Further validation of the THINC‐it tool and extension of the normative data set in a study of n = 10.019 typical controls
Maria Dalby, Peter Annas, 23andMe Research Team and 1 more
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · 2022
doi:10.1002/mpr.1922 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Abstract Introduction We report further validation and normative data for the THINC‐Integrated Tool (THINC‐it), a measure of cognitive function designed for use with individuals living with Major Depressive Disorder, but which is finding use in further psychiatric and neurological diseases. THINC‐it comprises four objective computerised cognitive tests based on traditional psychological paradigms and a version of the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire assessment. Methods Sample size of n = 10.019 typical control study participants were tested on one to two occasions to further validate the reliability of THINC‐it. Temporal reliability was assessed across 120–180 days. Results Test‐retest reliability correlations varied between r = 0.50 and 0.72 for the component measures and r = 0.75 (95% confidence intervals 0.74, 0.76) for the THINC‐it composite score. Normative data categorised by Age, Sex and Years of Education were calculated and the effect on task performance was reported. Discussion Our analysis confirms previously reported levels of reliability and validates previously reported normative data values.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.