Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 2, 2026.

Germline and somatic polymerase ϵ and δ mutations define a new class of hypermutated colorectal and endometrial cancers

Sarah Briggs, Ian Tomlinson

The Journal of Pathology · 2013

doi:10.1002/path.4185

Abstract

Polymerases ϵ and δ are the main enzymes that replicate eukaryotic DNA . Accurate replication occurs through Watson–Crick base pairing and also through the action of the polymerases' exonuclease (proofreading) domains. We have recently shown that germline exonuclease domain mutations ( EDMs ) of POLE and POLD1 confer a high risk of multiple colorectal adenomas and carcinoma ( CRC ). POLD1 mutations also predispose to endometrial cancer ( EC ). These mutations are associated with high penetrance and dominant inheritance, although the phenotype can be variable. We have named the condition polymerase proofreading‐associated polyposis ( PPAP ). Somatic POLE EDMs have also been found in sporadic CRCs and ECs , although very few somatic POLD1 EDMs have been detected. Both the germline and the somatic DNA polymerase EDMs cause an ‘ultramutated’, apparently microsatellite‐stable, type of cancer, sometimes leading to over a million base substitutions per tumour. Here, we present the evidence for POLE and POLD1 as important contributors to the pathogenesis of CRC and EC , and highlight some of the key questions in this emerging field. Copyright © 2013 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 18

  1. 1.

    Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487::330-337.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11252

  2. 2.

    Palles C, Cazier JB, Howarth KM, et al. Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Nature Genet. 2012;45:136-144.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2503

  3. 3.

    Donehower LA, Creighton CJ, Schultz N, et al. MLH1-silenced and non-silenced subgroups of hypermutated colorectal carcinomas have distinct mutational landscapes. J Pathol. 2013;229:99-110.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.4087

  4. 4.

    Seshagiri S, Stawiski EW, Durinck S, et al. Recurrent R-spondin fusions in colon cancer. Nature. 2012;488:660-664.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11282

  5. 5.

    Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401-404.

    Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0095

  6. 6.

    Church DN, Briggs SEW, Palles C, et al. DNA polymerase ϵ and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2013.

    Not in our library10.1093/hmg/ddt131

  7. 7.

    Pursell ZF, Isoz I, Lundstrom EB, et al. Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leading-strand DNA replication. Science. 2007;317:127-130.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1144067

  8. 8.

    McElhinny SA, Gordenin DA, Stith CM, et al. Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork. Mol Cell. 2008;30:137-144.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.022

  9. 9.

    Simon M, Giot L, Faye G. The 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity located in the DNA polymerase delta subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for accurate replication. EMBO J. 1991;10:2165-2170.

    Not in our library10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07751.x

  10. 10.

    Morrison A, Johnson AL, Johnston LH, et al. Pathway correcting DNA-replication errors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1993;12:1467-1473.

    Not in our library10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05790.x

  11. 11.

    Morrison A, Bell JB, Kunkel TA, et al. Eukaryotic DNA polymerase amino acid sequence required for 3′–5′ exonuclease activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:9473-9477.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.88.21.9473

  12. 12.

    Kokoska RJ, Stefanovic L, DeMai J, et al. Increased rates of genomic deletions generated by mutations in the yeast gene encoding DNA polymerase delta or by decreases in the cellular levels of DNA polymerase delta. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:7490-7504.

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.20.20.7490-7504.2000

  13. 13.

    Pavlov YI, Shcherbakova PV, Kunkel TA. In vivo consequences of putative active site mutations in yeast DNA polymerases alpha, epsilon, delta, and zeta. Genetics. 2001;159:47-64.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/159.1.47

  14. 14.

    Daee DL, Mertz TM, Shcherbakova PV. A cancer-associated DNA polymerase delta variant modeled in yeast causes a catastrophic increase in genomic instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:157-162.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0907526106

  15. 15.

    Venkatesan RN, Hsu JJ, Lawrence NA, et al. Mutator phenotypes caused by substitution at a conserved motif A residue in eukaryotic DNA polymerase delta. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:4486-4494.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m510245200

  16. 16.

    Dunlop MG, Dobbins SE, Farrington SM, et al. Common variation near CDKN1APOLD3 and SHROOM2 influences colorectal cancer risk. Nature Genet. 2012;44:770-776.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2293

  17. 17.

    Albertson TM, Ogawa M, Bugni JM, et al. DNA polymerase epsilon and delta proofreading suppress discrete mutator and cancer phenotypes in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17101-17104.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0907147106

  18. 18.

    Reha-Krantz LJ. Amino acid changes coded by bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase mutator mutants. Relating structure to function. J Mol Biol. 1988;202:711-724.

    Not in our library10.1016/0022-2836(88)90552-9

Cited by papers we hold 8

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.