Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Microbial nutrient limitation and catalytic adjustments revealed from a long‐term nutrient restriction experiment

Amit Kumar, Johanna Pausch

Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment · 2022

doi:10.1002/sae2.12015 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Introduction Microbial abundance and activities in soils are predominantly determined by soil carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability. Much research has focused on the effects of soil N than P availability on soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities as sensitive proxies of microbial ecophysiology highlighting the need to investigate how microbes will respond to P availability in soil, especially in cropping systems. Materials and Methods The effect of P fertilisation on microbial biomass‐C, ‐N and ‐P, and the kinetic parameters (maximal velocity [ V max ], Michaelis constant [ K m ] and catalytic efficiency [ K a ]) of β‐1,4‐glucosidase (BG; C‐acquiring), leucine‐aminopeptidase (LAP; predominantly N‐acquiring) and acid phosphomonoesterase (PHO; P‐acquiring) were measured in a nutrient‐poor agricultural soil (devoid of fertiliser application since 1942). Results This study showed that P fertilisation led to a 65% and 56% increase in microbial biomass‐N and ‐P, respectively, indicating severe P limitation and inefficient N acquisition by microbes without P availability. Increased K a values of LAP with P fertilisation further hint toward the production of efficient isoenzymes to avoid resource tradeoffs for nutrient acquisition. Conclusions Overall, these results decipher microbial metabolic and catalytic adjustments mediated by soil P availability. Increased microbial biomass‐N and ‐P with P fertilisation indicated microbial N and P colimitation that was partly overcome by the production of efficient enzymes for N acquisition with P fertilisation. We argue to incorporate microbial enzyme activities as a response to different management strategies to better inform us about soil biogeochemical cycles in cropping systems.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References34

  1. 8.
  2. 23.

32 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.