Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Farmer perspectives on benefits of and barriers to extended crop rotations in Iowa, USA

David A. Weisberger, Marshall D. McDaniel, J. G. Arbuckle and 1 more

Agricultural & Environmental Letters · 2021

doi:10.1002/ael2.20049 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The highly specialized maize ( Zea mays L.) and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production system that dominates midwestern U.S. agriculture has led to widespread on‐farm and off‐farm degradation of and damage to natural resources. The practice of extending maize–soybean rotations with small grains and forages has great potential to balance production and environmental goals, but adoption of these practices is low. Because little is known about farmers’ perspectives on extended rotations, we conducted social survey research with Iowa farmers to address this knowledge gap. Results show that farmers understand the potential benefits of extended rotations using small grains, but they perceive major barriers to use. The highest‐rated barriers were structural, such as lack of markets. Structural barriers cannot be easily addressed by individual farmers, indicating that efforts to address negative impacts of specialized commodity production through extended rotations with small grains will require transformative changes in agri‐food policies, programs, and ultimately markets.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.