Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 29, 2026.

Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis

Limin X. Clegg, Benjamin F. Hankey, Ram Tiwari and 2 more

Statistics in Medicine · 2009

doi:10.1002/sim.3733

Abstract

Trends in incidence or mortality rates over a specified time interval are usually described by the conventional annual per cent change (cAPC), under the assumption of a constant rate of change. When this assumption does not hold over the entire time interval, the trend may be characterized using the annual per cent changes from segmented analysis (sAPCs). This approach assumes that the change in rates is constant over each time partition defined by the transition points, but varies among different time partitions. Different groups (e.g. racial subgroups), however, may have different transition points and thus different time partitions over which they have constant rates of change, making comparison of sAPCs problematic across groups over a common time interval of interest (e.g. the past 10 years). We propose a new measure, the average annual per cent change (AAPC), which uses sAPCs to summarize and compare trends for a specific time period. The advantage of the proposed AAPC is that it takes into account the trend transitions, whereas cAPC does not and can lead to erroneous conclusions. In addition, when the trend is constant over the entire time interval of interest, the AAPC has the advantage of reducing to both cAPC and sAPC. Moreover, because the estimated AAPC is based on the segmented analysis over the entire data series, any selected subinterval within a single time partition will yield the same AAPC estimate—that is it will be equal to the estimated sAPC for that time partition. The cAPC, however, is re‐estimated using data only from that selected subinterval; thus, its estimate may be sensitive to the subinterval selected. The AAPC estimation has been incorporated into the segmented regression (free) software Joinpoint, which is used by many registries throughout the world for characterizing trends in cancer rates. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 16

  1. 1.

    Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LA, Wu X, Jamison PM, Wingo PA, Howe HL, Anderson RN, Edwards BK. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004;101:3-27.

    Not in our library10.1002/cncr.20288

  2. 2.

    Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg LX, Mariotto A, Feuer EJ, Edwards BK. 2004.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Rosamond WD, Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Cooper LS, Conwill DE, Clegg L, Wang CH, Heiss G. Trends in the incidence of myocardial infarction and in mortality due to coronary heart disease, 1987 to 1994. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;339:861-867.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm199809243391301

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Clayton D, Hills M. Statistical Models in Epidemiology. 1993;80-81.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Casella G, Berger RL. Statistical Inference. 1990;330.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Oehlert GW. A note on the delta method. The American Statistician. 1992;46:27-29.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Clegg LX, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN, Fay MP, Hankey B. Impact of reporting delay and reporting error on cancer incidence rates and trends. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002;94:1537-1545.

    Not in our library10.1093/jnci/94.20.1537

  10. 10.

    Midthune DN, Fay MP, Clegg LX, Feuer EJ. Modeling reporting delays and reporting corrections in cancer registry data. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2005;100:61-70.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Lerman PM. Fitting segmented regression models by grid search. Applied Statistics. 1980;29:77-84.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Statistics in Medicine. 2000;19:335-351.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<335::aid-sim336>3.0.co;2-z

  13. 13.

    Kim HJ, Fay MP, Yu B, Barret MJ, Feuer EJ. Comparability of segmented line regression models. Biometrics. 2004;60:1005-1014.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00256.x

  14. 14.

    Howe HL, Wu X, Ries LA, Cokkinides V, Ahmed F, Jemal A, Miller B, Williams M, Ward E, Wingo PA, Ramirez A, Edwards BK. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2003, featuring cancer among U.S. Hispanic/Latino populations. Cancer. 2006;107:1711-1742.

    Not in our library10.1002/cncr.22193

  15. 15.

    Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Hankey BF, Miler BA, Clegg LX, Mariotto A, Feuer EJ, Edwards BK. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2002. 2005.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Brillinger DR. The natural variability of vital rates and associated statistics. Biometrics. 1986;42:693-734.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 21

and 1 more

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.