Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.

Dysfunction of Endothelial Progenitor Cells from Smokers and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Due to Increased DNA Damage and Senescence

Koralia E. Paschalaki, Richard D. Starke, Yanhua Hu and 5 more

Stem Cells · 2013 · CC BY-NC

doi:10.1002/stem.1488

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of death in smokers, particularly in those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are required for endothelial homeostasis, and their dysfunction contributes to CVD. To investigate EPC dysfunction in smokers, we isolated and expanded blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOEC) from peripheral blood samples from healthy nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and COPD patients. BOEC from smokers and COPD patients showed increased DNA double-strand breaks and senescence compared to nonsmokers. Senescence negatively correlated with the expression and activity of sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), a protein deacetylase that protects against DNA damage and cellular senescence. Inhibition of DNA damage response by silencing of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase resulted in upregulation of SIRT1 expression and decreased senescence. Treatment of BOEC from COPD patients with the SIRT1 activator resveratrol or an ATM inhibitor (KU-55933) also rescued the senescent phenotype. Using an in vivo mouse model of angiogenesis, we demonstrated that senescent BOEC from COPD patients are dysfunctional, displaying impaired angiogenic ability and increased apoptosis compared to cells from healthy nonsmokers. Therefore, this study identifies epigenetic regulation of DNA damage and senescence as pathogenetic mechanisms linked to endothelial progenitors' dysfunction in smokers and COPD patients. These defects may contribute to vascular disease and cardiovascular events in smokers and could therefore constitute therapeutic targets for intervention. Stem Cells 2013;31:2813–2826

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are circulating stem cells that have the ability to differentiate into mature endothelial cells, thereby contributing to postnatal vasculogenesis and endothelial repair at sites of endothelial damage,. Blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOEC, also called endothelial colony forming cells [ECFC]), are a well-characterized endothelial cell population with robust clonal proliferative potential and ability to form de novo vessels in vivo. This population has recently attracted considerable interest as a potential cell-based therapy for vascular regeneration –, gene therapy,, and as a tool to study endothelial dysfunction in patients –. Endothelial progenitors contribute to vascular homeostasis, thus their reduction or dysfunction could be involved in the development of endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease (CVD) –.

Cigarette smoke-oxidative stress is a major risk factor for CVD and also the main risk factor for the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), an obstructive lung inflammatory disorder affecting approximately 20% of smokers. Smokers with COPD are more likely to develop CVD than smokers with normal lung function, and CVD is the leading cause of death in COPD. Numerous studies have described endothelial dysfunction in young healthy smokers and in COPD patients, and have suggested that reduced numbers and dysfunction of EPC could contribute to CVD in these groups –. However, the molecular process that links smoking and COPD with CVD is still unclear.

DNA damage pathways are important contributors to aging disorders, including COPD and CVD –. DNA damage, caused by factors such as oxidative stress, activates ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, a key player in the DNA damage response (DDR),; this can result in cell cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis. Recent evidence shows increased DNA damage and senescence in lung biopsies from smokers and COPD patients,, which may contribute to accelerated lung aging and pathogenesis of COPD,,. Increased DNA damage and senescence is also evident in atherosclerotic plaques,. Senescent vascular cells exhibit dysfunctional characteristics,, and have been shown to contribute to accelerated vascular aging and atherosclerosis. Recent studies suggest that accumulation of DNA damage in stem and tissue specific progenitor cells can result in senescence and loss of their self-renewal ability, tissue aging, and/or stem cell depletion –. Therefore, increased DNA damage is currently considered a causative link in the development of COPD, CVD, and tissue-specific stem cells aging.

An important regulator of genomic stability and cellular senescence is Sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent class III protein deacetylase. SIRT1 is recruited to sites of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) induced by oxidative stress and is required for their efficient repair and maintenance of genomic stability. Cigarette smoke-oxidative stress has been shown to reduce SIRT1 levels not only in vitro but also in lung tissue from smokers and COPD patients,. SIRT1 also inhibits endothelial senescence and appears to have a prominent protective role in vascular cells,. For these reasons, SIRT1 is currently considered an important therapeutic target for age-related disorders, including COPD and CVD –.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether EPC are dysfunctional in smoking individuals and patients with COPD due to increased DNA damage imposed by cigarette smoke, which could contribute to the development of CVD and to elucidate the pathways involved in this process.

Participants

Blood samples (15–50 mL) were collected from healthy nonsmoking volunteers, smokers with normal lung function (forced vital capacity in 1 second (FEV1) >80% predicted, FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) >0.7), and COPD patients (FEV1<80% predicted, FEV1/FVC <0.7). All individuals (aged 38–80 years) were free from significant cardiac, renal, hematological, or other major disorders as determined by history, physical examination, and screening investigations. All COPD patients were current or ex-smokers and were classified according to the Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria for severity of disease. All volunteers were stable (no chest or other infection requiring antibiotics and/or oral steroids) for at least 4 weeks. The study was approved by the Royal Marsden, Hammersmith and Queen Charlotte's Ethics Committees, and informed consent was obtained from all individuals.

Isolation and Culture of BOEC from Peripheral Blood

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from blood samples and seeded at a density of 3–5 × 107 cells per well, in complete endothelial growth medium (EGM)−2 (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, http://www.lonza.com), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Hyclone, Thermo Scientific, Fisher Scientific Ltd., Loughborough, U.K., http://www.hyclone.com), onto six-well plates precoated with type I rat tail collagen (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, http://www.bdbiosciences.com), as previously described,. After 24 hours, nonadherent cells and debris were aspirated, adherent cells were washed once with EGM-2 medium, and fresh EGM-2 was added to each well. Medium was changed daily for 7 days and then every 2 days. Colonies of BOEC appeared between 7 and 22 days in culture as discrete colonies of cells with cobblestone morphology and were enumerated by visual inspection using a ×4 objective lens (Olympus microscope CKX41 and Olympus microscope digital camera DP12-2, Olympus UK Ltd., London, U.K., http://www.olympus-global.com). Endothelial cells derived from the colonies were passaged for 2–3 weeks after appearance and grown to confluence.

In Vivo Matrigel Plug Assay

BOEC from nonsmokers and COPD patients were labeled with the Vybrant DiI Cell-Labeling Solution (V-22885, Invitrogen Ltd., Paisley, U.K., http://www.invitrogen.com), according to the manufacturer's protocol. BOEC (5 × 105) were mixed with 400 μL of Matrigel (BD Biosciences, 354234) and injected subcutaneously into the back or flank of NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/NcrCrl mice. Seven days later, the mice were sacrificed and the plugs were harvested, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and cryosectioned. Experiments were performed for each BOEC sample in duplicate. Frozen sections were either fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C overnight, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin stain (H&E) or fixed with acetone at 4°C for 10 minutes and analyzed by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy. Images for H&E staining were taken with a BX50 camera (Olympus) with Viewfinder software Version 3.0.1 (Pixera) using a ×10 and ×20 objective lenses. Images for immunofluorescence were captured using a Zeiss LSM510 META confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Welwyn Garden City, U.K., http://www.zeiss.com), using ×20, ×40, and ×63 objective lenses and running version 3.2 of the LSM acquisition software. At least three to five images were analyzed per sample. Volocity software (Improvision, Coventry, U.K., http://www.improvision.com) was used for quantification of cellular infiltration (H&E staining) and of Vybrant positive cells.

Senescence Induced by Oxidative Stress

A modified method of a previously described protocol for inducing premature senescence by H2O2 was used. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) or BOEC 1 × 105 were seeded in six-well plates and grown to 80% confluence in M199 medium (Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd., Dorset, U.K., http://www.sigmaaldrich.com) plus 10% FBS. Cells were washed twice with PBS and treated for 1 hour with 25 μmol/L or 50 μmol/L of H2O2 (Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd.). Cells were washed twice with PBS and cultured in M199 plus 10% FBS medium for two additional days.

RNA Interference

RNA interference of ATM and SIRT1 expression was induced by small interference RNA (siRNA) from Dharmacon (ABgene Ltd., Surrey, U.K., http://www.abgene.com). Two siRNAs specific for ATM with different sequences (siGENOME SMART-pool Human ATM, M-003201-04-0005 and ON-TARGET plus Human ATM, J-003201-14-0010), a siRNA specific for SIRT1 (ON-TARGET plus SMART-pool Human SIRT1, L-03540-00-0005), and two control siRNAs (siGENOME Non-Targeting siRNA Pool, D-001206-14-05 and ON-TARGET plus Non-targeting siRNA, D-001810-01-05) were used. Transfection of BOEC or HUVEC was performed as previously described.

Immunofluorescence

Isolated BOEC or HUVEC were stained as previously described with antibodies to platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM) (CD31), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)−2 (Abcam, Cambridge, U.K., http://www.abcam.com), vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin (CD144) (BD Bioscience Pharmingen Oxford, U.K., http://www.bdbiosciences.com/), von Willebrand factor (VWF) (Dako UK Ltd., Cambridge, U.K., http://www.dako.com), CD45 (AbD Serotec, Oxford, U.K.), CD3 (Caltag Laboratories, Buckingham, U.K.), p16 and p21 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Insight Biotechnology Ltd., Wembley, U.K., http://www.scbt.com), 53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) and γ-H2AX (Cell Signaling Technology, New England Biolabs, Hertfordshire, U.K., http://www.cellsignal.com). Secondary antibodies were anti-mouse AlexaFluor 555 and anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 488 (Invitrogen Ltd.). Nuclei were visualized using TOPRO-3 (Invitrogen Ltd.).

Frozen sections of Matrigel plugs were stained with antibodies to CD31 (Abcam), p16 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), 53BP1, and cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology). Nuclei were visualized using TOPRO-3 (Invitrogen Ltd.) or Draq-5 (Biostatus Limited, Leicester, U.K.). Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining was performed with “In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein” (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., West Sussex, U.K., http://www.roche-applied-science.com). Images were captured by confocal microscopy as described above.

Senescence-Associated β-Galactosidase Staining

Senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal) activity was measured with a β-Galactosidase staining kit (Senescence Detection Kit, BioVision Research Products, Mountain View, CA, http://www.bioscience.co.uk) following the manufacturer's protocol. The number of blue (senescent) cells relative to the total cell number was counted in two to four different optic fields, using ×10 or ×20 objective lens. At least 200 cells were counted per sample.

SIRT1 Activity Assay

Nuclear extracts were prepared using a nuclear extraction kit (Active Motif Europe, Rixensart, Belgium, http://www.activemotif.com). SIRT1 activity was measured using a SIRT1 fluorescent activity assay kit (Fluor-de-Lys SIRT1 fluorometric drug discovery assay kit, Enzo Life Sciences, Exeter, U.K., http://www.enzolifesciences.com). Total SIRT1 activity and in the presence of a sirtuin inhibitor (nicotinamide) were determined. SIRT1 activity was calculated by subtracting nonspecific activity (activity in the presence of nicotinamide) from the total SIRT1 activity and expressed as μmol/L standard equivalent per μg protein.

Western Blotting

Western blotting was carried out as described. The following antibodies were used: SIRT1 (Cell Signaling Technology), ATM, p21 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Millipore, Watford, U.K., http://www.millipore.com), α-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd.). Quantification of protein levels was performed by densitometry and normalized against GAPDH or α-tubulin.

Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

RNA was extracted from HUVEC treated with siRNA for ATM or control siRNA for 48 hours, as described. Levels of SIRT1 normalized to GAPDH mRNA were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using the following primers to SIRT1 (forward primer: 5′-CGTCTTATCCTCTAGTTCTTGTG-3′, reverse primer: 5′-ATCTCCATCAGTCCCAAATCC-3′) and GAPDH (forward primer: 5′-CAAGGTCATCCATGACAACTTTG-3′, reverse primer: 5′-GGGCCATCCACAGTCTTCTG-3′).

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Comparisons between multiple groups were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by a Fisher's least-significant difference post hoc test for normally distributed data or Games-Howell test for non-normally distributed data. Single comparisons were made with Student's t tests for normally distributed data or the Mann–Whitney U test for data not normally distributed. The correlation of values was estimated with the Spearman r correlation coefficient. Significance was defined as a p value of <.05.

Isolation and Characterization of BOEC

Eighteen healthy nonsmokers, 11 smokers with normal lung function, and 20 COPD patients were enrolled in the study (for characteristics see Table1). Cultures from all groups, between day 7 and 22, gave rise to colonies of high proliferative potential, low proliferative potential, or no colonies at all (Fig. 1A, 1B; Supporting Information Fig. 1A–1C). Colonies appeared later in culture in healthy smokers compared to healthy nonsmokers (Supporting Information Fig. 1D). There was no difference in the number of BOEC colonies per milliliter of blood between the three groups (Fig. 1B; Supporting Information Fig. 1E). In two nonsmokers, five smokers and six COPD patients BOEC isolation was performed twice, since the first isolation procedure was unsuccessful. One healthy nonsmoker was excluded from the analysis due to a reduced white blood cell count of unknown etiology.

Colonies were expanded and gave rise to morphologically homogeneous cultures (Supporting Information Fig. 1A–1C). There was no difference in the number of days that the colonies grew in culture before the first passage between the three groups (Supporting Information Fig. 1F, 1G). BOEC from colonies of high proliferative potential (expanded after passage 3) were obtained from 11 out of 18 healthy nonsmoking, 7 out of 11 healthy smoking, and 14 out of 20 COPD volunteers and were used for experiments between passage 3 and 6. The number of days between passage 2 and 3 (days ± SEM) was: 2.5 ± 0.2 in healthy nonsmokers, 4.6 ± 1.1 in healthy smokers, and 4.7 ± 1 in COPD patients, indicating a slower growth rate in healthy smokers and in COPD patients (even though significant only in healthy smokers) compared to nonsmokers.

The endothelial lineage of the cells was confirmed as described. All samples were positive for a range of endothelial cell markers including VE-cadherin, VWF, VEGFR-2, and CD31 and were negative for the lymphocytic and leukocytic markers CD3 and CD45 respectively (Fig. 1A; Supporting Information Fig. 2A–2C).

BOEC from Healthy Smokers and COPD Patients Show Increased Senescence

Increased cellular senescence has been described in lung biopsies from COPD patients and in human atherosclerotic plaques. BOEC from nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and COPD patients were stained for SA-β-gal. BOEC from healthy smokers and COPD patients displayed significantly increased SA-β-gal activity compared to healthy nonsmokers (Fig. 2A). We also measured p21 and p16 as alternative markers of senescence. Expression of both p21 and p16 was increased in BOEC from healthy smokers and COPD patients compared to healthy nonsmokers (Fig. 2B–2D), confirming the increased senescence in BOEC from healthy smokers and COPD patients. There was no correlation between SA-β-gal activity or p21 expression and age in all samples (Spearman r:.352, p =.06 and Spearman r: −.133, p =.7, respectively), indicating that the increased senescence observed in BOEC from healthy smokers and COPD patients is age-independent.

DDR Is Increased in BOEC from Healthy Smokers and COPD Patients

Activation of the ATM-dependent DNA damage signaling pathway contributes to oxidative stress-induced premature senescence in endothelial cells. Mediators of DNA repair via ATM activation are phosphorylated histone H2AX at serine 139 (γ-H2AX) and 53BP1; both mark the DSB in DNA and appear as distinct nuclear foci by immunofluorescent microscopy,,. The presence of these foci can be used to assess DNA damage and ATM activation, as shown in HUVEC treated with H2O2, which induces oxidative-stress premature senescence (Supporting Information Fig. 3A, 3B).

An increased number of BOEC with distinct γ-H2AX and 53BP1 nuclear foci were observed in smokers and COPD patients compared to healthy nonsmokers (Fig. 2E, 2F). In particular, 53BP1 foci were large and resembled the “53BP1 nuclear bodies” which have been shown to accumulate at chromosomal fragile sites to protect them against erosion. There was no correlation between γ-H2AX or 53BP1 and age in all samples (Spearman r:.334, p =.345 and Spearman r:.333, p =.318, respectively), indicating that the increased DNA damage in BOEC from healthy smokers and COPD patients is age-independent. Both γ-H2AX and 53BP1 expression strongly correlated with SA-β-gal activity (Spearman r: 1.00, p <.0001 and Spearman r:.95, p <.0001 respectively), as well as with smoking pack-years (Table1) in all groups (Spearman r:.9633, p <.0001 and Spearman r:.8808, p =.0003, respectively), suggesting a causative link between DNA damage and senescence, possibly due to cigarette-smoke exposure.

SIRT1 Regulates Senescence in BOEC via Deacetylation of p53; SIRT1 Protein Levels and Activity Are Reduced In Healthy Smokers and COPD Patients

Numerous studies describe the protective role of SIRT1 against endothelial senescence,–, which we confirmed in HUVEC by inhibiting SIRT1 expression with RNA interference. Treatment with siRNA for SIRT1 and control siRNA was performed in baseline conditions as well as in conditions of oxidative stress to induce premature senescence. As expected, abrogation of SIRT1expression in HUVEC resulted in increased senescence in both conditions (Supporting Information Fig. 4). We next confirmed the protective role of SIRT1 against senescence in BOEC, as inhibition of SIRT1 increased SA-β-gal activity in SIRT1-deficient BOEC compared to control siRNA-treated cells, both in baseline and oxidant conditions (Fig. 3A).

SIRT1 protein levels were significantly reduced in BOEC from healthy smokers and COPD patients compared to healthy nonsmokers (Fig. 3C). Similarly, SIRT1 activity was significantly reduced in cells from healthy smokers and COPD patients compared to healthy nonsmokers (Fig. 3D), with a significant correlation between SIRT1 protein levels and activity (Fig. 3E). No correlation between SIRT1 protein levels or activity and age of the subjects was found (Spearman r:.01089, p =.96 and Spearman r: −.2038, p =.42, respectively). There was a significant negative correlation between both SIRT1 protein levels and activity and SA-β-gal staining in all samples (Fig. 3F, 3G), suggesting that reduced SIRT1 expression was associated with the increased senescence in BOEC from healthy smokers and COPD patients.

SIRT1 has been shown to inhibit senescence by targeting p53, a transcription factor that becomes acetylated at Lys-382 as a result of DNA damage. This leads to enhanced p53 binding to DNA and transcription of genes that cause cell cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis,. Inhibition of SIRT1 expression in BOEC, which caused increased senescence, also resulted in increased acetylation of p53 at Lys-382, suggesting that the protective effect of SIRT1 against senescence in BOEC may be in part mediated by deacetylation of p53 (Fig. 3B).

ATM Regulates SIRT1 Protein Expression and Endothelial Senescence Induced by Oxidative Stress

SIRT1 is involved in ATM activation and downstream signaling pathways promoting cell survival and DNA repair, and in turn ATM regulates SIRT1 activity. To test whether ATM could also regulate SIRT1 levels, we inhibited ATM expression by siRNA in HUVEC. Inhibition of ATM caused a significant increase in SIRT1 mRNA and protein levels and a reduction in SA-β-gal activity compared to control cells (Supporting Information Fig. 5; Fig. 4A). Silencing of ATM also resulted in increased SIRT1 protein levels in BOEC (Fig. 4B); however, its effect on senescence was minimal because BOEC from healthy nonsmokers exhibited a low-grade of baseline senescence (Fig. 4B).

We next examined whether regulation of SIRT1 and senescence by ATM also applies under conditions of oxidative stress, which induces DNA damage and premature endothelial senescence and reduces SIRT1 protein levels (Supporting Information Fig. 3A–3C). Inhibition of ATM, in H2O2-treated HUVEC induced a significant increase in SIRT1 protein levels and reduction in senescence compared to control siRNA-treated cells (Fig. 4C). The same mechanism was confirmed in BOEC from healthy nonsmokers, where abrogation of ATM expression by siRNA increased SIRT1 protein levels and inhibited the oxidative stress-induced senescence (Fig. 4D).

We next examined whether the same occurs in BOEC from COPD patients, which display increased senescence in baseline conditions. Interestingly, inhibition of ATM expression in BOEC from COPD patients upregulated SIRT1 levels and reduced senescence (Fig. 5A), suggesting that SIRT1 upregulation through ATM inhibition could be a therapeutic target in these patients.

SIRT1 Activators and ATM Inhibitors Reduce Senescence in BOEC

SIRT1 activators like resveratrol and selective ATM inhibitors like KU-55933 have been shown to reduce stress-induced premature senescence in HUVEC,. Therefore, we tested whether pharmacological treatment with SIRT1 activators and ATM inhibitors could inhibit senescence in BOEC from COPD patients. BOEC isolated from COPD patients were treated with two different concentrations of resveratrol (Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd.) or KU-55933 (Calbiochem, Merck Chemicals Ltd., Nottingham, U.K., http://www.merck.com). Treatment with both doses of resveratrol and KU-55933 for 48 hours significantly inhibited the increased senescence observed in BOEC from COPD patients (Fig. 5B). In most cases, higher doses of both resveratrol (50 μmol/L) and KU-55933 (10 μmol/L) reduced the confluence of the cells, indicating possible toxicity of these drugs at higher doses. We confirmed that the protective effect of resveratrol against senescence is mediated by SIRT1 activation, as inhibition of oxidative stress-induced premature senescence in SIRT1-deficient HUVEC and BOEC was abolished by treatment with resveratrol (Supporting Information Fig. 6). Our results indicate that SIRT1 activators and possibly selective ATM inhibitors could be used therapeutically to inhibit the increased senescence in circulating endothelial progenitors in COPD patients with possible beneficial effects on endothelial function and CVD.

BOEC from COPD Patients Show Reduced Angiogenic Ability, and Increased DNA Damage, Senescence and Apoptosis

BOEC exhibit in vivo angiogenic ability and form functional vessels when in appropriate matrix and implanted into immunocompromised mice (mice with severe combined immunodeficiency [SCID]),,. To test whether the in vitro BOEC dysfunction was reflected in vivo, we studied the in vivo angiogenic capacity of these cells after injection into SCID mice. BOEC from nonsmokers and COPD patients were labeled with the Vybrant DiI Cell-Labeling Solution, mixed with Matrigel, and subcutaneously injected in SCID mice, as previously described. Interestingly, Matrigel plugs with BOEC from COPD patients showed decreased cellular content and capillary-like structures compared to healthy nonsmokers (Fig. 6A). An increased number of Vybrant positive cells was found in the Matrigel plugs with BOEC from nonsmokers compared to those with BOEC from COPD subjects (Fig. 6B). Immunofluorescent analysis revealed lining and colocalization of CD31 and Vybrant positive cells and formation of capillary-like structures in the Matrigel plugs with BOEC from nonsmokers but not in COPD samples (Fig. 6C).

Increased DDR and senescence (measured by expression of 53BP1 and p16) was found in Vybrant positive cells in the Matrigel plugs with BOEC from COPD patients compared to nonsmokers (Fig. 6D, 6E), in line with the in vitro results. Endothelial senescence is also linked to increased apoptosis, and oxidant conditions have been shown to induce increased apoptosis and reduced tube-forming ability in BOEC. We therefore investigated the presence of apoptotic cells by staining for cleaved caspase-3 and TUNEL, and found increased BOEC apoptosis in the COPD group compared to nonsmokers (Fig. 6F, 6G). Therefore, the in vivo data demonstrate that BOEC from COPD patients display impaired angiogenic ability compared to nonsmokers, linked to increased DNA damage, senescence, and apoptosis.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we demonstrate increased DNA damage and senescence in progenitor cells of the endothelial lineage in smokers and COPD patients. This study provides strong evidence of epigenetic alterations linked to cigarette smoke-oxidative stress, demonstrating reduced SIRT1 expression via the ATM mediated DDR pathway, and providing new insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in endothelial dysfunction in smokers and COPD patients.

Increased DNA damage and senescence have previously been shown in the peripheral lung of normal smokers and in a greater degree in COPD patients compared to nonsmoking controls,,. This likely reflects the lung injury induced by cigarette smoke-oxidative stress,,,. Other studies show evidence of increased senescence and telomere shortening in circulating white blood cells in smokers and COPD patients –, providing evidence for widespread systemic cellular senescence and confirming the proaging effects of smoking. In our study, we show for the first time increased DNA damage and senescence in BOEC from smokers and COPD patients compared to healthy nonsmokers, which were independent of the subjects' age. Therefore, our findings suggest accelerated aging of BOEC in healthy smokers and COPD patients and possibly reflect a systemic effect of cigarette smoke-oxidative stress on circulating endothelial progenitors. Interestingly, BOEC from smokers and COPD patients, expanded in culture in nonoxidant conditions, retained a senescent and dysfunctional phenotype. Among the possible mechanisms responsible for this may be transmission of the DNA damage to the daughter cells and/or epigenetic alterations linked to increased senescence.

BOEC have been shown to contribute to endothelial homeostasis and repair in areas of vascular damage, as they possess a robust proliferative potential and can incorporate into and form new blood vessels. Several studies indicate that DNA damage and endothelial senescence contribute to vascular dysfunction and the development of atherosclerosis,,,,. BOEC have been shown to be sensitive to oxidative stress, and when treated with oxidants they show reduced clonogenic capacity, increased apoptosis, and reduced vessel formation in vivo. We demonstrated that BOEC from COPD patients show reduced ability to form a capillary network in an in vivo angiogenesis assay, which was also confirmed in BOEC from a smoker volunteer (Supporting Information Fig. 7). Based on the results of our study, we propose that circulating BOEC from smokers and COPD patients, which show increased DNA damage and senescence, are ineffective in repairing vascular damage and maintaining vascular integrity and may be involved in endothelial dysfunction in these groups, leading to an increased severity of CVD.

The ATM mediated DDR pathway regulates cellular senescence,,. We showed that inhibition of the ATM pathway results in upregulation of SIRT1 expression. The protective role of SIRT1 overexpression against endothelial senescence via deacetylation of p53 has been clearly demonstrated in previous studies and we also confirmed it in BOEC. SIRT1 levels and activity are significantly decreased in peripheral lung tissue and macrophages from COPD patients, indicating a possible involvement of SIRT1 in the pathogenesis of COPD,. In this study, we observed significantly lower levels of SIRT1 protein and activity in BOEC from healthy smokers and COPD patients compared to healthy nonsmokers. In all subjects, the levels of SIRT1 protein and activity negatively correlated with the grade of senescence, suggesting that the increased BOEC senescence in smokers and COPD patients could be linked to reduced SIRT1 expression, secondary to cigarette smoke-induced oxidative stress activation of ATM. Importantly, we showed that the senescent phenotype of BOEC from smokers and COPD patients can be reversed by the SIRT1 activator resveratrol or an ATM inhibitor. Since ATM and SIRT1 proteins are currently targets for drug development, with compounds already in clinical studies,, our data provides further rationale for exploring the effects of these compounds in these patients.

Previous studies have found reduced numbers of circulating EPC in healthy smokers and COPD patients,; however, these findings were not confirmed by others,. In our study, we did not find a difference in the number of endothelial progenitors, measured as BOEC colonies per milliliter blood, in healthy smokers or COPD group. The discrepancy between studies may be due to the different cell populations examined. Previous studies have assessed the number of circulating EPC by measuring the endothelial cell-colony forming units (EC-CFU) in mononuclear cell cultures, or the number of mononuclear cells positive for CD34/CD133/VEGFR-2 surface markers by flow cytometry. However, EC-CFU have been shown to represent a heterogeneous population including myeloid cells which can express endothelial characteristics in culture, while the CD34/CD133/VEGFR2 positive subset of mononuclear cells was found to be enriched with hematopoietic colony-forming cells that cannot differentiate into mature endothelial cells in vitro or in vivo. Currently, there is no unique marker to identify circulating EPC and, as Yoder and Ingram have suggested, it might be helpful to avoid the term EPC and refer instead to the specific cell population under investigation.

In our study, the majority of our COPD patients had moderate disease (GOLD2). We did not recruit COPD patients with very severe disease (GOLD4), hypoxemia, and other major comorbidities, which could possibly have a further impact on endothelium and on BOEC function. We also excluded COPD patients and smokers with overt CVD, as these subjects would be more likely to show abnormalities in BOEC function. Even though it is important to see the effect of all these factors on the endothelium, our aim in this study was to identify the dysfunction imposed by cigarette smoke on the endothelium with the least confounding factors, such as hypoxia and the effect of medications. Future studies will expand our work to involve COPD patients with more severe disease and other co-morbidities, such as smokers with CVD.

Conclusion

In summary, we have provided evidence of increased DNA damage and endothelial senescence in smokers and COPD patients, processes that are known to increase the risk of atherosclerosis and CVD. We have also identified a molecular pathway whereby DNA damage and activation of ATM regulates SIRT1 expression, suggesting a mechanism for DNA damage-mediated endothelial senescence and dysfunction. The use of circulating BOEC allows the investigation of underlying molecular mechanisms affecting the endothelium. The effect of cigarette smoke exposure on endothelial progenitors, which are thought to have regenerative properties for the vascular system, provides a better understanding of the CVD seen in smokers and patients with COPD.

References 90

  1. 1.

    Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997;275:964-967.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.275.5302.964

  2. 2.

    Critser PJ, Voytik-Harbin SL, Yoder MC. Isolating and defining cells to engineer human blood vessels. Cell Prolif. 2011;44(suppl 1):15-21.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2184.2010.00719.x

  3. 3.

    Yoder MC, Mead LE, Prater D, et al. Redefining endothelial progenitor cells via clonal analysis and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell principals. Blood. 2007;109:1801-1809.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2006-08-043471

  4. 4.

    Fuchs S, Ghanaati S, Orth C, et al. Contribution of outgrowth endothelial cells from human peripheral blood on in vivo vascularization of bone tissue engineered constructs based on starch polycaprolactone scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2009;30:526-534.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.058

  5. 5.

    Hendrickx B, Verdonck K, Van den Berge S, et al. Integration of blood outgrowth endothelial cells in dermal fibroblast sheets promotes full thickness wound healing. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1165-1177.

    Not in our library10.1002/stem.445

  6. 6.

    Kung EF, Wang F, Schechner JS. In vivo perfusion of human skin substitutes with microvessels formed by adult circulating endothelial progenitor cells. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:137-146.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.34030.x

  7. 7.

    Dudek AZ, Bodempudi V, Welsh BW, et al. Systemic inhibition of tumour angiogenesis by endothelial cell-based gene therapy. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:513-522.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.bjc.6603883

  8. 8.

    Matsui H, Shibata M, Brown B, et al. Ex vivo gene therapy for hemophilia A that enhances safe delivery and sustained in vivo factor VIII expression from lentivirally engineered endothelial progenitors. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2660-2669.

    Not in our library10.1634/stemcells.2006-0699

  9. 9.

    Fernandez L, Sanz-Rodriguez F, Zarrabeitia R, et al. Blood outgrowth endothelial cells from Hereditary Haemorrhagic Telangiectasia patients reveal abnormalities compatible with vascular lesions. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;68:235-248.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.06.009

  10. 10.

    Medina RJ, O'Neill CL, O'Doherty TM, et al. Endothelial progenitors as tools to study vascular disease. Stem Cells Int. 2012;346735:2012.

    Not in our library10.1155/2012/346735

  11. 11.

    Starke RD, Ferraro F, Paschalaki KE, et al. Endothelial von Willebrand factor regulates angiogenesis. Blood. 2011;117:1071-1080.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2010-01-264507

  12. 12.

    Toshner M, Voswinckel R, Southwood M, et al. Evidence of dysfunction of endothelial progenitors in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:780-787.

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200810-1662oc

  13. 13.

    Guven H, Shepherd RM, Bach RG, et al. The number of endothelial progenitor cell colonies in the blood is increased in patients with angiographically significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1579-1587.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.101

  14. 14.

    Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JP, et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:593-600.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa022287

  15. 15.

    Vasa M, Fichtlscherer S, Aicher A, et al. Number and migratory activity of circulating endothelial progenitor cells inversely correlate with risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2001;89:E1-E7.

    Not in our library10.1161/hh1301.093953

  16. 16.

    Ballard VL, Edelberg JM. Stem cells and the regeneration of the aging cardiovascular system. Circ Res. 2007;100:1116-1127.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.res.0000261964.19115.e3

  17. 17.

    Williamson K, Stringer SE, Alexander MY. Endothelial progenitor cells enter the aging arena. Front Physiol. 2012;3:30.

    Not in our library10.3389/fphys.2012.00030

  18. 18.

    Freund KM, Belanger AJ, D'Agostino RB, et al. The health risks of smoking. The Framingham Study: 34 years of follow-up. Ann Epidemiol. 1993;3:417-424.

    Not in our library10.1016/1047-2797(93)90070-k

  19. 19.

    Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:532-555.

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200703-456so

  20. 20.

    Schneider C, Bothner U, Jick SS, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:253-260.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10654-010-9435-7

  21. 21.

    Sin DD, Wu L, Man SF. The relationship between reduced lung function and cardiovascular mortality: A population-based study and a systematic review of the literature. Chest. 2005;127:1952-1959.

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.127.6.1952

  22. 22.

    McAllister DA, Maclay JD, Mills NL, et al. Arterial stiffness is independently associated with emphysema severity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:1208-1214.

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200707-1080oc

  23. 23.

    Sabit R, Bolton CE, Edwards PH, et al. Arterial stiffness and osteoporosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:1259-1265.

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200701-067oc

  24. 24.

    Fadini GP, Schiavon M, Cantini M, et al. Circulating progenitor cells are reduced in patients with severe lung disease. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1806-1813.

    Not in our library10.1634/stemcells.2005-0440

  25. 25.

    Kondo T, Hayashi M, Takeshita K, et al. Smoking cessation rapidly increases circulating progenitor cells in peripheral blood in chronic smokers. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1442-1447.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.atv.0000135655.52088.c5

  26. 26.

    Michaud SE, Dussault S, Haddad P, et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells from healthy smokers exhibit impaired functional activities. Atherosclerosis. 2006;187:423-432.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.10.009

  27. 27.

    Palange P, Testa U, Huertas A, et al. Circulating haemopoietic and endothelial progenitor cells are decreased in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:529-541.

    Not in our library10.1183/09031936.06.00120604

  28. 28.

    Takahashi T, Suzuki S, Kubo H, et al. Impaired endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and colony-forming capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology. 2011;16:680-687.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01959.x

  29. 29.

    Yue WS, Wang M, Yan GH, et al. Smoking is associated with depletion of circulating endothelial progenitor cells and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:1248-1254.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.045

  30. 30.

    Campisi J, d'Adda di FF. Cellular senescence: When bad things happen to good cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:729-740.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm2233

  31. 31.

    Collado M, Blasco MA, Serrano M. Cellular senescence in cancer and aging. Cell. 2007;130:223-233.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.003

  32. 32.

    Gorgoulis VG, Halazonetis TD. Oncogene-induced senescence: The bright and dark side of the response. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22:816-827.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2010.07.013

  33. 33.

    Mahmoudi M, Mercer J, Bennett M. DNA damage and repair in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;71:259-268.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.03.002

  34. 34.

    Aoshiba K, Zhou F, Tsuji T, et al. DNA damage as a molecular link in the pathogenesis of COPD in smokers. Eur Respir J. 2012;39:1368-1376.

    Not in our library10.1183/09031936.00050211

  35. 35.

    Bartkova J, Rezaei N, Liontos M, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature. 2006;444:633-637.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05268

  36. 36.

    Gorgoulis VG, Vassiliou LV, Karakaidos P, et al. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature. 2005;434:907-913.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03485

  37. 37.

    Caramori G, Adcock IM, Casolari P, et al. Unbalanced oxidant-induced DNA damage and repair in COPD: A link towards lung cancer. Thorax. 2011;66:521-527.

    Not in our library10.1136/thx.2010.156448

  38. 38.

    Amsellem V, Gary-Bobo G, Marcos E, et al. Telomere dysfunction causes sustained inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:1358-1366.

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.201105-0802oc

  39. 39.

    Tsuji T, Aoshiba K, Nagai A. Alveolar cell senescence exacerbates pulmonary inflammation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiration. 2010;80:59-70.

    Not in our library10.1159/000268287

  40. 40.

    Martinet W, Knaapen MW, De Meyer GR, et al. Elevated levels of oxidative DNA damage and DNA repair enzymes in human atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation. 2002;106:927-932.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.cir.0000026393.47805.21

  41. 41.

    Gorgoulis VG, Pratsinis H, Zacharatos P, et al. p53-dependent ICAM-1 overexpression in senescent human cells identified in atherosclerotic lesions. Lab Invest. 2005;85:502-511.

    Not in our library10.1038/labinvest.3700241

  42. 42.

    Minamino T, Miyauchi H, Yoshida T, et al. Endothelial cell senescence in human atherosclerosis: Role of telomere in endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2002;105:1541-1544.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.cir.0000013836.85741.17

  43. 43.

    Minamino T, Komuro I. Vascular cell senescence: Contribution to atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2007;100:15-26.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.res.0000256837.40544.4a

  44. 44.

    Blanpain C, Mohrin M, Sotiropoulou PA, et al. DNA-damage response in tissue-specific and cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8:16-29.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.012

  45. 45.

    Liu L, Rando TA. Manifestations and mechanisms of stem cell aging. J Cell Biol. 2011;193:257-266.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201010131

  46. 46.

    Mandal PK, Blanpain C, Rossi DJ. DNA damage response in adult stem cells: Pathways and consequences. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12:198-202.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm3060

  47. 47.

    Sperka T, Wang J, Rudolph KL. DNA damage checkpoints in stem cells, ageing and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:579-590.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm3420

  48. 48.

    Finkel T, Deng CX, Mostoslavsky R. Recent progress in the biology and physiology of sirtuins. Nature. 2009;460:587-591.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08197

  49. 49.

    Oberdoerffer P, Michan S, McVay M, et al. SIRT1 redistribution on chromatin promotes genomic stability but alters gene expression during aging. Cell. 2008;135:907-918.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.025

  50. 50.

    Nakamaru Y, Vuppusetty C, Wada H, et al. A protein deacetylase SIRT1 is a negative regulator of metalloproteinase-9. FASEB J. 2009;23:2810-2819.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.08-125468

  51. 51.

    Rajendrasozhan S, Yang SR, Kinnula VL, et al. SIRT1, an antiinflammatory and antiaging protein, is decreased in lungs of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:861-870.

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200708-1269oc

  52. 52.

    Mattagajasingh I, Kim CS, Naqvi A. SIRT1 promotes endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation by activating endothelial nitric oxide synthase. 2007;104:14855-14860.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0704329104

  53. 53.

    Ota H, Akishita M, Eto M, et al. Sirt1 modulates premature senescence-like phenotype in human endothelial cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007;43:571-579.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.08.008

  54. 54.

    Lavu S, Boss O, Elliott PJ, et al. Sirtuins—Novel therapeutic targets to treat age-associated diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:841-853.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd2665

  55. 55.

    Milne JC, Lambert PD, Schenk S, et al. Small molecule activators of SIRT1 as therapeutics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2007;450:712-716.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature06261

  56. 56.

    Orimo M, Minamino T, Miyauchi H, et al. Protective role of SIRT1 in diabetic vascular dysfunction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:889-894.

    Not in our library10.1161/atvbaha.109.185694

  57. 57.

    Rahman I, Kinnula VL, Gorbunova, et al. SIRT1 as a therapeutic target in inflammaging of the pulmonary disease. Prev Med. 2012;54(suppl):S20-S28.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.11.014

  58. 58.

    Stein S, Matter CM. Protective roles of SIRT1 in atherosclerosis. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:640-647.

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.10.4.14863

  59. 59.

    Ingram DA, Mead LE, Tanaka H, et al. Identification of a novel hierarchy of endothelial progenitor cells using human peripheral and umbilical cord blood. Blood. 2004;104:2752-2760.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2004-04-1396

  60. 60.

    Zhan H, Suzuki T, Aizawa K, et al. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-mediated DNA damage response in oxidative stress-induced vascular endothelial cell senescence. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:29662-29670.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m110.125138

  61. 61.

    Tanaka T, Halicka HD, Huang X, et al. Constitutive histone H2AX phosphorylation and ATM activation, the reporters of DNA damage by endogenous oxidants. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:1940-1945.

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.5.17.3191

  62. 62.

    Lukas C, Savic V, Bekker-Jensen S, et al. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:243-253.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2201

  63. 63.

    Kao CL, Chen LK, Chang YL, et al. Resveratrol protects human endothelium from H(2)O(2)-induced oxidative stress and senescence via SirT1 activation. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2010;17:970-979.

    Not in our library10.5551/jat.4333

  64. 64.

    Ota H, Eto M, Ogawa S, et al. SIRT1/eNOS axis as a potential target against vascular senescence, dysfunction and atherosclerosis. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2010;17:431-435.

    Not in our library10.5551/jat.3525

  65. 65.

    Zu Y, Liu L, Lee MY, et al. SIRT1 promotes proliferation and prevents senescence through targeting LKB1 in primary porcine aortic endothelial cells. Circ Res. 2010;106:1384-1393.

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.109.215483

  66. 66.

    Vaziri H, Dessain SK, Ng EE, et al. hSIR2(SIRT1) functions as an NAD-dependent p 53 deacetylase. Cell. 2001;107:149-159.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00527-x

  67. 67.

    Gorospe M, de Cabo R. AsSIRTing the DNA damage response. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18:77-83.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2007.11.007

  68. 68.

    Yuan Z, Zhang X, Sengupta N, et al. SIRT1 regulates the function of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein. Mol Cell. 2007;27:149-162.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.029

  69. 69.

    Yuan J, Luo K, Liu T, et al. Regulation of SIRT1 activity by genotoxic stress. Genes Dev. 2012;26:791-796.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.188482.112

  70. 70.

    Au P, Daheron LM, Duda DG, et al. Differential in vivo potential of endothelial progenitor cells from human umbilical cord blood and adult peripheral blood to form functional long-lasting vessels. Blood. 2008;111:1302-1305.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2007-06-094318

  71. 71.

    Melero-Martin JM, Khan ZA, Picard A, et al. In vivo vasculogenic potential of human blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells. Blood. 2007;109:4761-4768.

    Not in our library10.1182/blood-2006-12-062471

  72. 72.

    Margariti A, Winkler B, Karamariti E. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into endothelial cells capable of angiogenesis and reendothelialization in tissue-engineered vessels. 2012;109:13793-13798.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1205526109

  73. 73.

    Chen J, Goligorsky MS. Premature senescence of endothelial cells: Methusaleh's dilemma. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290:H1729-H1739.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpheart.01103.2005

  74. 74.

    Erusalimsky JD. Vascular endothelial senescence: From mechanisms to pathophysiology. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:326-332.

    Not in our library10.1152/japplphysiol.91353.2008

  75. 75.

    Ingram DA, Krier TR, Mead LE, et al. Clonogenic endothelial progenitor cells are sensitive to oxidative stress. Stem Cells. 2007;25:297-304.

    Not in our library10.1634/stemcells.2006-0340

  76. 76.

    Tsuji T, Aoshiba K, Nagai A. Alveolar cell senescence in patients with pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:886-893.

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200509-1374oc

  77. 77.

    Ito K, Barnes PJ. COPD as a disease of accelerated lung aging. Chest. 2009;135:173-180.

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.08-1419

  78. 78.

    Macnee W. Accelerated lung aging: A novel pathogenic mechanism of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37 (pt 4):819-823.

    Not in our library10.1042/bst0370819

  79. 79.

    Lee J, Sandford A, Man P et al. Is the aging process accelerated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011;90-97.

    Not in our library10.1097/mcp.0b013e328341cead

  80. 80.

    Mui TS, Man JM, McElhaney JE, et al. Telomere length and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Evidence of accelerated aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:2372-2374.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02589.x

  81. 81.

    Savale L, Chaouat A, Bastuji-Garin S, et al. Shortened telomeres in circulating leukocytes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:566-571.

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200809-1398oc

  82. 82.

    Yoder MC, Ingram DA. The definition of EPCs and other bone marrow cells contributing to neoangiogenesis and tumor growth: Is there common ground for understanding the roles of numerous marrow-derived cells in the neoangiogenic process? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1796:50-54.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.04.002

  83. 83.

    Gray K, Bennett M. Role of DNA damage in atherosclerosis—Bystander or participant? Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;693-700.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.025

  84. 84.

    Wang JC, Bennett M. Aging and atherosclerosis: Mechanisms, functional consequences, and potential therapeutics for cellular senescence. Circ Res. 2012;111:245-259.

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.111.261388

  85. 85.

    Hoffmann E, Wald J, Lavu S, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of SRT2104, a first-in-class small molecule activator of SIRT1, after single and repeated oral administration in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75:186-196.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04340.x

  86. 86.

    Lapenna S, Giordano A. Cell cycle kinases as therapeutic targets for cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:547-566.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd2907

  87. 87.

    Caramori G, Rigolin GM, Mazzoni F, et al. Circulating endothelial stem cells are not decreased in pulmonary emphysema or COPD. Thorax. 2010;65:554-555.

    Not in our library10.1136/thx.2009.121640

  88. 88.

    Sala E, Villena C, Balaguer C, et al. Abnormal levels of circulating endothelial progenitor cells during exacerbations of COPD. Lung. 2010;188:331-338.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00408-009-9225-8

  89. 89.

    Timmermans F, Plum J, Yoder MC et al. Endothelial progenitor cells: Identity defined? J Cell Mol Med. 2009;87-102.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00598.x

  90. 90.

    Case J, Mead LE, Bessler WK. Human CD34+AC133+VEGFR-2+ cells are not endothelial progenitor cells but distinct, primitive hematopoietic progenitors. 2007;35:1109-1118.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.exphem.2007.04.002

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.