Skip to content
naulon

Corrected on Jan 22, 2020.

Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Oct 20, 2026 · Read the notice

Data‐Driven Materials Science: Status, Challenges, and Perspectives

Lauri Himanen, Amber Geurts, Adam Stuart Foster and 1 more

Advanced Science · 2019 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1002/advs.201900808

Abstract

Data‐driven science is heralded as a new paradigm in materials science. In this field, data is the new resource, and knowledge is extracted from materials datasets that are too big or complex for traditional human reasoning—typically with the intent to discover new or improved materials or materials phenomena. Multiple factors, including the open science movement, national funding, and progress in information technology, have fueled its development. Such related tools as materials databases, machine learning, and high‐throughput methods are now established as parts of the materials research toolset. However, there are a variety of challenges that impede progress in data‐driven materials science: data veracity, integration of experimental and computational data, data longevity, standardization, and the gap between industrial interests and academic efforts. In this perspective article, the historical development and current state of data‐driven materials science, building from the early evolution of open science to the rapid expansion of materials data infrastructures are discussed. Key successes and challenges so far are also reviewed, providing a perspective on the future development of the field.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 314

  1. 1.

    G. Ceder, Science 1998, 280, 1099.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    T. W. Eagar, Technol. Rev. 1995, 98, 42.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    M. Boren, V. Chan, C. Musso, In McKinsey on Chemicals, Vol. 4 McKinsey & Company Industry Publications, 2012.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    T. Hey, S. Tansley, K. Tolle, The Fourth Paradigm: Data‐Intensive Scientific Discovery, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA 2009.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    A. Agrawal, A. Choudhary, APL Mater. 2016, 4, 053208.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution (accessed: August 2019).

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    E. Brynjolfsson, A. McAfee, Second Machine Age. Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, W. W. Norton & Company, New York City, NY, USA 2014.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    K. Rajan, Mater. Today 2005, 8, 38.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    K. Rajan, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2015, 45, 153.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Y. Liu, T. Zhao, W. Ju, S. Shi, J. Materiomics 2017, 3, 159.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    L. Zdeborová, Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 420.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    M. Rupp, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2015, 115, 1058.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    R. Ramprasad, R. Batra, G. Pilania, A. Mannodi‐Kanakkithodi, C. Kim, npj Comput. Mater. 2017, 3, 54.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    L. Ward, C. Wolverton, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2017, 21, 167.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    T. Mueller, A. G. Kusne, R. Ramprasad, Machine Learning in Materials Science. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA 2016, Ch. 4, pp. 186–273.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    A. Zunger, Nat. Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 0121.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    K. T. Butler, D. W. Davies, H. Cartwright, O. Isayev, A. Walsh, Nature 2018, 559, 547.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2

  18. 18.

    J. E. Gubernatis, T. Lookman, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2018, 2, 120301.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    B. R. Goldsmith, J. Esterhuizen, J. X. Liu, C. J. Bartel, C. Sutton, AIChE J. 2018, 64, 2311.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    K. Takahashi, Y. Tanaka, Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 10497.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6dt01501h

  21. 21.

    The Minerals Metals & Materials Society (TMS), Building a Materials Data Infrastructure: Opening New Pathways to Discovery and Innovation in Science and Engineering. TMS, Pittsburgh, PA 2017.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    A. P. Bartók, S. De, C. Poelking, N. Bernstein, J. R. Kermode, G. Csányi, M. Ceriotti, Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, 12.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.1701816

  23. 23.

    Gu G. H., J. Noh, I. Kim, Y. Jung, J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 17096.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Walsh K., editor, Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World—A Vision for Europe, European Commission, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg 2016.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    J. J. Regazzi, Scholarly Communications: A History from Content as King to Content as Kingmaker, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham 2015.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    D. Fanelli, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 2628.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1708272114

  27. 27.
  28. 28.

    J. M. Esanu, P. F. Uhlir, in The Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in The Public Domain: Proc. of A Symp. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. 2003.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Open Science, https://openscience.com (accessed: August 2019).

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    FOSTER, https://www.fosteropenscience.eu (accessed: August 2019).

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    H. W. Chesborough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press, Brighton, MA, USA 2006.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.
  33. 33.

    When will everything be Open Access?, https://blog.impactstory.org/oa-by-when/ (accessed: August 2019).

    Not in our library

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    M. Schiltz, PLOS Biol. 2018, 16, 1.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pbio.3000031

  36. 36.

    ICSU World Data System, https://www.icsu-wds.org (accessed: August 2019).

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    OECD, OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding, OECD Publishing, Paris, France 2007.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    re3data.org, https://www.re3data.org (accessed: August 2019).

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    PLOS, https://www.plos.org (accessed: August 2019).

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Scientific Data, https://www.nature.com/sdata/ (accessed: August 2019).

    Not in our library

All 314 references

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.