospatial ability, attention, semantic knowledge, and motor performance and in MCI tasks of attention and working memory.
Resting-state fMRI provides insight into functional connectivity among structures in intrinsic networks implicated in the AD spectrum (Table 3). One particular network of interest is the default mode network (DMN), where increased neural activity is shown at rest compared to task engagement. Brain structures implicated in the DMN include the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), ventral anterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferolateral temporal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and parahippocampal gyrus. Abnormal coactivation at rest in AD was shown between medial temporal structures such as the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). This evidences the significance of the MTL in the DMN and establishes altered connectivity in the DMN as an indicator for AD. Levels of PCC connectivity to other DMN structures is associated with neuropsychological impairment and declines in PCC-retrosplenial cortex connectivity is associated with lower Aβ levels in the CSF for AD patients.
There is a decrease in posterior and an increase in anterior and ventral DMN regions early in AD. 2–4 years later all regions show marked declines in connectivity. This supports the notion that early mechanistic compensation occurs intrinsically within the DMN, but eventually global neurodegeneration occurs. This pattern of DMN dysfunction has been noted in MCI with limited increases in activation between DMN structures, indicative of prodromal compensatory mechanisms. Other large-scale brain networks that show disruption in AD include thalamo-cortical, dorsal attention, visual, and sensorimotor ones. Whilst fMRI provides unique insight into pathophysiology, its use in the clinical routine is not supported. This is due to primary limitations including a low signal or contrast to noise ratio and the questionable validity of BOLD signal as a measure of neuronal activity. Unexplained variability in this signal might result from hemodynamic factors that are not controlled for.
Conclusions
AD is a devastating illness that leads to cognitive impairment and functional deterioration. MRI modalities have shown substantial utility in identifying biomarkers for AD and MCI pathology. These, in turn, can be used to improve diagnostic accuracy and develop novel molecular-based treatment interventions. Whilst only traditional structural modalities are recommended for diagnosis in clinical practice of MCI and AD, there is a need for further research to overcome methodological limitations of more advanced ones, which provide unique insight into disease-specific patterns of neuropathology. This should hopefully warrant their inclusion in diagnostic criteria for MCI and AD in the future.
References 78
- 1.
Harrington CR. The molecular pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2012;22:11-22.
Not in our library10.1016/j.nic.2011.11.003
- 2.
McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly JJ, Mayeux R. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2011;7:263-269.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
- 3.
Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, Gamst A, Holtzman DM, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2011;7:270-279.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
- 4.
Politis M, Piccini P. Positron emission tomography imaging in neurological disorders. J Neurol. 2012;259:1769-1780.
Not in our library10.1007/s00415-012-6428-3
- 5.
Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82:239-259.
Not in our library10.1007/bf00308809
- 6.
Du A, Schuff N, Kramer J, Ganzer S, Zhu X, Jagust W, Miller B, Reed B, Mungas D, Yaffe K. Higher atrophy rate of entorhinal cortex than hippocampus in AD. Neurology. 2004;62:422-427.
Not in our library10.1212/01.wnl.0000106462.72282.90
- 7.
Pennanen C, Kivipelto M, Tuomainen S, Hartikainen P, Hanninen T, Laakso MP, Hallikainen M, Vanhanen M, Nissinen A, Helkala EL, Vainio P, Vanninen R, Partanen K, Soininen H. Hippocampus and entorhinal cortex in mild cognitive impairment and early AD. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:303-310.
Not in our library10.1016/s0197-4580(03)00084-8
- 8.
Oosterman JM, Oosterveld S, Rikkert MGO, Claassen JA, Kessels RP. Medial temporal lobe atrophy relates to executive dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24:1474-1482.
Not in our library10.1017/s1041610212000506
- 9.
Li X, Coyle D, Maguire L, Watson DR, McGinnity TM. Gray matter concentration and effective connectivity changes in Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal structural MRI study. Neuroradiology. 2011;53:733-748.
Not in our library10.1007/s00234-010-0795-1
- 10.
Nesteruk M, Nesteruk T, Styczyńska M, Barczak A, Mandecka M, Walecki J, Barcikowska-Kotowicz M. Predicting the conversion of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease based on the volumetric measurements of the selected brain structures in magnetic resonance imaging. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2015;49:349-353.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pjnns.2015.09.003
- 11.
Delli Pizzi S, Franciotti R, Bubbico G, Thomas A, Onofrj M, Bonanni L. Atrophy of hippocampal subfields and adjacent extrahippocampal structures in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;40:103-109.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.01.010
- 12.
Tam CW, Burton EJ, McKeith IG, Burn DJ, O’Brien JT. Temporal lobe atrophy on MRI in Parkinson disease with dementia: a comparison with Alzheimer disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology. 2005;64:861-865.
Not in our library10.1212/01.wnl.0000153070.82309.d4
- 13.
Cavedo E, Boccardi M, Ganzola R, Canu E, Beltramello A, Caltagirone C, Thompson P, Frisoni G. Local amygdala structural differences with 3T MRI in patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2011;76:727-733.
Not in our library10.1212/wnl.0b013e31820d62d9
- 14.
Thomann PA, Dos Santos V, Toro P, Schönknecht P, Essig M, Schröder J. Reduced olfactory bulb and tract volume in early Alzheimer’s disease—a MRI study. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:838-841.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.08.001
- 15.
Guo X, Wang Z, Li K, Li Z, Qi Z, Jin Z, Yao L, Chen K. Voxel-based assessment of gray and white matter volumes in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2010;468:146-150.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.086
- 16.
De Jong L, Van der Hiele K, Veer I, Houwing J, Westendorp R, Bollen E, De Bruin P, Middelkoop H, Van Buchem M, Van Der Grond J. Strongly reduced volumes of putamen and thalamus in Alzheimer’s disease: an MRI study. Brain. 2008;131:3277-3285.
Not in our library10.1093/brain/awn278
- 17.
Tagawa R, Hashimoto H, Matsuda Y, Uchida K, Yoshida A, Higashiyama S, Kawabe J, Toshihiro K, Shiomi S, Mori H. Correlation between right medial temporal lobe atrophy and persecutory delusions in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type demonstrated on VSRAD advance. Osaka City Med J. 2014;60:73-80.
Not in our library
- 18.
Poulin SP, Dautoff R, Morris JC, Barrett LF, Dickerson BC. Amygdala atrophy is prominent in early Alzheimer’s disease and relates to symptom severity. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2011;194:7-13.
Not in our library10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.06.014
- 19.
Kilimann I, Grothe M, Heinsen H, Alho EJL, Grinberg L, Amaro E, Dos Santos GAB, Da Silva RE, Mitchell AJ, Frisoni GB. Subregional basal forebrain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease: a multicenter study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40:687-700.
Not in our library10.3233/jad-132345
- 20.
Duarte A, Hayasaka S, Du A, Schuff N, Jahng G-H, Kramer J, Miller B, Weiner M. Volumetric correlates of memory and executive function in normal elderly, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2006;406:60-65.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.029
- 21.
Roy R, Niccolini F, Pagano G, Politis M. Cholinergic imaging in dementia spectrum disorders. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1376-1386.
Not in our library10.1007/s00259-016-3349-x
- 22.
Vasavada MM, Wang J, Eslinger PJ, Gill DJ, Sun X, Karunanayaka P, Yang QX. Olfactory cortex degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45:947-958.
Not in our library10.3233/jad-141947
- 23.
Tabatabaei-Jafari H, Walsh E, Shaw ME, Cherbuin N, Initiative AsDN. The cerebellum shrinks faster than normal ageing in A lzheimer’s disease but not in mild cognitive impairment. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38:3141-3150.
Not in our library10.1002/hbm.23580
- 24.
Lee JH, Ryan J, Andreescu C, Aizenstein H, Lim HK. Brainstem morphological changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport. 2015;26:411.
Not in our library10.1097/wnr.0000000000000362
- 25.
Moonga I, Niccolini F, Wilson H, Pagano G, Politis M, Initiative AsDN. Hypertension is associated with worse cognitive function and hippocampal hypometabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24:1173-1182.
Not in our library10.1111/ene.13374
- 26.
Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Offenbacher H, Schmidt R, Kleinert G, Payer F, Radner H, Lechner H. Pathologic correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology. 1993;43:1683-1683.
Not in our library10.1212/wnl.43.9.1683
- 27.
Capizzano AA, Acion L, Bekinschtein T, Furman M, Gomila H, Martinez A, Mizrahi R, Starkstein S. White matter hyperintensities are significantly associated with cortical atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:822-827.
Not in our library10.1136/jnnp.2003.019273
- 28.
de Leeuw FE, Barkhof F, Scheltens P. White matter lesions and hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 2004;62:310-312.
Not in our library10.1212/01.wnl.0000103289.03648.ad
- 29.
Debette S, Bombois S, Bruandet A, Delbeuck X, Lepoittevin S, Delmaire C, Leys D, Pasquier F. Subcortical hyperintensities are associated with cognitive decline in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Stroke. 2007;38:2924-2930.
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.107.488403
- 30.
Berlow YA, Wells WM, Ellison JM, Sung YH, Renshaw PF, Harper DG. Neuropsychiatric correlates of white matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25:780-788.
Not in our library10.1002/gps.2418
- 31.
Altamura C, Scrascia F, Quattrocchi CC, Errante Y, Gangemi E, Curcio G, Ursini F, Silvestrini M, Maggio P, Beomonte Zobel B. Regional MRI diffusion, white-matter hyperintensities, and cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. J Clin Neurol. 2016;12:201-208.
Not in our library10.3988/jcn.2016.12.2.201
- 32.
van Straaten EC, Harvey D, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Petersen RC, Thal LJ, Jack CR, DeCarli C. Periventricular white matter hyperintensities increase the likelihood of progression from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to dementia. J Neurol. 2008;255:1302.
Not in our library10.1007/s00415-008-0874-y
- 33.
Madden DJ, Bennett IJ, Burzynska A, Potter GG, Chen N-k, Song AW. Diffusion tensor imaging of cerebral white matter integrity in cognitive aging. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2012;1822:386-400.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.08.003
- 34.
Sexton CE, Kalu UG, Filippini N, Mackay CE, Ebmeier KP. A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32:2322.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.05.019
- 35.
Brüggen K, Dyrba M, Barkhof F, Hausner L, Filippi M, Nestor PJ, Hauenstein K, Klöppel S, Grothe MJ, Kasper E. Basal forebrain and hippocampus as predictors of conversion to Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment—a multicenter DTI and volumetry study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;48:197-204.
Not in our library10.3233/jad-150063
- 36.
Sjöbeck M, Elfgren C, Larsson E-M, Brockstedt S, Lätt J, Englund E, Passant U. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and executive dysfunction. A case-control study on the significance of frontal white matter changes detected by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;50:260-266.
Not in our library10.1016/j.archger.2009.03.014
- 37.
Hirni DI, Kivisaari SL, Monsch AU, Taylor KI. Distinct neuroanatomical bases of episodic and semantic memory performance in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51:930-937.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.013
- 38.
Zhang Y, Schuff N, Du A-T, Rosen HJ, Kramer JH, Gorno-Tempini ML, Miller BL, Weiner MW. White matter damage in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease measured by diffusion MRI. Brain. 2009;132:2579-2592.
Not in our library10.1093/brain/awp071
- 39.
Firbank MJ, Watson R, Mak E, Aribisala B, Barber R, Colloby SJ, He J, Blamire AM, O’Brien JT. Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;24:76-80.
Not in our library10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.01.003
- 40.
Mori S, Zhang J. Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron. 2006;51:527-539.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.012
Cited by papers we hold 4
- Alzheimer's disease: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, risk factors, symptoms diagnosis, management, caregiving, advanced treatments and associated challenges · 2024No notice
- Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome: Symptoms, Pathology, Diagnosis, and Recovery · 2022Not checked
- Imaging Techniques in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of Applications in Early Diagnosis and Longitudinal Monitoring · 2021No notice
- Applications of amyloid, tau, and neuroinflammation PET imaging to Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment · 2019No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.