Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

Pharmaceuticals targeting signaling pathways of endometriosis as potential new medical treatment: A review

Sze Wan Hung, Ruizhe Zhang, Zhouyurong Tan and 3 more

Medicinal Research Reviews · 2021 · Systematic review · CC BY

doi:10.1002/med.21802

Abstract

Endometriosis (EM) is defined as endometrial tissues found outside the uterus. Growth and development of endometriotic cells in ectopic sites can be promoted via multiple pathways, including MAPK/MEK/ERK, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, NF‐κB, Rho/ROCK, reactive oxidative stress, tumor necrosis factor, transforming growth factor‐β, Wnt/β‐catenin, vascular endothelial growth factor, estrogen, and cytokines. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms include proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, migration, invasion, fibrosis, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune escape. Current medical treatments for EM are mainly hormonal and symptomatic, and thus the development of new, effective, and safe pharmaceuticals targeting specific molecular and signaling pathways is needed. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature focused on pharmaceuticals that specifically target the molecular and signaling pathways involved in the pathophysiology of EM. Potential drug targets, their upstream and downstream molecules with key aberrant signaling, and the regulatory mechanisms promoting the growth and development of endometriotic cells and tissues were discussed. Hormonal pharmaceuticals, including melatonin, exerts proapoptotic via regulating matrix metallopeptidase activity while nonhormonal pharmaceutical sorafenib exerts antiproliferative effect via MAPK/ERK pathway and antiangiogenesis activity via VEGF/VEGFR pathway. N‐acetyl cysteine, curcumin, and ginsenoside exert antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory effects via radical scavenging activity. Natural products have high efficacy with minimal side effects; for example, resveratrol and epigallocatechin gallate have multiple targets and provide synergistic efficacy to resolve the complexity of the pathophysiology of EM, showing promising efficacy in treating EM. Although new medical treatments are currently being developed, more detailed pharmacological studies and large sample size clinical trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of these treatments in the near future.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Epidemiology and pathogenesis of endometriosis (EM)

EM is a disease caused by functional endometrial tissues growing in other areas outside the uterine cavity. It is a chronic disease that affects productivity and quality of life in women. 1 The typical presenting symptoms in women with EM include chronic pelvic pain, abnormal menstruation, and dyspareunia. EM occurs frequently in women of reproductive age, and the incidence is approximately 10%. 2 Approximately 40%–60% of women with EM experience dysmenorrhea, and 20%–30% are complicated with infertility. 3

Although EM presents as benign clinical and pathological manifestations, it has similar characteristics to cancers, including dissemination, invasion, and hyperplasia. It is generally accepted that EM is a hormone‐dependent disease. 4 Estrogen (E2) augmentation and progesterone resistance feature EM pathology, but the mechanism of how this occurs is unclear. Nevertheless, EM has been observed even in the absence of increased E2 production in postmenopausal women. 5 The pathogenesis of EM is dominated by the theory of ectopic implantation of the endometrium, along with multiple factors, such as endocrine, immunity, invasion, and angiogenesis. Retrograde menstruation theory suggests reflux of endometrial tissue through the fallopian tubes during menstruation and implantation into the peritoneal cavity.6, 7 Lymphatic and vascular dissemination theories suggest that endometrial cells disseminate via lymphatic or blood circulation. 8 Stem cell origin theory suggests that undifferentiated peritoneal tissue, ovarian surface epithelial tissue, and endometrium mesenchymal stem cells transform into endometrial‐like tissue in response to retrograde menstrual blood flow and stimulation from chronic inflammatory factors. 9

EM development is also associated with a combination of genetic variation and environmental factors. First‐degree relatives of women with EM have a seven fold greater risk of developing EM than those without a family history, and the risk of developing the disease in identical twins of women with EM is as high as 75%.10, 11 In recent years, the increased incidence of EM is also thought to be associated with exposure to environmental pollutants. Tetrachlorodibenzo‐p‐dioxin (TCDD) is the most prevalent air pollutant worldwide, and it promotes cytokine secretion. Endogenous E2 exacerbates the effects of TCDD and the interaction of the two chemicals provokes inflammatory responses, induces toxicity, and thus increases the severity of EM.12, 13, 14 Therefore, the pathophysiology of EM is complex, interrelated, and specific, thereby requiring multiple targeted therapies.

Dysregulated molecular and signaling pathways

Regardless of EM theories, endometrial cells must complete a serial process of immune escape, survival, adhesion, invasion, and angiogenesis to develop and grow in the ectopic sites. 15 Signaling pathway refers to a series of enzymatic reaction pathways that pass molecular signals into cells through the cell membrane to exert corresponding effects. EM‐related signaling pathways, together with their upstream and downstream regulatory factors, constitute a large and complex transduction system and play an important role in the occurrence and development of EM. Abnormalities in these pathways and their interactions can lead to abnormal proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, adhesion, invasion, fibrosis, angiogenesis, reactive oxidative stress (ROS), immune system, and inflammatory responses of the ectopic endometrial tissues, thereby promoting its growth and development. Hormonal‐related enzymes, growth factors, inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, transforming growth factors (TGF)‐β, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), prostaglandin‐endoperoxide synthase (COX)2 play important roles in these processes.16, 17 They induce local immune imbalance in the microenvironment to tolerate immune clearance and promote the survival of ectopic lesions. Downstream molecules, such as hypoxia‐inducible factors (HIF)‐1α, matrix metallopeptidase (MMPs), and vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), are dysregulated and play roles in the angiogenesis and growth of EM lesions.2, 15, 16, 17

Current treatment of EM

Current treatments for EM include surgical and medical therapies. Conservative surgery removes the EM deposits but increases the risk of impairing ovarian reserve, harming other organs, and imposing postoperative recurrence. 18 Therefore, medical therapy (Table 1) always comes first into consideration, and the choices depend on multiple factors, such as symptom severity, conceive desire, and comorbidities. Generic classes of medical therapies for EM include hormonal therapy, including oral contraceptives (COC), progesterone and gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist, and nonhormonal therapies such as nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

The available reports on the effectiveness of NSAIDs on pain relief in EM are very limited, and there is no strong evidence to support a conclusion. 1 Among all medical treatments, combined COC and progestin monotherapy represent the first‐line therapy, which can be applied to most women clinically diagnosed with EM with or without a surgical diagnosis. 26 Continuous COC effectively reduces the recurrence of dysmenorrhea, 27 and progestin suppresses ovulation by maintaining a hypoestrogenic state. Women with risk factors such as thrombosis and myocardial infarction may tolerate the side effects of progestin better than those of COC. 28 To date, few derivatives of progesterone, namely, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethindrone acetate, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as the sole therapy for EM.29, 30

Although GnRH is an effective hormonal treatment for EM, severe hypoestrogenic symptoms limit long‐term compliance.31, 32 GnRH agonists are second‐line hormonal therapies that exert strong action on the GnRH receptor, leading to an initial short stimulation and subsequent suppression of gonadotropin secretion. Decreased hormone levels result in the dormancy of endometriotic lesions. Owing to its long‐term adverse effects, especially osteoporosis, an add‐back therapy is recommended. 33 Recently, the FDA approved elagolix, a nonpeptide small molecule GnRH receptor antagonist that suppresses luteinizing hormone and follicle‐stimulating hormone and correspondingly reduces E2 and progesterone, as a treatment for moderate to severe EM‐associated pain. Its efficacy was shown after a 6‐month treatment, but it also caused a significant decrease in bone mineral density as the main side effect. 34 To overcome EM refractory to current hormonal treatments and NSAIDs, there have been extensive research of new medicines in recent years. Other than therapeutic efficacy, the potential use of a drug as a preventive treatment after surgery is also desirable. The recurrence of EM and the associated symptoms within 5 years after laparoscopy is approximately 19% in patients with endometrioma, 35 and up to 10% of women require secondary surgery after 1 year, 36 emphasizing the need for new medical treatments to prevent a recurrence.

In summary, to identify and develop new pharmaceuticals for EM treatment, understanding the dysregulated molecular and signaling pathways in EM development is essential (Figure 1). Numerous studies have focused on the antiproliferation mechanism and related targeted therapies in EM models and/or endometrial cells.37, 38 Owing to the interaction of different signaling pathways, the efficacy of potential pharmaceuticals in promoting or inhibiting a single signaling pathway is often very limited. Therefore, pharmaceutical targeting multisignaling pathways in EM has become important in the medical treatment of EM. An overview of the molecular pathways involved in the pathophysiology of EM has been reported by various publications,39, 40, 41 which provides a high quality evidence of the underlying pathophysiology of EM. However, previous publications only focused on currently available pharmaceuticals. In this review, we aimed to present an updated summary of studies focusing on new potential pharmaceuticals, including preclinical studies, clinical trials, as well as studies on marketed pharmaceuticals. In‐depth studies of signaling pathways targeted by pharmaceuticals are currently an emerging research direction, which will open up broad prospects for the new generation of EM treatment.

Experimental evidence in vitro and in vivo

The choice of investigation models considerably influences the translational potential of preclinical research. Endometriotic and endometrial tissue cells with specific cell characteristics, defined by their morphology and phenotypes, confirmed by immunocytochemistry allow in vitro investigations of the mechanism of hormonal expression, cytokine secretion, cell proliferation, and differentiation. 42 Romano et al. 43 critically analyzed different EM culture models of samples from peritoneal, ovarian, and deep infiltration EM and recommended a guideline for assessing the quality of both primary endometriotic cells and immortalized endometriotic cell lines. Culture conditions can imitate EM in situ; for example, endometrium undergoing menstruation, 44 macrophage activation, 45 epithelium mesothelium transformation, 46 and cell–cell interactions.47, 48 In addition, in vivo animal experiments provide a biological system with an integrative environment and complete cellular and molecular network for lesion development and growth in vivo. It mimics the conditions in humans in the hopes that the results can be translated from bench to clinic. The application and limitations of various EM animal models, including autotransplantation of uterine tissues and xenotransplantation of human endometrial tissues into the peritoneal cavity or subcutaneous pocket in ectopic sites of rodent models, as well as in the primate model have been assessed, and the choice of the appropriate model for studies depends on the research questions. 49

Apart from the appropriate model, positive control of current pharmaceuticals should be included for comparison, which will serve as experimental evidence of the efficacy of new drugs. When choosing a positive control, pharmaceuticals with relevant actions to the examined molecular and signaling pathways should be considered. For example, dienogest can be used as a positive control to compare the inhibition of NF‐κB activation, enhancement of apoptosis, or inhibition of MMP‐2/‐9,50, 51 leuprolide acetate to compare the inhibition of promitogenic cytokines, 52 and celecoxib to compare the proliferation‐inhibitory and apoptosis‐enhancing effects. 53

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety profile

In addition to the efficacy, the pharmacokinetic profile of a drug with respect to absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion should be available to support its clinical use. 54 The bioavailability of a drug and its active metabolites in systematic circulation and local tissues should be quantified to justify the therapeutic dosage for clinical application. 55 The relationship between drug potency and pharmacological effects on the body and action site should be evaluated to prevent off‐target toxicities. 56 The possible adverse effects on other tissues also need to be determined. Medications with specific efficacy on the ectopic endometrium and minimal side effects on the eutopic endometrium are preferable for EM treatment, as these medications will affect reproductive cycles the least. In animal experiments, adverse effects on reproductive tissues and functions should be carefully monitored. As a short‐term measure, no significant change in body weight should occur in the test animals, and as a long‐term measure, the animals should be able to conceive and deliver. For women with EM who prefer symptomatic medical therapy, such side effects should be limited and well‐tolerated. Medicines that regulate E2 levels usually result in hypoestrogenism and are associated with side effects such as hot flushes and vaginal dryness, which are acceptable, but not preferable. 57 Other common adverse effects, such as osteoporosis and venous thromboembolism, should be avoided. The effect of the medications on fertility should also be monitored; however, the current data are very limited.

Cost‐effectiveness analysis

Several studies have systematically recorded the direct and indirect costs of EM treatment and highlighted its long‐term economic burden on the society, healthcare system, and affected women. 58 This has raised awareness of the disease and increased the demand for cost‐effective EM drugs. However, the choice of treatment depends not only on patients’ desired outcomes but also on treatment affordability. A cost‐effective medication is that with equivalent monetary value and efficiency. Therefore, as the most cost‐effective treatment for EM is considered for use as a standard hormonal treatment, 59 a potential new pharmaceutical should be affordable and easily accessible to the market, in addition to showing good efficacy with fewer side effects.

In summary, a potential new pharmaceutical should be well‐studied in terms of not only action mechanism and efficacy in vitro and in vivo, but also safety, efficiency, and cost‐effectiveness. Progress in this area is expected to provide clear and effective insights for policy‐making and for decision‐making in the individualized treatment of EM.

POTENTIAL NEW PHARMACEUTICALS AND THEIR TARGET‐SIGNALING PATHWAYS

Medications investigated in ongoing or completed clinical trials on EM are summarized in Table 2. Most drugs are mainly symptomatic. Outcome measures used in these studies are pain score, levels of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia, and quality of life, except for epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and quinagolide, whose efficacy in reducing endometriotic lesions will be determined. To the best of our knowledge, there is limited clinical trial to examine the pathophysiology or signaling pathways targeted by the drugs. Moreover, heterogeneous pathophysiology among patients affects their responsiveness to drug treatment; therefore, the development of personalized medicines to specific patients based on EM pathophysiology is desirable. 39 These further emphasizes the demand for new pharmaceutical that is for symptomatic management, as well as targets specific pathophysiology and signaling pathways to eliminate the endometriotic lesions.

Here, we discuss the pathophysiology and molecular targets that are directly or indirectly associated with the drugs, as well as their effects on the corresponding signal transduction pathways in the treatment of EM. In Table 3, we distinguished potential drugs as a repurposed or a de novo drug of EM. A new drug is defined as a chemical that has not been studied in clinical trials for other diseases before EM and a repurposed drug is defined as a chemical that has been studied in clinical trials for other diseases before EM. We provided sufficient scientific data of their efficacies in reducing endometriotic cell viability in vitro or lesions in vivo, as well as in regulating specific signaling pathways and molecules involved in the pathophysiology of EM. The advantages, side effects, and limitations of the drugs are also highlighted.

E2‐mediated pathway

Increased levels of E2 reduce progesterone and inhibit endoplasmic reticulum stress in endometrial cells. 157 Increased expression of estrogen receptor (ER) isoforms has been observed in endometriotic lesions,158, 159 suggesting their contribution in regulating proliferation of the lesions. E2 is mediated by ERα and ERβ as well as by G protein‐coupled receptor 30 (GRP30), which is a seven‐transmembrane receptor. It activates phosphoinositide 3‐kinases (PI3K) and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) through the transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the plasma membrane.160, 161 Chloroindazole and oxabicycloheptene sulfonate are two new chemicals bound to ERα and ERβ, respectively, and both inhibited E2‐driven proliferative and inflammatory activities in a dual action manner in ectopic lesions. This experimental study demonstrated great potential owing to their high potency and efficacy as preventive and therapeutic treatments. In addition, they do not exert any undesirable effects on the reproductive system. Co‐treatment of either ligands with letrozole enhanced the regression of ectopic endometrium, but it did not affect eutopic uterine tissues as with only letrozole. 64 Increased COX‐2 and aromatase (P450AROM) levels stimulate E2 synthesis.162, 163, 164 P450AROM inhibitor maintained a low E2 level and reduced EM lesion size. 57 COX‐2‐targeted treatment with celecoxib and indomethacin, which are two available NSAIDs, showed multiple effects on EM.60, 165 The drugs inhibited COX‐2‐mediated prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which regulates E2 formation, 53 but caused side effects including reproductive failures and cardiac adverse conditions. 166

EGCG and resveratrol are both natural products that have been studied for EM treatment in clinical trials. They act as anti‐E2 agents, but with reduced side effects compared with hormonal drugs.65, 69 High doses of resveratrol reduced proliferation by interacting with ERα, and its expression in the endometrium epithelium was reduced to a profound level similar to that achieved with progesterone treatment. Nevertheless, progestogen did not reduce Ki‐67 expression in the endometrium stroma, whereas resveratrol reduced its expression in both the epithelium and stroma. 66 EGCG inhibited E2‐stimulated proliferation and VEGF expression in cultured endometriotic glandular cells as well as angiogenesis and lesion growth via VEGF in mouse models.70, 129, 167

NF‐κB pathway

NF‐κB is a protein that promotes cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in endometrial and endometriotic cells.168, 169, 170, 171 It is activated by cytokines, including TNF‐α, interleukins (IL)‐1β, and lipopolysaccharide. These stimulate inhibitors of NF‐κB (IκB) to be phosphorylated by IκB kinase (IκK). 171 NF‐κB binds to DNA and transcripts the genes of angiogenic and adhesion factors, cytokines, growth factors, and inducible enzymes such as nitric oxide synthase and COX. 172 Dienogest is a pregestational steroid of NF‐κB inhibitor, and it inhibits IL‐8 production to attenuate NF‐κB activation in endometriotic stromal cells in vitro. 50

MAPK/MEK/ERK

In EM, MAPK is activated to mediate the intracellular transmission of extracellular signals and induce cellular processes, 127 as shown by a high phosphorylated extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) level.173, 174 RAS binds to RAF and activates ERK kinase (MEK1/2) to phosphorylate ERK, which is a major MARK signaling cascade. 127 ERK1/2 regulates c‐fos and c‐jun expression to regulate mitosis and cell viability in endometrial cells under EM. 174 E2, IL‐1β, and TNF‐α stimulated the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in endometriotic stromal cells, but not in normal endometrial cells. 175 Protease‐activated receptor 2 also activated ERK1/2 in cultured ectopic endometrial stromal cells. 176

Sorafenib has completed phase IV clinical trials in several types of carcinoma, and it significantly abrogated the phosphorylation of RAF kinase by 64% via the MAPK/ERK pathway in stromal cells of EM patients. However, weight loss was observed in the xenograft EM mouse models. 87 Vemurafenib is FDA‐approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and significantly inhibits ERK phosphorylation by over 60% in both endometriotic stromal cells and epithelial cells. 89 U0126 is an MEK1/2 inhibitor that increases progesterone receptor (PR)‐αβ levels in endometriotic stromal cells. 91 However, although the above treatments were shown to have significant efficacy, treatment of EM with MAPK inhibitors induced adverse effects on reproductive functions in animal models, including ovulation inhibition, embryotoxicity, and teratogenicity. 127 Puerarin is a natural product that strongly binds to ERs; its binding affinity to ERs is one‐third that of E2, and it suppresses E2‐induced endometriotic stromal cells by 30% via the ERK pathway in vitro, 93 and results in reduced adverse effects.

PI3K/Akt/mTOR

PI3K phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate (PiP2) into phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5‐trisphosphate (PiP3) and activates protein kinase B (Akt). 177 Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a downstream protein kinase of Akt, is overexpressed in ectopic lesions.178, 179 Reduction of the phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 (PTEN) by mutation 180 enhanced the phosphorylation of Akt, thus promoting proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis, and reducing PR expression in EM. 91 MK2206, an Akt inhibitor, is a drug candidate for cancer treatment that acts by increasing PRβ and PRαβ levels and decreasing the viability of endometriotic stromal cells, without affecting normal cells. 91 WIN 55212–2 is a nonselective cannabinoid agonist that binds to cannabinoid receptor (CB)1 or CB2 to inhibit Akt levels and Akt phosphorylation, suggesting the inactivation of the Akt pathway. However, although it reduced the proliferation rate of endometriotic cells, it also reduced that of eutopic endometrial stromal cells. 98

Hippo/Yes‐associated protein (YAP)

The Hippo/YAP pathway is important for balancing cell proliferation and apoptosis. Upregulation of this pathway increased the viability of endometriotic cells, whereas knockdown of YAP increased apoptosis and decreased B‐cell/B‐cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‐2) expressions. 181 Verteporfin, a YAP1 inhibitor, inhibited the proliferation of endometriotic stromal cells, production of E2, and infiltration of immune cells. 75 It is an FDA‐approved drug for the treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. EM mouse models showed decreased vessel tube formation and cell migration, with no reported effects on reproductive organs, infertility, or transgenerational influence. 75 YAP1 is a potential target protein but has not been widely studied in EM.

Metabolic process

The metabolic pathways toward increased lactate and dysregulation of glycolysis were shown as contributing factors for cancer progression. 182 Lactate induces angiogenesis and supplies nutrients to proliferate tumor cells.182, 183 In EM peritoneal mesothelial cells, increased glycolysis, decreased mitochondrial respiration, decreased pyruvate dehydrogenase activity, and increased lactate was also observed. 46 Dichloroacetate, a nonhormonal treatment or recurrence prevention of EM, reversed the pathophysiology of EM by inhibiting pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase to activate pyruvate dehydrogenase. 46 Although dichloroacetate has completed a phase III clinical trial for lactic acidosis in 1998 and has widely studied in cancer, it has not been approved by the FDA for therapeutic use in cancer.

Proapoptotic mechanism

Apoptosis is a programmed cell death process that maintains the balance between the growth and differentiation of cells for tissue renewal. It is regulated by selective chromatin internucleosomal cleavage to shrink the cells. 184 Apoptosis is important in the normal endometrium to remove dysfunctional cells and repair tissues during the menstrual cycle. 185 Apoptotic cells were found to be more predominant in the endometrial epithelium glands than in the stroma. 186 Cell apoptotic activity was found to be relatively low in EM. 187 This can be explained by the reduced expression of proapoptotic factors (e.g., Bcl‐2‐associated X [Bax] and Bcl‐2 associated agonist of cell death [Bad]), overexpression of antiapoptotic factors (e.g., Bcl‐2), and dysregulation of cell cycle.188, 189 Endometriotic cells could not express surface receptors to trigger proapoptotic proteins; neither apoptotic signals were appropriately transduced, leading to proliferation being triggered instead. 188 GnRH agonists, such as leuprolide acetate or the preclinical nonhormonal drug propofol, increased the levels of proapoptotic proteins, as well as decreased the levels of antiapoptotic proteins and promitogenic cytokines.52, 100 Melatonin is highly effective in amplification of apoptotic activity via regulating MMP‐3 signal, was able to regress EM at either early or late stage. Melatonin in high dose and long‐term treatment shows no adverse effects in EM rodents. 63

MAPK, Akt, and NF‐κB pathways

The signaling pathways MAPK/ERK, PI3K/Akt, and NF‐κB also regulated apoptosis in endometriotic cells. ERK1/2 was activated as an antiapoptotic protein in eutopic and ectopic endometrial glands throughout the menstrual cycle. 174 Non‐E2 targeted treatments, such as selective PGE2 inhibitors, inhibited PGE2 receptor (EP) 2 and EP4 to induce apoptosis via multiple pathways including ERK1/2, AKT, and NF‐κB. They enhanced apoptosis by approximately 50% in both epithelial and stromal cells; thus, owing to their efficiency as selective or combination inhibitors, they are ideally used to treat stage I and II EM. 95 PGE2 inhibitors are preferred to COX‐2 inhibitors due to their fewer adverse effects and lack of hypoestrogenic effects. 95

BAY11‐7085 is an NF‐κB inhibitor that inhibits cell viability and enhances apoptosis in endometriotic cells by seven fold but induced less profound results in normal endometrial cells. 62 The activity of Bay11‐7085 has been shown in in vitro studies, but there has been no clinical study of its therapeutic potential. Ginsenoside Rg3, genistein, and curcumin are found in natural products, and they enhanced apoptosis via regulation of the NF‐κB pathway.79, 85 In addition, ginsenoside Rg3 neutralized the effect of TNF‐α to regulate proliferation. 79 Genistein had a similar capability as a GnRH agonist, that is, inhibiting transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β to regulate NF‐κB. Expression of Bcl‐2 was suppressed, whereas that of Bax was enriched. It also reduced COX‐2 and PGE2 expression to levels comparable to those in the control group. 85 Curcumin inhibited MMP‐3 and increased the Bax/Bcl‐2 ratio by upregulating tumor protein p53 (p53). 81 These natural products are highly attractive owing to their potential efficacies and minimal side effects reported in in vitro and in vivo studies of EM and clinical studies of other diseases.

Akt is a pleiotropic regulator of apoptosis that increases endometriotic cell survival and decreases apoptosis. 190 Akt/mTOR can be inhibited by endoplasmic reticulum stress. 51 Tunicamycin enhanced TNF‐related apoptosis‐inducing ligand‐induced apoptosis by inducing endoplasmic reticulum stress in endometriotic stromal cells. The effect was more potent in endometriotic cells than in eutopic endometrial cells 73; however, its action mechanism and pharmacokinetics profile have yet to be elucidated.

E2/TNF‐α

Transcription of antiapoptotic Bcl‐2 protein was increased by E2 through the promotion of thymic stromal lymphopoietin. 191 Extranuclear kinases are activated by an elevated ER complex to trigger a rapid nongenomic signaling cascade and inhibit apoptosis in stromal and epithelial cells.192, 193 Genistein interfered with the E2/ER pathway to induce apoptosis and apoptotic proteins in endometrial hyperplasia. 194 Moreover, the activity of E2 strongly regulates TNF‐α‐induced effects. In a healthy endometrium, TNF‐α stimulated apoptosis. In eutopic and ectopic endometriotic cells, TNF‐α stimulated proliferation and inhibited apoptosis instead. 195 In endometriotic lesions, apoptosis signal‐regulating kinase (ASK‐1), a TNF‐α induced apoptosis complex I, interacted with ERβ as well as serine/threonine kinase receptor‐associated protein (STRAP) and 14‐3‐3 proteins. 62 Formation of this complex disrupted the association of TNF‐receptor‐associated factor 2 (TRAF2) and ASK‐1 for TNF‐α‐induced apoptosis.196, 197 TNF‐α‐induced apoptosis complex I, complex II, and apoptosome were all inhibited, which dysregulated apoptosis and activated the invasiveness of lesions for survival. In addition, in endometriotic tissue, TNF‐α from macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells induced the generation of the steroid receptor coactivator (SRC)‐1 isoform from cleaved MMP‐9. 198 ERβ interacted with the caspase (CASP)‐8 and SRC‐1 isoforms to prevent activation of TNF‐α‐induced apoptosis complex II in endometriotic lesions in ectopic sites. 62 Therefore, inhibition of ASK1/ERβ/STRAP‐14‐3‐3 and ERβ/CASP8/SRC‐1 protein complex are potential therapeutic targets to regulate apoptosis via the E2/ER/TNF‐α pathway.

Autophagy mechanism

Autophagy is a process related to nonapoptotic cell death and is defined as self‐degradation. It balances the energy sources by removing misfolded proteins, damaging organelles, and eliminating intracellular pathogens. It promotes the proteolytic degradation of cytosolic components at the lysosome. 199 Recently, there have been more studies on the role of autophagy in both accelerating and decelerating the pathogenesis of EM. To examine the pathophysiology of autophagy in regulating EM, we divided the section into antiautophagy and proautophagy to discuss the controversies in the progression of EM.

Antiautophagy, anti‐EM

Downregulation of apoptosis favors the stimulation of autophagy, thus promotes EM growth. 200 A significant reduction in apoptosis inducer p53 mediated by Akt, an increased lapidated microtubule‐associated protein 1A/1B light chain 3 (LC3)‐II, and a significant decrease in sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) were observed in ovarian endometrioma. 200 LC3‐II is a standard autophagy marker while SQSTM1 is an autophagy adaptor protein that transfers ubiquitinated proteins to the autophagic machinery and is degraded via autophagy to indicate the activation of autophagic flux.197, 198, 199, 200, 201 Hypoxia upregulated autophagy in endometriotic cells to induce HIF‐1α. 202 Overexpression of HIF‐1α under normoxic conditions also induced autophagy. 203 Decreased expression of homeobox A10 (HOXA10) induced autophagy in EM, which was attributed to excessive inflammation. 204 It contributed to mitochondrial damage, increased PGE2, and increased mitochondrial ROS,203, 204 all stimulated autophagic processes. An increased oxidant heme oxygenase (HO)‐1 was observed in ovarian endometrioma to activate an adaptive defense mechanism and negatively modulate inflammation and apoptosis, and positively stimulated autophagy. 200 A combination therapy with MK2206 and chloroquine was found to be more effective than with either MK2206 or chloroquine in reducing endometriotic cell viability and preventing regrowth by inhibiting autophagy. 102 SQSTM1 expression was significantly upregulated. 102

Proautophagy, anti‐EM

Upregulation of autophagy promoted apoptosis and suppressed cell growth and invasion in EM.205, 206 Endometriotic stromal cells have an abnormal response to progesterone, which suppresses PTEN expression, suppresses autophagy, and reduces apoptosis in the menstrual cycle via the AKT/mTOR pathway. 207 Increased expression of YAP significantly decreased autophagy through the mTOR pathway in eutopic endometrium stromal cells. 208 Mullerian‐inhibiting substance (MIS) induced autophagy and apoptotic cell death and inhibited proliferation in vitro. 104 MIS, also known as anti‐Müllerian hormone, however, was found to be increased in EM lesions and in the serum of women with ovarian endometrioma and promoted inflammation. More preclinical data are required before the clinical application of this agent in EM treatment.209, 210 A ginsenoside metabolite, protopanaxadiol (PPD), reduced ERα expression and induced PRα expression in vitro and in vivo, which then induced autophagy and suppressed lesion growth, resulting in a significantly different expression of autophagy‐related genes, including downregulated estrogen receptor (ESR1), SQSTM1, and TGF‐β levels as well as upregulated CASP‐3, ATG ‐3/‐5/‐12 after treatment. 103

Anti‐Cell migration and invasion mechanism

Cell migration and invasion are critical processes for EM establishment according to the implantation theory. EM is believed to occur due to the shedding of endometrial cells and then migration to ectopic sites.15, 211 Migration of endothelial cells mediates angiogenesis and plays a role in the pathophysiology of EM. 212

Wnt/β‐catenin

The wingless‐type mouse mammary tumor virus integration site family (Wnt) plays a role in developmental processes and homeostasis. β‐catenin is crucial in regulating the cell cycle, which includes proliferation, differentiation, and migration in ectopic lesions. 213 In the presence of Wnt ligands, an accumulation of β‐catenin translocates to the nucleus and interacts with T‐cell factor/lymphoid enhancer‐binding factor (Tcf/LEF) transcription factors to activate the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway. 107 Wnt/β‐catenin was found to be abnormally activated in EM. 214 Multi‐drug resistance protein 4 (MRP4) regulates Wnt/β‐catenin signaling by stabilizing β‐catenin activity. It was involved in the pathogenic transformation of EM endometrium, confirmed in the ectopic lesion. In MRP4‐knockdown endometrial epithelial cells, reduced activity of β‐catenin was found to downregulate Wnt/β‐catenin signaling. 215

Overexpression of T‐cadherin inhibited the invasion and migration of cells in EM, and the phosphorylation of heat shock protein (HSP)‐ 27 and c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK)‐1/2/3 was promoted. MMP‐2/‐9 and vimentin expression was lowered in endometriotic cells. 216 MMP‐2/‐9 and Cyclin D1 are targets of Tcf/β‐catenin genes and were found to be upregulated in endometrial epithelial or stromal cells of EM, 107 MMPs are responsible for regulating migration, invasion, and angiogenesis by balancing growth factors and cytokines, and high expression of MMPs in EM favors lesions. 217 PKF115‐584 and CGP049090 are fungal derivatives and were screened through high‐throughput assay to disrupt Tcf/β‐catenin complex, 218 significantly inhibiting MMP‐9 activity and cell invasiveness in epithelial and stromal cells to a level close to that of normal endometrium. 108 However, they have not been widely studied in EM. Genistein regulates invasion and migration through downregulation of MMP‐2/‐9 by targeting NF‐κB, as shown in an in silico study and in an EM mouse model. 112 In addition, Wnt/β‐catenin is important for stem cell maintenance and tissue homeostasis 107; thus, an antagonist of Wnt/β‐catenin may have potential side effects. Moreover, Wnt2 is secreted by ectopic stromal cells, which induces β‐catenin signaling activity in ectopic endometrial epithelial cells, as well as expressions of the growth‐associated proteins in endometrial epithelial cells. 48 Wnt2/β‐catenin is a pathway involved in the communication of stromal and epithelial cells in EM, which can be modified by metformin. 48

Rho/ROCK

Ras homolog family member A/Rho‐associated coiled‐coil kinase (RhoA/ROCK) plays a major role in cell migration via phosphorylation of cytoskeletal regulatory proteins and results in actin depolymerization, actomyosin contraction, endothelial cell adhesion, and migration. 219 ROCK in the endothelial cytoskeleton is activated by proangiogenic stimuli. 219 VEGF stimulates RhoA/ROCK and mediates endothelial cell migration. 220 ROCKII regulates cell body contraction during migration. 221 It is a positive regulator of p27 to further activate cell migration in endometrial stromal cells and regulate RhoA in the cells. 222 Fasudil is a ROCK inhibitor used clinically and has the potential for treating EM by reducing endometriotic cell viability and inducing apoptosis by targeting Rho/ROCK. 115

Anti‐Fibrotic mechanism

Recently, EM was defined as a profibrotic condition, as a new concept by Vigano et. al.223, 224 The crucial role of fibrosis and differentiation of myofibroblasts in the progression of EM lesions have been reported. Fibrosis is the pathological activity when activated myofibroblasts accumulate leading to contraction of the collagenous extracellular matrix and anatomical structure disruption. The event of fibrosis justifies EM‐associated morbidity and adhesiveness and is considered a potential EM therapeutic target.223, 224

TGF‐β mediated pathways

TGF‐β1 is a stimulating factor that triggers the production of collagen and transition of epithelial to mesenchymal phenotype, leading to fibrosis. TGF‐β1 was found to be significantly increased in the peritoneal fluid of women with EM. 225 Wnt signaling is required for TGF‐β1‐mediated fibrosis. 226 Matsuzaki and Darcha 110 also showed that the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway was involved in fibrogenesis in EM. PKF1150‐584, CGP049090, and EGCG significantly inhibited TGF‐β1‐induced fibrotic markers, including α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA), type I collagen, fibronectin, and connective tissue growth factor in stromal cells via Wnt/β‐catenin signaling, with EGCG showing the greatest effects.110, 111 ICG‐001 and C‐82 are CBP inhibitors. They are also metabolites of PRI‐724, which is under clinical trials for its antitumor activity, 227 they inhibited fibrosis via Wnt/β‐Catenin signaling, with ICG‐001 showing great efficacy in upregulating apoptosis and inhibiting migration as well as C‐82 showing potent inhibition of proliferation and cell viability. 106

Rho/ROCK

Activation of the Rho/ROCK signaling pathway was associated with fibrosis in EM. 228 Heparin has completed phase IV clinical trials for several medical indications, including anticoagulation and cancer. It inhibited RhoA, ROCKI, ROCKII, and α‐SMA expression and activated the Rho/ROCK pathway to attenuate endometriotic stromal cell contractility, differentiation, and fibrosis. 117

Antiangiogenesis mechanism

Angiogenesis is highly regulated in the female reproductive system, and it is a process that results in the formation of new blood vessels from existing ones. Three mechanisms of angiogenesis have been described as sprouting, elongation, and intussusception. 229 It provides neovascularization to deliver essential nutrients and oxygen supply for the growth of endometriotic lesions. 230

VEGF

VEGF regulates angiogenic, endothelial cell‐specific mitogenic, and vascular permeability activities of endometrial and endometriotic cells through vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1–3 on the microvascular endothelial cell surface. The VEGF family helps in establishing and maintaining endometriotic foci.231, 232, 233 VEGFR2 is a highly active kinase that plays a major role in angiogenesis. VEGF binds to two proximal VEGFR2 receptors, promotes vascular permeability, increases the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells, and contributes to the formation of new blood vessels.234, 235 Sunitinib, SU6668, SU5416, sorafenib, and pazopanib were originally indicated as anticancer drugs but were further repurposed and tested for efficacy against EM.119, 120, 123, 126, 128 SU5416 selectively bound to VEGFR, and only reduced graft size by 5%.123, 126, 236 SU6668, a multi‐kinase inhibitor, reduced the endometrial graft by 25% by blocking VEFFR‐2, fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR)‐1, and platelet‐derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR)‐β.123, 236 Sunitinib regulates angiogenesis and apoptosis through multi‐kinase inhibition, regressing 50% cyst in an EM rat model. 120 The effects of pazopanib, sunitinib, and sorafenib on VEGF/VEGFR protein kinase pathways and their actions in EM were compared by Yildiz et. al., 128 which showed that pazopanib had better efficacy than the control and other treatments, reducing EM lesions by at least 45%, but Sorafenib was better in regulating VEGF. 128 However, tyrosine kinase inhibitors that regulate VEGFR are associated with a significant risk of treatment toxicities. 237 In sarcoma, pazopanib treatment led to a higher incidence of adverse effects, including fatigue and hypertension, compared with sunitinib or sorafenib. 237 An alternative VEGF regulator, EGCG, significantly inhibited lesion growth by suppressing VEGFC/VEGFR2 signaling. Overexpression of VEGFC induces migration of endothelial cells, increases vascular permeability, and induces angiogenesis and endometriotic lesions growth.70, 129 Prodrug of EGCG (ProEGCG), reduced lesion size, weight, and VEGF concentrations in plasma to a greater extent than the parent EGCG molecule. More importantly, there were no signs of side effects on reproductive tissues. 130 Quinagolide, a dopamine receptor 2 agonist, is under phase II clinical trial to examine its efficacy in reducing EM lesion size and related pain. It can completely reverse the size of lesions by downregulating the VEGF/VEGFR2 pathway in EM. 135 It has an acceptable safety profile and does not stimulate serotonin receptor subtype 2b to proliferate fibroblasts in cardiac valve tissues, and thus holds great potential as an alternative of tyrosine kinase inhibitor for EM. 135

Under normoxic conditions, HIF‐1α is regulated via proteasome‐mediated degradation. 238 However, under hypoxic conditions, HIF‐1α escapes ubiquitination and binds to hypoxia‐responsive enhancer on VEGF genes to upregulate their expression. 239 HIF‐1α was upregulated in lesions, thus promoting VEGF expression in an EM mouse model. 240 Increased VEGF secretion was observed in hypoxia‐induced endometrial stromal and glandular cells compared with that under normoxic conditions. 241 Oxidative stress also increased VEGF secretion, as shown by the results obtained after incubating endometrial epithelial cells with oxidized low‐density lipoprotein. 242 In the EM peritoneal environment, PGE2 was upregulated to elicit cell signals through upregulation of VEGF and FGFR. It induced the expression of COX‐2 and synthesis of E2 in ectopic endometrial cells to increase the production of MMP, thus enhancing VEGF expression and inducing angiogenesis.229, 243 TNF‐α mediates the angiogenic activity of macrophages, which stimulates endothelial cell migration and induces the release of VEGF and the formation of bloodvessel. 244 Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate inhibited NF‐κB activation and attenuated TNF‐α‐mediated VEGF and MMP‐9 expressions. 132 Pentoxifylline attenuated TNF‐α mediated effects in other diseases, requires further investigation of this in EM, but it suppressed angiogenesis by reducing VEGFC and VEGFR2 (Flk‐1) expression levels in glandular cells of endometriotic lesions. 133 Pentoxifylline is an immunomodulatory agent and has completed a phase III clinical trial of EM‐associated infertility. The clinical trial did not present any data on lesion progression or recurrence, only on pregnancy rate. 245

Rho/ROCK

The Rho/ROCK pathway regulates VEGF‐mediated endothelial cell activation and vessel stability.233, 246 RhoB mitigates VEGF‐induced vessel sprouting via the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway. 247 RhoA/ROCK activity can be blocked by inhibiting protein prenylation in endothelial cells to reduce migration and adhesion. 248 Avian myelocytomatosis virus oncogene cellular homolog (C‐Myc) is a target of the PI3K/Rho/ROCK signaling pathway and regulates VEGF expression. Under hypoxic conditions in EM, guanosine triphosphate (GTP)‐bound Rho was regulated in a PI3K‐dependent manner to induce VEGF by binding to C‐Myc without suppressing the induction of HIF‐1α. 249 ROCK activation initiates E2‐induced angiogenesis. 219 Inhibitors that target the Rho/ROCK pathway should be further investigated for their ability to regulate angiogenesis, migration, invasion, and fibrosis of endometriotic cells.

Antioxidative stress mechanism

Oxidative stress is the imbalance between ROS production and antioxidant function, which plays a main role in EM progression. 250 ROS are molecules that have unpaired electrons and can damage lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins.251, 252 Apoptotic endometrial tissues and macrophages induced oxidative stress in EM through retrograde menstruation. 253 Oxidative stress causes DNA hypermethylation and histone modification, which are linked to aberrant endometrium development in EM. 254

ROS‐mediated pathway

The production of ROS in the progression EM could be achieved through several pathways, including activation of inflammatory cytokines, MMPs, and transcriptional factors, such as NF‐κB. 255 Environmental factors, such as reproductive toxins, can also increase oxidative stress and decrease the expression of antioxidant enzymes. 256 Di‐2‐ethylexyl phthalate is used as a plasticizer and solvent in cosmetic and consumer products, and they altered the NF‐κB signaling pathway and expression levels of ER and PR in human endometrial stromal cells via activation of the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. 257

Balancing ROS production and antioxidant function by inhibiting free radicals or increasing antioxidant levels is important to regulate oxidative stress. Antioxidants include the enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), HO, and catalase, as well as nonenzymatic molecules such as vitamins A, C, and E.250, 252, 255 Significantly lower levels of antioxidants were found in the peritoneal fluid of EM, which indicated that women with EM had a low free radical‐scavenging ability.255, 258, 259 N‐Acetyl cysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant that inhibits ROS as well as abrogates ERK activation and proliferation. 137 EGCG and resveratrol are both well‐known natural antioxidant supplements for the treatment of EM and other diseases, including cancer.130, 138, 260 Resveratrol acts as a radical scavenger, and it significantly regressed endometriotic implants, decreased lipid peroxidation, and increased at least 50% endogenous antioxidant capacity in tissues and serum in EM. 138 The antioxidant effects of ProEGCG against EM were significantly greater than those of EGCG and at least four fold that of the control. 130 Melatonin reduced the level of oxidative stress markers and increased level of antioxidants in EM. EM implants in rat were significantly regressed.142, 143 Caffeic acid found in plants exerted similar antioxidant effects in EM and an enhanced nuclear translocation of nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2) regulated antioxidant enzymes in EM.141, 261

NO‐mediated pathway

NO is a vasodilator that mediates endothelium‐dependent vasodilation and angiogenesis. 262 NO has an unpaired electron and is a highly reactive free radical. The formation of NO requires NO synthase (NOS), l‐arginine, oxygen, and a number of cofactors, including nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, flavin mononucleotide (FMN), and flavin adenine dinucleotide. 263 Macrophages increased IL‐10 in EM and stimulated NO 264; NO and NOS levels were increased in endometrial tissues in EM. 265 Increased E2 level activated the formation of NO, 266 implying that macrophages and E2 regulate NO‐mediated oxidative stress in EM.

Iron‐mediated pathway

Iron carries hemoglobin throughout the body, an overproduction of it not only enhances epithelial cell proliferation but also induces oxidative stress.267, 268 Ferritin is a cellular iron storage that generates hydroxyl radical via Fenton reaction to initiate a free radical chain reaction, namely lipid peroxidation.37, 269 McKinnon et al. 37 reviewed studies on the implication of mTOR on iron homeostasis and suggested the dysregulation of mTOR in EM could overload iron levels to stimulate oxidative stress. Currently, there is lack of pharmaceuticals targeting iron‐mediated oxidative stress in EM and regulating the mTOR signaling pathway might reduce oxidative stress.

Immune system and inflammation

Immune system dysregulation and chronic inflammatory response are characterized in EM.270, 271 The adaptive immune system with increased quantity of regulatory T (Treg) cells and a shift towards type 2 immune response fail to recognize the endometriotic cells in the peritoneal cavity. 272 On the contrary, the innate immune system in EM is characterized by an enhanced activation state of macrophages, along with upregulated cytokines, but downregulated phagocytosis, 273 as well as a reduced cytotoxicity of natural killer (NK) cells, 274 and an altered population of dendritic cells. 275 These promote inflammation and contribute to the implantation process in EM and new drugs that modulate these specialized cells hold promise as a novel immunotherapy for EM.

Macrophages and cytokines

Macrophages exert their inflammatory effects against tumors via host defense mechanisms. 276 IL‐1 is a proinflammatory cytokine secreted by activated monocytes, macrophages, or NK cells, and is responsible for activating lymphocytes to reduce immune surveillance and stimulate PGE2 via COX‐2 in EM stromal cells.271, 277, 278 IL‐6 is responsible for stimulating B‐cell activity and T‐cell differentiation. The levels of IL6 in serum and peritoneal fluid are high, but its receptor is reduced in EM. However, endometriotic cells are resistant to its growth‐inhibitory effects.271, 279, 280 VEGF and TNF‐α are proinflammatory cytokines secreted by activated lymphocytes, neutrophils, NK cells, and macrophages to initiate the inflammatory cascade. 271

Niclosamide is an FDA‐approved nonsteroidal therapy for antihelminth 281 and was found to inhibit the proliferation and growth of endometriotic lesions. It reduced MAPK, WNT, and inflammation signaling‐related genes, such as NF‐κB and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, in an EM mouse model. No disruption to reproductive function was observed, indicating potential therapeutic efficacy and safety for EM treatment. 154 NAC regressed lesions by suppressing COX‐2 and MMP‐9 expression. Its side effect is mild and seemed to not interfere with fertility in vivo. 144 Crocin, curcumin, and metformin inhibit proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including TNF‐α, IL‐1β, IL‐6, VEGF, and so forth.148, 149, 155 These are responsible for recruiting and activating macrophages, neutrophils, and NK cells to the EM site and further enhancing angiogenesis and inflammation.155, 282 Acai, a natural product found in plants from the Amazon region, has completed phase III clinical trials as an antioxidant agent. It reduces EM lesions by targeting active macrophages, VEGF, and COX‐2. 156 Resveratrol inhibited inflammatory responses by reducing peritoneal and serum cytokines, 150 as well as activating sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) to significantly suppress IL‐8 in TNF‐α‐induced endometriotic stromal cells via NF‐κB. 151 SIRT1 has a dual function as a tumor suppressor or promoter, 283 and it is a potential target protein, considering that it is a strong regulator of the inflammatory responses, apoptosis, and oxidative stress in EM. 284 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a proinflammatory cytokine that is upregulated in peritoneal fluid in women with EM. It activates the MAPK/ERK pathway, stimulates COX‐2, and produces PGE2 in ectopic endometrial cells. MIF also contributes to angiogenesis via its effect on endothelial cell proliferation. 285 ISO‐1 is a MIF antagonist and a leading molecule discovered to treat sepsis. 286 It inhibited angiogenic and proinflammatory pathways via VEGF/VEGFR in peritoneal EM in vivo, without interrupting the reproductive cycle. 287

Estrogen

In EM, increased ESR2/E2 induces COX‐2 and PGE2, upregulates macrophages and NF‐κB,288, 289 and leads to oxidative stress. 255 ERβ modulates macrophage infiltration via NF‐κB in EM 290 and induces IL‐1β by interacting with the inflammasome complex to evade immune surveillance and promote the attachment of lesions at the endometriotic sites. 196 E2 activates thymic stromal lymphopoietin and induces the secretion of endometrial stromal cells‐associated growth‐promoting cytokines, including monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and IL‐8, via the JNK and NF‐κB pathways. 291 IL‐6 reduces E2 production in human granulosa tumor cells via the MAPK signaling pathway, 292 implying its possible targeting of E2 biosynthesis in EM. Puerarin reduced the level of ERβ, but not ERα, by inhibiting P450AROM. In a rat model, simultaneous reduction of E2, COX‐2, and PGE2 expression levels, as well as enhancement of the metabolism of E2 into estrone, 152 led to the inhibition of lesion growth in the ectopic endometrium tissues. In another study, ginsenoside PPD inhibited the E2 signal, thus activating the cytotoxicity of NK cells against ectopic endometrial stromal cells to regulate cell death. This was also confirmed in peritoneal fluids of the EM mouse model. 103

POTENTIAL PHARMACEUTICALS WITH MULTIPLE TARGETS

In the treatment of EM, targeting a specific pathway, or multiple pathways alleviate the lesions. Targeting a single molecule can lead to several anti‐EM effects, as downstream transduction elements are usually connected to a series of molecular events as secondary responses. However, owing to synergistic effects, a multiple target therapy may have a greater suppressive effect on lesions compared with a single targeted therapy. 196 Table 4 summarizes several single pharmaceuticals with multiple molecular targets, which affect multiple signaling pathways in a complex disease such as EM.

Hormonal pharmaceuticals

Melatonin is a natural substance produced by plants. It is also a hormone produced in the pineal gland to regulate neuroendocrine functions and inhibits LH and FSH secretion from the anterior pituitary gland. 293 Melatonin acts as an antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory agent and is currently under phase 2 clinical trial for reducing EM‐related pain. Another randomized, double‐blind, and placebo‐controlled clinical trial of melatonin was completed in 2013. The results of the study showed that melatonin acts as an analgesic and can relieve EM‐related chronic pain. 294 Melatonin receptor (MR)1A and MR1B are significantly upregulated in peritoneal EM lesions compared with those in the eutopic tissue. Melatonin has been shown to reduce EM lesions in various studies. It inhibits cell proliferation and modulates endometrial epithelial cell function. 295 Melatonin also inhibits angiogenesis via VEGF and oxidative stress via regulating radical scavenging activity and amplifies apoptotic activity via CASP3 mediated pathway in vivo and in vitro in EM.63, 142, 143 Melatonin has no adverse effects on reproductive functions, instead, it can improve ovarian functions, and thus has potential to treat EM‐related infertility.296, 297 High‐dose intravenous treatment of pain and sepsis with melatonin showed no adverse effects. 298 Its bioavailability is 15%. 299 Long‐term therapeutic investigation of melatonin in EM should be conducted to elucidate its ability to regulate E2 functions in EM.

Nonhormone pharmaceuticals

Metformin was shown to target multiple pathways 300 by regulating stromal‐epithelial cell communication in EM via Wnt2‐mediated signaling 48 and exerted an anti‐inflammatory effect through regulating cytokines. 149 Although a mild side effect was implied, 149 metformin regulated reproductive functions, 301 and improved conception in EM patients by inhibiting serum cytokine production. 149 Metformin is available in the market as a treatment for type 2 diabetes and PCOS in women. Considering its low cost, metformin was advocated to be used as a long‐term treatment. 302 NAC, an acetylated form of cysteine, has been prescribed as an antidote since the 1960s. It replenishes intracellular glutathione levels and modulates the redox environment; therefore, NAC is a strong antioxidant. 303 In EM, it acts as an antioxidant, antiproliferative, anti‐inflammatory, and anti‐invasiveness agent via ROS‐scavenging mechanism or through regulating cytokines in vitro and in vivo.137, 144 NAC is highly efficacious at low doses, and with no adverse effects in EM. 144 Long‐term adverse effects are also limited, including no effect on fertility.137, 144 NAC is considered to have a good safety profile and has been evaluated in phase 4 clinical trials for treating gastrointestinal and metabolic diseases.303, 304 Its pharmacokinetics and toxicity profiles are available; its terminal half‐life is 6.25 h after oral administration and bioavailability is 9.1%. 305 NAC is commercially available and cost‐effective as a dietary supplement in the market; however, studies on its efficiency in EM are limited, requiring more preclinical evidence.

Natural products

Natural products have a long history of use in the management of medical conditions. Research advances in analytical and synthetic chemistry have improved the identification and isolation of active compounds from natural products. EGCG is a polyphenol catechin from green tea and a well‐known antioxidant. It exerts efficacy against diseases including cancer, diabetes, and inflammation. 306 In EM, it exerts ant antiangiogenetic effect via the VEGFC/VEGFR2 pathways,70, 129 antioxidant effects via ROS‐scavenging mechanism, 130 antiproliferative effect via reduction of E2 production, and anti‐migration and anti‐invasion effects via TGF‐β1‐induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and MAPK pathways, 167 thus inhibiting the development and growth of lesions. Promising evidence of its high potency and efficacy, and without major side effects in reproductive functions were reported.130, 167 EGCG is currently under phase 2 clinical trial for reducing lesion size and pain as well as an evaluation of its safety profile in EM. On the contrary, EGCG act as an adjuvant that brings synergistic effects, as well as reduces adverse effects in cancer treatment. 307 This suggests a potential role of EGCG in combination therapy with current EM treatment. However, the low bioavailability of EGCG has limited its attractiveness in the market. 308 ProEGCG, is a prodrug of EGCG, shows higher bioavailability and greater efficiency than EGCG to reduce lesions in vivo. 130 More studies should be conducted to confirm the underlying mechanism of ProEGCG in the treatment of EM. Resveratrol is a polyphenol found in grapes. In EM, it reduces proliferation via an anti‐E2 mechanism targeting ESR1, 66 inhibits inflammatory responses via radical scavenging, 138 and inhibits angiogenesis by reducing the cytokines COX‐2 and VEGF 150 and activating SIRT1. 151 Resveratrol has completed a phase 4 clinical trial in EM and is safe and effective in relieving EM‐related pain, as well as in reducing serum CA125 and prolactin levels. Resveratrol is well‐known for its chemopreventive property. It also has a promising clinical profile in cancer treatment, nevertheless, the rapid metabolism rate of resveratrol has limited its efficacy in vivo. 309

Curcumin, genistein, ginsenoside, and puerarin are not under any EM clinical studies but have been clinically evaluated in breast cancers, endometrial carcinoma, endothelial functions, and so forth. They have been studied for their action mechanism against EM in primary cells, cell lines, and animal models. Curcumin, which is found in ginger and turmeric, enhances apoptosis by increasing the Bax/Bcl2 ratio through targeting of MMP‐3 via NF‐κB 81 and regulates angiogenesis and inflammation by targeting chemokines and cytokines 155 in EM. It has multiple biological effects in different diseases, including cancer and inflammatory diseases. It establishes a good safety profile with no acute toxicity. 310 Genistein is an isoflavone that acts as an E2 agonist or antagonist to manage postmenopausal symptoms. In EM animal models, genistein downregulated MMP‐2/‐9 and regulated cell invasion and migration by targeting NF‐κB. 311 It also regulated NF‐κB by inhibiting TGF‐β. 85 Long‐term treatment with genistein lower the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia and provided support for bone formation in postmenopausal women.83, 312 It acts as a chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent against cancers and has synergistic effects with other anticancer drugs. 313 Toxicity of high dose is minimal, so it needs more study to test the safe range. 314 Ginsenoside RG3, extracted from ginseng, restored TNF‐α‐induced effects by inhibiting NF‐κB, VEGF, and CASP‐3 in EM, which are responsible for cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. 79 Ginsenoside PPD regulated ERα and PRα expression to suppress autophagy and lesion growth in EM. 103 It also targeted E2‐induced NK cell cytotoxicity to regulate the immune system in EM. 103 Ginsenoside also possess synergistic effect with anticancer drugs, as well as prevents toxicity and morbidity from chemotherapy. 315 Puerarin is a phytoestrogen, binds to ERs via the ERK pathway to regulate proliferation in EM. 93 It also regulates inflammation in ectopic endometrium by inhibiting P450AROM and COX‐2 and promoting ERβ expression to facilitate E2 metabolism in EM. 152 Its therapeutic effects are studied extensively in diseases including cancer and cardiovascular disease. 316

Most of these products have known toxicity or pharmacokinetic profiles and act via multiple targets, making them beneficial as anti‐EM agents. However, their poor aqueous solubility and low oral bioavailability in vivo is the major challenge to be potential EM treatment.82, 92, 315 There are several approaches available currently to progress the bioavailability of drugs, which include prodrug approach, 130 solid dispersions approach, 317 lipid‐based formulation approach. 318 On the contrary, the long‐term safety of natural products in reproductive function and EM recurrence profiles should be further elaborated in future studies. Nevertheless, minimal side effects and available as an over‐the‐counter dietary supplement and routine remedies make them preferable to hormonal medicines.

EM is a complex clinical challenge, and recently, more signaling pathways have been identified to contribute to its pathophysiology. EM drugs that target only one receptor have inadequate therapeutic efficiency. However, although multitarget drugs present potent efficacy in suppressing the progression of EM lesions, they also pose a risk of side effects such as binding to undesirable drug targets and bringing off‐target toxicities. 56 Therefore, designing a drug that targets the appropriate pathways with high selectivity is highly desirable. For this purpose, it is essential to understand the compound‐target pathway‐disease relationships.

TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE (TCM)

In the theory of Chinese medicine, EM is defined as a blood stasis syndrome that leads to the formation of endometriotic lesion and other associated symptoms. Stagnation of Qi (energy) is believed to be one of the causes of EM. TCM aims to lessen the chronic pain experienced by women with EM. Therefore, studies on the action mechanism of TCM are focused mainly on the alleviation of inflammation and oxidation. TCM decoctions containing several herbs in different compositions, which are varied according to the condition of the patient, are a combinational approach that can target various pathophysiology. Fang et al. 319 and Tsai et al. 320 have identified the decoctions commonly used for treating EM in Taiwan, which included Gui‐Zhi‐Fu‐Ling‐Wan, Dang‐Gui‐Shao‐Yao‐San, Jia‐Wei‐Xiao‐Yao‐San, Shao‐Fu‐Zhu‐Yu‐Tang, and Wen‐Jing‐Tan. The therapeutic efficacy and pathophysiology of TCM in cancer and other diseases have been widely evaluated in vitro and in vivo; however, there are limited studies on the efficacy of TCM for EM.

Most of the herbs exert anti‐inflammatory effects by inhibiting the production of proinflammatory cytokines. Poria has been confirmed to exert antitumor activities against various cancers. It binds to cytokines and effector immune cells to regulate immunity and upregulate apoptosis. 321 Angelicae Sinensis Radix exerts anti‐inflammatory effects by reducing TNF‐α inflammatory cells. 322 Ligusticum Rhizoma inhibits inflammation and reduces PGE2 production. 323 Moutan Cortex, Glycyrrhizae Radix, Paeoniae Alba Radix, and Bupleuri Radix suppress proinflammatory cytokines via the NF‐κB signaling pathways.324, 325, 326, 327 Paeoniae Alba Radix and Bupleuri Radix also exert such effect via MAPK signaling pathways.

Atractylodis Ovatae Rhizoma exerts antioxidant effect by activating the MAPK cascades and inhibiting the production of radicals by 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl and catalases, thus inhibiting the activity of free radicals. 328 Glycyrrhizae Radix and Poria act as radical scavengers against superoxide and hydroxy radicals.328, 329, 330 Ligusticum Rhizoma acts as a reducing agent via the Nrf2 and NF‐κB pathways. 331

Angelicae Sinensis Radix exerts antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects; it induces mitochondrial‐dependent apoptosis and inhibits the Akt/mTOR pathway. 332 Atractylodis Ovatae Rhizoma induces apoptosis by upregulating ROS. 333 Moutan Cortex exerts proapoptotic effects by increasing Bax/Bcl‐2 expression and decreasing MMP via the formation of apoptosome and cytochrome c, activation of CASP, and the adenosine monophosphate‐activated protein kinase pathway. 323 It also induces apoptosis via activation of CASP‐3/‐8. 334 Paeoniae Alba Radix induces apoptosis via activation of CASP‐3/‐9 293 and exerts antiproliferative activity via cell cycle arrest and Fas/Fas ligand‐mediated apoptotic pathway. 334 It also downregulates the antiapoptotic protein Bcl and upregulates the apoptotic proteins Bax and CASP‐3. 335

TCMs have great potential as multitarget drugs. As TCMs consist of herbal formulas with various combinations of herbs, they have multiple mechanisms of action, which can be beneficial to reduce the concentration of each herb, thus, drug toxicity. 336 However, the costs and availability vary for different herbs, which limits its acceptability in Western countries at present. Furthermore, there is a lack of clinical management methods to evaluate their clinical effectiveness and standardized regulations of TCM practice.

CONCLUDING REMARKS AND PERSPECTIVES

This is the first review article combining medicinal research based on EM pathophysiology and the related signaling pathways. Our review revealed the challenges in EM management and the need for various available medical treatment options. Most of the medications prescribed by the FDA to treat EM are hormonal, such as contraceptives, progesterone, and GnRH. However, current hormonal medicines raise a major concern in the case of long‐term treatment. Therefore, new nonhormonal pharmaceuticals with relatively safer and few side effects are urgently needed.

Our aims in this review were to facilitate the research and development of novel treatments for EM based on an understanding of the pathological process. To compare new and old pharmaceuticals, an effective scale to evaluate parameters between different treatments as well as to align outcome measures from preclinical to clinical studies is needed. There is a lack of experimental and clinical evidence to support the effectiveness, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles of potential drugs in alleviating the pathophysiology of EM, compared with that of drugs already available in the market. Good practices such as the Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project, derived by the World Endometriosis Society, can help facilitate a large‐scale collaboration project worldwide. 337 It is a platform to ensure that the protocol is sufficient and consistent enough to maintain high research quality, datasets are shared to ensure data reproducibility, and results can better support the development of translational medicine. Moreover, multicenter collaboration can increase research visibility and avoid data integrity issues.

The nonhormonal treatments reviewed in this paper were only studied in vitro or in animal models or are still under clinical trials. The drugs mentioned in this review article showed significant efficacy in reducing ectopic endometrium cell viability and endometriotic lesion size; however, severe adverse effects were not elaborated in‐depth. High efficacy and innovative approach do not guarantee final success. Data from legal regulation and patients’ demand for available resources are as important as the pharmacological profile of medicines. In many countries, a new drug must be regulated and approved by the relevant authority before it is launched in the market. 338 Thus, apart from efficacy and safety data, the medical and financial burden of EM to women have raised the awareness on EM and accelerated the scientific research on this disease, which are key factors considered by R&D investors. To maximize a drug's value and cost‐effectiveness in the market while maintaining its affordability, fulfilling the society's demand, and making scientific advances, modification of lead compound or bioactive compound derived from natural products holds great potential because only the functional groups are modified, whereas the original core structure is conserved.

Considering both the medicinal and commercial perspectives of drug development, there is a huge pressure in the development of a new drug, starting from the synthesis or discovery stage to clinical trial, to proceeding with legal regulations, and to launch in the market. A drug requires 10–17 years of development, with less than 10% success rate to pass clinical trial. 339

Taking advantage of big data mining, drug repurposing is a strategy to identify new therapeutic use of a drug that is approved or under clinical trial, which comprises 30% of newly FDA‐approved drugs and vaccines.340, 341 These drugs can bind to the same target owing to the similar pathophysiology of different diseases, or these drugs can have multiple targets and are thus relevant to other diseases. 342 A repurposed drug offers sufficient preclinical pharmacology profile and safety reports, leading to a greater potential for phase III and IV clinical trials, which can reduce the time of drug development and cost of investment. Nevertheless, some advantages of de novo drug development outweigh the benefits of drug repurposing. A constant influx of chemicals via synthesis or extraction from natural products offers novel medical options for patients. A growing understanding of the pathophysiology of EM favors structure‐based or ligand‐based drug designs, in which by modifying lead compounds based on structure–activity relationships, the efficacy, potency, and selectivity can be compromised. However, a more in‐depth research is needed to study the underlying mechanisms and drug targets to support their potential as new EM treatments.

In conclusion, this review provides an update on the pathophysiology of EM and shows the efficacy of various medicines in treating EM. Increasing attention has been focused on understanding the pathophysiology of EM and the action mechanisms of potential pharmaceuticals; however, many of these are still not completely understood. With this review, we hoped to raise awareness on the missing puzzle pieces and to promote related research that can further advance diagnosis and treatment for better management of EM and improve the quality of women's lives.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Chi Chiu Wang is an active member of the World Endometriosis Society and an advisor of the Aptorum Group.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Sze Wan Hung, Ruizhe Zhang, and Chi Chiu Wang participated in research design. Sze Wan Hung participated in data evaluation, extraction and interpretation. Sze Wan Hung, Ruizhe Zhang, and Zhouyurong Tan participated in data validation and in drafting the manuscript. Tao Zhang participated in designing figure 1. Sze Wan Hung, Tao Zhang, Jacqueline Pui Wah Chung and Chi Chiu Wang critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

References 342

  1. 1.

    Brown J, Farquhar C. Endometriosis: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3:CD009590.

    Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd009590.pub2

  2. 2.

    Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1244‐1256.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmra1810764

  3. 3.

    Deguara CS, Liu B, Davis C. Measured symptomatic and psychological outcomes in women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis: a prospective study. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25(4):299‐301.

    Not in our library10.1097/gco.0b013e3283630da7

  4. 4.

    Velasco I, Rueda J, Acien P. Aromatase expression in endometriotic tissues and cell cultures of patients with endometriosis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006;12(6):377‐381.

    Not in our library10.1093/molehr/gal041

  5. 5.

    de Almeida Asencio F, Ribeiro HA, Ayrosa Ribeiro P, et al. Symptomatic endometriosis developing several years after menopause in the absence of increased circulating estrogen concentrations: a systematic review and seven case reports. Gynecol Surg. 2019;16(1):1‐11.

    Not in our library10.1186/s10397-019-1056-x

  6. 6.

    Javert CT. Pathogenesis of endometriosis based on endometrial homeoplasia, direct extension, exfoliation and implantation, lymphatic and hematogenous metastasis. Including five case reports of endometrial tissue in pelvic lymph nodes. Cancer. 1949;2(3):399‐410.

    Not in our library10.1002/1097-0142(194905)2:3<399::aid-cncr2820020304>3.0.co;2-l

  7. 7.

    Sampson JA. Peritoneal endometriosis due to menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1927;14:422‐469.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Jerman LF, Hey‐Cunningham AJ. The role of the lymphatic system in endometriosis: a comprehensive review of the literature. Biol Reprod. 2015;92(3):64.

    Not in our library10.1095/biolreprod.114.124313

  9. 9.

    Lu Z, Zhang W, Jiang S, Zou J, Li Y. Effect of oxygen tensions on the proliferation and angiogenesis of endometriosis heterograft in severe combined immunodeficiency mice. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):568‐576.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.039

  10. 10.

    Moen MH, Magnus P. The familial risk of endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72(7):560‐564.

    Not in our library10.3109/00016349309058164

  11. 11.

    Nouri K, Ott J, Krupitz B, Huber JC, Wenzl R. Family incidence of endometriosis in first‐, second‐, and third‐degree relatives: case‐control study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:85.

    Not in our library10.1186/1477-7827-8-85

  12. 12.

    Shi YL, Luo XZ, Zhu XY, Hua KQ, Zhu Y, Li DJ. Effects of combined 17beta‐estradiol with TCDD on secretion of chemokine IL‐8 and expression of its receptor CXCR1 in endometriotic focus‐associated cells in co‐culture. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(4):870‐879.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dei414

  13. 13.

    Shi YL, Luo XZ, Zhu XY, Li DJ. Combination of 17beta‐estradiol with the environmental pollutant TCDD is involved in pathogenesis of endometriosis via up‐regulating the chemokine I‐309‐CCR8. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(2):317‐325.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.129

  14. 14.

    Eskenazi B. Serum dioxin concentrations and menstrual cycle characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(4):383‐392.

    Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwf046

  15. 15.

    Sampson JA. The development of the implantation theory for the origin of peritoneal endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1940;40:549‐557.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Bersinger NA, Dechaud H, McKinnon B, Mueller MD. Analysis of cytokines in the peritoneal fluid of endometriosis patients as a function of the menstrual cycle stage using the Bio‐Plex(R) platform. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2012;118(4):210‐218.

    Not in our library10.3109/13813455.2012.687003

  17. 17.

    Wang Y, Nicholes K, Shih IM. The origin and pathogenesis of endometriosis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2020;15:71‐95.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032654

  18. 18.

    Bozdag G. Recurrence of endometriosis: risk factors, mechanisms and biomarkers. Womens Health (Lond). 2015;11(5):693‐699.

    Not in our library10.2217/whe.15.56

  19. 19.

    Schindler AE. Hormonal contraceptives and endometriosis/adenomyosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010;26(12):851‐854.

    Not in our library10.3109/09513590.2010.534612

  20. 20.

    Lidegaard O, Nielsen LH, Skovlund CW, Skjeldestad FE, Lokkegaard E. Risk of venous thromboembolism from use of oral contraceptives containing different progestogens and oestrogen doses: Danish cohort study, 2001‐9. BMJ. 2011;343:d6423.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.d6423

  21. 21.

    Ferrero S, Barra F, Leone Roberti Maggiore U. Current and emerging therapeutics for the management of endometriosis. Drugs. 2018;78(10):995‐1012.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40265-018-0928-0

  22. 22.

    Bedaiwy MA, Allaire C, Alfaraj S. Long‐term medical management of endometriosis with dienogest and with a gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist and add‐back hormone therapy. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(3):537‐548.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.024

  23. 23.

    Cottreau CM, Ness RB, Modugno F, Allen GO, Goodman MT. Endometriosis and its treatment with danazol or lupron in relation to ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(14):5142‐5144.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Ng J, Chwalisz K, Carter DC, Klein CE. Dose‐dependent suppression of gonadotropins and ovarian hormones by elagolix in healthy premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(5):1683‐1691.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2016-3845

  25. 25.

    Shaw RW. LHRH analogues in the treatment of endometriosis—comparative results with other treatments. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;2(3):659‐675.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0950-3552(88)80051-8

  26. 26.

    Grandi G, Barra F, Ferrero S, et al. Hormonal contraception in women with endometriosis: a systematic review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019;24(1):61‐70.

    Not in our library10.1080/13625187.2018.1550576

  27. 27.

    Muzii L, Di Tucci C, Achilli C, et al. Continuous versus cyclic oral contraceptives after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometriomas: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(2):203‐211.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.074

  28. 28.

    Falcone T, Flyckt R. Clinical management of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(3):557‐571.

    Not in our library10.1097/aog.0000000000002469

  29. 29.

    Barra F, Scala C, Ferrero S. Current understanding on pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of progestins for treating pain associated to endometriosis. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018;14(4):399‐415.

    Not in our library10.1080/17425255.2018.1461840

  30. 30.

    Simon MA, Shulman LP. Subcutaneous versus intramuscular depot methoxyprogesterone acetate: a comparative review. Womens Health (Lond). 2006;2(2):191‐197.

    Not in our library10.2217/17455057.2.2.191

  31. 31.

    Sakamoto Y, Harada T, Horie S, et al. Tumor necrosis factor‐α‐induced interleukin‐8 (IL‐8) expression in endometriotic stromal cells, probably through nuclear factor‐κB activation: gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist treatment reduced IL‐8 expression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(2):730‐735.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2002-020666

  32. 32.

    Andres M, Lopes L, Baracat E, Podgaec S. Dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis: systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(3):523‐529.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00404-015-3681-6

  33. 33.

    Scholes D, LaCroix AZ, Ichikawa LE, Barlow WE, Ott SM. Change in bone mineral density among adolescent women using and discontinuing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Feb 2005;159(2):139‐144.

    Not in our library10.1001/archpedi.159.2.139

  34. 34.

    Taylor HS, Giudice LC, Lessey BA, et al. Treatment of endometriosis‐associated pain with elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):28‐40.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1700089

  35. 35.

    Li XY, Chao XP, Leng JH, et al. Risk factors for postoperative recurrence of ovarian endometriosis: long‐term follow‐up of 358 women. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):79.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13048-019-0552-y

  36. 36.

    Uccella S, Cromi A, Casarin J, et al. Laparoscopy for ureteral endometriosis: surgical details, long‐term follow‐up, and fertility outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):160‐166.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.055

  37. 37.

    McKinnon BD, Kocbek V, Nirgianakis K, Bersinger NA, Mueller MD. Kinase signalling pathways in endometriosis: potential targets for non‐hormonal therapeutics. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(3):382‐403.

    Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmv060

  38. 38.

    Ferrero S, Evangelisti G, Barra F. Current and emerging treatment options for endometriosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19(10):1109‐1125.

    Not in our library10.1080/14656566.2018.1494154

  39. 39.

    Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. May 2014;10(5):261‐275.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrendo.2013.255

  40. 40.

    Baranov V, Malysheva O, Yarmolinskaya M. Pathogenomics of endometriosis development. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(7):1852.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms19071852

  41. 41.
  42. 42.

    Bouquet de Jolinière J, Ayoubi JMB, Gianaroli L, Dubuisson JB, Gogusev J, Feki A. Endometriosis: a new cellular and molecular genetic approach for understanding the pathogenesis and evolutivity. Front Surg. 2014;1:16.

    Not in our library10.3389/fsurg.2014.00016

  43. 43.

    Romano A, Xanthoulea S, Giacomini E, Delvoux B, Alleva E, Vigano P. Endometriotic cell culture contamination and authenticity: a source of bias in in vitro research? Hum Reprod. 2020;35(2):364‐376.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dez266

  44. 44.

    Evron A, Goldman S, Shalev E. Effect of primary human endometrial stromal cells on epithelial cell receptivity and protein expression is dependent on menstrual cycle stage. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(1):176‐190.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/deq.296

  45. 45.

    Chan RWS, Lee C, Ng EHY, Yeung WSB. Co‐culture with macrophages enhances the clonogenic and invasion activity of endometriotic stromal cells. Cell Prolif. 2017;50(3):e12330.

    Not in our library10.1111/cpr.12330

  46. 46.

    Horne AW, Ahmad SF, Carter R, et al. Repurposing dichloroacetate for the treatment of women with endometriosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(51):25389‐25391.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1916144116

  47. 47.

    Yu W, Niu W, Wang S, et al. Co‐culture with endometrial stromal cells enhances the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into endometrium‐like cells. Exp Ther Med. 2015;10(1):43‐50.

    Not in our library10.3892/etm.2015.2490

  48. 48.

    Zhang H, Xue J, Li M, Zhao X, Wei D, Li C. Metformin regulates stromal‐epithelial cells communication via Wnt2/beta‐catenin signaling in endometriosis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;413:61‐65.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mce.2015.06.011

  49. 49.

    Grümmer R. Animal models in endometriosis research. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(5):641‐649.

    Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dml026

  50. 50.

    Horie S, Harada T, Mitsunari M, Taniguchi F, Iwabe T, Terakawa N. Progesterone and progestational compounds attenuate tumor necrosis factor alpha‐induced interleukin‐8 production via nuclear factor‐kappa B inactivation in endometriotic stromal cells. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(5):1530‐1535.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.042

  51. 51.

    Choi J, Jo M, Lee E, Lee DY, Choi D. Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress in regulation of endometrial stromal cell invasiveness: possible role in pathogenesis of endometriosis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2019;25(3):101‐110.

    Not in our library10.1093/molehr/gaz002

  52. 52.

    Meresman GF, Bilotas MA, Lombardi E, Tesone M, Sueldo C, Baranao RI. Effect of GnRH analogues on apoptosis and release of interleukin‐1beta and vascular endothelial growth factor in endometrial cell cultures from patients with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(9):1767‐1771.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/deg356

  53. 53.

    Olivares C, Bilotas M, Buquet R, et al. Effects of a selective cyclooxygenase‐2 inhibitor on endometrial epithelial cells from patients with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(12):2701‐2708.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/den315

  54. 54.

    Prescott LF. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Lancet. 1969;294(7632):1239‐1243.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(69)90766-1

  55. 55.

    Ufer M, Juif PE, Boof ML, Muehlan C, Dingemanse J. Metabolite profiling in early clinical drug development: current status and future prospects. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017;13(8):803‐806.

    Not in our library10.1080/17425255.2017.1351944

  56. 56.

    Lin A, Giuliano CJ, Palladino A, et al. Off‐target toxicity is a common mechanism of action of cancer drugs undergoing clinical trials. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(509):eaaw8412.

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw8412

  57. 57.

    Mori T, Ito F, Koshiba A, et al. Aromatase as a target for treating endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(9):1673‐1681.

    Not in our library10.1111/jog.13743

  58. 58.

    Fourquet J, Gao X, Zavala D, et al. Patients' report on how endometriosis affects health, work, and daily life. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2424‐2428.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.017

  59. 59.

    Vercellini P, Frattaruolo MP, Buggio L. Toward minimally disruptive management of symptomatic endometriosis: reducing low‐value care and the burden of treatment. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. Feb 2018;18(1):1‐4.

    Not in our library10.1080/14737167.2018.1411803

  60. 60.

    Efstathiou J, Sampson D, Levine Z, et al. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs differentially suppress endometriosis in a murine model. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(1):171‐181.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.058

  61. 61.

    Choi J, Jo M, Lee E, Lee DY, Choi D. Dienogest enhances autophagy induction in endometriotic cells by impairing activation of AKT, ERK1/2, and mTOR. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):655‐664.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.020

  62. 62.

    Nasu K, Nishida M, Ueda T, Yuge A, Takai N, Narahara H. Application of the nuclear factor‐kappaB inhibitor BAY 11‐7085 for the treatment of endometriosis: an in vitro study. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007;293(1):E16‐E23.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajpendo.00135.2006

  63. 63.

    Paul S, Bhattacharya P, Das Mahapatra P, Swarnakar S. Melatonin protects against endometriosis via regulation of matrix metalloproteinase‐3 and an apoptotic pathway. J Pineal Res. 2010;49(2):156‐168.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-079x.2010.00780.x

  64. 64.

    Zhao Y, Gong P, Chen Y, et al. Dual suppression of estrogenic and inflammatory activities for targeting of endometriosis. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(271):271ra9.

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3010626

  65. 65.

    da Silva DM, Gross LA, de Paula Guedes Neto E, Lessey BA, Savaris RF. The use of resveratrol as an adjuvant treatment of pain in endometriosis: a randomized clinical trial. J Endocr Soc. 2017;1(4):359‐369.

    Not in our library10.1210/js.2017-00053

  66. 66.

    Amaya SC, Savaris RF, Filipovic CJ, et al. Resveratrol and endometrium: a closer look at an active ingredient of red wine using in vivo and in vitro models. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(11):1362‐1369.

    Not in our library10.1177/1933719114525271

  67. 67.

    Janle EM, Morre DM, Morre DJ, Zhou Q, Zhu Y. Pharmacokinetics of green tea catechins in extract and sustained‐release preparations. J Diet Suppl. 2008;5(3):248‐263.

    Not in our library10.1080/19390210802414279

  68. 68.

    Isbrucker RA, Edwards JA, Wolz E, Davidovich A, Bausch J. Safety studies on epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) preparations. Part 3: teratogenicity and reproductive toxicity studies in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2006;44(5):651‐661.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fct.2005.11.002

  69. 69.

    Chow HH, Cai Y, Alberts DS, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic study of tea polyphenols following single‐dose administration of epigallocatechin gallate and polyphenon E. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10(1):53‐58.

    Not in our library

  70. 70.

    Xu H, Becker CM, Lui WT, et al. Green tea epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate inhibits angiogenesis and suppresses vascular endothelial growth factor C/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression and signaling in experimental endometriosis in vivo. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(4):1021‐1028.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.008

  71. 71.

    Morin MJ, Morin MJ, Bernacki RJ, Bernacki RJ. Biochemical effects and therapeutic potential of tunicamycin in murine L1210 leukemia. Cancer Res (Chicago, Ill). 1983;43(4):1669‐1674.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    Foufelle F, Fromenty B. Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in drug‐induced toxicity. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016;4:1.

    Not in our library10.1002/prp2.211

  73. 73.

    Hasegawa A, Osuga Y, Hirota Y, et al. Tunicamycin enhances the apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor‐related apoptosis‐inducing ligand in endometriotic stromal cells. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(2):408‐414.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/den385

  74. 74.

    Aronson JK. Side Effects of Drugs Annual: A Worldwide Yearly Survey of New Data and Trends in Adverse Drug Reactions. Vol 30. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2010. https://www.sciencedirect.com/bookseries/side-effects-of-drugs-annual/vol/30/suppl/C

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    Lin SC, Lee HC, Hou PC, Fu JL, Wu MH, Tsai SJ. Targeting hypoxia‐mediated YAP1 nuclear translocation ameliorates pathogenesis of endometriosis without compromising maternal fertility. J Pathol. 2017;242(4):476‐487.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.4922

  76. 76.

    Choi MK, Jin S, Jeon JH, et al. Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ginsenosides Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, and compound K after single or multiple administration of red ginseng extract in human beings. J Ginseng Res. 2020;44(2):229‐237.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jgr.2018.10.006

  77. 77.

    Li C, Wang Z, Li G, et al. Acute and repeated dose 26‐week oral toxicity study of 20(S)‐ginsenoside Rg3 in Kunming mice and Sprague–Dawley rats. J Ginseng Res. 2020;44(2):222‐228.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jgr.2018.10.001

  78. 78.

    Lee N‐H, Son C‐G. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of ginseng. J Acupunct Meridian Studies. 2011;4(2):85‐97.

    Not in our library10.1016/s2005-2901(11)60013-7

  79. 79.

    Huang R, Chen S, Zhao M, Li Z, Zhu L. Ginsenoside Rg3 attenuates endometriosis by inhibiting the viability of human ectopic endometrial stromal cells through the nuclear factor‐kappaB signaling pathway. J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod. 2020;49(1):101642.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.101642

  80. 80.

    Arablou T, Kolahdouz‐Mohammadi R. Curcumin and endometriosis: review on potential roles and molecular mechanisms. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;97:91‐97.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.119

  81. 81.

    Jana S, Paul S, Swarnakar S. Curcumin as anti‐endometriotic agent: implication of MMP‐3 and intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;83(6):797‐804.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.030

  82. 82.

    Takimoto CH, Glover K, Huang X, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered to individuals with cancer. Cancer Epidemiol, Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(11):1213‐1221.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    Malloy KM, Wang J, Clark LH, et al. Novasoy and genistein inhibit endometrial cancer cell proliferation through disruption of the AKT/mTOR and MAPK signaling pathways. Am J Transl Res. 2018;10(3):784.

    Not in our library

  84. 84.

    Liu J, Yuan F, Gao J, et al. Oral isoflavone supplementation on endometrial thickness: a meta‐analysis of randomized placebo‐controlled trials. Oncotarget. 2016;7(14):17369‐17379.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.7959

  85. 85.
  86. 86.

    Krajewska J, Handkiewicz‐Junak D, Jarzab B. Sorafenib for the treatment of thyroid cancer: an updated review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(4):573‐583.

    Not in our library10.1517/14656566.2015.1005601

  87. 87.

    Leconte M, Santulli P, Chouzenoux S, et al. Inhibition of MAPK and VEGFR by sorafenib controls the progression of endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(9):1171‐1180.

    Not in our library10.1177/1933719115592708

  88. 88.

    Lau P, Kee D. Optimal Selection of Targeted Therapies for Melanoma Patients: Role of the Mitogen‐Activated Protein Kinase Pathway. Vol 3. USA: Academic Press, Elsevier Inc; 2016:169‐183. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128035085000123

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    Santulli P, Marcellin L, Chouzenoux S, et al. Role of the protein kinase BRAF in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20(8):1017‐1029.

    Not in our library10.1080/14728222.2016.1180367

  90. 90.

    Bae SH, Hwang JW, Shin SJ, Park GH, Yoon KD, Bae SK. Quantitation and pharmacokinetics of 1,4‐diamino‐2,3‐dicyano‐1,4‐bis (2‐aminophenylthio) butadiene (U0126) in rat plasma by liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci. 2013;36(2):239‐245.

    Not in our library10.1002/jssc.201200779

  91. 91.

    Eaton JL, Unno K, Caraveo M, Lu Z, Kim JJ. Increased AKT or MEK1/2 activity influences progesterone receptor levels and localization in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(12):E1871‐E1879.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2013-1661

  92. 92.

    Zhang L. Pharmacokinetics and drug delivery systems for puerarin, a bioactive flavone from traditional Chinese medicine. Drug Deliv. 2019;26(1):860‐869.

    Not in our library10.1080/10717544.2019.1660732

  93. 93.

    Cheng W, Chen L, Yang S, et al. Puerarin suppresses proliferation of endometriotic stromal cells partly via the MAPK signaling pathway induced by 17ss‐estradiol‐BSA. PLOS One. 2012;7(9):e45529.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0045529

  94. 94.

    Romm A, Clare B, Stansbury JE, et al. Menstrual wellness and menstrual problems. Botanic Med Women's Health. 2010:97‐185.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    Banu SK, Lee J, Speights VO, Jr, Starzinski‐Powitz A, Arosh JA. Selective inhibition of prostaglandin E2 receptors EP2 and EP4 induces apoptosis of human endometriotic cells through suppression of ERK1/2, AKT, NFkappaB, and beta‐catenin pathways and activation of intrinsic apoptotic mechanisms. Mol Endocrinol. 2009;23(8):1291‐1305.

    Not in our library10.1210/me.2009-0017

  96. 96.

    Tai S, Fantegrossi WE. Synthetic cannabinoids: pharmacology, behavioral effects, and abuse potential. Curr Addict Rep. 2014;1(2):129‐136.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40429-014-0014-y

  97. 97.

    Kraft B. Is there any clinically relevant cannabinoid‐induced analgesia? Pharmacology. 2012;89(5–6):237‐246.

    Not in our library10.1159/000337376

  98. 98.

    Leconte M, Nicco C, Ngô C, et al. Antiproliferative effects of cannabinoid agonists on deep infiltrating endometriosis. Am J Pathol. 2010;177(6):2963‐2970.

    Not in our library10.2353/ajpath.2010.100375

  99. 99.

    Marik PE. Propofol: therapeutic indications and side‐effects. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(29):3639‐3649.

    Not in our library10.2174/1381612043382846

  100. 100.

    Feng S, Sun Y. Protective role of propofol in endometriosis and its mechanism. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(4):3646.

    Not in our library10.3892/etm.2018.6648

  101. 101.

    Chu QSC, Sangha R, Spratlin J, et al. A phase I open‐labeled, single‐arm, dose‐escalation, study of dichloroacetate (DCA) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2015;33(3):603‐610.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10637-015-0221-y

  102. 102.

    Matsuzaki S, Pouly JL, Canis M. In vitro and in vivo effects of MK2206 and chloroquine combination therapy on endometriosis: autophagy may be required for regrowth of endometriosis. Br J Pharmacol. 2018;175(10):1637‐1653.

    Not in our library10.1111/bph.14170

  103. 103.

    Zhang B, Zhou WJ, Gu CJ, et al. The ginsenoside PPD exerts anti‐endometriosis effects by suppressing estrogen receptor‐mediated inhibition of endometrial stromal cell autophagy and NK cell cytotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(5):574.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41419-018-0581-2

  104. 104.

    Borahay MA, Lu F, Ozpolat B, et al. Mullerian inhibiting substance suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis and autophagy in endometriosis cells in vitro. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2013:361489‐6.

    Not in our library10.1155/2013/361489

  105. 105.
  106. 106.

    Hirakawa T, Nasu K, Miyabe S, et al. beta‐catenin signaling inhibitors ICG‐001 and C‐82 improve fibrosis in preclinical models of endometriosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):20056.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-019-56302-4

  107. 107.

    Matsuzaki S, Botchorishvili R, Pouly JL, Canis M. Targeting the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway in endometriosis: a potentially effective approach for treatment and prevention. Mol Cell Ther. 2014;2(1):36.

    Not in our library10.1186/s40591-014-0036-9

  108. 108.
  109. 109.

    Clement NS, Oliver TRW, Shiwani H, Sanner JRF, Mulvaney CA, Atiomo W. Metformin for endometrial hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017:10.

    Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd012214.pub2

  110. 110.

    Matsuzaki S, Darcha C. Antifibrotic properties of epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate in endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(8):1677‐1687.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/deu123

  111. 111.
  112. 112.

    Maharani M, Wahyuni ES, Sutrisno S. Effect of genistein on endometriosis lesion matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 level of endometriosis in silico and in vivo study. J Clinic Mol Endocrinol. 2016;1(1.4):1‐6.

    Not in our library10.21767/2572-5432.10004

  113. 113.

    Liu W, Gao J, Yi X, Li Y, Zeng Y. Absorption, tissue disposition, and excretion of fasudil hydrochloride, a RHO kinase inhibitor, in rats and dogs. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2020;41(4–5):206‐220.

    Not in our library10.1002/bdd.2231

  114. 114.

    Chan SY, Loscalzo J. Pulmonary arterial hypertension. Vascular Medicine: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2013:667‐686.

    Not in our library

  115. 115.

    Tsuno A, Nasu K, Kawano Y, et al. Fasudil inhibits the proliferation and contractility and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of human endometriotic stromal cells: a promising agent for the treatment of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):E1944‐E1952.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2011-1503

  116. 116.

    Alban S. Adverse Effects of Heparin. Vol 207, 2012 ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2012:211‐263. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22566227/

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-642-23056-1_10

  117. 117.

    Nasu K, Tsuno A, Hirao M, Kobayashi H, Yuge A, Narahara H. Heparin is a promising agent for the treatment of endometriosis‐associated fibrosis. Fertil Steril. Jun 2010;94(1):46‐51.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.057

  118. 118.

    Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2006;368(9544):1329‐1338.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69446-4

  119. 119.

    Mendel DB, Laird AD, Xin X, et al. In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet‐derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(1):327‐337.

    Not in our library

  120. 120.

    Abbas MA, Disi AM, Taha MO. Sunitinib as an anti‐endometriotic agent. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013;49(4):732‐736.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejps.2013.05.021

  121. 121.

    Xiong HQ, Herbst R, Faria SC, et al. A phase I surrogate endpoint study of SU6668 in patients with solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2004;22(4):459‐466.

    Not in our library10.1023/b:drug.0000036688.96453.8d

  122. 122.

    Kuenen BC, Giaccone G, Ruijter R, et al. Dose‐finding study of the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU6668 in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(17):6240‐6246.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-2466

  123. 123.

    Laschke MW, Elitzsch A, Vollmar B, Vajkoczy P, Menger MD. Combined inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor and platelet‐derived growth factor, but not inhibition of VEGF alone, effectively suppresses angiogenesis and vessel maturation in endometriotic lesions. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(1):262‐268.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dei308

  124. 124.

    Davis DW, Takamori R, Raut CP, et al. Pharmacodynamic analysis of target inhibition and endothelial cell death in tumors treated with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor antagonists SU5416 or SU6668. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(2 pt 1):678‐689.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    Haddad JJ. The immunopharmacologic potential of semaxanib and new generation directed therapeutic drugs: receptor tyrosine kinase regulation with anti‐tumorigenensis/angiogenesis properties. Saudi Pharm J. 2012;20(2):103‐123.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jsps.2011.09.002

  126. 126.

    Fong TA, Shawver LK, Sun L, et al. SU5416 is a potent and selective inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (Flk‐1/KDR) that inhibits tyrosine kinase catalysis, tumor vascularization, and growth of multiple tumor types. Cancer Res. 1999;59(1):99.

    Not in our library

  127. 127.

    Santulli P, Marcellin L, Tosti C, et al. MAP kinases and the inflammatory signaling cascade as targets for the treatment of endometriosis? Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2015;19(11):1465‐1483.

    Not in our library10.1517/14728222.2015.1090974

  128. 128.

    Yildiz C, Kacan T, Akkar OB, et al. Effects of pazopanib, sunitinib, and sorafenib, anti‐VEGF agents, on the growth of experimental endometriosis in rats. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(11):1445‐1451.

    Not in our library10.1177/1933719115584448

  129. 129.

    Xu H, Lui WT, Chu CY, Ng PS, Wang CC, Rogers MS. Anti‐angiogenic effects of green tea catechin on an experimental endometriosis mouse model. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(3):608‐618.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/den417

  130. 130.

    Wang CC, Xu H, Man GCW, et al. Prodrug of green tea epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate (Pro‐EGCG) as a potent anti‐angiogenesis agent for endometriosis in mice. Angiogenesis. 2013;16(1):59‐69.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10456-012-9299-4

  131. 131.

    Chabicovsky M, Prieschl‐Grassauer E, Seipelt J, et al. Pre‐clinical safety evaluation of pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate: pre‐clinical safety of pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;107(3):758‐767.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00573.x

  132. 132.

    Zhang J, Xu Z, Dai H, et al. Application of the nuclear factor‐kappaB inhibitor pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate for the treatment of endometriosis: an in vitro study. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2942‐2944.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.009

  133. 133.

    Vlahos NF, Gregoriou O, Deliveliotou A, et al. Effect of pentoxifylline on vascular endothelial growth factor C and FLK‐1 expression on endometrial implants in the rat endometriosis model. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(4):1316‐1323.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.056

  134. 134.

    Giusti M, Porcella E, Carraro A, Cuttica M, Valenti S, Giordano G. A cross‐over study with the two novel dopaminergic drugs cabergoline and quinagolide in hyperprolactinemic patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 1994;17(1):51‐57.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf03344963

  135. 135.

    Gomez R, Abad A, Delgado F, Tamarit S, Simon C, Pellicer A. Effects of hyperprolactinemia treatment with the dopamine agonist quinagolide on endometriotic lesions in patients with endometriosis‐associated hyperprolactinemia. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):882‐888.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.024

  136. 136.

    Sandilands EA, Bateman DN. Adverse reactions associated with acetylcysteine. Clin Toxicol. 2009;47(2):81‐88.

    Not in our library10.1080/15563650802665587

  137. 137.

    Ngô C, Chéreau C, Nicco C, Weill B, Chapron C, Batteux F. Reactive oxygen species controls endometriosis progression. Am J Pathol. 2009;175(1):225‐234.

    Not in our library10.2353/ajpath.2009.080804

  138. 138.

    Yavuz S, Aydin N, Celik O, Yilmaz E, Ozerol E, Tanbek K. Resveratrol successfully treats experimental endometriosis through modulation of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10(2):324.

    Not in our library10.4103/0973-1482.136619

  139. 139.

    Li J, Bai Y, Bai Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics of caffeic acid, ferulic acid, formononetin, cryptotanshinone, and tanshinone IIA after oral administration of naoxintong capsule in rat by HPLC‐MS/MS. Evid‐Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:9057238‐12.

    Not in our library10.1155/2017/9057238

  140. 140.

    Butt MS, Sultan MT. Coffee and its consumption: benefits and risks. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2011;51(4):363‐373.

    Not in our library10.1080/10408390903586412

  141. 141.

    Jamali N, Mostafavi‐Pour Z, Zal F, et al. Combination effect of caffeine and caffeic acid treatment on the oxidant status of ectopic endometrial cells separated from patients with endometriosis. Iran J Med Sci. 2019;44(4):315‐324.

    Not in our library10.30476/ijms.2019.44970

  142. 142.

    Yilmaz B, Kilic S, Aksakal O, et al. Melatonin causes regression of endometriotic implants in rats by modulating angiogenesis, tissue levels of antioxidants and matrix metalloproteinases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(1):209‐216.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00404-014-3599-4

  143. 143.

    Guney M, Oral B, Karahan N, Mungan T. Regression of endometrial explants in a rat model of endometriosis treated with melatonin. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):934‐942.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.023

  144. 144.

    Pittaluga E, Costa G, Krasnowska E, et al. More than antioxidant: N‐acetyl‐L‐cysteine in a murine model of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(7):2905‐2908.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.038

  145. 145.

    Almodovar P, Briskey D, Rao A, Prodanov M, Inarejos‐Garcia AM. Bioaccessibility and pharmacokinetics of a commercial saffron (Crocus sativus L.) extract. Evid‐Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020;2020:1575730‐1575738.

    Not in our library10.1155/2020/1575730

  146. 146.

    Bostan HB, Mehri S, Hosseinzadeh H. Toxicology effects of saffron and its constituents: a review. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2017;20(2):110‐121.

    Not in our library10.22038/ijbms.2017.8230

  147. 147.
  148. 148.

    Liu Y, Qin X, Lu X. Crocin improves endometriosis by inhibiting cell proliferation and the release of inflammatory factors. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;106:1678‐1685.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.108

  149. 149.

    Foda AA, Aal IAA. Metformin as a new therapy for endometriosis, its effects on both clinical picture and cytokines profile. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2012;17(4):262‐267.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mefs.2012.09.001

  150. 150.

    Ergenoğlu AM, Yeniel AÖ, Erbaş O, et al. Regression of endometrial implants by resveratrol in an experimentally induced endometriosis model in rats. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(10):1230‐1236.

    Not in our library10.1177/1933719113483014

  151. 151.

    Taguchi A, Wada‐Hiraike O, Kawana K, et al. Resveratrol suppresses inflammatory responses in endometrial stromal cells derived from endometriosis: a possible role of the sirtuin 1 pathway. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(3):770‐778.

    Not in our library10.1111/jog.12252

  152. 152.

    Yu J, Zhao L, Zhang D, et al. The effects and possible mechanisms of puerarin to treat endometriosis model rats. Evid‐Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:1‐11.

    Not in our library10.1155/2015/269138

  153. 153.

    Ryan ET. Antiparasitic agents. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018:1567‐1587.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    Prather GR, MacLean JA, Shi M, Boadu DK, Paquet M, Hayashi K. Niclosamide as a potential nonsteroidal therapy for endometriosis that preserves reproductive function in an experimental mouse model 1. Biol Reprod. 2016;95(4):74.

    Not in our library10.1095/biolreprod.116.140236

  155. 155.

    Chowdhury I, Banerjee S, Driss A, et al. Curcumin attenuates proangiogenic and proinflammatory factors in human eutopic endometrial stromal cells through the NF‐κB signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(5):6298‐6312.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcp.27360

  156. 156.

    Machado DE, Rodrigues‐Baptista KC, Alessandra‐Perini J, et al. Euterpe oleracea extract (Açaí) is a promising novel pharmacological therapeutic treatment for experimental endometriosis. PLOS One. 2016;11(11):e0166059.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0166059

  157. 157.

    Choi JY, Jo MW, Lee EY, Lee DY, Choi DS. Ovarian steroid dependence of endoplasmic reticulum stress involvement in endometrial cell apoptosis during the human endometrial cycle. Reproduction. 2018;155(6):493‐503.

    Not in our library10.1530/rep-17-0713

  158. 158.

    Brandenberger AW. Oestrogen receptor (ER)‐alpha and ER‐beta isoforms in normal endometrial and endometriosis‐derived stromal cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;5(7):651‐655.

    Not in our library10.1093/molehr/5.7.651

  159. 159.

    Matsuzaki S, Murakami T, Uehara S, Canis M, Sasano H, Okamura K. Expression of estrogen receptor alpha and beta in peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(6):1198‐1205.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01783-6

  160. 160.

    Filardo EJ. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) transactivation by estrogen via the G‐protein‐coupled receptor, GPR30: a novel signaling pathway with potential significance for breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;80(2):231‐238.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-0760(01)00190-x

  161. 161.

    Lin BC, Suzawa M, Blind RD, et al. Stimulating the GPR30 estrogen receptor with a novel tamoxifen analogue activates SF‐1 and promotes endometrial cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2009;69(13):5415‐5423.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1622

  162. 162.

    Simpson ER, Mahendroo MS, Means GD, et al. Aromatase cytochrome p450, the enzyme responsible for estrogen biosynthesis. Endocr Rev. 1994;15(3):342‐355.

    Not in our library10.1210/edrv-15-3-342

  163. 163.

    Ota H, Igarashi S, Sasaki M, Tanaka T. Distribution of cyclooxygenase‐2 in eutopic and ectopic endometrium in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(3):561‐566.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/16.3.561

  164. 164.

    Ebert AD, Bartley J, David M. Aromatase inhibitors and cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) inhibitors in endometriosis: new questions—old answers? Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;122(2):144‐150.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.017

  165. 165.
  166. 166.

    Cha YI, DuBois RN. NSAIDs and cancer prevention: targets downstream of COX‐2. Annu Rev Med. 2007;58:239‐252.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131253

  167. 167.

    Laschke MW, Schwender C, Scheuer C, Vollmar B, Menger MD. Epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate inhibits estrogen‐induced activation of endometrial cells in vitro and causes regression of endometriotic lesions in vivo. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(10):2308‐2318.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/den245

  168. 168.

    Laird SM, Tuckerman EM, Cork BA, Li TC. Expression of nuclear factor kappa B in human endometrium; role in the control of interleukin 6 and leukaemia inhibitory factor production. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6(1):34‐40.

    Not in our library10.1093/molehr/6.1.34

  169. 169.

    González‐Ramos R, Donnez J, Defrère S, et al. Nuclear factor‐kappa B is constitutively activated in peritoneal endometriosis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13(7):503‐509.

    Not in our library10.1093/molehr/gam033

  170. 170.

    Ponce C, Torres M, Galleguillos C, et al. Nuclear factor kappaB pathway and interleukin‐6 are affected in eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis. Reproduction. 2009;137(4):727‐737.

    Not in our library10.1530/rep-08-0407

  171. 171.

    Gonzalez‐Ramos R, Defrere S, Devoto L. Nuclear factor‐kappaB: a main regulator of inflammation and cell survival in endometriosis pathophysiology. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):520‐528.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.021

  172. 172.

    Viatour P, Merville MP, Bours V, Chariot A. Phosphorylation of NF‐kappaB and IkappaB proteins: implications in cancer and inflammation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005;30(1):43‐52.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2004.11.009

  173. 173.

    Ngô C, Nicco C, Leconte M, et al. Protein kinase inhibitors can control the progression of endometriosis in vitro and in vivo. J Pathol. 2010;222(2):148‐157.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.2756

  174. 174.

    Murk W, Atabekoglu CS, Cakmak H, et al. Extracellularly signal‐regulated kinase activity in the human endometrium: possible roles in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(9):3532‐3540.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2007-2051

  175. 175.

    Kayisli UA, Mahutte NG, Arici A. Uterine chemokines in reproductive physiology and pathology. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002;47(4):213‐221.

    Not in our library10.1034/j.1600-0897.2002.01075.x

  176. 176.

    Hirota Y, Osuga Y, Hirata T, et al. Activation of protease‐activated receptor 2 stimulates proliferation and interleukin (IL)‐6 and IL‐8 secretion of endometriotic stromal cells. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(12):3547‐3553.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dei255

  177. 177.

    Cantley LC. The phosphoinositide 3‐kinase pathway. Science. 2002;296(5573):1655‐1657.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.296.5573.1655

  178. 178.

    Guo J, Gao J, Yu X, Luo H, Xiong X, Huang O. Expression of DJ‐1 and mTOR in eutopic and ectopic endometria of patients with endometriosis and adenomyosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;79(3):195‐200.

    Not in our library10.1159/000365569

  179. 179.

    Rogers‑Broadway KR, Kumar J, Sisu C, et al. Differential expression of mTOR components in endometriosis and ovarian cancer: effects of rapalogues and dual kinase inhibitors on mTORC1 and mTORC2 stoichiometry. Int J Mol Med. 2019;43(1):47‐56.

    Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2018.3967

  180. 180.

    Sato N, Tsunoda H, Nishida M, et al. Loss of heterozygosity on 10q23. 3 and mutation of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN in benign endometrial cyst of the ovary: possible sequence progression from benign endometrial cyst to endometrioid carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Cancer Res. 2000;60(24):7052‐7056.

    Not in our library

  181. 181.

    Song Y, Fu J, Zhou M, et al. Activated Hippo/Yes‐associated protein pathway promotes cell proliferation and anti‐apoptosis in endometrial stromal cells of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(4):1552‐1561.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2016-1120

  182. 182.

    Jiang B. Aerobic glycolysis and high level of lactate in cancer metabolism and microenvironment. Genes Dis. 2017;4(1):25‐27.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gendis.2017.02.003

  183. 183.

    Hirschhaeuser F, Sattler UG, Mueller‐Klieser W. Lactate: a metabolic key player in cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71(22):6921‐6925.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1457

  184. 184.
  185. 185.

    Kokawa K, Shikone T, Nakano R. Apoptosis in the human uterine endometrium during the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(11):4144‐4147.

    Not in our library10.1210/jcem.81.11.8923873

  186. 186.

    Vaskivuo TE, Stenback F, Karhumaa P, Risteli J, Dunkel L, Tapanainen JS. Apoptosis and apoptosis‐related proteins in human endometrium. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000;165(1–2):75‐83.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0303-7207(00)00261-6

  187. 187.

    Dmowski WP, Gebel H, Braun DP. Decreased apoptosis and sensitivity to macrophage mediated cytolysis of endometrial cells in endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(5):696‐701.

    Not in our library10.1093/humupd/4.5.696

  188. 188.

    Gebel HM, Braun DP, Tambur A, Frame D, Rana N, Dmowski WP. Spontaneous apoptosis of endometrial tissue is impaired in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(6):1042‐1047.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00073-9

  189. 189.

    Nasu K, Nishida M, Kawano Y, et al. Aberrant expression of apoptosis‐related molecules in endometriosis: a possible mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2011;18(3):206‐218.

    Not in our library10.1177/1933719110392059

  190. 190.

    Cinar O, Seval Y, Uz YH, et al. Differential regulation of Akt phosphorylation in endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(6):864‐871.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.001

  191. 191.

    Yang HL, Chang KK, Mei J, et al. Estrogen restricts the apoptosis of endometrial stromal cells by promoting TSLP secretion. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(5):4410‐4416.

    Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2018.9428

  192. 192.

    Jones RK, Bulmer JN, Searle RF. Immunohistochemical characterization of proliferation, oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor expression in endometriosis: comparison of eutopic and ectopic endometrium with normal cycling endometrium. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(12):3272‐3279.

    Not in our library10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135901

  193. 193.

    Amaral JD, Sola S, Steer CJ, Rodrigues CM. Role of nuclear steroid receptors in apoptosis. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(29):3886‐3902.

    Not in our library10.2174/092986709789178028

  194. 194.

    Granese R, Perino A, Calagna G, et al. Gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone analogue or dienogest plus estradiol valerate to prevent pain recurrence after laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis: a multi‐center randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(6):637‐645.

    Not in our library10.1111/aogs.12633

  195. 195.

    Braun DP, Ding J, Dmowski WP. Peritoneal fluid‐mediated enhancement of eutopic and ectopic endometrial cell proliferation is dependent on tumor necrosis factor‐alpha in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(4):727‐732.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03318-6

  196. 196.

    Han SJ, Jung SY, Wu SP, et al. Estrogen receptor β modulates apoptosis complexes and the inflammasome to drive the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Cell. 2015;163(4):960‐974.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.034

  197. 197.

    Hatai T, Matsuzawa A, Inoshita S, et al. Execution of apoptosis signal‐regulating kinase 1 (ASK1)‐induced apoptosis by the mitochondria‐dependent caspase activation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(34):26576‐26581.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m003412200

  198. 198.

    Han SJ, Hawkins SM, Begum K, et al. A new isoform of steroid receptor coactivator‐1 is crucial for pathogenic progression of endometriosis. Nat Med. 2012;18(7):1102‐1111.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2826

  199. 199.

    Glick D, Barth S, Macleod KF. Autophagy: cellular and molecular mechanisms. The Journal of Pathology. 2010;221(1):3‐12.

    Not in our library10.1002/path.2697

  200. 200.

    Allavena G, Carrarelli P, Del Bello B, Luisi S, Petraglia F, Maellaro E. Autophagy is upregulated in ovarian endometriosis: a possible interplay with p53 and heme oxygenase‐1. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1244‐1251.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.007

  201. 201.

    Pankiv S, Clausen TH, Lamark T, et al. p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(33):24131‐24145.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m702824200

  202. 202.

    Xu TX, Zhao SZ, Dong M, Yu XR. Hypoxia responsive miR‐210 promotes cell survival and autophagy of endometriotic cells in hypoxia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(3):399‐406.

    Not in our library

  203. 203.

    Liu H, Zhang Z, Xiong W, et al. Hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1alpha promotes endometrial stromal cells migration and invasion by upregulating autophagy in endometriosis. Reproduction. 2017;153(6):809‐820.

    Not in our library10.1530/rep-16-0643

  204. 204.

    Zheng J, Luo X, Bao J, et al. Decreased expression of HOXA10 may activate the autophagic process in ovarian endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(9):1446‐1454.

    Not in our library10.1177/1933719118768704

  205. 205.

    Choi J, Jo M, Lee E, Oh YK, Choi D. The role of autophagy in human endometrium. Biol Reprod. 2012;86(3):70.

    Not in our library10.1095/biolreprod.111.096206

  206. 206.

    Choi J, Jo M, Lee E, Kim HJ, Choi D. Differential induction of autophagy by mTOR is associated with abnormal apoptosis in ovarian endometriotic cysts. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20(4):309‐317.

    Not in our library10.1093/molehr/gat091

  207. 207.

    Choi J, Jo M, Lee E, Hwang S, Choi D. Aberrant PTEN expression in response to progesterone reduces endometriotic stromal cell apoptosis. Reproduction. 2017;153(1):11‐21.

    Not in our library10.1530/rep-16-0322

  208. 208.

    Pei T, Huang X, Long Y, et al. Increased expression of YAP is associated with decreased cell autophagy in the eutopic endometrial stromal cells of endometriosis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2019;491:110432.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mce.2019.04.012

  209. 209.

    Marcellin L, Santulli P, Bourdon M, et al. Serum antimГјllerian hormone concentration increases with ovarian endometrioma size. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(5):944‐952.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.013

  210. 210.

    Carrarelli P, Rocha ALL, Belmonte G, et al. Increased expression of antimГјllerian hormone and its receptor in endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1353‐1358.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.052

  211. 211.
  212. 212.

    Laschke MW, Menger MD. Basic mechanisms of vascularization in endometriosis and their clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(2):207‐224.

    Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmy001

  213. 213.

    van der Horst PH, Wang Y, van der Zee M, Burger CW, Blok LJ. Interaction between sex hormones and WNT/β‐catenin signal transduction in endometrial physiology and disease. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;358(2):176‐184.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mce.2011.06.010

  214. 214.

    Matsuzaki S, Darcha C, Maleysson E, Canis M, Mage G. Impaired down‐regulation of E‐cadherin and β‐catenin protein expression in endometrial epithelial cells in the mid‐secretory endometrium of infertile patients with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2010;95(7):3437‐3445.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2009-2713

  215. 215.

    Chen JJ, Xiao ZJ, Meng X, et al. MRP4 sustains Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling for pregnancy, endometriosis and endometrial cancer. Theranostics. 2019;9(17):5049‐5064.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.32097

  216. 216.

    Lu Q, Huang Y, Wu J, et al. T‐cadherin inhibits invasion and migration of endometrial stromal cells in endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(1):145‐156.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dez252

  217. 217.

    Nap AW, Dunselman GA, de Goeij AF, Evers JL, Groothuis PG. Inhibiting MMP activity prevents the development of endometriosis in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane model. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2180‐2187.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/deh408

  218. 218.

    Lepourcelet M, Chen Y‐NP, France DS, et al. Small‐molecule antagonists of the oncogenic Tcf/ОІ‐catenin protein complex. Cancer Cell. 2004;5(1):91‐102.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00334-9

  219. 219.

    Liu J, Wada Y, Katsura M, et al. Rho‐associated coiled‐coil kinase (ROCK) in molecular regulation of angiogenesis. Theranostics. 2018;8(21):6053‐6069.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.30305

  220. 220.

    van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Koolwijk P, Versteilen A, van Hinsbergh VWM. Involvement of RhoA/Rho kinase signaling in VEGF‐induced endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis in vitro. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(2):211‐217.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.atv.0000054198.68894.88

  221. 221.

    Fukata Y, Oshiro N, Kinoshita N, et al. Phosphorylation of adducin by Rho‐kinase plays a crucial role in cell motility. J Cell Biol. 1999;145(2):347‐361.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.145.2.347

  222. 222.

    Yotova IY, Quan P, Leditznig N, Beer U, Wenzl R, Tschugguel W. Abnormal activation of Ras/Raf/MAPK and RhoA/ROCKII signalling pathways in eutopic endometrial stromal cells of patients with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(4):885‐897.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/der010

  223. 223.

    Vigano P, Candiani M, Monno A, Giacomini E, Vercellini P, Somigliana E. Time to redefine endometriosis including its pro‐fibrotic nature. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(3):347‐352.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dex354

  224. 224.

    Viganò P, Ottolina J, Bartiromo L, et al. Cellular components contributing to fibrosis in endometriosis: a literature review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):287‐295.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.011

  225. 225.

    Young VJ, Brown JK, Saunders PTK, Duncan WC, Horne AW. The peritoneum is both a source and target of TGF‐b in women with endometriosis. PLOS One. 2014;9(9):e106773.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0106773

  226. 226.

    Akhmetshina A, Palumbo K, Dees C, et al. Activation of canonical Wnt signalling is required for TGF‐beta‐mediated fibrosis. Nat Commun. 2012;3:735.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms1734

  227. 227.

    Martinez‐Font E, Pérez‐Capó M, Ramos R, et al. Impact of Wnt/beta‐catenin inhibition on cell proliferation through CDC25A downregulation in soft tissue sarcomas. Cancers. 2020;12(9):2556.

    Not in our library10.3390/cancers12092556

  228. 228.

    Yuge A, Nasu K, Matsumoto H, Nishida M, Narahara H. Collagen gel contractility is enhanced in human endometriotic stromal cells: a possible mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of endometriosis‐associated fibrosis. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(4):938‐944.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/del485

  229. 229.

    Taylor RN, Jie Yu G, Torres PB, et al. Mechanistic and therapeutic implications of angiogenesis in endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2009;16(2):140‐146.

    Not in our library10.1177/1933719108324893

  230. 230.

    Nap AW, Griffioen AW, Dunselman GAJ, et al. Antiangiogenesis therapy for endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(3):1089‐1095.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2003-031406

  231. 231.

    Donnez J, Smoes P, Gillerot S, Casanas‐Roux F, Nisolle M. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1686‐1690.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/13.6.1686

  232. 232.

    Smith SK. Regulation of angiogenesis in the endometrium. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2001;12(4):147‐151.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1043-2760(01)00379-4

  233. 233.

    Liu S, Xin X, Hua T, et al. Efficacy of anti‐VEGF/VEGFR agents on animal models of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLOS One. 2016;11:11.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0166658

  234. 234.

    Gille H, Kowalski J, Li B, et al. Analysis of biological effects and signaling properties of Flt‐1 (VEGFR‐1) and KDR (VEGFR‐2) A reassessment using novel receptor‐specific vascular endothelial growth factor mutants. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(5):3222‐3230.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m002016200

  235. 235.

    Zhang Z, Neiva KG, Lingen MW, Ellis LM, Nör JE. VEGF‐dependent tumor angiogenesis requires inverse and reciprocal regulation of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17(3):499‐512.

    Not in our library10.1038/cdd.2009.152

  236. 236.

    Hoekman K. SU6668, a multitargeted angiogenesis inhibitor. Cancer J. 2001;7:S134‐S138.

    Not in our library

  237. 237.

    Que Y, Liang Y, Zhao J, et al. Treatment‐related adverse effects with pazopanib, sorafenib and sunitinib in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a pooled analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:2141‐2150.

    Not in our library10.2147/cmar.s164535

  238. 238.

    Kallio PJ, Wilson WJ, O'Brien S, Makino Y, Poellinger L. Regulation of the hypoxia‐inducible transcription factor 1alpha by the ubiquitin‐proteasome pathway. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(10):6519‐6525. [doi]

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.274.10.6519

  239. 239.

    Liu Y, Cox SR, Morita T, Kourembanas S. Hypoxia regulates vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression in endothelial cells: identification of a 5′ enhancer. Circ Res. 1995;77(3):638‐643.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.res.77.3.638

  240. 240.

    Becker CM, Rohwer N, Funakoshi T, et al. 2‐methoxyestradiol inhibits hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1{alpha} and suppresses growth of lesions in a mouse model of endometriosis. Am J Pathol. 2008;172(2):534‐544.

    Not in our library10.2353/ajpath.2008.061244

  241. 241.

    Sharkey AM, Sharkey AM, Day K, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human endometrium is regulated by hypoxia. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2000;85(1):402‐409.

    Not in our library10.1210/jcem.85.1.6229

  242. 242.

    Park JK, Song M, Dominguez CE, et al. Glycodelin mediates the increase in vascular endothelial growth factor in response to oxidative stress in the endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1772‐1777.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.025

  243. 243.

    Sacco K, Portelli M, Pollacco J, Schembri‐Wismayer P, Calleja‐Agius J. The role of prostaglandin E2 in endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28(2):134‐138.

    Not in our library10.3109/09513590.2011.588753

  244. 244.

    Leibovich SJ, Polverini PJ, Shepard HM et al. Macrophage‐induced angiogenesis is mediated by tumour necrosis factor‐α. Nature. 1987;329(6140):630‐632.

    Not in our library10.1038/329630a0

  245. 245.

    Creus M, Fabregues F, Carmona F, del Pino M, Manau D, Balasch J. Combined laparoscopic surgery and pentoxifylline therapy for treatment of endometriosis‐associated infertility: a preliminary trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(8):1910‐1916.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/den167

  246. 246.

    Bryan BA, Dennstedt E, Mitchell DC, et al. RhoA/ROCK signaling is essential for multiple aspects of VEGF‐mediated angiogenesis. FASEB J. 2010;24(9):3186‐3195.

    Not in our library10.1096/fj.09-145102

  247. 247.

    Howe GA, Addison CL. RhoB controls endothelial cell morphogenesis in part via negative regulation of RhoA. Vasc Cell. 2012;4(1):1.

    Not in our library10.1186/2045-824x-4-1

  248. 248.

    Hasmim M, Bieler G, Rüegg C. Zoledronate inhibits endothelial cell adhesion, migration and survival through the suppression of multiple, prenylation‐dependent signaling pathways. J Thromb Haemostasis. 2007;5(1):166‐173.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.02259.x

  249. 249.

    Mizukami Y, Fujiki K, Duerr E‐M, et al. Hypoxic regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor through the induction of phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase/Rho/ROCK and c‐Myc. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(20):13957‐13963.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m511763200

  250. 250.

    Jackson LW, Schisterman EF, Dey‐Rao R, Browne R, Armstrong D. Oxidative stress and endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(7):2014‐2020.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dei001

  251. 251.

    Slater TF. Free‐radical mechanisms in tissue injury. Biochemical J. 1984;222(1):1–15.

    Not in our library10.1042/bj2220001

  252. 252.

    Lobo V, Patil A, Phatak A, Chandra N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health. Phcog Rev. 2010;4(8):118‐126.

    Not in our library10.4103/0973-7847.70902

  253. 253.
  254. 254.

    Ito Fuminori, Yamada Yuki, Shigemitsu Aiko, Akinishi Mika, Kaniwa Hiroko, Miyake Ryuta, Yamanaka Shoichiro, Kobayashi Hiroshi. Role of Oxidative Stress in Epigenetic Modification in Endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(11):1493–1502.

    Not in our library10.1177/1933719117704909

  255. 255.

    Harlev A, Gupta S, Agarwal A. Targeting oxidative stress to treat endometriosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2015;19(11):1447‐1464.

    Not in our library10.1517/14728222.2015.1077226

  256. 256.

    Al‐Gubory KH. Environmental pollutants and lifestyle factors induce oxidative stress and poor prenatal development. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(1):17‐31.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.002

  257. 257.

    Cho YJ, Park SB, Han M. Di‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐phthalate induces oxidative stress in human endometrial stromal cells in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;407:9‐17.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mce.2015.03.003

  258. 258.

    Iwabuchi T, Yoshimoto C, Shigetomi H, Kobayashi H. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in endometriosis and its malignant transformation. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:1‐7.

    Not in our library10.1155/2015/848595

  259. 259.

    Turkyilmaz E, Yildirim M, Cendek BD, et al. Evaluation of oxidative stress markers and intra‐extracellular antioxidant activities in patients with endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;199:164‐168.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.027

  260. 260.

    Ricci AG, Olivares CN, Bilotas MA, et al. Natural therapies assessment for the treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(1):178‐188.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/des369

  261. 261.

    Hayes JD, Dinkova‐Kostova AT. The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014;39(4):199‐218.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.002

  262. 262.

    Palmer RMJ, Ferrige AG, Moncada S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium‐derived relaxing factor. Nature. 1987;327(6122):524‐526.

    Not in our library10.1038/327524a0

  263. 263.

    Förstermann U, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(7):829‐837.

    Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehr304

  264. 264.

    Corradin SB, Fasel N, Buchmuller‐Rouiller Y, Ransijn A, Smith J, Mauel J. Induction of macrophage nitric oxide production by interferon‐gamma and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha is enhanced by interleukin‐10. Eur J Immunol. 1993;23(8):2045‐2048.

    Not in our library10.1002/eji.1830230851

  265. 265.

    Wu MY, Chao KH, Yang JH, Lee TH, Yang YS, Ho HN. Nitric oxide synthesis is increased in the endometrial tissue of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(12):2668‐2671.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/deg484

  266. 266.

    Nevzati E, Shafighi M, Bakhtian KD, Treiber H, Fandino J, Fathi AR. Estrogen induces nitric oxide production via nitric oxide synthase activation in endothelial cells. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2015;120:141‐145.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-3-319-04981-6_24

  267. 267.

    van Langendonckt A, Casanas‐Roux F, Donnez J. Oxidative stress and peritoneal endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):861‐870.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0015-0282(02)02959-x

  268. 268.

    Defrère S, van Langendonckt A, Vaesen S, et al. Iron overload enhances epithelial cell proliferation in endometriotic lesions induced in a murine model. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(11):2810‐2816.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/del261

  269. 269.
  270. 270.

    Zhang T, de Carolis C, Man GCW, Wang CC. The link between immunity, autoimmunity and endometriosis: a literature update. Autoimmun Rev. Oct 2018;17(10):945‐955.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.autrev.2018.03.017

  271. 271.
  272. 272.

    de Barros IBL, Malvezzi H, Gueuvoghlanian‐Silva BY, Piccinato CA, Rizzo LV, Podgaec S. What do we know about regulatory T cells and endometriosis? A systematic review. J Reprod Immunol. 2017;120:48‐55.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jri.2017.04.003

  273. 273.

    Zeller JM, Henig I, Radwanska EWA, Dmowski WP. Enhancement of human monocyte and peritoneal macrophage chemiluminescence activities in women with endometriosis. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol. 1987;13(3):78‐82.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-0897.1987.tb00097.x

  274. 274.

    Sikora J, Mielczarek‐Palacz A, Kondera‐Anasz Z. Role of natural killer cell activity in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(2):200‐208.

    Not in our library10.2174/092986711794088416

  275. 275.

    Schulke L, Berbic M, Manconi F, Tokushige N, Markham R, Fraser IS. Dendritic cell populations in the eutopic and ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(7):1695‐1703.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dep071

  276. 276.

    Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(12):958‐969.

    Not in our library10.1038/nri2448

  277. 277.

    Tabibzadeh S, Kaffka KL, Satyaswaroop PG, Kilian PL. Interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) regulation of human endometrial function: presence of IL‐1 receptor correlates with IL‐1‐stimulated prostaglandin E2 production. J Clini Endocrinol Metabol. 1990;70(4):1000‐1006.

    Not in our library10.1210/jcem-70-4-1000

  278. 278.

    Tanikawa M, Lee H‐Y, Watanabe K, et al. Regulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis by interleukin‐1 in cultured bovine endometrial cells. J Endocrinol. 2008;199(3):425‐434.

    Not in our library10.1677/joe-08-0237

  279. 279.

    Rier SE, Parsons AK, Becker JL. Altered interleukin‐6 production by peritoneal leukocytes from patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(2):294‐299.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56520-0

  280. 280.

    Rier SE, Zarmakoupis PN, Hu X, Becker JL. Dysregulation of interleukin‐6 responses in ectopic endometrial stromal cells: correlation with decreased soluble receptor levels in peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 1995;80(4):1431‐1437.

    Not in our library10.1210/jcem.80.4.7714120

  281. 281.

    Sano M, Terada M, Ishii A, Kino H, Anantaphruti M. Studies on chemotherapy of parasitic helminths (V). Effects of niclosamide on the motility of various parasitic helminths. Experientia. 1982;38(5):547‐549.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf02327042

  282. 282.

    Reis FM, Petraglia F, Taylor RN. Endometriosis: hormone regulation and clinical consequences of chemotaxis and apoptosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(4):406‐418.

    Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmt010

  283. 283.
  284. 284.

    Tatone C, Di Emidio G, Barbonetti A, et al. Sirtuins in gamete biology and reproductive physiology: emerging roles and therapeutic potential in female and male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(3):267‐289.

    Not in our library10.1093/humupd/dmy003

  285. 285.

    Carli C, Metz CN, Al‐Abed Y, Naccache PH, Akoum A. Up‐regulation of cyclooxygenase‐2 expression and prostaglandin E2 production in human endometriotic cells by macrophage migration inhibitory factor: involvement of novel kinase signaling pathways. Endocrinology. 2009;150(7):3128‐3137.

    Not in our library10.1210/en.2008-1088

  286. 286.

    Al‐Abed Y, Dabideen D, Aljabari B, et al. ISO‐1 Binding to the tautomerase active site of MIF inhibits its pro‐inflammatory activity and increases survival in severe sepsis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(44):36541‐36544.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.c500243200

  287. 287.

    Nothnick WB, Colvin A, Cheng KF, Al‐Abed Y. Inhibition of macrophage migration inhibitory factor reduces endometriotic implant size in mice with experimentally induced disease. J Endometr. 2011;3(3):135‐142.

    Not in our library

  288. 288.

    Tamura M, Deb S, Sebastian S, Okamura K, Bulun SE. Estrogen up‐regulates cyclooxygenase‐2 via estrogen receptor in human uterine microvascular endothelial cells. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1351‐1356.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.076

  289. 289.

    González‐Ramos R, van Langendonckt A, Defrère S, et al. Involvement of the nuclear factor‐κB pathway in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):1985‐1994.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.013

  290. 290.

    Gou Y, Li X, Li P, et al. Estrogen receptor β upregulates CCL2 via NF‐κB signaling in endometriotic stromal cells and recruits macrophages to promote the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(4):646‐658.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dez019

  291. 291.

    Chang KK, Liu LB, Li H, et al. TSLP induced by estrogen stimulates secretion of MCP‐1 and IL‐8 and growth of human endometrial stromal cells through JNK and NF‐kappaB signal pathways. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(5):1889‐1899.

    Not in our library

  292. 292.

    Deura I, Harada T, Taniguchi F, Iwabe T, Izawa M, Terakawa N. Reduction of estrogen production by interleukin‐6 in a human granulosa tumor cell line may have implications for endometriosis‐associated infertility. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(4):1086‐1092.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.014

  293. 293.

    Nabavi SM, Nabavi SF, Sureda A, et al. Anti‐inflammatory effects of melatonin: a mechanistic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(supply 1):S4‐S16.

    Not in our library10.1080/10408398.2018.1487927

  294. 294.

    Schwertner A, Conceição dos Santos CC, Costa GD, et al. Efficacy of melatonin in the treatment of endometriosis: a phase II, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Pain. 2013;154(6):874‐881.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.025

  295. 295.

    Mosher AA, Tsoulis MW, Lim J, et al. Melatonin activity and receptor expression in endometrial tissue and endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(7):1215‐1224.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/dez082

  296. 296.
  297. 297.
  298. 298.
  299. 299.

    Harpsoe NG, Andersen LP, Gogenur I, Rosenberg J. Clinical pharmacokinetics of melatonin: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;71(8):901‐909.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00228-015-1873-4

  300. 300.

    Viollet B, Guigas B, Sanz Garcia N, Leclerc J, Foretz M, Andreelli F. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin: an overview. Clin Sci (Lond). 2012;122(6):253‐270.

    Not in our library10.1042/cs20110386

  301. 301.

    Tao X, Cai L, Chen L, Ge S, Deng X. Effects of metformin and exenatide on insulin resistance and AMPKalpha‐SIRT1 molecular pathway in PCOS rats. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):86.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13048-019-0555-8

  302. 302.

    Shao R, Li X, Billig H. Promising clinical practices of metformin in women with PCOS and early‐stage endometrial cancer. BBA Clin. 2014;2:7‐9.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbacli.2014.07.001

  303. 303.
  304. 304.

    Rhodes K, Braakhuis A. Performance and side effects of supplementation with N‐acetylcysteine: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Sports Med. 2017;47(8):1619‐1636.

    Not in our library10.1007/s40279-017-0677-3

  305. 305.

    Olsson B, Johansson M, Gabrielsson J, Bolme P. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of reduced and oxidized N‐acetylcysteine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;34(1):77‐82.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01061422

  306. 306.
  307. 307.

    Lecumberri E, Dupertuis YM, Miralbell R, Pichard C. Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate (EGCG) as adjuvant in cancer therapy. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(6):894‐903.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2013.03.008

  308. 308.
  309. 309.

    Singh CK, Ndiaye MA, Ahmad N. Resveratrol and cancer: challenges for clinical translation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(6):1178‐1185.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.11.004

  310. 310.
  311. 311.

    Tsai YC, Leu SY, Peng YJ, et al. Genistein suppresses leptin‐induced proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells and neointima formation. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(3):422‐431.

    Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.12986

  312. 312.

    Marini H, Bitto A, Altavilla D, et al. Breast safety and efficacy of genistein aglycone for postmenopausal bone loss: a follow‐up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(12):4787‐4796.

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2008-1087

  313. 313.

    Spagnuolo C, Russo GL, Orhan IE, et al. Genistein and cancer: current status, challenges, and future directions. Adv Nutr. 2015;6(4):408‐419.

    Not in our library10.3945/an.114.008052

  314. 314.

    Sirtori CR. Risks and benefits of soy phytoestrogens in cardiovascular diseases, cancer, climacteric symptoms and osteoporosis. Drug Saf. 2001;24(9):665‐682.

    Not in our library10.2165/00002018-200124090-00003

  315. 315.

    Sun M, Ye Y, Xiao L, Duan X, Zhang Y, Zhang H. Anticancer effects of ginsenoside Rg3 (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2017;39(3):507‐518.

    Not in our library10.3892/ijmm.2017.2857

  316. 316.

    Zhou YX, Zhang H, Peng C. Puerarin: a review of pharmacological effects. Phytother Res. 2014;28(7):961‐975.

    Not in our library10.1002/ptr.5083

  317. 317.

    Medarevic D, Cvijic S, Dobricic V, Mitric M, Djuris J, Ibric S. Assessing the potential of solid dispersions to improve dissolution rate and bioavailability of valsartan: in vitro‐in silico approach. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;124:188‐198.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejps.2018.08.026

  318. 318.

    Sun J, Bi C, Chan HM, Sun S, Zhang Q, Zheng Y. Curcumin‐loaded solid lipid nanoparticles have prolonged in vitro antitumour activity, cellular uptake and improved in vivo bioavailability. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;111:367‐375.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.06.032

  319. 319.

    Fang R‐C, Tsai Y‐T, Lai J‐N, Yeh C‐H, Wu C‐T. The traditional chinese medicine prescription pattern of endometriosis patients in Taiwan: a population‐based study. Evid‐based Complement Alternat Med: eCAM. 2012;2012:591391‐591399.

    Not in our library10.1155/2012/591391

  320. 320.

    Tsai P‐J, Lin Y‐H, Chen J‐L, Yang S‐H, Chen Y‐C, Chen H‐Y. Identifying Chinese herbal medicine network for endometriosis: implications from a population‐based database in Taiwan. Evid‐Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:1‐10.

    Not in our library10.1155/2017/7501015

  321. 321.
  322. 322.

    Xie C‐H, Zhang M‐S, Zhou Y‐F, et al. Chinese medicine Angelica sinensis suppresses radiation‐induced expression of TNF‐α and TGF‐β1 in mice. Oncol Rep. 2006;15(6):1429‐1436.

    Not in our library

  323. 323.

    Park C, Han M‐H, Park S‐H, et al. Induction of apoptosis by Moutan Cortex Radicis in human gastric cancer cells through the activation of caspases and the AMPK signaling pathway. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2017;27(3):315‐323.

    Not in our library

  324. 324.

    Chung H‐S, Kang M, Cho C, et al. Inhibition of nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha by moutan cortex in activated mouse peritoneal macrophages. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30(5):912‐916.

    Not in our library10.1248/bpb.30.912

  325. 325.

    Kim YW, Zhao RJ, Park SJ, et al. Anti‐inflammatory effects of liquiritigenin as a consequence of the inhibition of NF‐κB‐dependent iNOS and proinflammatory cytokines production. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154(1):165‐173.

    Not in our library10.1038/bjp.2008.79

  326. 326.

    Zhu J, Luo C, Wang P, He Q, Zhou J, Peng H. Saikosaponin A mediates the inflammatory response by inhibiting the MAPK and NF‐κB pathways in LPS‐stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Exp Ther Med. 2013;5(5):1345‐1350.

    Not in our library10.3892/etm.2013.988

  327. 327.

    Bi X, Han L, Qu T, et al. Anti‐inflammatory effects, SAR, and action mechanism of monoterpenoids from Radix paeoniae Alba on LPS‐stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Molecules. 2017;22(5):715.

    Not in our library10.3390/molecules22050715

  328. 328.

    Wang K‐T, Chen L‐G, Chou D‐S, Liang W‐L, Wang C‐C. Anti‐oxidative abilities of essential oils from Atractylodes ovata Rhizome. Evid‐Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:1‐9.

    Not in our library10.1093/ecam/neq006

  329. 329.

    Wang Y, Yu Y, Mao J. Carboxymethylated β‐glucan derived from Poria cocos with biological activities. J Agricult Food Chem. 2009;57(22):10913‐10915.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf902589m

  330. 330.

    Fu N, Liu Z. Antipromoting, antimutagenic and antioxidant action of glycyrrhizae flavonoids. Chin J Cancer Res. 1995;7(3):163‐167.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf03023467

  331. 331.

    Yang W‐J, Li Y‐R, Gao H, et al. Protective effect of the ethanol extract from Ligusticum chuanxiong rhizome against streptozotocin‐induced diabetic nephropathy in mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;227:166‐175.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jep.2018.08.037

  332. 332.

    Liao K‐F, Chiu T‐L, Huang S‐Y, et al. Anti‐cancer effects of Radix angelica sinensis (Danggui) and N‐butylidenephthalide on gastric cancer: implications for REDD1 activation and mTOR inhibition. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;48(6):2231‐2246.

    Not in our library10.1159/000492641

  333. 333.

    Huang H‐L, Chen C‐C, Yeh C‐Y, Huang R‐L. Reactive oxygen species mediation of Baizhu‐induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97(1):21‐29.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jep.2004.09.058

  334. 334.

    Lin M‐Y, Lee Y‐R, Chiang S‐Y, et al. Cortex Moutan induces bladder cancer cell death via apoptosis and retards tumor growth in mouse bladders. Evid‐Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:1‐8.

    Not in our library10.1155/2013/207279

  335. 335.

    Zhang L, Zhang S. Modulating Bcl‐2 family proteins and caspase‐3 in induction of apoptosis by paeoniflorin in human cervical cancer cells. Phytother Res. 2011;25(10):1551‐1557.

    Not in our library10.1002/ptr.3534

  336. 336.

    Sun W, Sanderson PE, Zheng W. Drug combination therapy increases successful drug repositioning. Drug Discov Today. 2016;21(7):1189‐1195.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.drudis.2016.05.015

  337. 337.
  338. 338.
    Drugs and Devices · 2016
    Not checked
  339. 339.

    Ashburn TT, Thor KB. Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3(8):673‐683.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd1468

  340. 340.

    Pushpakom S, Iorio F, Eyers PA, et al. Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;18(1):41‐58.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd.2018.168

  341. 341.

    Pillaiyar T, Meenakshisundaram S, Manickam M, Sankaranarayanan M. A medicinal chemistry perspective of drug repositioning: recent advances and challenges in drug discovery. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;195:112275.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112275

  342. 342.

    Sleigh SH, Barton CL. Repurposing strategies for therapeutics. Pharm Med. 2010;24(3):151‐159.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf03256811

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.