Evaluating the Reliability and Accuracy of Senior Veterinary Students in Detecting and Scoring Lameness in Dairy Cows
Yalcin Alper Ozturan, Ibrahim Akin
Veterinary Medicine and Science · 2025
doi:10.1002/vms3.70496 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Background Lameness detection is essential for effective dairy cattle management, with accurate diagnosis improving animal welfare and reducing economic losses. Senior veterinary students must acquire these skills before graduation to ensure competent diagnosis in the field. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of senior veterinary students in detecting and scoring lameness in dairy cows. Methods The study included 201 senior veterinary students who scored lameness in cows using video recordings and a 5‐point scoring system. Students’ lameness scores were compared to those assigned by an experienced observer using a confusion matrix, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy calculated. Intra‐rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, while inter‐rater reliability was evaluated using Krippendorff's alpha. Binary logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of lameness severity on detection accuracy. Results Students demonstrated high accuracy for severe lameness (93.67%) and healthy cases (85.93%), with sensitivities of 75.84% and 74.46%, respectively. However, sensitivity for mild to moderate lameness was lowest. Specificity ranged from 81.87% for mild cases to 98.12% for severe cases. Inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability showed various agreement coefficients across lameness categories. Logistic regression indicated decreased accuracy with increasing lameness severity. Conclusion Gaps in detecting intermediate lameness highlight the need for enhanced training methods in veterinary education. Integrating advanced tools can improve diagnostic accuracy and support better lameness detection in practice.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References30
30 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.