No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 21, 2026.

Pleiotropy robust methods for multivariable Mendelian randomization

Andrew J. Grant, Stephen Burgess

Statistics in Medicine · 2021 · CC BY

Abstract

Mendelian randomization is a powerful tool for inferring the presence, or otherwise, of causal effects from observational data. However, the nature of genetic variants is such that pleiotropy remains a barrier to valid causal effect estimation. There are many options in the literature for pleiotropy robust methods when studying the effects of a single risk factor on an outcome. However, there are few pleiotropy robust methods in the multivariable setting, that is, when there are multiple risk factors of interest. In this article we introduce three methods which build on common approaches in the univariable setting: MVMR‐Robust; MVMR‐Median; and MVMR‐Lasso. We discuss the properties of each of these methods and examine their performance in comparison to existing approaches in a simulation study. MVMR‐Robust is shown to outperform existing outlier robust approaches when there are low levels of pleiotropy. MVMR‐Lasso provides the best estimation in terms of mean squared error for moderate to high levels of pleiotropy, and can provide valid inference in a three sample setting. MVMR‐Median performs well in terms of estimation across all scenarios considered, and provides valid inference up to a moderate level of pleiotropy. We demonstrate the methods in an applied example looking at the effects of intelligence, education and household income on the risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 45

1.
Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(1):1-22.
Not in our library10.1093/ije/dyg070
2.
Greenland S. An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(4):722-729.
Not in our library10.1093/ije/29.4.722
3.
Mendelian Randomization Analysis With Multiple Genetic Variants Using Summarized Data · 2013
No notice
4.
Pierce BL, Burgess S. Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(7):1177-1184.
Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwt084
5.
Multivariable Mendelian Randomization: The Use of Pleiotropic Genetic Variants to Estimate Causal Effects · 2015
No notice
6.
An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings · 2018
No notice
7.
A comparison of robust Mendelian randomization methods using summary data · 2020
No notice
8.
Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology · 2017
No notice
9.
Extending the MR‐Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy · 2017
No notice
10.
Testing and correcting for weak and pleiotropic instruments in two‐sample multivariable Mendelian randomization · 2021
No notice
11.
A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two‐sample summary data Mendelian randomization · 2017
No notice
12.
Kang H, Zhang A, Cai TT, Small DS. Instrumental variables estimation with some invalid instruments and its application to Mendelian randomization. J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(513):132-144.
Not in our library
13.
Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression · 2015
No notice
14.
Robust methods in Mendelian randomization via penalization of heterogeneous causal estimates · 2019
No notice
15.
Burgess S, Dudbridge F, Thompson SG. Re: “Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects”. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(4):290-291.
Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwv017
16.
Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50(5):693-698.
Not in our library10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7
17.
Koller M, Stahel WA. Sharpening Wald-type inference in robust regression for small samples. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2011;55(8):2504-2515.
Not in our library
18.
Koenker R. Quantile Regression. 2005.
Not in our library
19.
Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator · 2016
No notice
20.
Tarr G. Small sample performance of quantile regression confidence intervals. J Stat Comput Simul. 2012;82(1):81-94.
Not in our library
21.
Education protects against coronary heart disease and stroke independently of cognitive function: evidence from Mendelian randomization · 2019
No notice
22.
Windmeijer F, Farbmacher H, Davies N, Davey Smith G. On the use of the Lasso for instrumental variables estimation with some invalid instruments. J Am Stat Assoc. 2019;114(527):1339-1350.
Not in our library10.1080/01621459.2018.1498346
23.
Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R. Least angle regression. Ann Stat. 2004;32(2):407-499.
Not in our library
24.
Belloni A, Chen D, Chernozhukov V, Hansen C. Sparse models and methods for optimal instruments with an application to eminent domain. Econometrica. 2012;80(6):2369-2429.
Not in our library
25.
Zhao Q, Chen Y, Wang J, Small DS. Powerful three-sample genome-wide design and robust statistical inference in summary-data Mendelian randomization. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(5):1478-1492.
Not in our library10.1093/ije/dyz142
26.
Grant AJ, Burgess S. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting. Biostatistics. 2020.
Not in our library10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa045
27.
Bi N, Kang H, Taylor J. Inference after selecting plausibly valid instruments with application to Mendelian randomization. arXiv. 2019;1911.03985.
Not in our library
28.
Koenker R, Mandl P, Hušková M. Asymptotic Statistics. 1994;349-359.
Not in our library
29.
Multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization estimates of the effects of intelligence and education on health · 2019
No notice
30.
Education, intelligence and Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from a multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization study · 2020
No notice
31.
A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence · 2018
No notice
32.
Okbay A, Beauchamp JP, Fontana MA, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature. 2016;533:539-542.
Not in our library10.1038/nature17671
33.
Lambert JC, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45(12):1452-1458.
Not in our library10.1038/ng.2802
34.
Johnston J. Econometric Methods. 1984.
Not in our library
35.
Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways · 2014
No notice
36.
Burgess S, Thompson DJ, Rees JMB, et al. Dissecting causal pathways using Mendelian randomization with summarized genetic data: application to age at menarche and risk of breast cancer. Genetics. 2017;207(2):481-487.
Not in our library10.1534/genetics.117.300191
37.
Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation · 2021
No notice
38.
Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods · 2015
No notice
39.
Burgess S, Thompson SG. Bias in causal estimates from Mendelian randomization studies with weak instruments. Stat Med. 2011;30(11):1312-1323.
Not in our library10.1002/sim.4197
40.
MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data · 2017
No notice
41.
Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Croux C, et al. robustbase: basic robust statistics. 2020.
Not in our library
42.
Koenker R. quantreg: quantile regression R package version 555. 2020.
Not in our library
43.
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1-22.
Not in our library
44.
PhenoScanner: a database of human genotype–phenotype associations · 2016
No notice
45.
PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype–phenotype associations · 2019
No notice

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.