Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 31, 2026.

Distinct evolutionary trajectories of primary high‐grade serous ovarian cancers revealed through spatial mutational profiling

Ali Bashashati, Gavin Ha, Alicia Tone and 22 more

The Journal of Pathology · 2013 · CC BY-NC-ND

doi:10.1002/path.4230

Abstract

High‐grade serous ovarian cancer ( HGSC ) is characterized by poor outcome, often attributed to the emergence of treatment‐resistant subclones. We sought to measure the degree of genomic diversity within primary, untreated HGSCs to examine the natural state of tumour evolution prior to therapy. We performed exome sequencing, copy number analysis, targeted amplicon deep sequencing and gene expression profiling on 31 spatially and temporally separated HGSC tumour specimens (six patients), including ovarian masses, distant metastases and fallopian tube lesions. We found widespread intratumoural variation in mutation, copy number and gene expression profiles, with key driver alterations in genes present in only a subset of samples (eg PIK3CA , CTNNB1 , NF1 ). On average, only 51.5% of mutations were present in every sample of a given case (range 10.2–91.4%), with TP53 as the only somatic mutation consistently present in all samples. Complex segmental aneuploidies, such as whole‐genome doubling, were present in a subset of samples from the same individual, with divergent copy number changes segregating independently of point mutation acquisition. Reconstruction of evolutionary histories showed one patient with mixed HGSC and endometrioid histology, with common aetiologic origin in the fallopian tube and subsequent selection of different driver mutations in the histologically distinct samples. In this patient, we observed mixed cell populations in the early fallopian tube lesion, indicating that diversity arises at early stages of tumourigenesis. Our results revealed that HGSCs exhibit highly individual evolutionary trajectories and diverse genomic tapestries prior to therapy, exposing an essential biological characteristic to inform future design of personalized therapeutic solutions and investigation of drug‐resistance mechanisms. © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 40

  1. 1.

    Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, James K, et al. Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin–paclitaxel versus cisplatin–cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92::699-708.

    Not in our library10.1093/jnci/92.9.699

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Network CGAR. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011;474::609-615.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10166

  4. 4.

    Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Cole DEC, et al. Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin–cohort study in Ontario, Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98::1694-1706.

    Not in our library10.1093/jnci/djj465

  5. 5.

    Geisler JP, Hatterman-Zogg MA, Rathe JA, et al. Frequency of BRCA1 dysfunction in ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94::61-67.

    Not in our library10.1093/jnci/94.1.61

  6. 6.

    Hilton JL, Geisler JP, Rathe JA, et al. Inactivation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94::1396-1406.

    Not in our library10.1093/jnci/94.18.1396

  7. 7.

    Folkins AK, Jarboe EA, Saleemuddin A, et al. A candidate precursor to pelvic serous cancer (p53 signature) and its prevalence in ovaries and fallopian tubes from women with BRCA mutations. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109::168-173.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.012

  8. 8.

    Kuhn E, Kurman RJ, Vang R, et al. TP53 mutations in serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and concurrent pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma–evidence supporting the clonal relationship of the two lesions. J Pathol. 2012;226::421-426.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.3023

  9. 9.

    Kuhn E, Meeker A, Wang TL, et al. Shortened telomeres in serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: an early event in ovarian high-grade serous carcinogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34::829-836.

    Not in our library10.1097/pas.0b013e3181dcede7

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    McAlpine JN, Porter H, Kobel M, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations correlate with TP53 abnormalities and presence of immune cell infiltrates in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2012;25::740-750.

    Not in our library10.1038/modpathol.2011.211

  12. 12.

    Nowell PC. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science (NY). 1976;194::23-28.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.959840

  13. 13.

    Fearon ER. Vogelstein B, others. . A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61::759-767.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-i

  14. 14.

    Gray JW. Evidence emerges for early metastasis and parallel evolution of primary and metastatic tumors. Cancer Cell. 2003;4::4-6.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00167-3

  15. 15.

    Kuukasj\arvi T, Karhu R, Tanner M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution underlying development of asynchronous metastasis in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1997;57::1597-1604.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Futreal PA. The cancer genome. Nature. 2009;458::719-724.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07943

  17. 17.

    Baldus SE, Schaefer KL, Engers R, et al. Prevalence and heterogeneity of KRASBRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in primary colorectal adenocarcinomas and their corresponding metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16::790-799.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-2446

  18. 18.

    Ding L, Ellis MJ, Li S, et al. Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft. Nature. 2010;464::999-1005.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08989

  19. 19.

    Losi L, Baisse B, Bouzourene H, et al. Evolution of intratumoral genetic heterogeneity during colorectal cancer progression. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26::916-922.

    Not in our library10.1093/carcin/bgi044

  20. 20.

    Shah SP, Morin RD, Khattra J, et al. Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution. Nature. 2009;461::809-813.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08489

  21. 21.

    Wu JM, Halushka MK, Argani P. Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2 gene amplification and protein overexpression in breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 2010;41::914-917.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.humpath.2009.10.022

  22. 22.

    Kitano H. Cancer as a robust system: implications for anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4::227-235.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1300

  23. 23.

    Ding L, Ley TJ, Larson DE, et al. Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Nature. 2012;481::506-510.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10738

  24. 24.

    Khalique L, Ayhan A, Weale ME, et al. Genetic intra-tumour heterogeneity in epithelial ovarian cancer and its implications for molecular diagnosis of tumours. J Pathol. 2007;211::286-295.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.2112

  25. 25.

    Khalique L, Ayhan A, Whittaker JC, et al. The clonal evolution of metastases from primary serous epithelial ovarian cancers. Int J Cancer. 2009;124::1579-1586.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.24148

  26. 26.

    Cooke SL, Ng CKY, Melnyk N, et al. Genomic analysis of genetic heterogeneity and evolution in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Oncogene. 2010;29::4905-4913.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2010.245

  27. 27.

    Castellarin M, Milne K, Zeng T, et al. Clonal evolution of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma from primary to recurrent disease. J Pathol. 2013;229::515-524.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.4105

  28. 28.

    Shah SP, Roth A, Goya R, et al. The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature. 2012;486::395-399.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10933

  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.

    Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2012;366::883-892.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1113205

  32. 32.

    Forshew T, Murtaza M, Parkinson C, et al. Noninvasive identification and monitoring of cancer mutations by targeted deep sequencing of plasma DNA. Sci Translat Med. 2012;4::136ra68.

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3003726

  33. 33.

    Misale S, Yaeger R, Hobor S, et al. Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Nature. 2012;486::532-536.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11156

  34. 34.

    Al-Hussaini M, Stockman A, Foster H, et al. WT-1 assists in distinguishing ovarian from uterine serous carcinoma and in distinguishing between serous and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Histopathology. 2004;44::109-115.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.01787.x

  35. 35.

    Catasus L, Bussaglia E, Rodríguez I, et al. Molecular genetic alterations in endometrioid carcinomas of the ovary: similar frequency of β-catenin abnormalities but lower rate of microsatellite instability and PTEN alterations than in uterine endometrioid carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2004;35::1360-1368.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.humpath.2004.07.019

  36. 36.

    Futreal PA, Coin L, Marshall M, et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4::177-183.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1299

  37. 37.

    Tothill RW, Tinker AV, George J, et al. Novel molecular subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14::5198-5208.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0196

  38. 38.
  39. 39.

    Cowin PA, George J, Fereday S, et al. LRP1B deletion in high-grade serous ovarian cancers is associated with acquired chemotherapy resistance to liposomal doxorubicin. Cancer Res. 2012;72::4060-4073.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-0203

  40. 40.

    Tone AA, Salvador S, Finlayson SJ, et al. The role of the fallopian tube in ovarian cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2012;10::296-306.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 23

and 3 more

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.