Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 31, 2026.

Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA

Michel P. Bonnin, Axel Schmidt, Luca Basiglini and 2 more

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · 2013

doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2443-x

Abstract

Purpose Manufacturers of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have introduced narrower femurs to improve bone‐implant fit. However, few studies have reported the clinical consequences of mediolateral oversizing. Our hypothesis was that component oversizing negatively influences the results after TKA. Methods One hundred and twelve prospectively followed patients with 114 consecutive TKA (64 females and 50 males) were retrospectively assessed. The mean age of the patients was 72 years (range, 56 to 85 years). The dimensions of the femur and tibia were measured on a preoperative CT‐scan and were compared with those of the implanted TKA. The influence of size variation on the clinical outcomes 1 year after surgery was assessed. Results Mediolateral overhang was observed in at least one area in 66 % of the femurs (84 % in females and 54 % in males) and 61 % of the tibia (81 % in females and 40 % in males). Twenty‐two patients presented no overhang in any area and 16 had overhang in all studied zones. The increase in the Pain and KOOS scores were 43 ± 21 and 36 ± 18 in the patients without overhang and 31 ± 19 and 25 ± 13 in patients with overhang ( p = 0.033; p = 0.032). Knee flexion was 127° ± 7 and 121° ± 11, respectively. Regression and latent class analysis showed a significant negative correlation between overall oversizing and overall outcome. Conclusions This study confirms that oversizing may lead to worse clinical results in TKA. The clinical consequences are that surgeons should pay attention not to oversize implants during implantation nd that oversizing should be ruled out in case of so called unexplained pain. Level of evidence IV.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 53

  1. 1.

    Barrett WP. The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference? Orthopedics. 2006;29(9 Suppl):53-55.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(1):50-53.

    Not in our library10.1302/0301-620x.84b1.12432

  3. 3.

    Bellemans J, Carpentier K, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J, Victor J. The John Insall Award: both morphotype and gender influence the shape of the knee in patients undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:29-36.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-009-1016-2

  4. 4.

    Bollen K. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. 1989;1-514.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Bonnin M, Westphal M, Bonnin M, Chambat P. Rehabilitaton in total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis of the knee. 2008;225-238.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Bonnin MP, Saffarini M, Mercier PE, Laurent JR, Carrillon Y. Is the anterior tibial tuberosity a reliable rotational landmark for the tibial component in total knee arthroplasy? J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(2):260-267.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.015

  7. 7.

    Booth RE. The gender-specific (female) knee. Orthopedics. 2006;29(9):768-769.

    Not in our library10.3928/01477447-20060901-28

  8. 8.

    Booth RE. Sex and the total knee: gender-sensitive designs. Orthopedics. 2006;29(9):836-838.

    Not in our library10.3928/01477447-20060901-24

  9. 9.

    Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57-63.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9

  10. 10.

    Bourne RB, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Mokete L, Guerin J. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:27-31.

    Not in our library10.1097/blo.0b013e318159c5ff

  11. 11.

    Charlton WP, St John TA, Ciccotti MG, Harrison N, Schweitzer M. Differences in femoral notch anatomy between men and women: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):329-333.

    Not in our library10.1177/03635465020300030501

  12. 12.

    Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, Scott RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2002;15(4):213-217.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Clarius M, Hauck C, Seeger JB, Pritsch M, Merle C, Aldinger PR. Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA. Int Orthop. 2010;34(8):1145-1151.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00264-009-0881-3

  14. 14.

    Clarke HD, Hentz JG. Restoration of femoral anatomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2711-2716.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-008-0454-6

  15. 15.

    Conley S, Rosenberg A, Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(Suppl 1):S31-S36.

    Not in our library10.5435/00124635-200700001-00009

  16. 16.

    Daluga D, Lombardi AV, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK. Knee manipulation following total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of prognostic variables. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6(2):119-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0883-5403(11)80006-9

  17. 17.

    Dalury DF, Mason JB, Murphy JA, Adams MJ. Analysis of the outcome in male and female patients using a unisex total knee replacement system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(3):357-360.

    Not in our library10.1302/0301-620x.91b3.21771

  18. 18.

    Elson D, Brenkel I. Predicting pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(7):1047-1053.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arth.2005.12.010

  19. 19.

    Emerson RH, Martinez J. Men versus women: does size matter in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2706-2710.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-008-0431-0

  20. 20.

    Fitzgerald JD, Orav EJ, Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Poss R, Goldman L, Mangione CM. Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(1):100-109.

    Not in our library10.1002/art.20090

  21. 21.

    Greenberg RL, Kenna RV, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Kenna RV. Instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. Total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive approach. 1984;35-70.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Greene KA. Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):27-31.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.019

  23. 23.

    Harwin SF, Greene KA, Hitt K. Early experience with a new total knee implant: maximizing range of motion and function with gender-specific sizing. Surg Technol Int. 2007;16:199-205.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Hitt K, Shurman JR, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Hoeman T, Mont MA. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(Suppl 4):115-122.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Ho WP, Cheng CK, Liau JJ. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. Knee. 2006;13(1):12-14.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.knee.2005.05.002

  26. 26.

    Insall JN, Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aglietti PA. Surgical techniques and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Surgery of the Knee. 1993;739-804.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME. The effect of age on pain, function, and quality of life after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(3):454-460.

    Not in our library10.1001/archinte.161.3.454

  28. 28.

    Lesh ML, Schneider DJ, Deol G, Davis B, Jacobs CR, Pellegrini VD Jr (2000) The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A (8):1096–1101

    Not in our library10.2106/00004623-200008000-00005

  29. 29.

    Liebs TR, Herzberg W, Roth-Kroeger AM, Ruther W, Hassenpflug J. Women recover faster than men after standard knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2855-2865.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-011-1921-z

  30. 30.

    Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA, Sledge CB. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(10):2179-2186.

    Not in our library10.2106/00004623-200410000-00008

  31. 31.

    Lo CS, Wang SJ, Wu SS. Knee stiffness on extension caused by an oversized femoral component after total knee arthroplasty: a report of two cases and a review of the literature. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(6):804-808.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00331-0

  32. 32.

    Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Thomas BS. Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2724-2729.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-008-0415-0

  33. 33.

    Lord SJ, Gebski VJ, Keech AC. Multiple analyses in clinical trials: sound science or data dredging? Med J Aust. 2004;181(8):452-454.

    Not in our library10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06376.x

  34. 34.

    Lotke PA, Lotke PA. Primary total knees: standard principles and techniques. Knee arthroplaty. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. 1995;65-92.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    MacDonald SJ, Charron KD, Bourne RB, Naudie DD, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH. The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2612-2616.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-008-0430-1

  36. 36.

    Mahoney OM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(5):1115-1121.

    Not in our library10.2106/jbjs.h.00434

  37. 37.

    Merchant AC, Arendt EA, Dye SF, Fredericson M, Grelsamer RP, Leadbetter WB, Post WR, Teitge RA. The female knee: anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:3059-3065.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-008-0536-5

  38. 38.

    Matziolis G, Hube R, Perka C, Matziolis D. Increased flexion position of the femoral component reduces the flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6):1092-1096.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00167-011-1704-9

  39. 39.

    Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Mitsuhiko I, Kadoya Y, Ohashi H, Takaoka K, Nakamura H. The risk of notching the anterior femoral cortex with the use of navigation systems in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(6):718-722.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00167-009-0927-5

  40. 40.

    Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Karabacakoglu A, Seker M, Ziylan T. Distal femur morphometry: a gender and bilateral comparative study using magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;27(2):108-112.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00276-004-0295-2

  41. 41.

    O’Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979;35(3):549-556.

    Not in our library10.2307/2530245

  42. 42.

    Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, Tavernier C, Argenson JN, Roos EM, Guillemin F, Maillefert JF. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16(4):423-428.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.joca.2007.08.007

  43. 43.

    Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ. Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:39-46.

    Not in our library10.1097/00003086-199811000-00008

  44. 44.

    Parratte S, Pagnano MW. Instability after total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:295-304.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    Parsley BS, Bertolusso R, Harrington M, Brekke A, Noble PC. Influence of gender on age of treatment with TKA and functional outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1759-1764.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-010-1348-y

  46. 46.

    Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:35-46.

    Not in our library10.1097/00003086-199610000-00006

  47. 47.

    Ritter M, Wing J, Berend M, Davis K, Meding J. The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(3):331-336.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.031

  48. 48.

    Roth ML, Tripp DA, Harrison MH, Sullivan M, Carson P. Demographic and psychosocial predictors of acute perioperative pain for total knee arthroplasty. Pain Res Manag. 2007;12(3):185-194.

    Not in our library10.1155/2007/394960

  49. 49.

    Royston PaA DG. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. Appl Stat. 1994;43:429-467.

    Not in our library10.2307/2986270

  50. 50.

    Schwab JH, Haidukewych GJ, Hanssen AD, Jacofsky DJ, Pagnano MW. Flexion instability without dislocation after posterior stabilized total knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:96-100.

    Not in our library10.1097/00003086-200511000-00018

  51. 51.

    Singh JA, Gabriel S, Lewallen D. The impact of gender, age, and preoperative pain severity on pain after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2717-2723.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11999-008-0399-9

  52. 52.

    Watkins MA, Riddle DL, Lamb RL, Personius WJ. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):90-96.

    Not in our library10.1093/ptj/71.2.90

  53. 53.

    Zalzal P, Backstein D, Gross AE, Papini M. Notching of the anterior femoral cortex during total knee arthroplasty characteristics that increase local stresses. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(5):737-743.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.020

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.