Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH ‐21 st Project

J. Stirnemann, J. Villar, L. J. Salomon and 22 more

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2017 · CC BY

doi:10.1002/uog.17347

Abstract

Objective. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) and fetal biometry are complementary measures used to screen for fetal growth disturbances. Our aim was to provide international EFW standards to complement the INTERGROWTH‐21st Fetal Growth Standards that are available for use worldwide.

Methods. Women with an accurate gestational‐age assessment, who were enrolled in the prospective, international, multicenter, population‐based Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study (FGLS) and INTERBIO‐21st Fetal Study (FS), two components of the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project, had ultrasound scans every 5 weeks from 9–14 weeks' until 40 weeks' gestation. At each visit, measurements of fetal head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter, occipitofrontal diameter, abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were obtained blindly by dedicated research sonographers using standardized methods and identical ultrasound machines. Birth weight was measured within 12 h of delivery by dedicated research anthropometrists using standardized methods and identical electronic scales. Live babies without any congenital abnormality, who were born within 14 days of the last ultrasound scan, were selected for inclusion. As most births occurred at around 40 weeks' gestation, we constructed a bootstrap model selection and estimation procedure based on resampling of the complete dataset under an approximately uniform distribution of birth weight, thus enriching the sample size at extremes of fetal sizes, to achieve consistent estimates across the full range of fetal weight. We constructed reference centiles using second‐degree fractional polynomial models.

Results. Of the overall population, 2404 babies were born within 14 days of the last ultrasound scan. Mean time between the last scan and birth was 7.7 (range, 0–14) days and was uniformly distributed. Birth weight was best estimated as a function of AC and HC (without FL) as log(EFW) = 5.084820 − 54.06633 × (AC/100)3 − 95.80076 × (AC/100)3 × log(AC/100) + 3.136370 × (HC/100), where EFW is in g and AC and HC are in cm. All other measures, gestational age, symphysis–fundus height, amniotic fluid indices and interactions between biometric measures and gestational age, were not retained in the selection process because they did not improve the prediction of EFW. Applying the formula to FGLS biometric data (n = 4231) enabled gestational age‐specific EFW tables to be constructed. At term, the EFW centiles matched those of the INTERGROWTH‐21st Newborn Size Standards but, at < 37 weeks' gestation, the EFW centiles were, as expected, higher than those of babies born preterm. Comparing EFW cross‐sectional values with the INTERGROWTH‐21st Preterm Postnatal Growth Standards confirmed that preterm postnatal growth is a different biological process from intrauterine growth.

Conclusions. We provide an assessment of EFW, as an adjunct to routine ultrasound biometry, from 22 to 40 weeks' gestation. However, we strongly encourage clinicians to evaluate fetal growth using separate biometric measures such as HC and AC, as well as EFW, to avoid the minimalist approach of focusing on a single value. © 2016 Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

References 58

  1. 1.

    de Onis M, Habicht J‐P. Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert Committee. Am J Clin Nutr 1996; 64: 650–658.

    Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/64.4.650

  2. 2.

    Bakalis S, Peeva G, Gonzalez R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30–34 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 446–451.

    Not in our library10.1002/uog.14863

  3. 3.

    Lesmes C, Gallo DM, Gonzalez R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates: screening by maternal serum biochemical markers at 19–24 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 341–349.

    Not in our library10.1002/uog.14899

  4. 4.

    Conde‐Agudelo A, Papageorghiou AT, Kennedy SH, Villar J. Novel biomarkers for predicting intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG 2013; 120: 681–694.

    Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.12172

  5. 5.

    Ioannou C, Talbot K, Ohuma E, Sarris I, Villar J, Conde‐Agudelo A, Papageorghiou AT. Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size. BJOG 2012; 119: 1425–1439.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03451.x

  6. 6.

    Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, Todros T, Cheikh Ismail L, Lambert A, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Pang R, Victora CG, Barros FC, Carvalho M, Salomon LJ, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Villar J; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH‐21st). International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. Lancet 2014; 384: 869–879.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61490-2

  7. 7.

    Villar J, Ismail LC, Victora CG, Ohuma EO, Bertino E, Altman DG, Lambert A, Papageorghiou AT, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Frederick IO, Noble AJ, Pang R, Barros FC, Chumlea C, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross‐Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. Lancet 2014; 384: 857–868.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60932-6

  8. 8.

    Villar J, Giuliani F, Bhutta ZA, Bertino E, Ohuma EO, Ismail LC, Barros FC, Altman DG, Victora C, Noble JA, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Pang R, Lambert A, Papageorghiou AT, Ochieng R, Jaffer YA, Kennedy SH; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21(st) Century (INTERGROWTH‐21(st)). Postnatal growth standards for preterm infants: the Preterm Postnatal Follow‐up Study of the INTERGROWTH‐21(st) Project. Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3: e681–691.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00163-1

  9. 9.

    Villar J, Altman DG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Knight HE, Ruyan P, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Papageorghiou AT, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. BJOG 2013; 120 (Suppl 2): 9–26.

    Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.12047

  10. 10.

    Onis M de, Garza C, Onyango AW, Martorell R. WHO | Acta Paediatrica supplement on the WHO Child Growth Standards. WHO. http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/acta_supplement/en/. Published 2006.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Villar J, Papageorghiou AT, Pang R, Salomon LJ, Langer A, Victora C, Purwar M, Chumlea C, Qingqing W, Scherjon SA, Barros FC, Carvalho M, Altman DG, Giuliani F, Bertino E, Jaffer YA, Cheikh Ismail L, Ohuma EO, Lambert A, Noble JA, Gravett MG, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH. Monitoring human growth and development: a continuum from the womb to the classroom. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 494–499.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.002

  12. 12.

    Villar J, Papageorghiou AT, Pang R, Ohuma EO, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Altman DG, Purwar M, Frederick IO, Noble JA, Victora CG, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH‐21st). The likeness of fetal growth and newborn size across non‐isolated populations in the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study and Newborn Cross‐Sectional Study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2: 781–792.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2213-8587(14)70121-4

  13. 13.

    Ioannou C, Sarris I, Hoch L, Salomon LJ, Papageorghiou AT; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. Standardisation of crown–rump length measurement. BJOG 2013; 120 (Suppl 2): 38–41.

    Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.12056

  14. 14.

    Wanyonyi SZ, Napolitano R, Ohuma EO, Salomon LJ, Papageorghiou AT. Image‐scoring system for crown–rump length measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 649–654.

    Not in our library10.1002/uog.13376

  15. 15.

    Robinson HP, Fleming JE. A critical evaluation of sonar “crown–rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 702–710.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x

  16. 16.

    Papageorghiou AT, Sarris I, Ioannou C, Todros T, Carvalho M, Pilu G, Salomon LJ; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. Ultrasound methodology used to construct the fetal growth standards in the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. BJOG 2013; 120 (Suppl 2): 27–32.

    Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.12313

  17. 17.

    Ohuma EO, Hoch L, Cosgrove C, Knight HE, Cheikh Ismail L, Juodvirsiene L, Papageorghiou AT, Al‐Jabri H, Domingues M, Gilli P, Kunnawar N, Musee N, Roseman F, Carter A, Wu M, Altman DG; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. Managing data for the international, multicentre INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. BJOG 2013; 120 (Suppl 2): 64–70.

    Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.12080

  18. 18.

    Sarris I, Ioannou C, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, Hoch L, Cosgrove C, Fathima S, Salomon LJ, Papageorghiou AT; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. Standardisation and quality control of ultrasound measurements taken in the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. BJOG 2013; 120 (Suppl 2): 33–37.

    Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.12315

  19. 19.

    Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Doris B, Mas N, Ville Y. Feasibility and reproducibility of an image‐scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34–40.

    Not in our library10.1002/uog.2665

  20. 20.

    Sarris I, Ioannou C, Dighe M, Mitidieri A, Oberto M, Qingqing W, Shah J, Sohoni S, Al Zidjali W, Hoch L, Altman DG, Papageorghiou AT; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. Standardization of fetal ultrasound biometry measurements: improving the quality and consistency of measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 681–687.

    Not in our library10.1002/uog.8997

  21. 21.

    de Onis M, Onyango AW, Van den Broeck J, Chumlea WC, Martorell R. Measurement and standardization protocols for anthropometry used in the construction of a new international growth reference. Food Nutr Bull 2004; 25 (1 Suppl): S27–S36.

    Not in our library10.1177/15648265040251s104

  22. 22.

    Cheikh Ismail L, Knight HE, Ohuma EO, Hoch L, Chumlea WC; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. Anthropometric standardisation and quality control protocols for the construction of new, international, fetal and newborn growth standards: the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. BJOG 2013; 120 (Suppl 2): 48–55.

    Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.12127

  23. 23.

    Cheikh Ismail L, Knight HE, Bhutta Z, Chumlea WC; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. Anthropometric protocols for the construction of new international fetal and newborn growth standards: the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. BJOG 2013; 120 (Suppl 2): 42–47.

    Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.12125

  24. 24.

    Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 80–89.

    Not in our library10.1002/uog.1751

  25. 25.

    Royston P, Altman DG. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. Appl Stat 1994; 43: 429–467.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R. Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g. J Perinat Med 2004; 32: 155–161.

    Not in our library10.1515/jpm.2004.028

  27. 27.

    Cohen JM, Hutcheon JA, Kramer MS, Joseph KS, Abenhaim H, Platt RW. Influence of ultrasound‐to‐delivery interval and maternal–fetal characteristics on validity of estimated fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 434–441.

    Not in our library10.1002/uog.7506

  28. 28.

    Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. CRC Press, 1994.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Sauerbrei W. The use of resampling methods to simplify regression models in medical statistics. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 1999; 48: 313–329.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Bootstrap resampling methods. BMJ 2015; 350: h2622.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.h2622

  31. 31.

    Ambler G, Royston P. Fractional polynomial model selection procedures: investigation of Type I error rate. J Stat Comput Simul 2001; 69: 89–108.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Bellera CA, Hanley JA. A method is presented to plan the required sample size when estimating regression‐based reference limits. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 610–615.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.004

  33. 33.

    Royston P. Constructing time‐specific reference ranges. Stat Med 1991; 10: 675–690.

    Not in our library10.1002/sim.4780100502

  34. 34.

    Altman DG, Ohuma EO; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. Statistical considerations for the development of prescriptive fetal and newborn growth standards in the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project. BJOG 2013; 120 (Suppl 2): 71–76.

    Not in our library10.1111/1471-0528.12031

  35. 35.

    Altman DG, Chitty LS. Design and analysis of studies to derive charts of fetal size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 378–384.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1469-0705.1993.03060378.x

  36. 36.

    Royston P, Altman DG. Design and analysis of longitudinal studies of fetal size. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 307–312.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06050307.x

  37. 37.

    Wright EM, Royston P. A comparison of statistical methods for age‐related reference intervals. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 1997; 160: 47–69.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Hynek M. Approaches for constructing age‐related reference intervals and centile charts for fetal size. Eur J Biomed Inform 2010; 6: 51–60.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Cole TJ. Fitting smoothed centile curves to reference data. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 1988; 151: 385–418.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Cole TJ. Using the LMS method to measure skewness in the NCHS and Dutch National height standards. Ann Hum Biol 1989; 16: 407–419.

    Not in our library10.1080/03014468900000532

All 58 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.