Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 1, 2026.

EMT and MET : necessary or permissive for metastasis?

Mohit Kumar Jolly, Kathryn E. Ware, Shivee Gilja and 2 more

Molecular Oncology · 2017 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12083

Abstract

Epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition ( EMT ) and its reverse mesenchymal‐to‐epithelial transition ( MET ) have been suggested to play crucial roles in metastatic dissemination of carcinomas. These phenotypic transitions between states are not binary. Instead, carcinoma cells often exhibit a spectrum of epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype(s). While epithelial/mesenchymal plasticity has been observed preclinically and clinically, whether any of these phenotypic transitions are indispensable for metastatic outgrowth remains an unanswered question. Here, we focus on epithelial/mesenchymal plasticity in metastatic dissemination and propose alternative mechanisms for successful dissemination and metastases beyond the traditional EMT / MET view. We highlight multiple hypotheses that can help reconcile conflicting observations, and outline the next set of key questions that can offer valuable insights into mechanisms of metastasis in multiple tumor models.

Cited by papers we hold 16

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.