Protonate3D: Assignment of ionization states and hydrogen coordinates to macromolecular structures

Abstract

A new method, called Protonate3D, is presented for the automated prediction of hydrogen coordinates given the 3D coordinates of the heavy atoms of a macromolecular structure. Protonate3D considers side‐chain “flip,” rotamer, tautomer, and ionization states of all chemical groups, ligands, and solvent, provided suitable templates are available in a parameter file. The energy model includes van der Waals, Coulomb, solvation, rotamer, tautomer, and titration effects. The results of computational validation experiments suggest that Protonate3D can accurately predict the location of hydrogen atoms in macromolecular structures. Proteins 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 42

1. 1.

   Berstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977;112:535-542.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3

2. 2.

   Forrest LR, Honig B. An assessment of the accuracy of methods for predicting hydrogen positions in protein structures. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf. 2005;61:296-309.

   Not in our library10.1002/prot.20601

3. 3.

   Georgescu RE, Alexov EG, Gunner MR. Combining conformational flexibility and continuum electrostatics for calculating pKas in proteins. Biophys J. 2002;83:1731-1748.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(02)73940-4

4. 4.

   Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem. 1983;4:187-217.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   Brunger AT, Adams P, Clore GM, DeLano WL, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszewski J, Nilges M, Pannu NS, Read RJ, Rice LM, Simonson T, Warren GL. Crystallography and NMR system: a new software system for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Cryst Sect D. 1998;54:905-921.

   Not in our library10.1107/s0907444998003254

6. 6.

   Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model. 2001;7:306-317.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Word MM, Lovell SC, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J Mol Biol. 1999;285:1735-1747.

   Not in our library10.1006/jmbi.1998.2401

8. 8.

   Hooft R, Sander C, Vriend G. Positioning hydrogen atoms by optimizing hydrogen bond networks in protein structures. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet. 1996;26:363-376.

   Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(199612)26:4<363::aid-prot1>3.0.co;2-d

9. 9.

   Brunger AT. X-PLOR Version 3.1: a system for X-ray crystallography and NMR. 1992.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Li X, Jacobson MP, Zhu K, Zhao S, Friesner RA. Assignment of polar states for protein amino acid residues using an interaction cluster decomposition algorithm and its application to high resolution protein structure modeling. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf. 2007;66:824-837.

    Not in our library10.1002/prot.21125

11. 11.

    Gilson MK. Multiple-site titration and molecular modeling: two rapid methods for computing energies and forces for ionizable groups in proteins. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet. 1992;15:266-282.

    Not in our library10.1002/prot.340150305

12. 12.

    van Vlijman HWT, Schaefer M, Karplus M. Improving the accuracy of protein pKa calculations: conformational averaging versus the average structure. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet. 1988;33:145-158.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19981101)33:2<145::aid-prot1>3.0.co;2-i

13. 13.

    Bower MM, Cohen FE, Dunbrack RL. Prediction of protein side-chain rotamers from a backbone dependent rotamer library: a new homology modeling tool. J Mol Biol. 1997;267:1268-1282.

    Not in our library10.1006/jmbi.1997.0926

14. 14.

    Goldstein RF. Efficient rotamer elimination applied to protein side chains and related spin glasses. Biophys J. 1994;66:1335-1340.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80923-3

15. 15.

    Beroza P, Fredkin DR, Okamura MY, Feher G. Protonation of interacting residues in a protein by a monte carlo method: application to lysozyme and the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:5804-5808.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.88.13.5804

16. 16.

    Xu J, Miyano S, Mesirov J, Kasif S, Istrail S, Pevzner P, Waterman M. Rapid protein side-chain packing via tree decomposition. RECOMB 2005 lecture notes in bioinformatics. 2005;423-439.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Kolppmann E, Ullmann GM, Becker T. An extended dead-end elimination algorithm to determine gap-free lists of low energy states. J Comput Chem. 2007;28:2325-2335.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.20749

18. 18.

    Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;117:11225-11236.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Halgren TA. The Merck force field. J Comput Chem. 1996;17:490-641.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins and nucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;177:5179-5197.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Engh RA, Huber R. Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Cryst A. 1991;47:392-400.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Labute P. The generalized born/volume integral (GB/VI) implicit solvent model: estimation of the free energy of hydration using London dispersion instead of atomic surface area. J Comput Chem. 2008;29:1693-1698.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.20933

23. 23.

    Wojciechowski M, Lesyng B. Generalized born model: analysis, refinement and applications to proteins. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:18368-18376.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Gallicchio E, Zhang LY, Levy RM. The SGB/NP hydration free energy model based on the surface generalized born solvent reaction field and novel nonpolar hydration free energy estimators. JComput Chem. 2002;23:517-529.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcc.10045

25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

26. 26.
    Accurate protein crystallography at ultra-high resolution: Valence electron distribution in crambin · 2000

    Not checked
27. 27.

    Kuhn P, Knapp M, Soltis SM, Ganshaw G, Thoene M, Bott R. The 0.78 Å structure of a serine protease: Bacillus lentus substilisin. Biochemistry. 1998;37:13446-13452.

    Not in our library10.1021/bi9813983

28. 28.

    Rypniewski WR, Ostergaard PR, Norregaard-Madsen M, Dauter M, Wilson KS. Fusarium oxysporum trypsin at atomic resolution at 100 and 283 K: a study of ligand binding. Acta Cryst Sect D. 2001;57:8-19.

    Not in our library10.1107/s0907444900014116

29. 29.

    Xiang Y, Huang RH, Liu XZ, Zhang Y, Wang DC. Crystal structure of a novel antifungal protein distinct with five disulfide bridges from Eucommia ulmoides Oliver at an atomic resolution. J Struct Biol. 2004;148:86-97.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsb.2004.04.002

30. 30.

    Ko TP, Robinson H, Gao YG, Cheng CH, DeVries AL, Wang AH. The refined crystal structure of an eel pout Type III antifreeze protein RD1 at 0.62 Å resolution reveals structural microheterogeneity of protein and solvation. Biophys J. 2003;84:1228-1237.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(03)74938-8

31. 31.

    Bonisch H, Schmidt CL, Bianco P, Ladenstein R. Ultra-high resolution study on Pyrococcus abbyssi rubredoxin. I. 0.69 Å X-ray structure of mutant W4L/R5S. Acta Cryst Sect D. 2005;61:990-1004.

    Not in our library10.1107/s090744490501293x

32. 32.

    Hakanpaa J, Linder M, Popov A, Schmidt A, Rouvinen J. Hydrophobin HFBII in detail: ultra-high resolution structure at 0.75 Å. Acta Cryst Sect D. 2006;62:356-367.

    Not in our library10.1107/s0907444906000862

33. 33.

    Furhmann CN, Gaugherty MD, Agard DA. Subangstrom crystallography reveials that short ionic hydrogen bonds and not a His-Aps low-barrier hydrogen bond stabilize the transition state in serine protease catalysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:9086-9102.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja057721o

34. 34.

    Genick UK, Soltis SM, Kuhn P, Canestrelli IL, Getzoff EE. Structure at 0.85 Å resolution of an early protein photocycle intermediate. Nature. 1998;292:206-209.

    Not in our library10.1038/32462

35. 35.

    Czodrowski P, Sotriffer CA, Klebe G. Atypical protonation states in the active site of HIV-1 protease: a computational study. J Chem Inf Model. 2007;47:1590-1598.

    Not in our library10.1021/ci600522c

36. 36.

    Wittayanarakul K, Aruksakunwong O, Sompornpisut P, Sanghiran-Lee V, Parasuk V, Pinitglang S, Hannongbua S. Structure, dynamics and solvation of HIV-1 protease/saquinavir complex in aqueous solution and their contributions to drug resistance: molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Inf Model. 2005;45:300-308.

    Not in our library10.1021/ci049784g

37. 37.

    Holden HM, Matthews BW. The binding of l-valyl-l-tryptophan to crystalline thermolysin illustrates the mode of interaction of a product of peptide hydrolysis. J Biol Chem. 1987;263:3256-3260.

    Not in our library10.2210/pdb3tmn/pdb

38. 38.

    Weichsel A, Andersen JF, Roberts SA, Montfort WR. Nitric oxide binding to nitrophorin 4 induces complete distal pocket burial. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7:551-554.

    Not in our library10.1038/76769

39. 39.

    Menyhárd DK, Keserü GM. Protonation state of Asp30 exerts crucial influence over surface loop rearrangements responsible for NO release in nitrophorin 4. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:5392-5398.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.febslet.2005.09.003

40. 40.

    Toseland CP, McSparron H, Davies MN, Flower DR. PPD v1.0–an integrated, web-accessible, database of experimentally, determined protein pKa values. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D199-D203.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkj035

41. 41.

    Onufriev A, Case DA, Ullmann GM. A novel view of pH titration in biomolecules. Biochemistry. 2001;40:3413-3419.

    Not in our library10.1021/bi002740q

42. 42.

    Beroza P, Fredkin DR, Okamura MY, Feher G. Protonation of interacting residues in a protein by a Monte Carlo method: application to lysozyme and the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:5804-5808.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.88.13.5804

Cited by papers we hold 4

• Comparing Antibody Interfaces to Inform Rational Design of New Antibody Formats · 2022
  Not checked
• Broadly neutralizing antibodies target a haemagglutinin anchor epitope · 2021
  No notice
• Protoss: a holistic approach to predict tautomers and protonation states in protein-ligand complexes · 2014
  No notice
• Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation · 2012
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.