Systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation for anatomical liver resection based on Laennec's capsule: proposal of a novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver

1Anatomical liver resection with the Glissonean pedicle isolation is widely approved as an essential procedure for safety and curability 1, 2. Especially, the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation without parenchymal destruction should be an ideal procedure. Nevertheless, the surgical technique of the Glissonean pedicle isolation has not been standardized due to a lack of anatomical understanding. According to a rapid spread of liver resection including emerging minimally invasive liver resection such as laparoscopic and robotic surgery, it became increasingly imperative to standardize the surgical technique of the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation.

2Couinaud described the three different ways to approach the Glissonean pedicles 3: the intrafascial, the extrafascial, and the extrafascial and transfissural approach. The intrafascial approach means the individual vascular transection method, whereas the extrafascial approach means the Glissonean pedicle approach. The extrafascial approach is further divided into the intrahepatic and the extrahepatic approach according to the presence or absence of parenchymal destruction. The extrafascial and transfissural approach is the pedicle approach with major liver transection through the main portal or the umbilical fissure. Therefore, the extrafascial or the Glissonean pedicle approach could be subdivided into three categories as follows: the intrahepatic approach with minor liver transection, the intrahepatic with major liver transection and the extrahepatic approach without parenchymal destruction. Couinaud first proposed the intrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation with major liver transection in 1957 4. Afterwards, Lin et al. 5, Ton‐That‐Tung and Nguyen‐Duong‐Quang 6 and Okamoto 7 successfully performed the intrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation with major liver transection through the main portal fissure. Meanwhile, Galperin and Karagiulian described the intrahepatic approach with minor transection using digitoclasia in 1989 8 and Machado et al. reported the same type of approach using a clamp or a vascular stapler 9, 10. However, the intrahepatic isolation might be accompanied by a potential risk of unexpected injury to the portal pedicle or the hepatic vein. Therefore, the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation should be an ideal procedure. Couinaud first proposed the concept of the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach for left hepatectomy in 1985 10, 11 and Takasaki et al. actually performed for the first time as the Glissonean pedicle transection method 12, 13. Although this is a well‐known method, a conventional liver anatomy shown in Figure 1 had been prevented standardization because parenchymal destruction was inevitable without a membrane on the opposite side of the Glissonean pedicles.

3Regarding the history of the surgical anatomy of the liver, Walaeus first described the vasculo‐biliary sheath, which contains the portal vein, the hepatic artery, and the bile duct in 1640 14. Glisson also reported the Glissonean pedicle in 1642 15. Although some researchers had proposed a proper membrane of the liver, they confused it with the serosa or misunderstood as a nonexistent capsule of the Glissonean pedicles. In 1802, Laennec first described a proper membrane as the distinct structure from the serosa 16. Couinaud established the concept of the plate system as a fibrous thickening part of the Glissonean sheath 17, 18 and demonstrated that Laennec's capsule has no continuity with the Glissonean pedicle 3. He described detailed pathological findings on Laennec's capsule, but he did not give award to its importance 3 and Laennec's capsule had been ignored for more than 200 years. Recently, Hayashi et al. conducted the precise histological study of cadaveric livers with the elastic fiber and lymphatic vein staining and revealed that the so‐called Glissonean capsule was not derived from the Glissonean sheath but from Laennec's capsule surrounding the pedicles and that Laennec's capsule extended to the peripheral Glissonean pedicles 9. We also confirmed Laennec's capsule histologically as shown in Figure 2. Laennec's capsule could be observed as a dense fibrous layer beneath the serosa (Fig. 2a) and on the surface of the bare area (Fig. 2b). The similar fibrous layer also could be observed as lining of the Glissonean pedicle (Fig. 2c,d), on the cystic fossa after cystic plate cholecystectomy (Fig. 2e) and on the outside of the hepatic vein (Fig. 2f). In the process of standardizing liver resection, we came to believe that Laennec's capsule should be the essential structure for understanding the comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver and standardizing the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation for anatomical liver resection. Herein, we proposed a novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver based on Laennec's capsule.

4Figure 1 shows the schema of a conventional anatomy of the liver; the bare area is covered by nothing, the parenchyma of the cystic fossa is adjacent to the subserosal layer of the gallbladder, the Glissonean pedicle is directly in contact with the intrahepatic parenchyma, and the hilar plate covers the outer circumference of the pedicles. On the other hand, Figure 3 demonstrates the schema of a novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver; Laennec's capsule (red line) covers not only the entire surface of the hepatic parenchyma beneath the serosa (blue line) including the bare area but also the intrahepatic parenchyma surrounding the Glissonean pedicle surface (green line). Consequently, a gap exists between the Glissonean pedicle (the plate system) and Laennec's capsule (gray space) as shown in Figure 2 that allows us to isolate the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle without parenchymal destruction. Because the plate system (yellow line) represents a fibrous thickened part of the Glissonean pedicle including vaginal ductuli 17, 18, 19, it would become a good landmark for the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation. Similarly, between the parenchyma of the cystic fossa and the subserosal layer of the gallbladder, Laennec's capsule and the cystic plate are interposed and the cystic plate also would become a good landmark. The red line between the peripheral Glissonean pedicle and the hepatic vein, and the orange line covering the suprahepatic inferior vena cava represent our hypothesis that whole Laennec's capsule is a continuous structure originated from the septum transversum as suggested by Sabourin 20. Actually such structures can be found during liver resection. Thus, this novel anatomy gives a theoretical background for the systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation. For standardization, it is required to establish the specific surgical techniques.

5For standardization of the systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation, it is essential to recognize the “four anatomical landmarks” and the “six gates (Gate I to Gate VI)” as shown in Figure 4a,b. The four anatomical landmarks are defined as follows: the Arantius plate, the umbilical plate, the cystic plate, and the caudate process pedicle (G1c). The gates are the points indicated by these anatomical landmarks. The well‐defined gaps between Laennec's capsule and the Glissonean pedicle (the plate system) could be identified and entered consistently only at the gates without parenchymal destruction and the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation could be standardized. By connecting the two gates precisely, the systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation could be achieved at will. Detailed surgical techniques are described below.

6Figure 5a represents the vertical‐section at the umbilical fossa. The left Glissonean pedicle isolation should start from detaching the Arantius plate from Laennec's capsule to identify Gate I followed by detaching the umbilical plate from Laennec's capsule covering the umbilical fossa at Gate II. By connecting these two gates, the common trunk of the Glissonean pedicles of segment 2 and 3 (G2 and G3) could be isolated en bloc as shown in Figure 5b. Afterwards each extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle could be isolated precisely. The Glissonean pedicle of segment 4 (G4) or of the umbilical portion (Gup; G2 + G3 + G4) could be isolated connecting Gate II and III or Gate III and I in the same manner.

7Figure 6a represents the vertical‐section at the main portal fissure. As clearly demonstrated, the right extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation should start from detaching the cystic plate from Laennec's capsule covering the cystic fossa; we named the procedure as “the cystic plate cholecystectomy” that leads to the precise layer of the right anterior Glissonean pedicle and Gate IV and V could be identified. It is noteworthy that this procedure could isolate the Calot's triangle untouched even if the anomalous bile ducts are included. We can isolate the extrahepatic anterior Glissonean pedicle by connecting Gate IV and V as shown in Figure 6b and the extrahepatic posterior Glissonean pedicle by Gate V and VI as shown in Figure 6c. The G1c could be consistently identified at the entry of the Rouviere's sulcus. Further peripheral pedicles could be isolated extrahepatically using the subtraction method. However, it requires the utmost care not to dig into the intrahepatic parenchyma but to drag out the pedicles towards the hilum to prevent the unexpected injury to the hepatic veins.

8Owing to the novel concept of comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver based on Laennec's capsule, all the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicles including those of the caudate lobe could be isolated systematically, and thus, the hepatic inflow would be kept under controlled conditions during parenchymal dissection. The novel concept also could be applied to isolate and expose the main hepatic veins by preserving Laennec's capsule to the vein wall. Therefore, the anatomical liver resection could be standardized completely. In the near future, this concept would be expanded to any type of liver resection including laparoscopic or robotic liver resection and would bring innovative changes in the hepatobiliary surgery for spreading safe and curable liver resection.

9A novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver based on Laennec's capsule would contribute to standardize the surgical techniques of the systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation for anatomical liver resection, and would bring innovative changes in hepatobiliary surgery for spreading safe and curable liver resection.

10None declared.